Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Riddle(WARNING:invovles logic).
J @ M @ L:
--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on January 05, 2006, 02:55:46 AM ---lol...Sorry man, this "so called" riddle was an analogy targeted at Jamal. Something to help him get along with reality.Something to point out what happens when you generalize when your generalization entails the contradiction of known/given facts.
--- End quote ---
Read my sig. You basically exposed yourself. You admit to relying on generalizations rather than facts... but then again, you're a Zionist.. so that's expected. :)
J @ M @ L:
Since you're so slow in the head... I'll help you out...
--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on December 21, 2005, 09:32:19 AM ---
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on December 21, 2005, 09:19:32 AM ---Yeah, the only thing that's contradicted is that they're PRIMARILY descended
--- End quote ---
Which is the only thing that was debated :) like you said:
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on December 20, 2005, 02:33:55 PM ---The only thing that's debated is if Ashkenazi Jews are PRIMARILY descendant of the Khazars....
--- End quote ---
MEANING THAT THE ONLY THING THAT'S DEBATED WAS DISPROVED.... 1+1
P.S Non-Jewish groups do not mean Khazar and this is while paternally they still were descendants of exiled Jews(intermix).
--- End quote ---
1. It is disputed that Ashkenazis are PRIMARILY descendants of Khazars, and the research found that they're not PRIMARILY descendants as previously believed.
2. It was the only thing "debated" by researchers (not us)
3. Then you said it was the only thing disproven... ok fine... so they're not primarily descendants of Khazars. WHICH IS WHAT I SAID AT THE BEGINNING. LOLLLL do you get it now, retard? Why do you even argue if the statements you make basically agree with what I initially stated and only further prove me right. Then you're made to look like fucking idiot... and you come back... with some lame "riddle" to further show how dumb you are.
I TO DA GEEZY:
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on January 04, 2006, 01:26:21 PM --- up until they had done this research, it was believed that Ashkenazi Jews were PRIMARILY descendants of this ONE TRIBE (Khazar).
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on January 05, 2006, 03:02:41 AM --- the fact that they're primarily descendants is disputed... which is exactly what I said from the beginning.
--- End quote ---
So was it disputed or believed? LMAO would you decide?
I just paraphrased the findings of a research and it's conclusion.All you do is making these misguided assumptions about my statements' meanings and implications while addressing your sorry "ad hominem"(look it up son ;D) at me.
P.S Still don't get how Semite genes found among Ashkenazi Jews correlate with the extinction of exiled Jews [I understand that it's your assumption since neither of us claimed this before, (you don't have to bitch about it) but how did you reach it?Based on what?]
J @ M @ L:
--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on January 05, 2006, 03:22:05 AM ---
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on January 04, 2006, 01:26:21 PM --- up until they had done this research, it was believed that Ashkenazi Jews were PRIMARILY descendants of this ONE TRIBE (Khazar).
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on January 05, 2006, 03:02:41 AM --- the fact that they're primarily descendants is disputed... which is exactly what I said from the beginning.
--- End quote ---
So was it disputed or believed? LMAO would you decide?
I know you Zionists aren't really familiar with research and facts (as evident from my sig), but things are believed and research showing otherwise leads to there being a dispute... or if something is disputed, it is researched... it's not a fact that they're primarily descendants, it's a theory... so therefore it was "generally" believed... meaning there was doubt/dispute... leading to research to a stronger doubt... your problem seems to be not only lack of education in regards to such matters, but you also need a better understanding of terms such as "believe", "fact", "dispute", etc... but being that you're a Zionist, I suggest you focus mainly on the word "fact" because that word seems to be foreign to you guys... do I need to get into what the scientific method is, and the meaning of the word hypothesis, etc? It's evident you're dumb, but you really can't be THIS dumb.
I just paraphrased the findings of a research and it's conclusion.All you do is making these misguided assumptions about my statements' meanings and implications while addressing your sorry "ad hominem"(look it up son ;D) at me.
The argument we had was over the existence of converted Jews. I presented the Khazars as an example, and showed that a proportion of Ashkenazi Jews (which make up the majority of Jews in the world today) are descendants of the Khazars. The only thing that research showed is that the proportion of Ashkenazi Jews being descendants of the Khazars is not as great as previously believed.. since I know you need help, this is implied when the word PRIMARILY was used. This means that my statement was correct, and all you did is argue even though the research just proved me right. What the fuck are you even arguing for?
P.S Still don't get how Semite genes found among Ashkenazi Jews correlate with the extinction of exiled Jews [I understand that it's your assumption since neither of us claimed this before, (you don't have to bitch about it) but how did you reach it?Based on what?]
Your statements implied that the converted Jews were extinct. I simply said that if somebody who's just as dumb as you... or close to being as dumb as you, since you're one of a kind... would use your "theory"... they could easily imply that the exiled Jews are extinct. I said this would be a stupid assumption to make... just as stupid as everything you've said.
--- End quote ---
J @ M @ L:
This is what the argument was... not whether or not Ashkenazi Jews are PRIMARILY descendants of Khazars.... all I stated is that a proportion of them are... which you basically confirmed...
--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on December 19, 2005, 09:23:21 AM ---
--- Quote from: JML - no vowels, disembowel your Colin Powell, throw in the towel on December 18, 2005, 02:27:59 PM ---
--- Quote from: I TO DA GEEZY on December 18, 2005, 01:19:58 PM ---most Jews are descendants of those who were exiled from this land,
--- End quote ---
Is that fact, or a conclusion you have reached? If you still don't know the difference, then go find out before you answer.
--- End quote ---
It is a fact, and one that you need to know in order to debate on this matter.
--- End quote ---
So let me get this straight...
-Most Jews are descendants of the exiled Jews (based on nothing)
-It is a known fact that entire populations converted to Judaism.
-It is a known fact that a majority of Jews are Ashkenazi Jews.
-It is a known fact that a proportion of Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of Khazars.
-You stated that "you can't trace how many..." ... ok fine, I'll take that into consideration.. you can't.
-It is a known fact that a proportion of Jews are descendants of converted Jews... you yourself stated that you can't trace how many... so how the hell do you claim it is a FACT that most Jews are descendants of exiled Jews? LOLLLLL SONNED.
Where are the facts?
Perhaps.... GENERALIZATION is a better word to use? Or maybe... ASSUMPTION?
LOLLL @ FACT.
"It's disputed"
"It's a fact"
"You can't trace it"
"It's a fact"
Come on... you've got to be kidding me.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version