West Coast Connection Forum
DUBCC - Tha Connection => Outbound Connection => Topic started by: Drudge on June 13, 2006, 10:15:05 AM
-
Michael Jackson Double Whammy May lose kids also.
Michael Jackson: Exclusive Photos, Bruising Story
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
By Roger Friedman
PHOTOS
Jacko: Exclusive Photos, Bruising Story
see pics here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199236,00.html
As tomorrow marks the one-year anniversary of Michael Jackson’s acquittal in his child molestation and conspiracy trial, we are observing the day by providing new information about past allegations.
In this case, the allegations were made by Jackson against the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Department. Jackson was arrested by them on Nov. 20, 2003, after returning to Santa Barbara from Las Vegas.
A few weeks later, at the end of December, Jackson claimed that the sheriffs roughed him up. Specifically, he claimed that bruises on his forearms were the result of too-tight handcuffs.
Click here for the Michael Jackson Celebrity Center.
Months later, in 2004, an investigation proved that Jackson had not suffered any kind of unusual harassment at the hands of the sheriffs.
Now this column can show you four photos obtained exclusively from sources close to Jackson. These photos show Jackson in a bathroom at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Lake Las Vegas, Nev. They were taken at least eight days after the arrest. Jackson had returned to the Mirage Hotel in Las Vegas, moved to a nearby resort before finally ending up at the Ritz Carlton.
(Story continues below)
In the pictures, he’s wearing a Ritz-Carlton robe. But what the sequence of photos also shows is that he, according to sources, self-inflicted a wound on his arm and caused a rapidly rising welt to form.
The pictures literally show the welt growing on Jackson’s arm “almost as if by magic.” They also show it turning not black and blue, but a kind of amber color. My sources say this discoloration was caused by makeup. The pictures were taken within a few minutes of each other.
“If you look closely at his cheek,” says my source, “you can see the blush on it is the same color as the bruise on the arm.”
Indeed, the coloring on the bruise in one picture is so artfully composed that it resembles a lipstick stain left by a pair of large lips.
Even weirder, in one picture shown here, of Jackson looking directly at the camera, it’s quite easy to see the tape holding his nose in place. Jackson isn’t wearing his typical whiteface makeup either. It may be one of the few photos that show Michael Jackson exactly as he is, warts and all.
Jackson, according to my sources, knew he was in trouble after the arrest in November 2003 —not so much with the police but with the public. My sources insist that he called his inner circle together and said, “We have to push the ‘red’ button.”
His idea was to create sympathy for himself by inventing a race war of some kind.
“He wanted it to be like O.J., a black vs. white issue,” says my source. “He wanted the black community to burn down police stations, riot and protest if they [the police and authorities] went against him.”
One of the pictures, of Jackson in profile staring at the welt at its most inflated, was approved for release back at the time of its origination. It was to be used in a “60 Minutes” piece by Ed Bradley. The others have never been seen by the public before today.
One of them, interestingly, shows the very white hand of a child touching Jackson’s arm. That hand, my source says, belongs to Prince Michael, Jackson’s son by Debbie Rowe. It further asserts Rowe’s private claim that Prince and Rowe's daughter Paris do not share Jackson’s DNA.
Ironically, what Jackson did to get his bruises is not much different than the hoax the mother of his former accuser perpetrated in the past.
In last year’s court testimony, pictures shown of Janet Arvizo after an arrest at a California J.C. Penney also depicted graphic bruises all over her body. The nature of those bruises was discussed at length, and the conclusion drawn was that Arvizo’s huge welts could not have come from her scuffle with police and security guards, but at the hands of her then-husband, well after the incident.
The goal, however, was the same, which makes for an interesting point. In attracting Arvizo into his orbit, Jackson — a noted liar and prevaricator who routinely acts “dumb” but is very shrewd — may have found a kindred spirit.
Arvizo, of course, is now on trial for welfare fraud in California. Jackson, in his refusal to return to the United States, may have already figured out that this issue of false harassment at the hands of the sheriff’s department might cause him legal trouble. For that reason he may always be California dreamin’, just not residin’.
Michael may lose both kids
http://perezhilton.com/boardroom/viewtopic.php?t=1767
Michael Jackson could lose two of his children over allegations he is not their real father.
Secret court papers will reportedly prove that Paris, 8, and Prince Michael, 9, are not the biological children of the singer.
The papers, to be unsealed next month in the court battle over custody of Paris and Prince Michael, allegedly confirm the children were fathered by an anonymous sperm donor.
Debbie Rowe, the biological mother of the children and Jackson's ex-wife, gave up her legal rights to her children five years ago in exchange for a multi-million pound pay-off.
Rowe is now asking for access to the children and claims the singer has "abducted" them by taking them to Bahrain on "faked passports".
The 47-year-old singer - who also has another son, Prince Michael II, not conceived with Rowe - is said to be horrified by the prospect of a legal battle with his former wife and is terrified he will lose his children.
** Article Continues Below **
** Michael Jackson could lose two children Article Now Continues **
Meanwhile, Jackson has been spotted wearing striped pyjamas as a bodyguard pushed him around Paris in a wheelchair.
The reclusive star was visiting botanical gardens on Saturday (10.06.06) and used a huge umbrella to shelter himself from the sun and waiting photographers.
His three children were following close behind with veils to hide their faces.
-
Damn people still stay on his ass! This is from when he got arrested back in '03 ::). .......................It's that Diane Diamond bitch :rant:!
-
Damn people still stay on his ass! This is from when he got arrested back in '03 ::). .......................It's that Diane Diamond bitch :rant:!
i see there is no actual proof in that article that it was self inflicted and not done by the police.
-
never could beat him enuff :D
-
They want this man so badly. If I were him, I'd never come back to the US.
-
I can't see Proof in those pics.
;D
-
Damn people still stay on his ass! This is from when he got arrested back in '03 ::). .......................It's that Diane Diamond bitch :rant:!
i see there is no actual proof in that article that it was self inflicted and not done by the police.
-
I can't see Proof in those pics.
;D
exactly
-
funny thing is...im listening to "Dirty Diana" right now
-
They need to leave him alone, geez
-
Proof is dead.
-
They need to leave him alone, geez
no shit, no wonder he's avoiding the U.S.
-
lol his kid has healing powers in one of those pics ;D
-
They need to leave him alone, geez
^Exactly.
-
This guy Roger Friedman is a psychopath. He's a paid newsman for Foxnews, but he posts EVERY FUCKING DAY about what Michael Jackson is doing that day. I mean, there's fans with messageboards that don't follow Michael Jackson as close as this guy does.
Michael never made any formal complaint against the sheriff's department, he said in an interview they roughed him up. He didn't sue, he didn't file a complaint.
Friedman is a fucking loon. Here's what he says about Michael in today's paper; he's going on and on about Michael supposedly making a charity song in 01, and then not paying anybody but keeping the publishing rights to himself to make money off of. He claims Michael said this:
Jackson told the attorneys in the deposition, and I am paraphrasing without a direct transcript available: “I don’t know songwriters who give their royalties to charity. To give the royalty rights, that’s a lot of money to give away.” When asked whether the idea was to give “zero percent” of the royalties to “What More Can I Give?” to charity, Jackson is said to have responded: “I told you so, yes.”
And here's the direct quote from the transcript of what Michael ACTUALLY said in the deposition. The interviewer was asking Michael about this guy that's suing Michael, who wanted Michael to give him part of the publishing rights of the charity single.
Question: Do you recall telling Mr. Shaefell that he could receive points on What More Can I Give?
Michael: He should get a percentage from a CHARITY record??
Question: You didn't think it was a good idea because it was a Charity record?
Michael: I have just never had anybody coming and, you know, haphazardly ask for points on a song that I had written.
------------
So Friedman characterizes Michael as opportunistic and trying to make profit off of a charity single, when in actuality, all Michael was saying was that he's not signing his publishing rights over to some guy just because he asked for them, and he doesn't think somebody who had nothing to do with the writing of the song should receive royalties from a charity song.
The second part of his paragraph where he says Michael said that 0 percent of royalties would go to charity, he was never asked that question or said anything like that. It's just all made up out of thin air, this guy does this shit day in and day out about Michael Jackson for whatever reason. He's obssessed.
-
There's mad other news repoters obssesed. Gloria Allred filed a complaint agaist Michael Jackson tryin to get his kids taken away, like this ol bitch knows him.
Nancy Grace always, always got something to say.
But I ain't seen nobody more insane about MJ than Diane Diamond. That fuckin lady loves Michael more than his damn fans.
-
man they need to leave that nigga alone...he change colors boy got all kinds of problems...when he was brown..nobody wasnt trippin...he was fuckin webster,carlton and brooke shields..
smh
man let him be...he only has a few years left on earth neway...what they gone do when he die..sue his estate?
-
Sue his estate? LMFAO! I wouldn't doubt it though.