West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 06:00:38 PM

Title: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 06:00:38 PM
I'm so glad we didn't trade for Jermaine O'Neal.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_ylt=AlhMC7TbvdRo4GwkGd_arQ6QvLYF?gid=2008010613
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 07, 2008, 06:32:55 PM
you might as well just make a thread saying that bynum is the best big man in the leauge, cuz i havent seen one thread were any other big man is better. :P
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Fuck Your Existence on January 07, 2008, 06:34:15 PM
lol,word...bynum had oneal on lock on D last night aswell...actually out of all the trades mentioned as of yet im content with team as they are now. As much as i like Kidd im glad the trade for him didnt go down either
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Fuck Your Existence on January 07, 2008, 06:34:42 PM
you might as well just make a thread saying that bynum is the best big man in the leauge, cuz i havent seen one thread were any other big man is better. :P
give him two years tops
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: PLANT on January 07, 2008, 06:59:17 PM
Bynum is a player on the rise while it seems JO is on the decline the last couple seasons
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: WC Iz Active on January 07, 2008, 08:09:51 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Snoopafly-1986 on January 07, 2008, 08:22:20 PM
I'm so glad we didn't trade for Jermaine O'Neal.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore;_ylt=AlhMC7TbvdRo4GwkGd_arQ6QvLYF?gid=2008010613

on point Bynum is gonna be a beast O'neal is a has been we got good chemistry going right now 8)
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: WC Iz Active on January 07, 2008, 09:07:15 PM
Let me know when Bynum makes 6 straight all star games, or finishes 3rd in MVP voting,  or makes a ALL NBA team, hell let me know when he is on a team that gets out of the first round,  until then  SHUT UP.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 07, 2008, 09:09:56 PM
Let me know when Bynum makes 6 straight all star games, or finishes 3rd in MVP voting,  or makes a ALL NBA team, hell let me know when he is on a team that gets out of the first round,  until then  SHUT UP.

yo spice, im no Lakers fan

but this Bynum kid looks legit.  He's no Dwight Howard but he's pretty damn good.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: WC Iz Active on January 07, 2008, 09:11:38 PM
^^I agree!   Dude is beastin no doubt.

but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Vegasmac25 on January 07, 2008, 10:39:20 PM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 07, 2008, 10:57:10 PM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.
the thread starter also thinks the Celtics aren't the best franchise in history despite having the most championships, MVPs and all-star appearances.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 11:17:06 PM
LOL



How is this funny? Another Spice moment with no arguments? JO is playing his worst ball since being a Trailblazer. Bynum OWNED him worse than he owned Amare. :-X
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 11:19:42 PM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.
the thread starter also thinks the Celtics aren't the best franchise in history despite having the most championships, MVPs and all-star appearances.



Your point? Everyone who knows basketball thinks that. Compare the Laker dynasties to the Celtic dynasties, and then try tellin me the Celtics are better. You guys won most of your rings in the span of a decade, when there were barely any threats in the NBA. Compare Laker final appearances throughout the years to the Celtics and then get back to me...PeACe
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 11:21:05 PM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 11:22:03 PM
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 07, 2008, 11:24:32 PM
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe

JO is scoring like 3 more poinst a game

but anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrect

and call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long.  shaq dominated against no threats too.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 07, 2008, 11:48:20 PM
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe

JO is scoring like 3 more poinst a game

but anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrect

and call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long.  shaq dominated against no threats too.


he averages 3 more points attempting almost double the shots Bynum takes! ahahahaha.

P.S. It's called the Showtime Lakers.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 08, 2008, 12:23:43 AM
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe

JO is scoring like 3 more poinst a game

but anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrect

and call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long.  shaq dominated against no threats too.

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: SGV on January 08, 2008, 01:26:51 AM


And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em.

80s = Lakers
90s = Bulls
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: 7even on January 08, 2008, 07:16:26 AM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 11:21:48 AM


And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em.

80s = Lakers
90s = Bulls



The greatest team ever assembled...and if you haven't heard of the Lakers in the 90's, you've been living under a rock.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 08, 2008, 11:23:19 AM


And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em.

80s = Lakers
90s = Bulls

Well if you were raised in the 90s then you know about those 3 straight championships we won to start off the millennium. I know you heard of that ;D
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 11:33:49 AM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe


That'll never be true as long as LeBron keeps doing this...

http://www.youtube.com/v/i--mrQzEl14

http://www.youtube.com/v/qE2gOnVOSpQ

http://www.youtube.com/v/xZILJf7LhCo

http://www.youtube.com/v/t8z3bymtYyc

http://www.youtube.com/v/IUjwP1onBok

http://www.youtube.com/v/rVb1WgdO4Jc&NR=1



and after he stops doing that, he needs to learn how to make these...

http://www.youtube.com/v/Pc-cxl1UGTQ
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: SGV on January 08, 2008, 11:37:30 AM
Outside of the 1991, the Lakers never got into the Finals in the 90s and only made it past the 2nd round one other time. They were the Dallas Mavericks of 90s. Its not like the Lakers did anything worthwhile in the 90s for people to even know them. The 90s belonged to the Bulls. The Rockets. The Spurs. Not the Lakers.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: 7even on January 08, 2008, 11:38:02 AM
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 11:40:17 AM
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 11:41:18 AM
Outside of the 1991, the Lakers never got into the Finals in the 90s and only made it past the 2nd round one other time. They were the Dallas Mavericks of 90s. Its not like the Lakers did anything worthwhile in the 90s for people to even know them. The 90s belonged to the Bulls. The Rockets. The Spurs. Not the Lakers.


You're right...acquiring Shaq and Kobe in 1996 wasn't big at all. ::)



LMAO@the Spurs.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: 7even on January 08, 2008, 11:44:42 AM
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D

Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 11:51:51 AM
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D

Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.


His supporting cast didn't suck as much as the current Cavs, they just threw in the towel once Rudy-T quit midway through the season...BTW, LeBron was a -7 in the Lakers-Cavs match-up, while Kobe was a +8.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2007122005

Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 11:53:49 AM
Anyone notice how it's a lose-lose situation with Laker haters? When Kobe is collecting massive stats never before seen in this leage, he's "not getting the other players involved". When he's getting everyone involved and improving his teammates, the bench is "outshining him"...get the fuck out of here with that shit.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 08, 2008, 11:55:31 AM
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D

Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.

Yeah that goes to show the Western Conference is a muthafucka. Then again, Lebron managed to miss the playoffs 2 straight years while playing in the East  :-X
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 08, 2008, 12:02:17 PM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe

it's damn close.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: SGV on January 08, 2008, 12:05:45 PM
Yeah sure, bringing Shaq to L.A. was a good look. But it didn't do shit for them until the 2000's. How can you down the Suns for being a good Regular season team but a poor Playoff team, yet sit here and big up the 90s Lakers? LOL. Horrible.

When the Cavs played the Lakers back in December, Lebron owned Kobe.

STARTERS         MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS  
Kobe Bryant       40 8-22    0-3      5-8      1       4      5     5     1    0    2   2   21
LeBron James     38 12-29   0-3     9-11     4       6     10    5     1    1    3   3   33


And quite frankly, he's owning Kobe this season too.

Kobe
           G GS  MIN   FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A   FT% OF DF TOT STL BLK TO    PF  AST PTS
Season 32 32 36.5 286-647 .442 55-162 .340 228-265 .860 1.0 5.1 6.1 1.97 .53 3.31 2.44 4.9 26.7

Lebron
           G  GS MIN  FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A  3P% FTM-A   FT% OF  DF TOT STL BLK TO     PF  AST PTS
Season 29 28 39.9 300-629 .477 38-128 .297 210-296 .709 1.5 5.8 7.2 1.90 1.07 3.14 2.10 7.7 29.2
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 12:34:16 PM
Yeah sure, bringing Shaq to L.A. was a good look. But it didn't do shit for them until the 2000's. How can you down the Suns for being a good Regular season team but a poor Playoff team, yet sit here and big up the 90s Lakers? LOL. Horrible.

When the Cavs played the Lakers back in December, Lebron owned Kobe.

STARTERS         MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS 
Kobe Bryant       40 8-22    0-3      5-8      1       4      5     5     1    0    2   2   21
LeBron James     38 12-29   0-3     9-11     4       6     10    5     1    1    3   3   33


And quite frankly, he's owning Kobe this season too.

Kobe
           G GS  MIN   FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A   FT% OF DF TOT STL BLK TO    PF  AST PTS
Season 32 32 36.5 286-647 .442 55-162 .340 228-265 .860 1.0 5.1 6.1 1.97 .53 3.31 2.44 4.9 26.7

Lebron
           G  GS MIN  FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A  3P% FTM-A   FT% OF  DF TOT STL BLK TO     PF  AST PTS
Season 29 28 39.9 300-629 .477 38-128 .297 210-296 .709 1.5 5.8 7.2 1.90 1.07 3.14 2.10 7.7 29.2



Lakers were very storied in the 90s...that's all I'm saying. you're tryna act as if they were in the same league as the Celtics, which is pathetic. LOL.


Stat-wise, LeBron is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Jordan, Magic, Kobe, Bird, etc...Maybe one day, though.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 12:34:48 PM
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe

it's damn close.



7even doesn't really believe that, and neither do you.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Fuck Your Existence on January 08, 2008, 01:05:14 PM
Anyone notice how it's a lose-lose situation with Laker haters? When Kobe is collecting massive stats never before seen in this leage, he's "not getting the other players involved". When he's getting everyone involved and improving his teammates, the bench is "outshining him"...get the fuck out of here with that shit.
i was just gonna post that, before he was a ballhog and now that he's a "team player" he cant score all of a sudden. He could take over a game and shoot the lights out if he wanted but thats not how this current team is structured. Kobe has to get his team mates involved and involved early for his team to win.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: SGV on January 08, 2008, 01:16:17 PM
And you realize that it's lose-lose with Laker Dickriders. A team finishes with a better record in the regular season, they're not as good as the Lakers because of some reason. They beat the Lakers and what's said? The Lakers had that, they let the game go. They were 1 rebound away. The refs were against us.

It's rare to see a Laker Dickrider actually admit that the Lakers ever lost because they were inferior.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on January 08, 2008, 01:17:55 PM
^^That's why they're called dickriders. ::)
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 01:19:51 PM
And you realize that it's lose-lose with Laker Dickriders. A team finishes with a better record in the regular season, they're not as good as the Lakers because of some reason. They beat the Lakers and what's said? The Lakers had that, they let the game go. They were 1 rebound away. The refs were against us.

It's rare to see a Laker Dickrider actually admit that the Lakers ever lost because they were inferior.


Laker dickriders suck...not as much as Laker haters, though. :-*
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 08, 2008, 02:13:38 PM
Alright lets get back on topic cuz we have like 4 different debates going on right now.

Let's sum it up...

Kobe > Lebron

Lakers franchise > Celtics franchise

How about that Andrew Bynum?
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: SGV on January 08, 2008, 02:15:07 PM
Alright lets get back on topic cuz we have like 4 different debates going on right now.

Let's sum it up...

Kobe < Lebron

Lakers franchise < Celtics franchise

How about that Andrew Bynum?

Stat-wise, Bynum is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Amare, JO, Howard etc...Maybe one day, though.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 02:17:46 PM
Alright lets get back on topic cuz we have like 4 different debates going on right now.

Let's sum it up...

Kobe < Lebron

Lakers franchise < Celtics franchise

How about that Andrew Bynum?

Stat-wise, Bynum is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Amare, JO, Howard etc...Maybe one day, though.


Then why can't any of them hold Bynum? Bynum has nothing to do with stats. He takes 8 shots a game. Come up with some real arguments, basketball head.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Hatesrats™ on January 08, 2008, 02:34:00 PM
As per the Lakers lineup we have right now I'd say
Bynum >>> J.O. like a Muthfucka, Imagine J.O. on this team  :P
I was always oppossed to a trade for J.O., IMO it was either KG or Bust.

I'm 100% glad the Lakers decided to ride with Bynum.
The Kid is doing his thing right now, By next season we shall see further.
I know/belive he can continue, Once Bynum makes this Double Double thing his everyday game (like he has Sofar this year)
Dude reminds me of a Young Duncan, minus the jump shot but he's defo got a stroke check his free throw's.
Once he adds a Jumper or a least a short range hook on a consitant bassis, GAME OVER.

He's a beast, with Monster in the making.
IMO, he should be considered for All-Star status this year
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: SGV on January 08, 2008, 02:49:09 PM


Then why can't any of them hold Bynum? Bynum has nothing to do with stats. He takes 8 shots a game. Come up with some real arguments, basketball head.

If I was NIK, how would I respond "Amare played less minutes." "Bynum went to the line more times than JO and he played more minutes."

LOL. End of the day, Bynum may have had a good game against these dudes, but he still hasn't proven he's better. This is his first season where he's actually doing good. Let's see if he can keep up this pace before you start talking about who he's better than. Last season you spoke nothing but bad about him. But now that he's doing good, you're all over his sack.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 08, 2008, 03:05:41 PM
IMO, he should be considered for All-Star status this year


Hell yeah him and Kaman have been the best Centers in the West this season.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: M Dogg™ on January 08, 2008, 03:15:15 PM
I like Bynum... but I will say that JO and Bynum downlow at the post would be better. Why have just one.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 03:32:27 PM


Then why can't any of them hold Bynum? Bynum has nothing to do with stats. He takes 8 shots a game. Come up with some real arguments, basketball head.

If I was NIK, how would I respond "Amare played less minutes." "Bynum went to the line more times than JO and he played more minutes."

LOL. End of the day, Bynum may have had a good game against these dudes, but he still hasn't proven he's better. This is his first season where he's actually doing good. Let's see if he can keep up this pace before you start talking about who he's better than. Last season you spoke nothing but bad about him. But now that he's doing good, you're all over his sack.


I spoke bad about Bynum? LOLLL. Game over.



SGV...Who would you rather have right now? Bynum, JO, or Amare?
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 03:32:57 PM
I like Bynum... but I will say that JO and Bynum downlow at the post would be better. Why have just one.


I like Odom over JO in the triangle right now.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: WC Iz Active on January 08, 2008, 04:37:23 PM
^^LOL.  The way you discredit Jermaine is unreal.  dude has been a superstar for several years now,  give the guy some fuckin respect.  He is one of the best defenders as a big man on top of everything else he can do. 
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 08, 2008, 07:22:57 PM
^^LOL.  The way you discredit Jermaine is unreal.  dude has been a superstar for several years now,  give the guy some fuckin respect.  He is one of the best defenders as a big man on top of everything else he can do. 


Tell me the truth, is he playing like a superstar? Trust me, I'm not tryna discredit JO, I always liked him...His game just fell the fuck off the past couple years. He'd probably be re-motivated if he were traded.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Hatesrats™ on January 08, 2008, 07:35:40 PM
Again 100% satisfied that The lakers didn't trade for J.O.
Was Against it, Will always be against it unless we get him without trading anyone. (Free agent style)
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 08, 2008, 08:10:13 PM
Yeah sure, bringing Shaq to L.A. was a good look. But it didn't do shit for them until the 2000's. How can you down the Suns for being a good Regular season team but a poor Playoff team, yet sit here and big up the 90s Lakers? LOL. Horrible.

When the Cavs played the Lakers back in December, Lebron owned Kobe.

STARTERS         MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS 
Kobe Bryant       40 8-22    0-3      5-8      1       4      5     5     1    0    2   2   21
LeBron James     38 12-29   0-3     9-11     4       6     10    5     1    1    3   3   33


And quite frankly, he's owning Kobe this season too.

Kobe
           G GS  MIN   FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A   FT% OF DF TOT STL BLK TO    PF  AST PTS
Season 32 32 36.5 286-647 .442 55-162 .340 228-265 .860 1.0 5.1 6.1 1.97 .53 3.31 2.44 4.9 26.7

Lebron
           G  GS MIN  FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A  3P% FTM-A   FT% OF  DF TOT STL BLK TO     PF  AST PTS
Season 29 28 39.9 300-629 .477 38-128 .297 210-296 .709 1.5 5.8 7.2 1.90 1.07 3.14 2.10 7.7 29.2



Lakers were very storied in the 90s...that's all I'm saying. you're tryna act as if they were in the same league as the Celtics, which is pathetic. LOL.


Stat-wise, LeBron is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Jordan, Magic, Kobe, Bird, etc...Maybe one day, though.

I don't think Kobe is up there with the likes of MJ, Magic and Bird lol

and as for the 90s lakers, theres a song by Juice, Common and O Type Star.  O type star uses the line "i smoke me a nickel and choke like the Lakers" at some point lol.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 09, 2008, 10:52:30 AM
I don't think Kobe is up there with the likes of MJ, Magic and Bird lol



LOL...especially at Bird.
Title: Re: Bynum>JO.
Post by: WILL-I-DIE on January 09, 2008, 12:03:47 PM
bynum is the next great thing to happen since slice bread.