West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Ant on May 30, 2005, 10:14:26 PM
-
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - First lady Laura Bush would defeat U.S. Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton if the two were to face each other in the 2008 presidential contest, Vice President
Dick Cheney said on Monday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050530/us_nm/bush_laura_dc_1
this fucktard thinks a HS librarian with almost no govt. experience beyond dicking around with her husband for the past four years would beat Hillary Clinton who all polls show is already the front runner to win the 08 elections should she choose to run. Its scare the way an echo chamber destroys one's intellect. Not only is it completely retarded to suggest such a thing but its an insult to the American population to suggest we are dumb enough to elect Laura Bush.
-
chewing tabacco causes mouth cancer, but creates an amazing buzz.
-
I think most of us will agree Cheney is definitely crazy.
-
i wouldnt be surprised...anything can happen with Karl Rove on your side :-\
-
I think hes just saying that to show that Hillary Clinton has no chance of becoming the next president...
-
I think hes just saying that to show that Hillary Clinton has no chance of becoming the next president...
This is true
As a matter of fact, Laura Bush would have a better chance, especially the way people vote.
-
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - First lady Laura Bush would defeat U.S. Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton if the two were to face each other in the 2008 presidential contest, Vice President
Dick Cheney said on Monday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050530/us_nm/bush_laura_dc_1
this fucktard thinks a HS librarian with almost no govt. experience beyond dicking around with her husband for the past four years would beat Hillary Clinton who all polls show is already the front runner to win the 08 elections should she choose to run. Its scare the way an echo chamber destroys one's intellect. Not only is it completely retarded to suggest such a thing but its an insult to the American population to suggest we are dumb enough to elect Laura Bush.
how is that an insult? aren't we the ones who elected and RE-ELECTED fucktard George?
-
Thats how ant and his "I'm better than you because I make $12.50 an hour" friends think about the general public.
-
I think hes just saying that to show that Hillary Clinton has no chance of becoming the next president...
This is true
As a matter of fact, Laura Bush would have a better chance, especially the way people vote.
Exactly...
-
Thats how ant and his "I'm better than you because I make $12.50 an hour" friends think about the general public.
lol you get funnier everyday.
-
I think hes just saying that to show that Hillary Clinton has no chance of becoming the next president...
I'm by no means a huge hillary fan, but right now a majority of the population plans on voting for hillary in 2008 and she has yet to even decide she is running. Do some research if you don't believe me, I don't care to find the data for you at the moment.
-
I think hes just saying that to show that Hillary Clinton has no chance of becoming the next president...
I'm by no means a huge hillary fan, but right now a majority of the population plans on voting for hillary in 2008 and she has yet to even decide she is running. Do some research if you don't believe me, I don't care to find the data for you at the moment.
Americans are Conservatives, the last election proved this.
Hilliary Clinton at this present time is trying to get more conservative support so she is swinging more to the right so thats why most people would vote for her... but watch, when its comes close to election day, everyone will realize how much of a Liberal she really is and will not vote for her.
-
The only thing this last election proved is how much of a sham your democracy is, and how mind numbingly stupid the electorate is.
democrats vs republicans remains the dumbest thing ive ever heard, thank you wcc elephants and donkeys for the entertainment
-
i wouldnt be surprised...anything can happen with Karl Rove on your side :-\
Karl Rove is nothing w/o Christan wacks.
-
I think hes just saying that to show that Hillary Clinton has no chance of becoming the next president...
I'm by no means a huge hillary fan, but right now a majority of the population plans on voting for hillary in 2008 and she has yet to even decide she is running. Do some research if you don't believe me, I don't care to find the data for you at the moment.
Americans are Conservatives, the last election proved this.
Hilliary Clinton at this present time is trying to get more conservative support so she is swinging more to the right so thats why most people would vote for her... but watch, when its comes close to election day, everyone will realize how much of a Liberal she really is and will not vote for her.
She has always at times swung to the right, that is why she calls herself a centrist. I don't argue about assumptions cuz its a waste of time. People argue assumptions becuz they want to avoid a test of validity. If you argue that which can't be proven, you can't lose the arguement. You said Hillary has 'no' chance of winning. That is obviously a ridiculous statement since any major candidate has 'some' chance of winning. And according to current polls not only is Hillary the front-runner for 08, but she has been trending positively more so than any other potential candidate. Only fools argue untestable opinions all day... i'm just givin you the facts.
-
She has always at times swung to the right, that is why she calls herself a centrist. I don't argue about assumptions cuz its a waste of time. People argue assumptions becuz they want to avoid a test of validity. If you argue that which can't be proven, you can't lose the arguement. You said Hillary has 'no' chance of winning. That is obviously a ridiculous statement since any major candidate has 'some' chance of winning. And according to current polls not only is Hillary the front-runner for 08, but she has been trending positively more so than any other potential candidate. Only fools argue untestable opinions all day... i'm just givin you the facts.
How the fuck can Clinton call her self a centerist? She's more liberal then her husband! When she swings to the right on issues, she is trying to get more Moderate and Conservative support. She's doing the exact same thing her husband did in 92 and 95...She will be more of a Moderate canidate all the way through the election and in the end she will either up winning or loosing. I believe she will loose this election because in the end I think everyone will really see what she really is...An Extreme Liberal. She can win, if the people are stupid and really belive she isnt...
I never said she has NO ance of winning, I said that Cheney is probably thinking that.
Clinton is a great politican, I belive she has some chance...