West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Thirteen on September 20, 2004, 12:23:03 PM

Title: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 20, 2004, 12:23:03 PM
hey both these countries have oil and so far Bush lifted almost all sanctions placed on Libya in 1986, and while Sudan has alot of oil, america wants them sanctioned

kind of throws off the whole Jew/Oil company conglomerate conspiracy theory alot of you had about the US
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Don Rizzle on September 21, 2004, 12:34:05 AM
you obviously don't understand the situations properly.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 21, 2004, 12:40:25 AM
no i understand them perfectly...Libya stopped all actions of looking to make nuclear weapons and also said it would be open for inspections and now they don't get invaded or bombed....and they have oil

Sudan has oil and the US wants to sanction them but china doesn't want them sanctioned because china gets alot of oil from them...if Sudan gets sanctioned, then no one gets their oil

now you can feel free to throw in your anti semetic conspiracy theories in here but what i've layed down is fact
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Don Rizzle on September 21, 2004, 03:52:24 AM
Libya has been working on resuming diplomatic ties for a while, it has paid through the nose in compensation for the families of those they sponsored terrorists acts against it also libya gave up its WMD programs hence welcomed back into the international community. It was for the sponsorship of terror and WMD programs that Libya had sanctions placed against them now they have resolved those issues sanctions can be removed.


With Sudan no one wants to see another Rwanda, previous resolutions havn't done much to control resolve the situation, hence the need for sanctions to force the governemnt to act. the government who are current bombing the black african rebels and they also unleashed the janjaweed on them, and now they want to disarm the rebels before before they negotiate, but look in the rebels perspective they have been oppressed and neglected for some time and now the enemy will only negotiate after they disarm them after which they will have now bargening power again. If you ask me britain should resume control of the old colony and resolve the situation  effically as the sudaneese government have little interest in doing so.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Woodrow on September 21, 2004, 08:45:48 AM
you obviously don't understand the situations properly.

If you ask me britain should resume control of the old colony and resolve the situation

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: King Tech Quadafi on September 21, 2004, 04:01:20 PM
hey both these countries have oil and so far Bush lifted almost all sanctions placed on Libya in 1986, and while Sudan has alot of oil, america wants them sanctioned

kind of throws off the whole Jew/Oil company conglomerate conspiracy theory alot of you had about the US

What the hell are you ranting about man? Do you know what youre talkin about? Can you even point out the continent both countries are located within on a map?
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 23, 2004, 09:11:16 AM
well so far i've stated nothing but facts and i can pull articles that back up my statements...

and if you can't point me out on a map, then don't talk shit about me

your logic works wonders  ;D
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Sikotic™ on September 23, 2004, 09:11:20 PM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 23, 2004, 09:47:50 PM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Sikotic™ on September 23, 2004, 11:20:18 PM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!

No, but I'm sure it has crossed the Bush administrations mind a few times.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 24, 2004, 07:01:10 AM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!

No, but I'm sure it has crossed the Bush administrations mind a few times.

so if it's all about the oil....why haven't we invaded these two countries?

i mean Libya has oil, terrorists and nuclear weapons, we got them to cut down on terrorists and stop their nuclear weapons project...seems like a perfect time to attack them

and no one's saying shit about china not wanting to do anything to Sudan. they're one of the few countries that doesn't want Sudan sanctioned...and that's because of oil
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Sikotic™ on September 25, 2004, 01:48:06 AM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!

No, but I'm sure it has crossed the Bush administrations mind a few times.

so if it's all about the oil....why haven't we invaded these two countries?

i mean Libya has oil, terrorists and nuclear weapons, we got them to cut down on terrorists and stop their nuclear weapons project...seems like a perfect time to attack them

and no one's saying shit about china not wanting to do anything to Sudan. they're one of the few countries that doesn't want Sudan sanctioned...and that's because of oil

No, it all about liberating people we could give two shits about. WOW! my eyes have been opened!
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 25, 2004, 06:03:49 PM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!

No, but I'm sure it has crossed the Bush administrations mind a few times.

so if it's all about the oil....why haven't we invaded these two countries?

i mean Libya has oil, terrorists and nuclear weapons, we got them to cut down on terrorists and stop their nuclear weapons project...seems like a perfect time to attack them

and no one's saying shit about china not wanting to do anything to Sudan. they're one of the few countries that doesn't want Sudan sanctioned...and that's because of oil

No, it all about liberating people we could give two shits about. WOW! my eyes have been opened!
[/quote

so you admit you were wrong on the first try so now you're going to do the liberating scheme? strike 2....the afghan war was about terrorists and the second war was about WMD's, neither one was about liberation  :P
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Sikotic™ on September 25, 2004, 06:14:05 PM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!

No, but I'm sure it has crossed the Bush administrations mind a few times.

so if it's all about the oil....why haven't we invaded these two countries?

i mean Libya has oil, terrorists and nuclear weapons, we got them to cut down on terrorists and stop their nuclear weapons project...seems like a perfect time to attack them

and no one's saying shit about china not wanting to do anything to Sudan. they're one of the few countries that doesn't want Sudan sanctioned...and that's because of oil

No, it all about liberating people we could give two shits about. WOW! my eyes have been opened!
[/quote

so you admit you were wrong on the first try so now you're going to do the liberating scheme? strike 2....the afghan war was about terrorists and the second war was about WMD's, neither one was about liberation  :P

Did I ever say anything about the war in Afghanistan? As a matter of fact did I ever mention anything about Iraq? Someone's paranoid.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 25, 2004, 08:10:53 PM
Sudan kiills 800,000 people but it's okay, they have oil. I love it.

so you're saying we should invade another country? that's a great idea!

No, but I'm sure it has crossed the Bush administrations mind a few times.

so if it's all about the oil....why haven't we invaded these two countries?

i mean Libya has oil, terrorists and nuclear weapons, we got them to cut down on terrorists and stop their nuclear weapons project...seems like a perfect time to attack them

and no one's saying shit about china not wanting to do anything to Sudan. they're one of the few countries that doesn't want Sudan sanctioned...and that's because of oil

No, it all about liberating people we could give two shits about. WOW! my eyes have been opened!
[/quote

so you admit you were wrong on the first try so now you're going to do the liberating scheme? strike 2....the afghan war was about terrorists and the second war was about WMD's, neither one was about liberation  :P

Did I ever say anything about the war in Afghanistan? As a matter of fact did I ever mention anything about Iraq? Someone's paranoid.

someone knows they should have never stepped foot in ToT because they can't debate worth shit  ;)
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: King Tech Quadafi on September 25, 2004, 09:08:44 PM
Sikotic got stripes and bars while your pussy ass is making threads not even worth responding to.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Sikotic™ on September 25, 2004, 11:36:02 PM
someone knows they should have never stepped foot in ToT because they can't debate worth shit  ;)

What are we debating over? Are you denying that there's a genocide in the Sudan? You're making all these assumptions on how I am linking a genocide to Iraq and Afghanistan when they are completely different situations. Don't tell me you are linking the Sudan situation with Iraq/Afghanistan.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: King Tech Quadafi on September 26, 2004, 12:18:33 AM
Sikotic, dont pay attention to this lame.

 A dumb thread made by a dumb poster based on a dumb logic based on a dumb assumption= Dumb
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 26, 2004, 03:44:56 AM
Sikotic got stripes and bars while your pussy ass is making threads not even worth responding to.

you just responded making your whole statement false moron

and sorry, none of you bitches have stripes and bars in here besides me
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Sikotic™ on September 26, 2004, 01:01:42 PM
Sikotic got stripes and bars while your pussy ass is making threads not even worth responding to.

you just responded making your whole statement false moron

and sorry, none of you bitches have stripes and bars in here besides me

LMAO @ this over confident paranoid fool making absolutely no sense. How can I make my statements false when I am clarifying my stance on the issue and questioning you about what YOU'RE saying? That's called a fuckin' debate you dumbfuck. A debate is not about your sorry ass building your confidence by doctoring up bullshit from my comments.

Now with that, I'ma take the homie Tech's advice, and give up on trying to have a INTELLEGENT discussion with your DUMB ass.
Title: Re: Libya and Sudan - US Policies
Post by: Thirteen on September 26, 2004, 01:08:45 PM
Sikotic got stripes and bars while your pussy ass is making threads not even worth responding to.

you just responded making your whole statement false moron

and sorry, none of you bitches have stripes and bars in here besides me

LMAO @ this over confident paranoid fool making absolutely no sense. How can I make my statements false when I am clarifying my stance on the issue and questioning you about what YOU'RE saying? That's called a fuckin' debate you dumbfuck. A debate is not about your sorry ass building your confidence by doctoring up bullshit from my comments.

Now with that, I'ma take the homie Tech's advice, and give up on trying to have a INTELLEGENT discussion with your DUMB ass.

paranoid? that's why you responded to a post i made about tech that had nothing to do with you....you should give up trying to be intelligent, it hasn't worked for you so far