West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Chamillitary Click on January 24, 2010, 07:52:14 PM

Title: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 24, 2010, 07:52:14 PM
i think the Colts are going to take this, but i've always liked the Saints.

Sean Payton is my boy lol.

offenses are equally matched & it'll come down to who can make the stops when they are needed.

too bad we don't have any real Saint fans on here; makes things in this thread pretty humble lol.
Title: colts vs saints
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 24, 2010, 07:55:50 PM
go colts
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Black Friday on January 24, 2010, 07:56:15 PM
I'll be pulling for the Saints to win the bowl  8)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 24, 2010, 08:06:18 PM
If it were the Vikings I would have been a little torn on who I wanted to win since it would have been Brett's last chance for sure and would have made the past few years of whining irrelevant, but I would have cheered against the Saints vs anyone but the Patriots and Chargers, and I would have cheered for the Peyton (I say Peyton and not Colts because if he goes down with injury before the game knock on wood I'll cheer against the Colts) in the SB against anyone. So no big shocker here, but Colts all the way. I would have been a huge Jets fan at the SB if they won today though.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: stephen619 on January 24, 2010, 10:52:49 PM
That's a tough one, my bookie has the Colts -5 O/U 56.  Need a winner for the last bet of the football season.

2009-2010 Football Wages
Winnings  14,572
Loses  5,011
Total  +9,561 So Far
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Lunatic on January 24, 2010, 11:01:23 PM
Colts take it 30-20
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: 2010-thefuture on January 25, 2010, 07:05:10 AM
I bet cotls win by a HUGE amount
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: J.D. Wykid, Esq. on January 25, 2010, 10:02:38 PM
rooting for the saints...but i doubt ill be putting money on it. 
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on January 25, 2010, 10:09:21 PM
got less than 2 weeks for my final bettin
im already up from my winnings of the colts game
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: ThaChamp on January 25, 2010, 10:38:41 PM
wheres the "i dont give a fuck" option?
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on January 26, 2010, 10:40:01 AM
The Colts are beating the Saints in the Super Bowl.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: westsiderider323 on January 27, 2010, 10:47:34 AM
WHO DEY? saints win  8)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: thisoneguy360 on January 27, 2010, 07:51:25 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 28, 2010, 02:01:18 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 28, 2010, 03:10:32 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 28, 2010, 03:21:36 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.

who has the most wins in one single season?
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 28, 2010, 07:20:00 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.

who has the most wins in one single season?


Except they couldn't win when it counted. The other 40+ teams better than them could. They're definitely the best team to not win a ring.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 28, 2010, 07:46:45 PM
wheres the "i dont give a fuck" option?

right next to the "young a.g. eats a dicc" option
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on January 28, 2010, 08:26:34 PM
haha^^^

but damn so whos gon win this?
which side is leanin? lol
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 28, 2010, 09:23:43 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.

who has the most wins in one single season?


Except they couldn't win when it counted. The other 40+ teams better than them could. They're definitely the best team to not win a ring.

so if you can't be considered one of the greatest teams because you can't win; how can you be considered the best player if you can't win?
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: jaytee on January 29, 2010, 02:24:21 AM
I'm going for the Saints, but you can't count out Manning.  Personally, I'm just hoping for a good game.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 29, 2010, 07:12:45 AM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.

who has the most wins in one single season?


Except they couldn't win when it counted. The other 40+ teams better than them could. They're definitely the best team to not win a ring.

so if you can't be considered one of the greatest teams because you can't win; how can you be considered the best player if you can't win?


Because as I've said the entire time we've been debating and will say again; QBs DON'T WIN GAMES. TEAMS WIN GAMES. How that keeps going over your head I'll never know.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 29, 2010, 10:37:46 AM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.

who has the most wins in one single season?


Except they couldn't win when it counted. The other 40+ teams better than them could. They're definitely the best team to not win a ring.

so if you can't be considered one of the greatest teams because you can't win; how can you be considered the best player if you can't win?


Because as I've said the entire time we've been debating and will say again; QBs DON'T WIN GAMES. TEAMS WIN GAMES. How that keeps going over your head I'll never know.

so how is Peyton so good? maybe his team (that wins the games) just helps him look good. ;D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: dexter on January 29, 2010, 11:43:23 AM
Colts 23-20
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Blasphemy on January 29, 2010, 01:03:07 PM
Colts Wipe there ass with the saints uniforms at the end of the day. Once they done celebrating they'll stick the saints back into the dome and force fuck em like Katrina.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 29, 2010, 07:17:13 PM
I'm going for the Saints, they have a chance, but it's gonna be hard to stop Manning.

they have a legit chance.

if the Giants beat arguably the greatest team ever, the even matched Saints can beat the Colts.


No team that lost the Superbowl is arguably the greatest team ever. They would have lost to any one of the last 20 Superbowl Champs. Even the 01 Pats would have punched them in their pompous mouths and KOed them.

who has the most wins in one single season?


Except they couldn't win when it counted. The other 40+ teams better than them could. They're definitely the best team to not win a ring.

so if you can't be considered one of the greatest teams because you can't win; how can you be considered the best player if you can't win?


Because as I've said the entire time we've been debating and will say again; QBs DON'T WIN GAMES. TEAMS WIN GAMES. How that keeps going over your head I'll never know.

so how is Peyton so good? maybe his team (that wins the games) just helps him look good. ;D


You just wish he was on the Jets.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on January 29, 2010, 07:37:16 PM
haha they sayin if peyton wins this...hes the best qb of all time....damn
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 29, 2010, 07:47:16 PM
haha they sayin if peyton wins this...hes the best qb of all time....damn

why? Superbowls don't mean shit. ;D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on January 29, 2010, 07:49:55 PM
haha tell em espn dukes
they goin either way like they always do before the game and after theyll start talkin sideways

if brees wins...hes one of the best all time
if he loses he shouldnt be an all star etc...
if peyton wins then hes better than elway, montana, marino, brett etc...haha

they say the most simplistic shit of all time... ;D




haha they sayin if peyton wins this...hes the best qb of all time....damn

why? Superbowls don't mean shit. ;D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 29, 2010, 07:55:15 PM
haha tell em espn dukes
they goin either way like they always do before the game and after theyll start talkin sideways

if brees wins...hes one of the best all time
if he loses he shouldnt be an all star etc...
if peyton wins then hes better than elway, montana, marino, brett etc...haha

they say the most simplistic shit of all time... ;D




haha they sayin if peyton wins this...hes the best qb of all time....damn

why? Superbowls don't mean shit. ;D

yeah, they made Brady seem like a God when he won; now they are going to do the same to Peyton if he does. :D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on January 29, 2010, 07:58:31 PM
haha yeah brady is a loser and one of the worst.....right now til he wins again but damn as soon as you lose the world turns against even tho the night before those same fsdfsjfsjdh faces  (<<<haha) were callin you # all star, this n that in recorded history etc....
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 29, 2010, 08:35:51 PM
Ha ha, Cham just ended up starting a Brady sucks campaign by accident.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 29, 2010, 10:38:49 PM
Ha ha, Cham just ended up starting a Brady sucks campaign by accident.

accident? pshhhhhhh

he sucks major dick; easily one of the worst QBs in NFL history.

the guy won just a few Superbowls & people called him "great" ( ::)); give me a break!

any schmuck who even relatively follows the NFL knows it's all about MVP awards & setting records; unless it's something stupid like "most TDs in the single season" or some bullshit like that.

like it's "wtf, man?", you might as well give it to the offensive coordinator or something; i mean, after all, he is responsible for everything & should be given every last drop of credit.

the offensive coordinator deserves all the credit for anything successfully done offensively, for 99% of the teams in the NFL, besides some team from Indy, why? i don't know, they are just different.

anyway, it's really a "what have you done for me lately?" business.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 30, 2010, 07:36:27 AM
Ha ha, Cham just ended up starting a Brady sucks campaign by accident.

accident? pshhhhhhh

he sucks major dick; easily one of the worst QBs in NFL history.

the guy won just a few Superbowls & people called him "great" ( ::)); give me a break!

any schmuck who even relatively follows the NFL knows it's all about MVP awards & setting records; unless it's something stupid like "most TDs in the single season" or some bullshit like that.

like it's "wtf, man?", you might as well give it to the offensive coordinator or something; i mean, after all, he is responsible for everything & should be given every last drop of credit.

the offensive coordinator deserves all the credit for anything successfully done offensively, for 99% of the teams in the NFL, besides some team from Indy, why? i don't know, they are just different.

anyway, it's really a "what have you done for me lately?" business.


Finally you seem to get it.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 30, 2010, 08:07:23 AM
GO SAINTS!
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 30, 2010, 08:15:29 AM
GO SAINTS!



They can win all they want. Peyton's still the best of the era.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 30, 2010, 08:28:59 AM
GO SAINTS!



They can win all they want. Peyton's still the best of the era.

i'm not too sure of the record or streak they hold, but it's like 10 or 11 seasons in a row they've had like 10 or 11 wins?

basically one of the best teams in the league every single season for Peyton's enitre career & one ring to show for it.

not to mention, if you look back on the decade, they beat the WORST possible Superbowl opponet.

Peyton is like Paris Hilton, he can have whatever he wants in the regular season, but the postseason is like her love life & he just can't find it. ;D

i mean, when you win on an average of 12-13 games every single season & can't pull it out in the post season, i can't see where the finger pointing comes into play.

it's like when Peyton wins all his games in the regular season, it's all Peyton; couldn't have been done without Peyton; MVP Peyton; but then they get bounced by the "amazingly awful Chargers" & we're pointing fingers at the defense & "after all it is a team game".

it's probably the sole reason i dislike Peyton Jimbob Manning.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 30, 2010, 09:35:50 AM
GO SAINTS!



They can win all they want. Peyton's still the best of the era.

i'm not too sure of the record or streak they hold, but it's like 10 or 11 seasons in a row they've had like 10 or 11 wins?

basically one of the best teams in the league every single season for Peyton's enitre career & one ring to show for it.

not to mention, if you look back on the decade, they beat the WORST possible Superbowl opponet.

Peyton is like Paris Hilton, he can have whatever he wants in the regular season, but the postseason is like her love life & he just can't find it. ;D

i mean, when you win on an average of 12-13 games every single season & can't pull it out in the post season, i can't see where the finger pointing comes into play.

it's like when Peyton wins all his games in the regular season, it's all Peyton; couldn't have been done without Peyton; MVP Peyton; but then they get bounced by the "amazingly awful Chargers" & we're pointing fingers at the defense & "after all it is a team game".

it's probably the sole reason i dislike Peyton Jimbob Manning.

You over simplify it. They were a worse team on record than the 03 and 04 Pats and that's why they had to travel to New England and lose in the snow and cold. If they were the better team those seasons they would have hosted both games, probably won both, and went on to win to SBs right there. Throw in another SB if Hick Harper ran to the outside and that's 4 already.


Let's look at the decade of playoff losses for the Colts

2000 - a loss to OT to the Dolphins after the Fins ran the ball right into the endzone
2001- 6-10
2002 - the 10-6 Colts have to travel to the 9-7 Jets and get beat up in the cold
2003 and 2004 the 12-4 Colts lose to the 14-2 Pats in New England back to back years
2005 - The Steelers eat the Colts alive all game and still it was up to a blown fumble recovery and a missed FG against the team that beat everyone that year
2006- they win
2007 and 2008 The Chargers just move the line against the Colts D all game and destroy the Colts run game

Blame Peyton all you want but looking at all of those losses I see a ppg allowed to average at 25.7 and a avg yards per game rushing to be 65 yards. When you let up 26 points a game and can't run 70 yards you can't win most of the time. So tell me again where were these chokes? Which of those games was a choke by Manning? To me a choke is when the better team has the worse team outmatched across the board but finds a way to lose, like SD in 06 against the Pats. The 07 Pats I never said choked against the Giants because the Giants putplayed them all game and we're not at that moment a worse team.



Also what team had the most win in the 90s? The Niners. They had 1 ring to the Cowboys 3. Why do I never hear people say Aikman was as good or better than Young, or Favre? I've convinced myself that the hype of Tom Brady is completely based on selling the NFL product to women and nothing will make me change my mind.


But here's the question; if let's say the defense and team hold up all season to get those 12 wins and then lose in the playoffs why is it just Peyton that choked? Why isn't it the defense, run game, WRs, etc that choke too? You say Peyton gets all the credit that's why you hate him. I say he gets all the blame and that's why I defend him.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 30, 2010, 10:52:09 AM
when you throw 4 interceptions it's your fault.

GREAT PEOPLE CAN WIN ON THE ROAD! ;D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 30, 2010, 11:05:37 AM
when you throw 4 interceptions it's your fault.

GREAT PEOPLE CAN WIN ON THE ROAD! ;D


But it isn't a choke when the you are playing on the road against a better team. Of course if illegal contact was called on those INT passes it would have been a choke by the Pats.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on January 30, 2010, 11:36:26 AM
when you throw 4 interceptions it's your fault.

GREAT PEOPLE CAN WIN ON THE ROAD! ;D


But it isn't a choke when the you are playing on the road against a better team. Of course if illegal contact was called on those INT passes it would have been a choke by the Pats.

when you're the greatest quarterback in the history of mankind & you throw 4 picks, you choked.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on January 30, 2010, 03:24:54 PM
when you throw 4 interceptions it's your fault.

GREAT PEOPLE CAN WIN ON THE ROAD! ;D


But it isn't a choke when the you are playing on the road against a better team. Of course if illegal contact was called on those INT passes it would have been a choke by the Pats.

when you're the greatest quarterback in the history of mankind & you throw 4 picks, you choked.


Except when those INTs come during timing patterns and the WRs are being penalized by illegal contact, to the point where the rules of the NFL get changed to make sure they calls are enforced.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 01, 2010, 05:13:43 PM
aite i found some of it
anyone have the stats for when they played in the regular season?
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 01, 2010, 05:34:19 PM
aite i found some of it
anyone have the stats for when they played in the regular season?

who the Colts & Saints? they didn't play in the regular season. :P
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 01, 2010, 05:37:28 PM
nah im lookin for any important info
numbers, stats, injuries etc....
ima bet so im tryna get this info together

looks like colts have the edge but saints have more fans there
word is the saints vs colts fanbase at the stadium will be 4:1
thats a crazy ratio




aite i found some of it
anyone have the stats for when they played in the regular season?

who the Colts & Saints? they didn't play in the regular season. :P
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: 2010-thefuture on February 02, 2010, 12:30:03 PM
I want to make a bet with somebody...........I ama bet 25.00 that colts will win............and by a large score..........

anyone was to play 4:!-it means if you win you'd win 100.00
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Nutty on February 02, 2010, 09:58:40 PM
When is this f'n game meant to go down? lol. Wednesday here, but isn't it Tuesday US time?
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 02, 2010, 11:25:03 PM
you talkin bout the stuperbowl?
not til sunday
thats why the call it stuperbowl sunday....lol not monday, tuesday etc...
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 06, 2010, 04:34:46 PM
tomorrow is the day! 8)

i'm kind of hopin' Freeny doesn't play, but i know he'll be out there; it's the Superbowl!
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 06, 2010, 04:41:42 PM
he wont be 100 tho so thats a plus for the saints
looks like ima go wit the saints....underdog or nuthin....haha
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: white Boy on February 07, 2010, 11:20:19 AM
so this morning i woke up, listened to the house of the rising sun, and decided to root for the saints, gotta go for the underdog...

-on a side note, 57 over under, whats everyone think about that, i dont think itll be a shootout like that
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 12:40:48 PM
so this morning i woke up, listened to the house of the rising sun, and decided to root for the saints, gotta go for the underdog...

-on a side note, 57 over under, whats everyone think about that, i dont think itll be a shootout like that


Would 31-28 be such a stretch?
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 01:44:34 PM
so this morning i woke up, listened to the house of the rising sun, and decided to root for the saints, gotta go for the underdog...

-on a side note, 57 over under, whats everyone think about that, i dont think itll be a shootout like that


Would 31-28 be such a stretch?

that's the score i'm looking at.

it's going to be like the Pats/Indy regular season game.

both teams will score at least 20.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: white Boy on February 07, 2010, 02:42:51 PM
so this morning i woke up, listened to the house of the rising sun, and decided to root for the saints, gotta go for the underdog...

-on a side note, 57 over under, whats everyone think about that, i dont think itll be a shootout like that


Would 31-28 be such a stretch?
not at all, but neither would 24- 20
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: westsiderider323 on February 07, 2010, 02:50:31 PM
scores gon b in the 40s
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on February 07, 2010, 03:29:14 PM
so this morning i woke up, listened to the house of the rising sun, and decided to root for the saints, gotta go for the underdog...

-on a side note, 57 over under, whats everyone think about that, i dont think itll be a shootout like that
If I was betting, I'd say under.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: K.Dub on February 07, 2010, 05:27:54 PM
I GIVE UP!

Now I gave your type of football a chance. I watched half of the game - and I found it boring.
I mean it's 5 yards... BREAK... 5 yards back... BREAK... OOH TOUCHDOWN, FIELDGOAL - now what, BREAK. Fuck that shit. lol

And what's up with that half time show. L O L
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on February 07, 2010, 06:35:26 PM
LOL @ Manning. Sucks to be him right now.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on February 07, 2010, 06:38:57 PM
I GIVE UP!

Now I gave your type of football a chance. I watched half of the game - and I found it boring.
I mean it's 5 yards... BREAK... 5 yards back... BREAK... OOH TOUCHDOWN, FIELDGOAL - now what, BREAK. Fuck that shit. lol

And what's up with that half time show. L O L
In the second half there was an onside kick, 2 point conversion, and an interception return for a touch down. This game is awesome.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 06:59:03 PM
Ah well. Congrats to the Saints. The Colts all year have tightened up in second half all year and tonight they couldn't. Peyton's big mistake was the 3rd and 11 long pass attempt when a play for a shorter FG should have been the call. The INT was just a mix of a well placed blitzed, a missed time routes, a rushed pass, and an on the ball DB with the right guess. And if Indy had scored to tie with any time on the clock yet I'm almost positive the Saints would have gotten into FG range and won. The onside kick really upset me because I called it the second I saw the Colts backed up the way they were, and if I was ready for it they should have been.


In the end, the team that tried harder to win all year, won tonight. The Saints cared about the Perfect season, the Colts didn't, the Saints decided to take risks, the Colts didn't, the Saints played tight coverage the whole game, the Colts decided to lay back after a great start. I'm not going to say Brees outplayed Manning, but Payton definitely beat Peyton in the mental part of the game, and Williams beat Coyer.

I like the Saints and I'm glad they won, plus Manning was already voted player of the decade on some NFL Films special earlier this week so fuck Brady. I just wish Peyton threw the ball twice more, or Brees once more.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 07:23:52 PM
Pics of the game:
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_HEh2auCRBAk/SUFRpPUEgkI/AAAAAAAAAOY/hLC_1GsKsYQ/s400/Who_Dat.JPG)

(http://www.idsnews.com/news/mfiles/photos/0000-081035617891.jpg)

(http://cache.boston.com/images/bostondirtdogs//Headline_Archives/10.2_Ozzie_choke_BDD.jpg)

(http://lloydvance.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/brees.jpg)

(http://blog.nola.com/tpmoney/2008/08/large_seanpayton.bmp)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 07:29:52 PM
That choke pic doesn't offend. I'm really not all that upset.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 07:38:07 PM
That choke pic doesn't offend. I'm really not all that upset.

it wasn't intended to, it was just a picture of the game. ;)

it was a great game; i was tight when the Colts went up early & the Saints were looking weak on offense.

but that onside kick at the start of the second half gave me that "WOW, THERE GOING TO WIN!".

Drew Brees realllly went off in the second half; it was sick.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 07:46:35 PM
That choke pic doesn't offend. I'm really not all that upset.

it wasn't intended to, it was just a picture of the game. ;)

it was a great game; i was tight when the Colts went up early & the Saints were looking weak on offense.

but that onside kick at the start of the second half gave me that "WOW, THERE GOING TO WIN!".

Drew Brees realllly went off in the second half; it was sick.


I don't think the difference was Brees. The Colts were doing great playing tight man to man, but the second they went back to zone Colston and Henderson went to town. There were key third downs were either one of them were so wide open I couldn't understand it. Brees was still great and still MVP, but the difference in the game was one team played full throttle and the other played too safe, and then the one play where the DB jumped it on Indy would have been better served playing it too safe, because that tipped ball would have been a pick 6.

I still say Reggie Wayne is not the solid #1 WR that an offense like that needs. I know he was hurt but that ball was on the hands and he wasn't getting open enough for most of the night. Freeney's injury started to show in the second half but the Colts ended up with more time to pass than the Saints did.


P.S. with regards to the onside kick. I wish you could have heard me screaming at the TV before the kick off for the Colts to be ready for an onside kick. That's all on Caldwell.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 07:50:36 PM
my man Tracy Porter, Mr. "73 rating catch in Madden" = amazing for a CB lol.

they were just picking the Colts D apart in the second half.

the pic was so great though, oh my GOD; i was running in circles lmao.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 07:55:12 PM
haha i put money on the saints....damn
thats 2 in a row
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 07:59:46 PM
this is a young Football team; we could be looking at a dynasty here. :o

Jets/Saints Superbowl next year! 8)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 08:06:35 PM
my man Tracy Porter, Mr. "73 rating catch in Madden" = amazing for a CB lol.

they were just picking the Colts D apart in the second half.

the pic was so great though, oh my GOD; i was running in circles lmao.


I wasn't even upset by it because at that moment I knew the Saints had this game locked up. I was certain in my mind that even if they tie it NO will win. If the 2-pt had missed then I would have been more upset.

The other thing was the timeout Peyton called but tried to take back. I think the Colts would have scored playing with 3 TOs and would have gotten the ball back with about a minute, but once NO went up 24-17 I said the best chance Indy has is an OT loss. The stars aligned an it was the Saints that were destined to win this.

That injury on Wayne was what took his fire away, but even still this same game with a WR like Andre Johnson, Moss, Plax, or Fitzgerald instead of Wayne would have been different. Of course if Collie and Garcon switched and Gonzalez, or Harrison were in Garcon's spot I that that would have made the difference too. The way the D played in the second half the Colts need a stronger lead and they couldn't get it.

The 3rd and inches at the end of the first half summed up the game. Sean Payton would have went for a big play on that, while Peyton Manning played it conservative, and instead of maybe adding points at the end of the half they let NO get it back and get an FG.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 08:16:47 PM
i was yelling during the two point conversation; yelling for a challange & they went to commercial break & i was like WTF?

then they came back & it said challange, i was jumpin'! 8)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 08:17:43 PM
now peyton is the worse player of all time and brees becomes a hero....instantly
you gotta love these haters...part of it was luck...like that throw
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 08:21:11 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I think the played the exact same. Both made mostly good throws, and a few bad ones. Both made great decisions and a few bad ones. And bot threw intercept-able balls. The difference was the Saints had a play where the DB was more heads up than a Colts DBs were. Peyton threw two or three balls that were either intercepted of could have been, and Brees threw two or three that could have been.





i was yelling during the two point conversation; yelling for a challange & they went to commercial break & i was like WTF?

then they came back & it said challange, i was jumpin'! 8)

I'm just curious whether that exact same play in the middle of the field would have been called a fumble.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 07, 2010, 08:24:15 PM
now peyton is the worse player of all time and brees becomes a hero....instantly
you gotta love these haters...part of it was luck...like that throw

greatest QB of all time is 9-9 in the Playoffs? FUCK OUTTA HERE.

that was the beauty of the Saints win though, it wasn't just Brees; it was the Saints as a whole.

the WR's getting open, Brees throwing dimes to them, Pierre Thomas running hard, the line giving Brees good protection; the defense stepping up, Tracy Porter making plays, Jonathon Vilma making plays; & Gregg Williams calling a great defensive game & my personal MVP, Sean Payton sending the message throughout, "we're here to win!".

it was awesome; Bourbon Street is jumpin'. 8)

i was yelling during the two point conversation; yelling for a challange & they went to commercial break & i was like WTF?

then they came back & it said challange, i was jumpin'! 8)

I'm just curious whether that exact same play in the middle of the field would have been called a fumble.

the guy kicked it out of his hands, the question there would be if he was down by contact; but who knows.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 08:33:10 PM
jus wait
monday mornin quaterbackin.....youll see




now peyton is the worse player of all time and brees becomes a hero....instantly
you gotta love these haters...part of it was luck...like that throw

greatest QB of all time is 9-9 in the Playoffs? FUCK OUTTA HERE.

that was the beauty of the Saints win though, it wasn't just Brees; it was the Saints as a whole.

the WR's getting open, Brees throwing dimes to them, Pierre Thomas running hard, the line giving Brees good protection; the defense stepping up, Tracy Porter making plays, Jonathon Vilma making plays; & Gregg Williams calling a great defensive game & my personal MVP, Sean Payton sending the message throughout, "we're here to win!".

it was awesome; Bourbon Street is jumpin'. 8)

i was yelling during the two point conversation; yelling for a challange & they went to commercial break & i was like WTF?

then they came back & it said challange, i was jumpin'! 8)

I'm just curious whether that exact same play in the middle of the field would have been called a fumble.

the guy kicked it out of his hands, the question there would be if he was down by contact; but who knows.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 08:36:27 PM
now peyton is the worse player of all time and brees becomes a hero....instantly
you gotta love these haters...part of it was luck...like that throw

greatest QB of all time is 9-9 in the Playoffs? FUCK OUTTA HERE.



He called Peyton "the worse player of all time", not greatest. Obviously the greatest QB of all time is Bart Starr. 9-1 in the playoffs. If the Colts had him tonight they would have won.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 08:58:52 PM
and that isnt me sayin that....thats them monday qb's

Peyton Manning better than Brady my ass. Pick 6 to lose the Superbowl. Back to being a choke artist again.




now peyton is the worse player of all time and brees becomes a hero....instantly
you gotta love these haters...part of it was luck...like that throw

greatest QB of all time is 9-9 in the Playoffs? FUCK OUTTA HERE.



He called Peyton "the worse player of all time", not greatest. Obviously the greatest QB of all time is Bart Starr. 9-1 in the playoffs. If the Colts had him tonight they would have won.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: J.D. Wykid, Esq. on February 07, 2010, 09:23:49 PM
great game, new orleans deserves a winner. 

great game too, the halftime show was wack as fuck, but other than that it was great.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 09:25:03 PM
and that isnt me sayin that....thats them monday qb's

Peyton Manning better than Brady my ass. Pick 6 to lose the Superbowl. Back to being a choke artist again.




now peyton is the worse player of all time and brees becomes a hero....instantly
you gotta love these haters...part of it was luck...like that throw

greatest QB of all time is 9-9 in the Playoffs? FUCK OUTTA HERE.



He called Peyton "the worse player of all time", not greatest. Obviously the greatest QB of all time is Bart Starr. 9-1 in the playoffs. If the Colts had him tonight they would have won.


That's already the discussion but all he didn't do anything wrong. Porter was heads up on the play so no matter what the game was over. Wayne was not going to catch it even if he did break early. The best case scenario would have been a break up of the pass, but then a 4th and 5 and with 3 TOs probably a punt, but the way the Colts D played at the end of the half that punt would have sealed the game anyway.

Like I said Manning did make 1 bad decision that he wishes he could take back and it wasn't the INT. It was the 3rd and 11 bomb to Collie when a short pass to Clark would have at least given them a proper FG try. Clark was open short and maybe even had room for the 1st, but that being said the blame game starts with Caldwell who drew up a way too lax gameplan all night. And for players Wayne was a way bigger let down than Manning tonight, and Garcon's drop was the worst mistake on the field by the Colts. But of course it's all Manning's fault.

Bill Cowher would have made these Colts 4 or 5 time Champs this decade.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Lunatic on February 07, 2010, 09:26:55 PM
Ya the Colts play calling was very lax...didn't seem like it was a super bowl to them lol
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 09:27:32 PM
damn and the saints went for it on 4th....thought it was over when they did that....damn started to throw my money away....luckily they came back for real
sad tho for peyton....
oh and now the monday qb's are gon say peyton let em win cuz they felt bad for em since katrina happened....doggs
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 09:32:32 PM
damn and the saints went for it on 4th....thought it was over when they did that....damn started to throw my money away....luckily they came back for real
sad tho for peyton....
oh and now the monday qb's are gon say peyton let em win cuz they felt bad for em since katrina happened....doggs


Nah, no one is going to say that. Not even me; Mr Conspiracy.


Speaking of money, Addai kept me from winning 300 bucks by running 6 yards too many.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 09:35:07 PM
haha damn thats close but that dont count i guess....lol
this might be a thing for brett to come back and try it again to show hes better than peyton, brady, and others....



damn and the saints went for it on 4th....thought it was over when they did that....damn started to throw my money away....luckily they came back for real
sad tho for peyton....
oh and now the monday qb's are gon say peyton let em win cuz they felt bad for em since katrina happened....doggs


Nah, no one is going to say that. Not even me; Mr Conspiracy.


Speaking of money, Addai kept me from winning 300 bucks by running 6 yards too many.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 07, 2010, 09:39:10 PM
haha damn thats close but that dont count i guess....lol
this might be a thing for brett to come back and try it again to show hes better than peyton, brady, and others....



damn and the saints went for it on 4th....thought it was over when they did that....damn started to throw my money away....luckily they came back for real
sad tho for peyton....
oh and now the monday qb's are gon say peyton let em win cuz they felt bad for em since katrina happened....doggs


Nah, no one is going to say that. Not even me; Mr Conspiracy.


Speaking of money, Addai kept me from winning 300 bucks by running 6 yards too many.

I didn't even realize it until I looked at my ticket just now. It was all because of that one big run.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 09:39:32 PM
everyones in shock right now includin the millions that put money on the colts
and almost everyone n nis piece too....everyone thought the colts would win right, by a large margin?
no lyin.....

 ;D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: white Boy on February 07, 2010, 09:40:43 PM
in the end of it all, as far as my team not making it, im just happy it was another great superbowl, that was a bad pick tho, i
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 07, 2010, 09:42:28 PM
some will argue....it was colts fault for not catchin it....even tho it wasnt directly thrown to a colts player.....but thats the thing wit picks.....does hte qb really want to do that?
haha
come on...he eyed his player and he trusts his player to move and get the ball.....that didnt happen
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: U.N.T.O.U.C.H.A.B.L.E. on February 08, 2010, 07:07:34 AM
Ah well. Congrats to the Saints. The Colts all year have tightened up in second half all year and tonight they couldn't. Peyton's big mistake was the 3rd and 11 long pass attempt when a play for a shorter FG should have been the call. The INT was just a mix of a well placed blitzed, a missed time routes, a rushed pass, and an on the ball DB with the right guess. And if Indy had scored to tie with any time on the clock yet I'm almost positive the Saints would have gotten into FG range and won. The onside kick really upset me because I called it the second I saw the Colts backed up the way they were, and if I was ready for it they should have been.


In the end, the team that tried harder to win all year, won tonight. The Saints cared about the Perfect season, the Colts didn't, the Saints decided to take risks, the Colts didn't, the Saints played tight coverage the whole game, the Colts decided to lay back after a great start. I'm not going to say Brees outplayed Manning, but Payton definitely beat Peyton in the mental part of the game, and Williams beat Coyer.

I like the Saints and I'm glad they won, plus Manning was already voted player of the decade on some NFL Films special earlier this week so fuck Brady. I just wish Peyton threw the ball twice more, or Brees once more.

lmao and brady still better than both of em and still has 3 rings to peyton's 1 so fuck that Choke Artist.....haha...the saints made me 2gs last night so fuck peyton 'CHOKE ARTIST' manning again.... ;)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 08, 2010, 07:21:06 AM
in the end of it all, as far as my team not making it, im just happy it was another great superbowl, that was a bad pick tho, i


The pick was Wayne's fault, but at best it would have been an incomplete. Dude jumped the route big time and no way would Wayne have moved to catch it but when the called play is a quick inside pass and you're the WR you absolutely have to stay infront of the DB. Wayne passed the DB and then turned in. What was he expecting would happen. The only excuse would be if the ball wasn't supposed to go to him but when he looked back for it it seemed to me he knew it was coming for him. I'm sure Peyton will gladly take the brunt of the critique for his players but I know what I saw. Wayne could not get open all day, and he missed patterns, and dropped a TD pass.

Manning wasn't perfect, and if he was perfect yes the Colts would have won, but that's the story of the Colts since 1999. When Manning isn't perfect they lose, except for 06, but in that case it was more Grossman than anyone else. The bottom line is as far as I'm concerned not a single QB in history on his very best day would have played any better than Manning did last night for the Colts. Where as I could name a lot of WRs that would have played better than Wayne did last night and that would have made the difference. Almost all his catches came when NO started playing prevent D.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: bez on February 08, 2010, 07:46:45 AM
Love watching the Superbowl, this was awesome.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: U.N.T.O.U.C.H.A.B.L.E. on February 08, 2010, 08:11:52 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9399/whoopsb.jpg)
By ridahz (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/ridahz) at 2010-02-08

Lmao, yes u did peyton welcome back to your playoff career  ;D
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 08, 2010, 09:52:56 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9399/whoopsb.jpg)
By ridahz (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/ridahz) at 2010-02-08

Lmao, yes u did peyton welcome back to your playoff career  ;D

 :D :laugh: (http://smileydatabase.com/s/517.gif)
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 08, 2010, 10:16:58 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9399/whoopsb.jpg)
By ridahz (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/ridahz) at 2010-02-08

Lmao, yes u did peyton welcome back to your playoff career  ;D


Whoops, I expected my team to play at the level I played at again. All these fags on NFL Network that said tonight kept him from achieving the Bradshaw/Aikman level forget to mention that if Bradshaw or Aikman were on the Colts they wouldn't have made the playoffs more than twice this decade. 06 was a fluke because they played teams that make mistakes but a relying on a defense that relies on a team to make mistakes is the real mistake. That team needs a better football philosophy and an entirely new direction. They didn't blitz once all night. Peyton is entering a contract year. I say fuck the money, ask Jim Irsay what he is going to do to fix this team. The Chargers would have beaten these guys in the AFC Championship, and no team except maybe the Cards on the NFC would have lost to last nights Colts. I think it's time to find a new team, if winning the SB is really his agenda and not getting the big bucks then he needs to address the relaxed nature of those Colts.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: U.N.T.O.U.C.H.A.B.L.E. on February 08, 2010, 12:09:41 PM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9399/whoopsb.jpg)
By ridahz (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/ridahz) at 2010-02-08

Lmao, yes u did peyton welcome back to your playoff career  ;D


Whoops, I expected my team to play at the level I played at again. All these fags on NFL Network that said tonight kept him from achieving the Bradshaw/Aikman level forget to mention that if Bradshaw or Aikman were on the Colts they wouldn't have made the playoffs more than twice this decade. 06 was a fluke because they played teams that make mistakes but a relying on a defense that relies on a team to make mistakes is the real mistake. That team needs a better football philosophy and an entirely new direction. They didn't blitz once all night. Peyton is entering a contract year. I say fuck the money, ask Jim Irsay what he is going to do to fix this team. The Chargers would have beaten these guys in the AFC Championship, and no team except maybe the Cards on the NFC would have lost to last nights Colts. I think it's time to find a new team, if winning the SB is really his agenda and not getting the big bucks then he needs to address the relaxed nature of those Colts.

the picture itself is priceless end of story, im done dissing chokeman lol....
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 08, 2010, 12:52:19 PM
when the Colts win, Peyton did every last drop of work & deserves all the credit; he did it all.

when they lose, you can't go pointing fingers at other people, unless it's ridiculous; it definatly can't flip flop that hard.

if they "could of gone perfect" with Peyton, not to mention it was all Peyton those first 18 (minus the two) games; no help, nothing; good old Peyton boy did it because he's so amazing; when they lose, how can it not be his fault? again, unless it's absolutely absurd lol.

nobody fucked up, the Saints are the most dangerous offensive team in the league with all the weapons, so it's not the defenses fault & other than a dropped pass my Pierre Garcon early on, the WR core was fine; Joseph Addai ran his ass off.

if you told me i was in the Superbowl, down seven in the 4th, my ball & Peyton was my QB, i'd take that; the "GOAT" had his chance to tie it, he couldn't, that's why Ozzie made an apperance in here.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 08, 2010, 01:54:33 PM
when the Colts win, Peyton did every last drop of work & deserves all the credit; he did it all.

when they lose, you can't go pointing fingers at other people, unless it's ridiculous; it definatly can't flip flop that hard.

if they "could of gone perfect" with Peyton, not to mention it was all Peyton those first 18 (minus the two) games; no help, nothing; good old Peyton boy did it because he's so amazing; when they lose, how can it not be his fault? again, unless it's absolutely absurd lol.

nobody fucked up, the Saints are the most dangerous offensive team in the league with all the weapons, so it's not the defenses fault & other than a dropped pass my Pierre Garcon early on, the WR core was fine; Joseph Addai ran his ass off.

if you told me i was in the Superbowl, down seven in the 4th, my ball & Peyton was my QB, i'd take that; the "GOAT" had his chance to tie it, he couldn't, that's why Ozzie made an apperance in here.

if you told me I was in the Superbowl, down 7 in the 4th, my ball & Peyton was my QB, 3rd and 5, I'd say run a quick draw to Wayne I'd take that. The ball was thrown exactly where it should have been. TO, Moss, Fitz, Johnson, Plax, Boldin, Marshall, Ward, I could go on, make that play. Colts #1 Receiver Reggie Wayne miss-timed his route and let a DB get infront of him when he knew the kind of throw that was coming. At the very least he should have tackled him before hand for offensive pass interference. Then right after that he drops a pass right in his hands.

You want to hear a nice stat; the Colts Defense, when the starters were playing averaged 6.5 points allowed in the second half of every game this season. Last night they let up 18 points. 3 times what they averaged.

When Peyton makes a mistake I call him on it. That INT wasn't a mistake and would have happened even if Jesus Christ himself threw the ball.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Chamillitary Click on February 08, 2010, 02:38:01 PM
right, Reggie Wayne blows. :D

is that stat from this year? the same year they played one team with actual offensive threats, the Pats (gave up 10 to them in the 4th alone)? you can argue the Cards, but other than that they played no one.

i said it from the start they had a cake walk schedule & they showed it.

they played the Baltimore, good run, but all defense & the Jets, good run, but ALL defense & they beat them.

they played a true offensive threat & the defense couldn't stop them, but it was expected; the over/under wasn't 57 because Vegas thought the Colts were going to win 50-7; they knew it was going to be a shootout & it was coming down to a defensive stand; that stand happened because Reggie Wayne is a shit reciever, even though his route running is what analysts use to give him his "elite" status. Peyton Manning didn't see Tracy Porter coming.

regardless, why were they going for a five yard pass on the dot to get a first down? that's pussy play, you have to air it out at least 10 yards to be considered good in this league.

the quick slants over the middle, the quick "hike...one mississippi...bullet over the middle" was working fine; it was a silly call & Mr. "I see everything & change the play seven times before i call hike" didn't see Mr. Porter.
Title: Re: Superbowl Thread: Saints vs. Colts
Post by: Shallow on February 08, 2010, 03:09:10 PM
right, Reggie Wayne blows. :D

is that stat from this year? the same year they played one team with actual offensive threats, the Pats (gave up 10 to them in the 4th alone)? you can argue the Cards, but other than that they played no one.

i said it from the start they had a cake walk schedule & they showed it.

they played the Baltimore, good run, but all defense & the Jets, good run, but ALL defense & they beat them.

they played a true offensive threat & the defense couldn't stop them, but it was expected; the over/under wasn't 57 because Vegas thought the Colts were going to win 50-7; they knew it was going to be a shootout & it was coming down to a defensive stand; that stand happened because Reggie Wayne is a shit reciever, even though his route running is what analysts use to give him his "elite" status. Peyton Manning didn't see Tracy Porter coming.

regardless, why were they going for a five yard pass on the dot to get a first down? that's pussy play, you have to air it out at least 10 yards to be considered good in this league.

the quick slants over the middle, the quick "hike...one mississippi...bullet over the middle" was working fine; it was a silly call & Mr. "I see everything & change the play seven times before i call hike" didn't see Mr. Porter.


He had to make the throw or get sacked. A pump fake would have meant a sack, and Collie mauy or may not have been open but he was out of sight by then. He went to his go to WR and his go to WR wasn't ready.