West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Don Rizzle on September 14, 2004, 04:38:30 AM
-
for a country which houses only 4 % of worlds population manages to produce 25 % or worlds green house gases
-
cause we kick ass :cow:
-
and we get shit loads of floods wheras 20 years we didn't get many floods now its someink like 2million properties in britain are in flood prone areas. i'll wait for the likes of trauma to try and explain that one away
-
the answer will be who gives a fuck.. you aint in america.. we dont owe you shit.
we need to stop being so lefty and stop taking shit!
-
... because we're evil. See, all the worlds' problems, including whether or not it RAINS can be blamed on America. More specificlally, our president. Now, if Kerry gets elected in November; magically, those problems will vanish, and the evil rain clouds will dissapear; it really DOES have everything to do with the colors red and blue!!!! It's like a really, really good Harry Potter book.
-
what's a "plannet" ? ???
-
It's clear that Don Rizzle doesn't understand basic economic thought nor does he see the "big picture" when dealing with America.
First off, We have around 7% of the worlds population.
Second, we produce around a third of the worlds economic output. If he would look at other nations, he'd find that both Australia and Canada put out more greenhouse gases per capita than we do and don't even come close to the same amount of economic output of America. Also from 1990 to 1999 greenhouse gas emissions per capita have gone down 14%
Ignore this chump, It's like talking to an autistic 3rd grader:
"America is bad, Israel is bad"
"America is bad, Israel is bad"
"America is bad, Israel is bad"
"America is bad, Israel is bad"
"America is bad, Israel is bad"
"America is bad, Israel is bad"
-
Don't worry we will all die and another civilization will start over.
-
i agree you have made improvements but not nearly enough all countries need to make more improvements but currently blair hasn't been able to pursuade bush to do more hopeful his presidency of g8 will encourage the most powerful nations to do more. in particular i'd like to see america sign up to the Kyoto accord even bush senior was pursuaded to sign up to ithe forerunner of the kyto agreement
-
I dont really know how to word this. but
America produces the most polution....but we also so the most producing.
-
its for exactly that reason america should be at the forefront in reducing pollution and creating green energy
-
Don rizzle, you're from England, why do you give a shit?
-
Don rizzle, you're from England, why do you give a shit?
and we get shit loads of floods wheras 20 years we didn't get many floods now its someink like 2million properties in britain are in flood prone areas. i'll wait for the likes of trauma to try and explain that one away
^He explained it right there smart guy.
-
These threads really get on my nerves now because it's the same shit over and over again. How come no one ever talks about China's pollution for a change?
-
go hug a tree you fuckin bitch ass hippie :pimp:
-
These threads really get on my nerves now because it's the same shit over and over again. How come no one ever talks about China's pollution for a change?
because america produces the most. but i agree china could do alot more and they are expanding so quickly now really is the time, but china has a very strong negotiating position in most things and and most countries find it hard to put pressure on them.
-
because america produces the most. but i agree china could do alot more and they are expanding so quickly now really is the time, but china has a very strong negotiating position in most things and and most countries find it hard to put pressure on them.
Capitalize Sentences
When referring to yourself, please capitalize the letter "I"
A Lot is TWO words
Countries need to be capitalized
You get an F-
-
well in that case you get a C for COCK, i never write in correct english here for the simple fact that i don't have too this is not a report i'm writing for work or an essay i'm going to submit to university its a political discussion.
-
well in that case you get a C for COCK
That was almost gayer than Mauzip...
-
well in that case you get a C for COCK,
Damn! I got SERVED!!!!
(http://www.haro-online.com/stuff/yougots1.jpg)
SIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i never write in correct english here for the simple fact that i don't have too this is not a report i'm writing for work or an essay i'm going to submit to university its a political discussion.
How is anybody supposed to take you seriously regarding politics when you can't use the proper tools to talk about politics?
-
because what i wright can be understood, all you are doing is nit picking. The political view point isn't any different its just presentred in a different way, which is faster for me to type, especially when my internet use at work is monitored i don't like to spend too much time writing my posts.
-
because what i wright can be understood
effically
???
-
because what i wright can be understood
effically
???
if you can't understand that you must be a dumbass. or maybe if i spelt it correctly (ethically) you probably still wouldn't understand judging by your unquestioned support of bush
-
because what i wright can be understood
effically
???
if you can't understand that you must be a dumbass. or maybe if i spelt it correctly (ethically) you probably still wouldn't understand judging by your unquestioned support of bush
Holy shit you dunce. Are you fucking kidding me? How am I supposed to understand that effically=ethically??????? Even Microsoft Word has no clue what you were trying to spell.
(http://www.dj-quik.net/rizzle.jpg)
Let's do some Don Rizzle Math!!!!!
2+2 = 5
1+3 = 6
Let's do some Don Rizzle Geography!!!!!
(http://www.dj-quik.net/rizzle2.jpg)
Let's do some Don Rizzle History:
(http://esperantonord.free.fr/cdrom/allemagne/allemagne/hitler.jpg)
Andrew Jackson
(http://www.foundation33.com/media/all_the_people.jpg/06/ghandi.jpg)
Abe Lincoln
(http://www.historychannel.com/exhibits/uselections/images/5_top_elections/kennedy.jpg)
Gandhi
-
lmao
-
dies.......
-
lmao.. damn.. engle never seems do diapoint me.. funny ass dude.. and hes killin yall with them pics
-
LMAO at this shit. It's hilarious. hahahaha
-
the thing is computers don't have intelligence they follow rules when doing spelling checks, the human brain however can make judgements, obviously this level of intelligence way above yours.
-
the thing is computers don't have intelligence they follow rules when doing spelling checks, the human brain however can make judgements, obviously this level of intelligence way above yours.
Here's a judgment I've made: You're a fucking dunce.
-
LOLLLLLL
-
It's America all right...
http://www.sacbee.com/state_wire/story/10854599p-11772282c.html
LOS ANGELES (AP) - California air regulators on Friday unanimously approved the world's most ambitious rules to reduce the car emissions that contribute to global warming, a move that could bring sweeping changes to how the rest of the nation fights vehicle pollution.
The regulations are expected to cut exhaust emissions in cars and light trucks by 25 percent and in larger trucks and SUVs by 18 percent.
Their approval by the California Air Resources Board came after nearly two full days of debate and discussion, during which the auto industry vigorously stated its opposition.
Industry officials argued that the board did not have the authority to adopt such sweeping regulations, that they couldn't be met by current technology, and that they unfairly targeted California, which produces less than 1 percent of the world's greenhouse gases.
Heat-trapping greenhouse gases are believed by many scientists to contribute to global warming.
The proposals would require automakers to reduce emissions by using such technological innovations as better air conditioners, more efficient transmissions and smaller engines.
Among those supporting the regulations was Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's environmental protection secretary, Terry Tamminen, who said Friday he and Schwarzenegger believe California should do its part to reduce pollution. He strongly urged the board to adopt the proposals.
"We can make it clear that yes, we understand that our contribution, no matter how large or small, makes a difference," Tamminen said. "Every single action that we take -- or inaction -- makes a difference."
Gloria J. Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the industry trade group Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said the regulations would only reduce worldwide emissions of greenhouse gases by "one-tenth of 1 percent."
"We see that as no apparent health benefit at a great cost to California consumers," she said.
Bergquist said manufacturers are already working to produce cleaner vehicles, but that introducing the technology required under the regulations would be "almost as complicated as developing the first automobile."
Asked after the vote if her group planned to sue to block the regulations, she said that was an option but no decision had been made yet.
The board's staff said the cost increases would top out at about $1,000 per vehicle by 2016. Staff members studied the automakers' estimates Thursday night, and said in a report issued Friday that the automakers' $3,000 figure was an exaggeration.
Air Resources Board Chairman Alan C. Lloyd and other board members said they were disappointed that automakers did not accept invitations to work with them on the regulations.
"The response, the silence, was deafening," Lloyd said. "We should be able to work together. I hope that we still can work together on this tremendously important issue. The stakes could not be higher."
Board member Mark DeSaulnier, a Contra Costa County supervisor, said he had slept fitfully the night before the vote because he felt "disappointment, frustration, and sometimes anger at the auto industry."
He objected to industry arguments that Washington, D.C., and not California, should lead efforts to fight greenhouse emissions -- and argued that automakers should have taken the lead themselves.
"If I had my druthers, it would be settled in Detroit," he said.
The proposals stem from a law signed by former Gov. Gray Davis in 2002 that required the board to set emission standards for greenhouse gases. The bill's author, Assemblywoman Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, said Friday's vote marked the first time in the world regulations have been placed on vehicles for the specific purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
She said the fact the action had the support of Davis, a Democrat, and Schwarzenegger, the Republican who replaced him, "speaks to the unified effort among all Californians" to reduce greenhouse gases.
Board members said there is no dispute that greenhouse gases contribute to global warming that can harm California's economy in fields ranging from agriculture to tourism.
They said the emissions can also lead to serious respiratory problems, especially among children, by exacerbating the effects of smog. Los Angeles has the worst smog problem in the nation.
Board member Henry Gong, a physician, noted that many medical experts pushed for the regulations and none testified against them.
-
bECAUSE its the Great SATAN as they say in the Middle East.