West Coast Connection Forum

DUBCC - Tha Connection => West Coast Classics => Topic started by: forgotabout on February 25, 2002, 03:42:51 PM

Title: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: forgotabout on February 25, 2002, 03:42:51 PM
along time ago there was talk of dre working with the former beatle

has anything progressed in this situation
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: ZILLA THA GOODFELLA on February 25, 2002, 05:58:20 PM
PUH
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on February 25, 2002, 06:04:29 PM
Paul's wife died about 3 years ago... Paul asked Dre to contribute a song to a tribute album of beatles cover songs being released to raise money for Breast Cancer charity, which is what killed Linda.  Now, I don't know how dre could do it... he could Produce a cover song I guess, but I'm not sure.  Dre's a big beatles fan (Eminem and Snoop are too, imagine that), so it should be interesting.  That would basically be Pop production though, there's no beats involved, just guitars and drums, so I don't know how Dre would go about producing it.  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: 4 KiN L on February 26, 2002, 10:43:20 AM
u know i really hate the beatles...but one thing i like is how people with so simple lyrics...so simple music...crap voices (the truth really) can be as famous as they were....and really respect that fact!! i can't believe someone with dre's ability to suply dope beats can be a fan of shite like that!! but then i guess it really is his choice!
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on February 26, 2002, 11:56:16 AM
Quote
u know i really hate the beatles...but one thing i like is how people with so simple lyrics...so simple music...crap voices (the truth really) can be as famous as they were....and really respect that fact!! i can't believe someone with dre's ability to suply dope beats can be a fan of shite like that!! but then i guess it really is his choice!


I dislike The Beatles too.  I just think their image is too hunky dory and they are too plain as artists.  With their heads boppin side to side, holding those guitars the way they doo.  They seemed so manufactured, like robots as they played.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: infinite59 on February 27, 2002, 02:07:03 AM
Who are the Beatles?  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: KVB on February 27, 2002, 02:51:30 AM
^ An English pop group that was popular during the 70's & 80's.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: infinite59 on February 27, 2002, 02:58:19 AM
Quote
^ An English pop group that was popular during the 70's & 80's.


They must not of been too dope, I ain't ever listened to them.  Probably some hippie white boys making protest music, lol.....Anyway, so when's that Royce the 5'9" shit dropping?
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: KVB on February 27, 2002, 03:01:28 AM
Quote
They must not of been too dope, I ain't ever listened to them.  Probably some hippie white boys making protest music, lol.....Anyway, so when's that Royce the 5'9" shit dropping?


Probably March... if I remember right.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: infinite59 on February 27, 2002, 03:37:23 AM
Quote


Probably March... if I remember right.


Yo.... were the Beatles that group with that lead singer called Mick Jagger?
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: KVB on February 27, 2002, 04:04:56 AM
Quote


Yo.... were the Beatles that group with that lead singer called Mick Jagger?


Exactly.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on February 27, 2002, 05:58:54 AM
Simple lyrics, excuse my while I throw up.  LOL

The beatles, if ya don't know, started out like the Backstreet Boys, and grew into one of the most lyrically talented groups ever, I took a music appreciation class, and they're mentioned alongside Beethoven and Bach.  They were that great.  McCartney/Lennon is the greatest songwriting team of all time.  If you can look at them subjectively, you'll see they were the most talented group easily of the century.

They started out just writing love songs, in 1962.  They were good love songs, kinda like Usher, or somebody today.  For back then, it was good.  NOBODY was making real music, all music was doo-wop, or early rock from the states.  Little Richard, Elvis, etc. were king, and Motown was just starting with the supremes, and smokey robinson.  

Then, in 1965, John Lennon got the idea to write a song about his life.  He started writing real music, as opposed to music designed to make women cream.  He wrote "My Life", stll a love song, but all about his thoughts, his feelings.  He wrote "Norweigan wood" all about him cheating on his wife.  He wrote "Girl", about the same thing.  By 1967, every song the beatles were writing was superior to anything else on the radio, you can take one of their throwaway songs, and it'll be better than the best songs on other albums.

They're solely responsible for turning pop music into something more respected, unfortuantely since then we've gone backwards.  George Harrison invented the Wah Guitar, which made Hendrix famous.  John lennon was the first to talk rythmically in a song, paving the way for rap.  Paul McCartney came up with the idea of recording a drum beat, then looping it through the song , adding samples over it, which is hip hop 101.  Beatles were pretty much the first to cuss on record... they wre only around about 7 years, and put out 12 or so albums, along with 20 #1 songs, which still hasn't been topped by any group.  If you think their lyrics are simple they must be above your head, or you're not familiar with their later work.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Shallow on February 27, 2002, 07:26:49 AM
Well said Trauma.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on February 27, 2002, 07:35:03 AM
They were revolutionary, but I dont' think they were anything special besides starting these trends.  Sorry..
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: engelwood on February 27, 2002, 08:30:20 AM
Incognito, KVB, infinite59: Your comments are very ignorant...

Infinite59: Just because you haven’t listened to a group doesn’t make them any less impressive and revolutionary.

KVB: Have you ever listened to the Beatles? Or are you just speaking from ignorance? Their Debut record was in 1963.

Incognito: "They were revolutionary, but I don’t' think they were anything special besides starting these trends.  Sorry.. "

If you start a revolution, it is not just a "Trend" look closer at what trauma wrote... He dropped some knowledge on all of you.


I wish that before dismissing any other form of music, you all would at least give it a chance. The Beatles defined a generation. Kind of like what rap music is doing today, but they were one group.

-Engelwood
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on February 27, 2002, 09:29:19 AM
I'm sorry, I don't like any of their music.

The only Beatle related track I like is "Imagine."
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on February 27, 2002, 09:39:30 AM
John Lennon had 20 tracks as good or better than imagine, paul probably had 20, and the beatles probably had 50.  No lie.  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on February 27, 2002, 10:50:38 AM
Quote
John Lennon had 20 tracks as good or better than imagine, paul probably had 20, and the beatles probably had 50.  No lie.  


Well, that's your opinion.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: engelwood on February 27, 2002, 10:55:06 AM
Well Incognito, your opinion is wrong!  :D

-Engelwood
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on February 27, 2002, 10:58:53 AM
nothing new there... lol.

I dont care, sorry, I just don't.  Say what you want, I just don't care.  I'm evil, whatever.  I'm wrong, i'm cold, whatever.

Some people are flowers, some are still seeds.  Nothing wrong with being a seed.  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: M Dogg™ on February 27, 2002, 11:51:02 AM
LOL... Beetles were cool. My dad used to like them before getting into Santana and War, chicano music. He told me in '93 that it's alright if I like Snoop Doggy Dogg because in his day the Beetles used to piss off parents. LOL I guess he looked back and saw that his parents didn't like his music, so he didn't judge mine.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on February 28, 2002, 12:58:13 AM
Quote
nothing new there... lol.

 


See, just remember who started this one.  You become over-protective on these artists.  Calm down, and stop singling me out, what about Infinite & KVB?
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on February 28, 2002, 04:09:12 AM
Sorry man, I just don't like you anymore.  I'm sure the feeling's mutual.  Some of the stuff you say, and the way you act is just so ignorant compared to what you used to be, that I just gotta say something.  Like I said, I dont' care if you think I started it, I don't care if people think I'm an a$$hole about it, It's just 'my opinion' that you're a dick.  Sorry.  I hope you change for the better, because you had a lot of potential at one time, now you're resorted to bragging about pot.  LOL.  What a slip.  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on February 28, 2002, 07:49:39 AM
Quote
Sorry man, I just don't like you anymore.  I'm sure the feeling's mutual.  Some of the stuff you say, and the way you act is just so ignorant compared to what you used to be, that I just gotta say something.  Like I said, I dont' care if you think I started it, I don't care if people think I'm an a$$hole about it, It's just 'my opinion' that you're a dick.  Sorry.  I hope you change for the better, because you had a lot of potential at one time, now you're resorted to bragging about pot.  LOL.  What a slip.  


Then keep that shit to yourself and stop reigniting beef, I told you I was done but you can't shut up about it.  You don't know who I am, so you can't say that I'm slipping or that I need to change for the better.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: KVB on February 28, 2002, 07:56:26 AM
Quote
Incognito, KVB, infinite59: Your comments are very ignorant...

Infinite59: Just because you haven’t listened to a group doesn’t make them any less impressive and revolutionary.

KVB: Have you ever listened to the Beatles? Or are you just speaking from ignorance? Their Debut record was in 1963.

Incognito: "They were revolutionary, but I don’t' think they were anything special besides starting these trends.  Sorry.. "

If you start a revolution, it is not just a "Trend" look closer at what trauma wrote... He dropped some knowledge on all of you.


I wish that before dismissing any other form of music, you all would at least give it a chance. The Beatles defined a generation. Kind of like what rap music is doing today, but they were one group.

-Engelwood


I never noticed this post... lol...
Anyway... how can I be ignorant? Weren't The Beatles popluar during the 70's & 80's? That's what I thought, but I'm obviously wrong, as it was 60's & 70's. Sorry. That doesn't make me ignorant. And yes, I've listened to a lot of their music, and yes, they were revolutionary. I just got the timeline mixed up, alright? Don't diss me because of that.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on February 28, 2002, 09:12:53 AM
Heidy-Ho, you're the one who had that smart ass remark about "my opinion".  Don't get me started.  Your'e right, I don't know you, but every contact you have with me is negative.  So if you want to say some stuff back, that's fine, im' just making it public, that I can't stand you.  I used to, then you changed, so yes, I can say you've taken a turn for the worse in my mind.  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on March 04, 2002, 07:39:36 AM
Quote
Heidy-Ho, you're the one who had that smart ass remark about "my opinion".  Don't get me started.  Your'e right, I don't know you, but every contact you have with me is negative.  So if you want to say some stuff back, that's fine, im' just making it public, that I can't stand you.  I used to, then you changed, so yes, I can say you've taken a turn for the worse in my mind.  


Nah man, you changed, eversince I told you I was 16 you stopped talking to me even though I still had my same beliefs and opinions.
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on March 04, 2002, 07:49:13 AM
I don't have any problem with your age.  You're the one who quit the site, lol.  Man, you're making your own problems, just chill, relax, love life.  
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: lee on March 04, 2002, 07:55:19 AM
lol Mick Jagger was not in the Beatles ...
infinate how have u never heard of the Beatles ?
i don't like them or anything .. but loadsa people like them and they were famous in the USA .. they were even on the Simpsons .. lol
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Murrow on March 04, 2002, 10:00:52 AM
Quote
I don't have any problem with your age.  You're the one who quit the site, lol.  Man, you're making your own problems, just chill, relax, love life.  


Yup,  ::)
Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Trauma-san on March 04, 2002, 05:33:45 PM
lee, it's called "Sarcastic Humour".  

Incognito, it's called "Constructive Criticism".

Title: Re: Dre and Paul McCartney
Post by: Bishop on March 05, 2002, 08:10:08 AM
i like the beatles... "Yesterday" is my song.  i like the simplicity of it.  

i think in order to appreciate today's music you gotta have a love for the old shit too.

and you know what's funny... if you did a poll or sumpin you'd find that a lot rappers don't even primarily listen to other rap music.  that's sumpin i'm beginning to learn.  i think i'll always have a 2pac cd in my player first and foremost but other than that... as a rapper listenin to other rappers constantly can fuck your shit up.  in a way i'm like snoop with my listening... i put in some Isley Brothers or O'Jays and listen to that a lot or some Alicia Keys... but i'm kinda gettin tired of a lot of the rap that comes out... i mean i'll always stay on top of it and have all the newest shit the day it comes out cause rap is my first love but then i'll prolly just go back to some old shit and focus on my own shit...

but to get back on topic... the beatles are worth respectin and giving a listen to every once in  a while