West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on October 12, 2006, 12:00:42 PM
-
It doesn't mean you're cool if you make 30 threads in a row with 0 replies. You're flooding the front page, some of the shit you post can be crammed into one topic. I know you're trying, but Lakers still own this section. 8)...PeACe
-
I know mac 10! Stop posting sports news in a sports forum. :oi:
:sign_banhim: :rant: :baseballbat: :catfight: :grumpy: :idea: :stupid:
:eh:
-
It doesn't mean you're cool if you make 30 threads in a row with 0 replies. You're flooding the front page, some of the shit you post can be crammed into one topic. I know you're trying, but Lakers still own this section. 8)...PeACe
lol funny stuff.
Now_I_Know has got 10 topics on the front page and mac 10 has 9 topics and 1 sticky topic on the front page.
Looks like a little battle is brewing, lets keep it peaceful .
-
Ain't no battle, only children like him actually notice these types of things. :laugh:
p.s. I know it ain't cool. Cool is treasuring 23,000 posts on an online forum, right? :-\
-
I know mac 10! Stop posting sports news in a sports forum. :oi:
:sign_banhim: :rant: :baseballbat: :catfight: :grumpy: :idea: :stupid:
:eh:
LMAO!! Yeah, I know!! What was I thinking?? ???
-
(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/7889/3090175jq.png)
-
Don't bring that up again - you'll make him --> :'(
-
An average thread of mine actually gets posts...Look at how many threads with 0 posts in them he has, and then most of the rest have like 1 or 2 replies, 3-4 max in the rare ones...He should just open one big soccer thread instead of flooding the front page with shit that most people (provenly) don't care about...I keep a lot of the Laker shit in the Laker thread, despite the fact that I can open a new thread for every article, I choose not to clutter the front page...Just look at the difference...PeACe
-
According to your theory, these threads get 0 replies. So they will be outta here in a day/2 days.
Are you so impatient you can't wait that long?
-
According to your theory, these threads get 0 replies. So they will be outta here in a day/2 days.
Are you so impatient you can't wait that long?
No, I just think it would be more efficient to open a misc. soccer thread for shit the majority of people don't care about.
-
According to your theory, these threads get 0 replies. So they will be outta here in a day/2 days.
Are you so impatient you can't wait that long?
No, I just think it would be more efficient to open a misc. soccer thread for shit the majority of people don't care about.
It's a Sports section, not a Kobe section, not a Lakers section but a Sports section. Get used to it.
-
According to your theory, these threads get 0 replies. So they will be outta here in a day/2 days.
Are you so impatient you can't wait that long?
No, I just think it would be more efficient to open a misc. soccer thread for shit the majority of people don't care about.
It's a Sports section, not a Kobe section, not a Lakers section but a Sports section. Get used to it.
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument...As of now, you don't. I'm not saying not to make soccer threads, just not for every little insignificant thing, especially when you see it isn't even important enough to get a reply even from soccer fans. That's what we have "Official _______" threads stickyed at the top for ::)...PeACe
-
Well not including the sticky football goals request thread I have 9 other threads on page 1, 5 of which have at least 1 reply.
5/9 = 0.555 so on average more threads will get a reply than won't.
I'd have to double check but I'm sure that means an average thread of mine does in fact get a reply.
Strange, coz you've just said the opposite and you're hardly ever wrong right? ;)
-
Well not including the sticky football goals request thread I have 9 other threads on page 1, 5 of which have at least 1 reply.
5/9 = 0.555 so on average more threads will get a reply than won't.
I'd have to double check but I'm sure that means an average thread of mine does in fact get a reply.
Strange, coz you've just said the opposite and you're hardly ever wrong right? ;)
I never said the opposite, I said your threads usually get 0 or minimal replies, which is 100% true...Is it really so hard to open one thread to keep at the top for insignificant soccer updates?
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
i.e. an average thread of mine doesn't get a reply
Whereas I just proved the opposite.
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
i.e. an average thread of mine doesn't get a reply
Whereas I just proved the opposite.
That wasn't my main point though, my main point was that your threads usually get zero to little replies and take up space on the front page, when you can just as easily put it in one "soccer update" thread. Get it yet?
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
i.e. an average thread of mine doesn't get a reply
Whereas I just proved the opposite.
That wasn't my main point though, my main point was that your threads usually get zero to little replies and take up space on the front page, when you can just as easily put it in one "soccer update" thread. Get it yet?
Nice back-track attempt but you didn't quite pull it off.
I don't care what your "main point" was.
THE point is, you said something then I went and showed that the opposite of that was true.
-
Well I'm with u both.....now_i_know has point that all the threads could be in one big thread so u can always watch there for some news and shit...but I don't mind personaly if they aren't, I can just scroll down or go to the next page to see the news, no big deal....and those football news that mac brings to us are, to me, interesting and I read them all and I could reply to them but I don't see the point in replying if I don't have anything else to say than, for example, "thanks for posting" or "interesting" etc.
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
i.e. an average thread of mine doesn't get a reply
Whereas I just proved the opposite.
That wasn't my main point though, my main point was that your threads usually get zero to little replies and take up space on the front page, when you can just as easily put it in one "soccer update" thread. Get it yet?
Nice back-track attempt but you didn't quite pull it off.
I don't care what your "main point" was.
THE point is, you said something then I went and showed that the opposite of that was true.
Are you dumb? You're picking at something that really has very little to do with what were "debating". I don't care if on average your threads DO get replies. It was an exaggeration smart guy... the fact that I wasn't far off should tell you that a good portion of your topics aren't really topic-worthy...The end.
-
the fact that I wasn't far off should tell you that a good portion of your topics aren't really topic-worthy...The end.
Whether you were far off or not, you were still wrong.
-
the fact that I wasn't far off should tell you that a good portion of your topics aren't really topic-worthy...The end.
Whether you were far off or not, you were still wrong.
Dude, you lost...you're picking at something very small and ignoring the main point. :-*
-
Dude, you lost
Nahhh :nawty:
you're picking at something very small and ignoring the main point. :-*
I sure am ;)
-
Another case closed.
8)
-
Another case closed.
8)
Is that so?
Seems like it's ongoing from where I'm sitting. :banana_llama:
-
Another case closed.
8)
Is that so?
Seems like it's ongoing from where I'm sitting. :banana_llama:
Cuz you're sitting on a handicapped llama that never stops...
-
Well yeah that is true, my llama nigga never stops.
But also a few other things would suggest the case is in fact, not closed.
Here is his homie John the mouse for your ass. :monkey_dance2:
-
Well yeah that is true, my llama nigga never stops.
But also a few other things would suggest the case is in fact, not closed.
Here is his homie John the mouse for your ass. :monkey_dance2:
I always thought John was a monkey...Then again, I always thought humans were born with common sense. :-X
-
Well yeah that is true, my llama nigga never stops.
But also a few other things would suggest the case is in fact, not closed.
Here is his homie John the mouse for your ass. :monkey_dance2:
I always thought John was a monkey...Then again, I always thought humans were born with common sense. :-X
John is in denial, he prefers it when I call him a mouse.
-
Well yeah that is true, my llama nigga never stops.
But also a few other things would suggest the case is in fact, not closed.
Here is his homie John the mouse for your ass. :monkey_dance2:
I always thought John was a monkey...Then again, I always thought humans were born with common sense. :-X
John is in denial, he prefers it when I call him a mouse.
Just like I prefer calling your threads a waste of space. :D
-
Just like I prefer calling your threads a waste of space. :D
Yeah it's just like that.
Just like I was wrong by referring to John as a mouse. ;)
-
Just like I prefer calling your threads a waste of space. :D
Yeah it's just like that.
Just like I was wrong by referring to John as a mouse. ;)
Do you know who I am? I'm NEVER wrong.
-
I'm NEVER wrong.
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
Well not including the sticky football goals request thread I have 9 other threads on page 1, 5 of which have at least 1 reply.
5/9 = 0.555 so on average more threads will get a reply than won't.
I'd have to double check but I'm sure that means an average thread of mine does in fact get a reply.
:sleep:
-
I'm NEVER wrong.
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
Well not including the sticky football goals request thread I have 9 other threads on page 1, 5 of which have at least 1 reply.
5/9 = 0.555 so on average more threads will get a reply than won't.
I'd have to double check but I'm sure that means an average thread of mine does in fact get a reply.
:sleep:
It was an exaggeration smart guy...
Still not wrong. :D
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.
Sadly for you, it was the latter. :(
Had you said "Your threads never get any replies." THAT would be an exaggeration. There is a difference.
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.
Sadly for you, it was the latter. :(
Had you said "Your threads never get any replies." THAT would be an exaggeration. There is a difference.
How would you know if I was exaggerating or not, this is internet text. LOL@your dumb logic.
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.
Sadly for you, it was the latter. :(
Had you said "Your threads never get any replies." THAT would be an exaggeration. There is a difference.
How would you know if I was exaggerating or not, this is internet text. LOL@your dumb logic.
Of course there is no way I can prove in what kind of tone you said it and what you meant by it.
And whatever I say, of course you can argue the exact opposite.
But I know what you meant and you know what you meant, it's there to be seen.
If you wanna try and squirm out of it on a technicality because it's something that can't be proven either way, be my guest.
It won't change the fact that you were wrong.
-
At least if an average thread of yours got a reply, you'd have an argument
That is a statement, it could be either right or wrong.
Sadly for you, it was the latter. :(
Had you said "Your threads never get any replies." THAT would be an exaggeration. There is a difference.
How would you know if I was exaggerating or not, this is internet text. LOL@your dumb logic.
Of course there is no way I can prove in what kind of tone you said it and what you meant by it.
And whatever I say, of course you can argue the exact opposite.
But I know what you meant and you know what you meant, it's there to be seen.
If you wanna try and squirm out of it on a technicality because it's something that can't be proven either way, be my guest.
It won't change the fact that you were wrong.
I didn't really believe an average thread of yours got 0 replies, I didn't actually sit down to do the math, if you're too stupid to see that, then I'm sorry for you...You're the idiot who admittedly squirmed out of the argument by picking at something small and avoiding the main point. :-*
-
:monkey_dance2: its clearly a monkey lol
-
Just split the sport section in football - basketball. Problem solved.
-
Just split the sport section in football - basketball. Problem solved.
Now_I_Know would still come in and talk shit :D
-
:monkey_dance2: its clearly a monkey lol
I wouldn't say 'clearly'. :oi: :nawty: :baseballbat: :rant: :catfight:
He's got big ears for a monkey and no (visible) tail aswell. :P
Could be either. ???
-
:monkey_dance2: its clearly a monkey lol
I wouldn't say 'clearly'. :oi: :nawty: :baseballbat: :rant: :catfight:
He's got big ears for a monkey and no (visible) tail aswell. :P
Could be either. ???
: monkey : : monkey_dance2 :
Does that not prove it? :P
oh and monkeys generally have big ears
(http://www.stock-monkey.com/images/bald-monkey.gif)
-
ya NIK this thread made a lot of sense! the only reason ur threads get responses is becoz of the stupidity u tend to blurt out in them and becaoz u love picking fights on petty issues....if u've noticed a lot of the time people aren't contributing to ur thread, they're just asking u to make a little sense and grow up
peace
-
ya NIK this thread made a lot of sense! the only reason ur threads get responses is becoz of the stupidity u tend to blurt out in them and becaoz u love picking fights on petty issues....if u've noticed a lot of the time people aren't contributing to ur thread, they're just asking u to make a little sense and grow up
peace
Thanks for licking my cock, but this thread has made perfect sense. The point was to minimize flooding the front page, understand? My threads get replies because they're topic-worthy (mostly), and people usually have input to add when I open a topic. No need to get your panties wet over it...PeACe
-
Thanks for licking my cock, but this thread has made perfect sense. The point was to minimize flooding the front page, understand? My threads get replies because they're topic-worthy (mostly), and people usually have input to add when I open a topic. No need to get your panties wet over it...PeACe
Yeah like this bad boy posted 12 days ago. --> http://www.dubcnn.com/connect/index.php?topic=122287.0
During those 12 quick days, a grand total of 9 people actually entered to even look at the thread.
But I can see how my threads aren't topic-worthy and shit like this is.
-
nik, the point is if u wanted to address mac u could have done it in a pm (u have summ like 3759833754 posts, i'm sure u know how to use that feature)...the only reason u made a thread about it was because u need need the attention and ur looking for validation from other peple
peace
-
Thanks for licking my cock, but this thread has made perfect sense. The point was to minimize flooding the front page, understand? My threads get replies because they're topic-worthy (mostly), and people usually have input to add when I open a topic. No need to get your panties wet over it...PeACe
Yeah like this bad boy posted 12 days ago. --> http://www.dubcnn.com/connect/index.php?topic=122287.0
During those 12 quick days, a grand total of 9 people actually entered to even look at the thread.
But I can see how my threads aren't topic-worthy and shit like this is.
Okay, look at how many threads I have that actually get replies (and pages of replies at that) as opposed to you. How do you even dare compare? At least the shit I posted wasn't just some gay news update, it was an interview that the average NBA fan would be interested in reading...And why do you think I said my threads are MOSTLY topic-worthy? Because every once in a while I'll post something that I thought would be interesting but doesn't really gain much interest once I've posted it...Still not even close to comparable to what you do...PeACe
-
nik, the point is if u wanted to address mac u could have done it in a pm (u have summ like 3759833754 posts, i'm sure u know how to use that feature)...the only reason u made a thread about it was because u need need the attention and ur looking for validation from other peple
peace
I was addressing Mac 10 as well as this section, because this is the section that's being flooded with his news updates that should be merged into one thread. I had a pretty valid reason to open a thread, that way everyone can voice their concern (if they have one)...Too bad YOU'RE too busy sucking nutsacks to realize this...PeACe
-
why dont you make a sticky football thread where people can post random football newsm instead of ''flooding'' the main page.