West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: On The Edge of Insanity on November 27, 2006, 10:47:26 AM
-
Watching this crap on the news now. Basically a load of bible bashers want the idea of the world being created by a higher being to be taught in Science classes alongside Darwin's theory of evolution. They seem to fail to realise that its not a scientific theory, which is why its not taught in Science classes, you get taught that rubbish in Religious Education already so it makes no sense to have it in a Science class.
The science teacher they had on the news completly sonned the Intelligent Design idiot on there though, which was funny, saying he would talk about it in his lessons, but only to ridicule it, the guy didn't have any idea how to respond to that.
Anyone else share my distain for this?
-
Intelligent Design is comedy, religious people should just take the L when it comes to scientific talk and move on.
-
It's bible thumpers btw, a basher would be the dude doing the bashing on the count of his little dick. But I agree religion shouldn't be taught in science class, and neither should the theory be used to discredit religion in science class. I still cannot see how a theory, and it is a theory, is treated as fact. Clearly things have changed over time, but none of the changes fit in too well with survival of the fittest, humans are not the pinnacle of this so we can't be the most evolved for survival, animals are much more suited for the enviroment. We are smarter yes, but why would this magic allowing us to evolve only going to focus on the mind, while making everything else hairless and weaker since apes are much stronger and warm? I actually think it's further proof of a higher power, you can't have a system if it wasn't designed. And if you look at everything in our universe, it has a cycle.
I also wanna add that non-religious people have a way bigger problem with religious people than vice versa for real. Dudes get so pretentious about it.
-
kids should be allowed to bully other kids with strong religious beliefs
-
especially the math squad. but especially the fellow christian athletes group
-
lol quick on the reply there, i deleted that shit but cool
-
baaaallllllliiiin
-
It's bible thumpers btw, a basher would be the dude doing the bashing on the count of his little dick. But I agree religion shouldn't be taught in science class, and neither should the theory be used to discredit religion in science class. I still cannot see how a theory, and it is a theory, is treated as fact. Clearly things have changed over time, but none of the changes fit in too well with survival of the fittest, humans are not the pinnacle of this so we can't be the most evolved for survival, animals are much more suited for the enviroment. We are smarter yes, but why would this magic allowing us to evolve only going to focus on the mind, while making everything else hairless and weaker since apes are much stronger and warm? I actually think it's further proof of a higher power, you can't have a system if it wasn't designed. And if you look at everything in our universe, it has a cycle.
I also wanna add that non-religious people have a way bigger problem with religious people than vice versa for real. Dudes get so pretentious about it.
Humans have lost their hair because they had the brains to create fire, to skin animals and wear their coat, etc.
Humans can live on almost any place in the world. Not by themselves, of course, but due to their intelligence they were able to create certain things to make them able to do so.
You give humans not enough credit, they are the fittest, animals suck in comparison. We lost all that shit like hair and theeth and whatever because we own so much, we can simply make tools to compensate for those things, so we lost it, because we don't need it, our brain became the main part leading us to the top of the food chain, and therefore we became even smarter - and that's exactly what evolution is, the things that help us evolve, while the things we don't need vanish.
-
Then why aren't we the only animals on the planet if everything evolved through the first cell organisms? Why wouldn't we still see the obsolete models; unless they all died, or evolved at the same rate somehow? Are some races superior then, since theres different people on earth? Wouldn't all humans be the same uniform race? I have a hard time beleiving we can cultivate humans, yet theres still simple fish in the ocean, animals of the old times that were gigantic have all died off and we're left with lame-ass offspring? But evolution put everthing it had in only us?
Theres some unspoken mysticism involved here, the things we don't need vanish but we all change for the better? The theory is implying that somehow we're all linked, how do all our bodies know that it needs to mutate sperm and cells to make a new type of animal? Wouldn't each thing evolve differently according to it's own experiences, its own survival.
-
It's not survival of the strongest but survival of the fittest, just because some animals are gigantic it don't mean that they fit the environment better. Races are different because the environments on earth are different, and back in the day people didn't travel/mix a lot. When people breed with each other regardless of race, a uniform race will emerge eventually. And why the heck would we be the only animals lol? There's no logic in some of your odd questions.
-
We are a product of intellegent design sorry folks!
-
haha yeah there was no order to those ?'s at all, was just kinda random thoughts. As for why we would be the only animals I was saying if we were evolving and losing the traits we didn't need why isn't it universal for all the animals? Why are there still apes when there is man as well? But very few animals, if any, still have their evolutionary ancestors; Either we all evolve together or its a singular experience for each animal, in which case there would be no secular species, they would vary with each creature. Or maybe within each species, which then leads to the question of race? What color was the first man, why then would he evolve into all the races changing only his appearance? How did the human race manage to survive before fire, or huts? We survived against animals far better suited to survive in the element, which would be the most basic of survival skills evolved over billions of years.
I'm sure we evolved, just not why Darwin thought we did, its just as bad to accept what he says as fact and teach only that in school, as it is with some christians and the bible.
-
This is a never ending argument. My interpretation of intelligent design is is that we were genetically engineered by advanced humanoids. Which is totally feasible.
-
This is a never ending argument.
Now that's true, this is one of those things we don't know enough about to give a definitive answer.
-
exactly, its called the "theory" of evolution for a reason.
-
Great Commie, you're on some Science-Fiction shit, ever tried writing a Science-Fiction book? As far as I know it's quite damn proven that there were neanderthalish "humans" before us, so you think some advanced humanoids went here a shitload of years ago, "genetically engineered", then waited a shitload of years without doing anything here? Sounds weird enough, so I won't get into that.
Smoke Break, tell me why blacks are so obsessed with that original man shit lol. You subconsciously think "your" race was the beginning or some shit, therefore you despise evolution because it would imply that other races, stemming from "your" race, are more evolved or some shit? Well I don't know what the eaaaaaaaarly "humans" (depends on how early you wanna go, but I wouldnt even call them humans, humans is rather what they later evolved to) looked like, but I'm quite sure they were hella different compared to ANY race of today. There is no original race for that matter.
It's funny to me how everybody wants to be the original, the chosen few, whatever. Original man, accurate religion, whatever. It's crazy. It's like little children fighting over who has the cooler Daddy.
-
Smoke Break, tell me why blacks are so obsessed with that original man shit lol. You subconsciously think "your" race was the beginning or some shit, therefore you despise evolution because it would imply that other races, stemming from "your" race, are more evolved or some shit? Well I don't know what the eaaaaaaaarly "humans" (depends on how early you wanna go, but I wouldnt even call them humans, humans is rather what they later evolved to) looked like, but I'm quite sure they were hella different compared to ANY race of today. There is no original race for that matter.
It's funny to me how everybody wants to be the original, the chosen few, whatever. Original man, accurate religion, whatever. It's crazy. It's like little children fighting over who has the cooler Daddy.
We are not "obsessed" with it; it is what Allah taught us is the truth. Blackman = Original Man.
-
Lets be open minded now. There is no hard scientific fact tht human beings evolved through macroevolution. I am not on some science fiction shit. I am proposing an feasible alternative to popular beliefs. What if an advanced extraterrestrial humanoid through the manipulation of DNA and genetics created each and every species and the so called evolution is the gradual improvement in genetic engineering? We are already at the begining stages of creating life. Why couldn't it have happened before? There are many in the scientific community that think this could be fact as there are more and more flaws in the evolutionary theory. How is a subject that is so important get thrown out as science fiction when it is more likely tha a supernatural god fashioning life out of thin air.
-
Lets be open minded now. There is no hard scientific fact tht human beings evolved through macroevolution. I am not on some science fiction shit. I am proposing an feasible alternative to popular beliefs. What if an advanced extraterrestrial humanoid through the manipulation of DNA and genetics created each and every species and the so called evolution is the gradual improvement in genetic engineering? We are already at the begining stages of creating life. Why couldn't it have happened before? There are many in the scientific community that think this could be fact as there are more and more flaws in the evolutionary theory. How is a subject that is so important get thrown out as science fiction when it is more likely tha a supernatural god fashioning life out of thin air.
interesting. that theory may account for the gap in human evolution. But with animals there is no gap in their evolution. If these 'angels' had done this to us, then they are morally responsible for our destructive actions, like the the human destruction of the animal kingdom. They gave us fire. Either way, something created the universe and all that exists, somehow these 'aliens' couldnt have done all that too, so they too would have the concept of 'The Creator'.
-
We are not "obsessed" with it; it is what Allah taught us is the truth. Blackman = Original Man.
don't you think that is self-insulting? I mean, who wants a PS2 instead of a PS3?
-
don't you think that is self-insulting? I mean, who wants a PS2 instead of a PS3?
No, because Blackman is divine. We are a race of GODS, whites are a race of devils.
-
We are a product of intellegent design sorry folks!
WELL THAT SETTLES THAT! Look at the tremendous body of evidence he offers supporting his claim.
-
exactly, its called the "theory" of evolution for a reason.
there is also a reason that it is called "science."