West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: W3STCOAST on May 01, 2007, 05:00:08 PM

Title: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: W3STCOAST on May 01, 2007, 05:00:08 PM
WHO DO YOU THINK IS GONNA TAKE IT I GOT 50 BUCKS ON DE LA HOYA............
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: mrceo on May 01, 2007, 06:00:01 PM
De La Hoya is a joke now, he wouldn't win if his life depended on it, Mayweather is fuckin' quick and strong, way more than De La Hoya, De La Hoya should just stick to singing, I used to be a fan of Oscar but fuck him now
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: thisoneguy360 on May 01, 2007, 08:59:33 PM
I don't really care, I just want the fight to happen so I don't have to watch those annoying ass advertisements anymore
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 01, 2007, 09:13:35 PM
Mayweather is going to get his ass beat.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on May 01, 2007, 11:22:30 PM
De La Hoya is going down.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: STILLDRE IS THE GODFATHER on May 02, 2007, 05:44:01 AM
man 1 last show from de la hoya to shut up this arrogant twat
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 02, 2007, 09:40:59 AM
man, all Mayweather gotta do is punch that faggot on the kidney and Bernard Hopkins his bitch ass.

MayWaether by knockout, Round 9.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 02, 2007, 10:55:55 AM
Mayweezy
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Soulful on May 02, 2007, 11:10:39 AM
Floyd 70% - Oscar 30%

mayweather wont knock him out, will prolly win by decision

oscar's only chance to win is by knockout, which is obviously gonna be very hard, thats why i give him so low percentage even though hes one of the greatest of his time..

floyd by decision
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: GangstaBoogy on May 02, 2007, 11:25:07 AM
De La Hoya doesn't stand a chance.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 02, 2007, 11:27:44 AM
^ Doesn't stand a chance? C'mon now.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: $Eg2$ on May 02, 2007, 12:25:37 PM
 I think De La Hoya will knock him out by the 8th or 9th  Mayweather has never beat anybody as good as Oscar
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Bay Area Jat on May 02, 2007, 01:47:30 PM
De La Hoya doesn't stand a chance.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Vegasmac25 on May 02, 2007, 06:40:23 PM
If any of you motherfuckers watch boxing you would know that Oscar will be Mayweathers tuffest opponent ever.I hate the way Mayweather fights he fucking runs like a bitch around the ring and i know for a fact he will not fight Oscar because he will get him.I hate to say it but i see this fight being boring as fuck due to Mayweathers style (stick and run run run).I see Oscar winning by decision because he knows how to cut the ring and will make Mayweather eventually fight him.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 03, 2007, 08:47:14 AM
^ If the judges don't fuck him over.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 03, 2007, 09:05:29 AM
^ If the judges don't fuck him over.

na nigga.  Tito won that fight after Oscar started running away the last couple of rounds.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 03, 2007, 09:17:04 AM
As much of a asshole Floyd is, I think he will pull it out. I have met him a couple of times since he lives in Vegas and the guy acts like the world owes him something. But he has pissed alot of people off in the boxing world so if it is close at all, Oscar might get the decision.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Bay Area Jat on May 03, 2007, 10:25:25 AM
if it goes to a decision i think they will give it to oscar
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Kool Beenz on May 03, 2007, 12:12:00 PM
im hopeing mayweather becuase i love his style and he is the best boxer since ali and leonard... plus i like his style
but de la hoya has a good chance to beat him
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 03, 2007, 01:16:43 PM
im hopeing mayweather becuase i love his style and he is the best boxer since ali and leonard... plus i like his style
but de la hoya has a good chance to beat him


LOL
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 03, 2007, 03:02:18 PM
Who remember's the Jose Luis Castillo Fight?
I bet Mayweather don't want to.... 8)

I've seen ^^ his crackhead uncle Roger crumble to JC Chavez
and quit in the corner..
I don't think the apple falls far from the tree.
the only big name's on Mayweather's record off the top of my head would be

Gatti - De La Hoya Whooped him aswell, & at Gatti's best

Corrales - Mayweather's greatest performance to date...

Judah - Crack'y Roger got involved and ruined a fight Judah had in the bag up untill that point
+ Mayweather wanted to quit during the match.

Castillo - Hit mayweather like he has never been hit before, & till this day still don't know why the decison went his way..
notice they never show clip's of that fight during all this publicity.

bottomline is tho, styles make fight's...
and I anticipate a great fight by these guy's, but to be honest I'll give Mayweather the runner's chance
If Lil' Floyd decides to slug with Oscar....Goodnight, De La Hoya will win.
If Oscar goes backward's & back's up during the fight even a lil', Floyd will win round's even without throwing a punch.
(Ring Generalship)

154lbs is a whole different world.
De La Hoya should win, IMO

can't wait for Sat, Let's Go Oscar
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 03, 2007, 03:26:00 PM
^ Yeah, I remember the first Castillo/Mayweather fight. Castillo got robbed that muthafuckin' fight. That should have been Floyd's firs lost.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Shallow on May 03, 2007, 07:04:35 PM
^ If the judges don't fuck him over.

na nigga.  Tito won that fight after Oscar started running away the last couple of rounds.

Score cards are score cards. It didn't make any sense to lose the first 8 rounds, win the last 4 and end up winning. Something was fidhy about that fight. There was no way Tito won even 2 of the first 8. In any other sport based on points this can't happen. The judges had that fight set up from the start.

Of course crooked boxing matches are nothing new. Just ask Sonny Liston's family.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 03, 2007, 07:21:27 PM
^ If the judges don't fuck him over.

na nigga.  Tito won that fight after Oscar started running away the last couple of rounds.

Score cards are score cards. It didn't make any sense to lose the first 8 rounds, win the last 4 and end up winning. Something was fidhy about that fight. There was no way Tito won even 2 of the first 8. In any other sport based on points this can't happen. The judges had that fight set up from the start.

Of course crooked boxing matches are nothing new. Just ask Sonny Liston's family.

Exactly, they also fucked him over in the second Mosely fight.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Vegasmac25 on May 04, 2007, 05:04:40 PM
Yeah i remember Castillo-Mayweather 1 Castillo pretty much out boxed mayweather even hurting him a few times while Mayweather didnt do shit to him.I see the same thing in this fight but if De la hoya gets the hits Castillo got on Mayweather i think he could go down.Mayweather is a pussy i hate it  how people like this guy yet he is scared to go toe to toe with a fighter then why the fuck do you want to watch his fights if he doesnt want to fight.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Shallow on May 04, 2007, 05:24:50 PM
Yeah i remember Castillo-Mayweather 1 Castillo pretty much out boxed mayweather even hurting him a few times while Mayweather didnt do shit to him.I see the same thing in this fight but if De la hoya gets the hits Castillo got on Mayweather i think he could go down.Mayweather is a pussy i hate it  how people like this guy yet he is scared to go toe to toe with a fighter then why the fuck do you want to watch his fights if he doesnt want to fight.

I hope he takes Dana White's challenge to fight Sean Sherk in the UFC. How funny would it be to see Pretty Boy tap out inside of 2 minutes while the world is watching? (of course if he wins by chance it takes MMA down a huge peg in the mainstream eyes).
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: ThatSICCNESS on May 04, 2007, 10:27:52 PM
I think it will be a close one but De La Hoya will pull it out imo
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: LAKERS_FAN89 on May 05, 2007, 12:07:51 AM
de la hoya will win.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 05, 2007, 11:47:09 AM
I hope he takes Dana White's challenge to fight Sean Sherk in the UFC. How funny would it be to see Pretty Boy tap out inside of 2 minutes while the world is watching? (of course if he wins by chance it takes MMA down a huge peg in the mainstream eyes).

Imagine A-Rod vs. Kobe in a HomeRun hitting contest?
come on bro, different sport's...
I bet if they had boxing gloves with boxing rules Sean Sherk would last all of 30 second's againt Mayweather
Even if you were to train Sherk for boxing & only boxing for the rest of his carrer chances are
Floyd would knock his ass out everytime.

I like how the UFC alway's tries to call out Boxer's...lol
it's kinda funny & Pathetic at the same time.

I love the UFC don't get me wrong...
but in no way can any fighter in the UFC (IMO) beat a world class Boxer at their given weight in a
Boxing rules matchup.
same goes for the other way around, a MMA fighter will 9-10 beat a Boxer in a MMA style match.
(Boxer alway's have that puncher's chance)

besides that, Mayweather is BIG money
Can the UFC afford that?
if so...
let's get him in the octagon fuck it...lol

Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Furor Teutonicus on May 05, 2007, 11:59:34 AM
Hmmm I'm  still asking myself if this fight is worth to stand up at 4:45 am
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 05, 2007, 12:05:59 PM
Hmmm I'm  still asking myself if this fight is worth to stand up at 4:45 am

On paper I say yes bro..
But to tell you the truth, both fighter's have the styles to make this a
boring fight.
let's hope this 24/7 experiment by HBO work's out & both come out with fire for this one.
I'm expecting a KO, shit for $50+ someone better get knocked the fuck out.

Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Furor Teutonicus on May 05, 2007, 12:09:15 PM
^^^^
so are they are kind of defensive fighters?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 05, 2007, 12:15:56 PM
^^^^
so are they are kind of defensive fighters?

They are both on paper Boxer/Puncher's
which mean's they will only counter punch if punched at.
they are normaly not aggressive & Chase, but like I said this fight has so much riding on it
I'm expecting firework's.

it will not be a Hatton Vs. Castillo!! tho..
(I hope it will be, tho)
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Vegasmac25 on May 05, 2007, 03:49:59 PM
if its going to be a great fight it will be up to Mayweather wanting to actually fight.Mayweathers style is fucking trash bro when have you actually seen him fight toe for toe?All im saying if De la hoya can connect just one really good punch i think he can hurt mayweather and im pretty de la hoya has nothing to worry about from mayweather besides just chasing him through out the fight.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Shallow on May 05, 2007, 06:32:59 PM
I hope he takes Dana White's challenge to fight Sean Sherk in the UFC. How funny would it be to see Pretty Boy tap out inside of 2 minutes while the world is watching? (of course if he wins by chance it takes MMA down a huge peg in the mainstream eyes).

Imagine A-Rod vs. Kobe in a HomeRun hitting contest?
come on bro, different sport's...
I bet if they had boxing gloves with boxing rules Sean Sherk would last all of 30 second's againt Mayweather
Even if you were to train Sherk for boxing & only boxing for the rest of his carrer chances are
Floyd would knock his ass out everytime.

I like how the UFC alway's tries to call out Boxer's...lol
it's kinda funny & Pathetic at the same time.

I love the UFC don't get me wrong...
but in no way can any fighter in the UFC (IMO) beat a world class Boxer at their given weight in a
Boxing rules matchup.
same goes for the other way around, a MMA fighter will 9-10 beat a Boxer in a MMA style match.
(Boxer alway's have that puncher's chance)

besides that, Mayweather is BIG money
Can the UFC afford that?
if so...
let's get him in the octagon fuck it...lol



The problem is that Mayweather started all the fuss when he said any 10-0 fighter can beat any UFC guy in any style of fight. Dana White responded with the challenge. Fuck rules. Make it an anything goes street fight. Fedor will beat any boxer in the history of boxing in that context. No one is saying that MMA guys would dominate boxing under boxing rules but someone who can fight multiple styles is usually a better fighter than someone that only fights one style.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 06, 2007, 11:22:21 AM
LOL@the first judge scored the fight in Oscar's favor. :-X
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 06, 2007, 12:55:34 PM
Yeah the fight defo did not live up to the hype..
Oscar could have won the fight with just the "Jab" alone IMO.
to bad he decided to throw it only like 2 round's in total.
Mayweather fought what everyone expected....
Oscar did not, bottomline.
we all expected firework's from oscar & we got sparkler's..
we expected a marathon from Floyd and we got one, AKA his fight.

Floyd is very fast, but his style is very beatable, he need's to reset every time a jab is thrown at him..
his defense is good, but an overhand right can penetrate his croutching style.
(Then again easier said than done, but this is the formula)

To bad Pamona's green eyed Champion might never get a chance to fight Floyd.
I think Shane has the style to give Mayweather problem's, then again...
Why should the pretty Boy fight anyone else, he beat The Golden Boy.

Hatton Vs. Castillo, That's gonna be the fight to watch.
Boxing is not dead.

Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: ZILLA THA GOODFELLA on May 07, 2007, 12:05:26 AM
The fight went EXACTLY as I expected. Mayweather going for the big hit, Oscar gettin too excited.. $50 in my pocket.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: TuSlic on May 07, 2007, 01:49:28 AM
(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b177/sonofisis/homepage_dlh_mayweather_post2_760x4.jpg)
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: R-Tistic on May 07, 2007, 02:46:58 AM
(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b177/sonofisis/homepage_dlh_mayweather_post2_760x4.jpg)

LMMFAO....damn, I wonder if some Ese's got somethin on his head for all that shit
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Bch on May 07, 2007, 06:49:09 AM
I DONT THINK MAYWEATHER WAS DISRESPECTING.... HE WAS JUST IN THE CINCO DE MAYO SPIRIT

HIM AND OSCAR ARE VERY GOOD FRIENDS AND HE NEVER SAID ANYTHING BAD ABOUT THAT... AND IN LAS VEGAS NO RACIAL WARS WENT DOWN OR ANYTHING IT WAS ALL PEACE :)
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 07, 2007, 09:20:59 AM
de la hoya been overrated.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 07, 2007, 09:22:26 AM
de la hoya been overrated.

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 07, 2007, 09:43:19 AM
de la hoya been overrated.

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

who has he beat that was actually a legit boxer?  the only person i can think of is Pernell Whitaker, and he was past his prime.  Vargas, a lot of power with no defense at all, Hector Camacho, 50+ fights deep, beat Quarty on a split, and Mayorga is a wild puncher with no defense.

the only legit fights that Hoya has fought and beat is Gatti and Oba Carr.

it just seems like he came into the sport when everybody left or the was past thier primes heading into retierment.

when he faced legit fighters in thier prime:

Shane lost twice.
Trinidad lost by MAJORITY D.
Got beat up by 40 year old Hopkins
and got his shit handed by Mayweather.


 ;D

Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 07, 2007, 09:47:30 AM
Lost to Shane once, second fight get got fucked over by judges.
Beat Trinidad, got fucked over by judges.
Hopkins beat him.
And it's not like Mayweather beat the shit outta him.

Who has Mayweather beat?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 07, 2007, 10:02:55 AM
Lost to Shane once, second fight get got fucked over by judges.
Beat Trinidad, got fucked over by judges.
Hopkins beat him.
And it's not like Mayweather beat the shit outta him.

Who has Mayweather beat?

the only fighter that Mayweather has beat that was a legit fighter was Gatti.

he also fought Zab Judah, but i think people regard Judah as a much better fighter than he really is.

so you ask, why doesnt suckaa free say that mayweather is overrated? 
even though Maywaether hasn't really beat anybody of substance, he hasnt LOST either.  thats the difference.  you cant fault the nigga for just winning every fight, its not his fault there is nobody is his class that can beat him.

but by no means does that mean he is one of the 5 greatest fighters at his weight.  the media makes him seem like the untouchable dude because nobody else is really that good Right Now. but like i said, he IS  un defeated though.  its a double edged sword.
 but i still think Gatti can take him if he gets his shit together.

 :bandit:

Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 07, 2007, 10:06:30 AM
The thing about Mayweather is that he shouldn't be undefeated. He lost the first fight against Castillo and everyone who watched that fight knows it.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 07, 2007, 11:25:27 AM
I agree...I always thought De La Hoya was overrated. Sure, he's a good boxer, but he doesn't deserve to be the most recognized figure in boxing AS A BOXER. Not saying he isn't great, but I wouldn't consider him an all-time great, and that's the sort of attention he gets...PeACe
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 07, 2007, 10:37:23 PM
boozer fucken murderd us on the boards, and we were still right in it.  we should have stole Game 1.   :(

Hopefully Nellie will give Harrington more time in Game 2 as he played very well in this game.  it will also be harder for Boozer to get over him.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 07, 2007, 10:38:11 PM
boozer fucken murderd us on the boards, and we were still right in it.  we should have stole Game 1.   :(

Hopefully Nellie will give Harrington more time in Game 2 as he played very well in this game.  it will also be harder for Boozer to get over him.

Wrong thread, loco.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 08, 2007, 08:22:53 AM
Most of you youngin's would not know the impact of De la Hoya's earlier victories..
so before you say Oscar fought nobody do your homework first.

His list of victories over Champion's & Former champion's is a who's who of the best the 90's had to offer.
Including victories over: (I will not list their accomplishment's in the ringm That's the homework part)

JC Chavez
Rafael Ruelas
Jorge Paez
Hector Camacho
Pernel Whitaker
Ricardo Mayorga
Fernando Vargas
Arturo Gatti
Oba Carr
Ike Quartey
Miguel Angel Gonzalez
Jesse James Leija
Jeff Mayweather (The Least talked about Mayweather, Lil' Floyd's Tio)
in his 5th fight as a pro

Just a list of some of the fighter's Oscar has defeated during his time.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 08, 2007, 10:59:12 AM
^ School them.  8)
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 08, 2007, 11:12:02 AM
Not saying he didn't have great victories...Doesn't mean he's not overrated though.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Just Another Sunny day in California on May 08, 2007, 11:19:04 AM
De La Hoya, to me, is the 2nd greatest Mexican fighter only behind

Julio Cesar Chavez

108-6-2 87KOs
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Javier on May 08, 2007, 12:42:10 PM
Overrated?  How so, and who is justly rated?  Oscar is still in the top 15 of the best pound for pound boxers today, as a 34 year old.  If he was 27-29, then he would be seen in the top 5.  He's rated fine, he's also very popular but those are just two different things. 
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 08, 2007, 12:56:20 PM
Most of you youngin's would not know the impact of De la Hoya's earlier victories..
so before you say Oscar fought nobody do your homework first.

His list of victories over Champion's & Former champion's is a who's who of the best the 90's had to offer.
Including victories over: (I will not list their accomplishment's in the ringm That's the homework part)

JC Chavez
Rafael Ruelas
Jorge Paez
Hector Camacho
Pernel Whitaker
Ricardo Mayorga
Fernando Vargas
Arturo Gatti
Oba Carr
Ike Quartey
Miguel Angel Gonzalez
Jesse James Leija
Jeff Mayweather (The Least talked about Mayweather, Lil' Floyd's Tio)
in his 5th fight as a pro

Just a list of some of the fighter's Oscar has defeated during his time.

True, and alot of those fighters were also past there prime as well. Oscar like his nickname says was the Golden Boy coming out of the Olympics and his camp brought him along slowly. He was able to get these fights in the prime of his career and towards the end of some of his opponents. Quartey, Ruelas, Carr and Gonzalez were still in their prime but definitely not Chavez, Vargas, Whitaker Leija, Gatti, Paez or Mayweather really.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Sanford - V. President of the Dangerous Crew Movement on May 08, 2007, 02:36:31 PM
boozer fucken murderd us on the boards, and we were still right in it.  we should have stole Game 1.   :(

Hopefully Nellie will give Harrington more time in Game 2 as he played very well in this game.  it will also be harder for Boozer to get over him.

Wrong thread, loco.

 :P
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 08, 2007, 02:39:57 PM
LMAO @ People saying Oscar is overrated. LMAO @ He never fought any legit fighters.

His losses to Mosely were rather legit, while most people will dispute the 2nd fight, I won't. But, his loss to Trinidad was bull. Anyone who knows boxing knows De La Hoya won. Anyone moving up to fight Hopkins like De La Hoya did would've lost.

De La Hoya consistently moved up weight classes to fight the best and brightest. Moving up to Middleweight and only having one fight (Sturm) preceding the Hopkins fight was a mistake. But it showed De La Hoya's heart.

Lastly, this loss to Mayweather wasn't all that bad. He was outclassed, but then again, Mayweather got him at the end of his career. Just like you discredit De La Hoya's wins over Chavez since he was "out of his prime," anyone can do the same to Mayweather for this win.

I don't think anyone can make a real legit arguement as to how and why Oscar is overrated aside from just stating it.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 08, 2007, 02:54:00 PM
LMAO @ People saying Oscar is overrated. LMAO @ He never fought any legit fighters.

His losses to Mosely were rather legit, while most people will dispute the 2nd fight, I won't. But, his loss to Trinidad was bull. Anyone who knows boxing knows De La Hoya won. Anyone moving up to fight Hopkins like De La Hoya did would've lost.

De La Hoya consistently moved up weight classes to fight the best and brightest. Moving up to Middleweight and only having one fight (Sturm) preceding the Hopkins fight was a mistake. But it showed De La Hoya's heart.

Lastly, this loss to Mayweather wasn't all that bad. He was outclassed, but then again, Mayweather got him at the end of his career. Just like you discredit De La Hoya's wins over Chavez since he was "out of his prime," anyone can do the same to Mayweather for this win.

I don't think anyone can make a real legit arguement as to how and why Oscar is overrated aside from just stating it.

From Quartey on, Oscar has fought the best of the best. No doubt about it.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 08, 2007, 03:45:15 PM
LMAO @ People saying Oscar is overrated. LMAO @ He never fought any legit fighters.

His losses to Mosely were rather legit, while most people will dispute the 2nd fight, I won't. But, his loss to Trinidad was bull. Anyone who knows boxing knows De La Hoya won. Anyone moving up to fight Hopkins like De La Hoya did would've lost.

De La Hoya consistently moved up weight classes to fight the best and brightest. Moving up to Middleweight and only having one fight (Sturm) preceding the Hopkins fight was a mistake. But it showed De La Hoya's heart.

Lastly, this loss to Mayweather wasn't all that bad. He was outclassed, but then again, Mayweather got him at the end of his career. Just like you discredit De La Hoya's wins over Chavez since he was "out of his prime," anyone can do the same to Mayweather for this win.

I don't think anyone can make a real legit arguement as to how and why Oscar is overrated aside from just stating it.

Exactly, and I'm not the biggest Oscar fan, but to say he's overrated is ridiculous.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 08, 2007, 05:43:06 PM
LMAO @ People saying Oscar is overrated. LMAO @ He never fought any legit fighters.

His losses to Mosely were rather legit, while most people will dispute the 2nd fight, I won't. But, his loss to Trinidad was bull. Anyone who knows boxing knows De La Hoya won. Anyone moving up to fight Hopkins like De La Hoya did would've lost.

De La Hoya consistently moved up weight classes to fight the best and brightest. Moving up to Middleweight and only having one fight (Sturm) preceding the Hopkins fight was a mistake. But it showed De La Hoya's heart.

Lastly, this loss to Mayweather wasn't all that bad. He was outclassed, but then again, Mayweather got him at the end of his career. Just like you discredit De La Hoya's wins over Chavez since he was "out of his prime," anyone can do the same to Mayweather for this win.

I don't think anyone can make a real legit arguement as to how and why Oscar is overrated aside from just stating it.


So he's good enough to be the most recognized figure in boxing? LOL@that.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SmokinDro520 on May 08, 2007, 06:14:33 PM
De La Hoya, to me, is the 2nd greatest Mexican fighter only behind

Julio Cesar Chavez

108-6-2 87KOs
This is what i told my homie when he was sayin Oscar De La Hoya was the best mexican fighter ever.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 08, 2007, 06:58:03 PM
De La Hoya, to me, is the 2nd greatest Mexican fighter only behind

Julio Cesar Chavez

108-6-2 87KOs
This is what i told my homie when he was sayin Oscar De La Hoya was the best mexican fighter ever.

Yeah, Best Mexican fighter has to be Chavez, no doubt. His son is shaping up to be a pretty good fighter himself.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 08, 2007, 08:26:28 PM

So he's good enough to be the most recognized figure in boxing? LOL@that.

You say LOL @ That... But you have nothing concrete to back that up. What makes him "not good enough"?? Did he not move up from Super Featherweight 30 pounds to Middleweight and hold titles in each Class? Did he not accept damn near any and every challenge threw at him? Did he not beat Paez, Johnny Molina, Ruelas, Leija, Chavez (twice!), Miguel Angel Gonzalez, Whittaker, Camacho, Quartey and Carr before his first "loss"? Even after his loss, he still beat notables like Gatti, Castillejo and Campas.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 08, 2007, 09:49:46 PM

So he's good enough to be the most recognized figure in boxing? LOL@that.

You say LOL @ That... But you have nothing concrete to back that up. What makes him "not good enough"?? Did he not move up from Super Featherweight 30 pounds to Middleweight and hold titles in each Class? Did he not accept damn near any and every challenge threw at him? Did he not beat Paez, Johnny Molina, Ruelas, Leija, Chavez (twice!), Miguel Angel Gonzalez, Whittaker, Camacho, Quartey and Carr before his first "loss"? Even after his loss, he still beat notables like Gatti, Castillejo and Campas.

I always wanted to see him fight Ike Quartey again. I thought even with the knockdown in the 12th, De La Hoya did not win that fight.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 08, 2007, 11:32:56 PM

So he's good enough to be the most recognized figure in boxing? LOL@that.

You say LOL @ That... But you have nothing concrete to back that up. What makes him "not good enough"?? Did he not move up from Super Featherweight 30 pounds to Middleweight and hold titles in each Class? Did he not accept damn near any and every challenge threw at him? Did he not beat Paez, Johnny Molina, Ruelas, Leija, Chavez (twice!), Miguel Angel Gonzalez, Whittaker, Camacho, Quartey and Carr before his first "loss"? Even after his loss, he still beat notables like Gatti, Castillejo and Campas.



I just don't think he's an all-time great, and that's the sort of recognigion he gets. You're saying there aren't better boxers out there who don't have nearly as much hype behind their name? Come on, now.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 08, 2007, 11:57:51 PM
That's not much logic. De la Hoya has more than just hype. He's proven time and again how great he is. He's challeneged himself in nearly every fight. He doesn't discredit fighters so he doesn't have to go against them like other "champions" have. He has always looked for the best fighters to beef up his W column. He's one of the greats. And until someone can come with a competent enough arguement, I cannot believe otherwise.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 09, 2007, 12:27:03 AM
That's not much logic. De la Hoya has more than just hype. He's proven time and again how great he is. He's challeneged himself in nearly every fight. He doesn't discredit fighters so he doesn't have to go against them like other "champions" have. He has always looked for the best fighters to beef up his W column. He's one of the greats. And until someone can come with a competent enough arguement, I cannot believe otherwise.


How many times have you heard people saying he's "the best", or he's "the greatest Mexican boxer of all time", when that's obviously not true? That's the definition of overrated.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 09, 2007, 07:59:57 AM
It's not overrating because any Boxing Fan can easily make the arguement that he is indeed the Best Mexican Boxer or just best Overall.  Again, you're just making statements which leads me to believe that you really don't know what you're talking about, you're just going by what you read in threads such as these. How is it "obviously not true" NIK? Since you said it, elaborate. Where are the facts to back this up? Can one not argue that De La Hoya has proven his greatness? Can he not be mentioned among the elite? If not, then what do you say about his record? Are you saying the people he beat were nobodies? That he never beat a fighter who was consider great?

Oscar is the definition of a great fighter. If Boxing had more fighters like Oscar and less like Mayweather (backing out of boxing when they're on "top" instead of taking on the best), Boxing wouldn't be in it's current state. Nobody in the past 15 years of Boxing has defeated all the people De La Hoya has. And it's obviously true...
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 08:11:47 AM
It's not overrating because any Boxing Fan can easily make the arguement that he is indeed the Best Mexican Boxer or just best Overall.  Again, you're just making statements which leads me to believe that you really don't know what you're talking about, you're just going by what you read in threads such as these. How is it "obviously not true" NIK? Since you said it, elaborate. Where are the facts to back this up? Can one not argue that De La Hoya has proven his greatness? Can he not be mentioned among the elite? If not, then what do you say about his record? Are you saying the people he beat were nobodies? That he never beat a fighter who was consider great?

Oscar is the definition of a great fighter. If Boxing had more fighters like Oscar and less like Mayweather (backing out of boxing when they're on "top" instead of taking on the best), Boxing wouldn't be in it's current state. Nobody in the past 15 years of Boxing has defeated all the people De La Hoya has. And it's obviously true...

Who is left for Mayweather to fight?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 09, 2007, 10:45:48 AM
It's not overrating because any Boxing Fan can easily make the arguement that he is indeed the Best Mexican Boxer or just best Overall.  Again, you're just making statements which leads me to believe that you really don't know what you're talking about, you're just going by what you read in threads such as these. How is it "obviously not true" NIK? Since you said it, elaborate. Where are the facts to back this up? Can one not argue that De La Hoya has proven his greatness? Can he not be mentioned among the elite? If not, then what do you say about his record? Are you saying the people he beat were nobodies? That he never beat a fighter who was consider great?

Oscar is the definition of a great fighter. If Boxing had more fighters like Oscar and less like Mayweather (backing out of boxing when they're on "top" instead of taking on the best), Boxing wouldn't be in it's current state. Nobody in the past 15 years of Boxing has defeated all the people De La Hoya has. And it's obviously true...



It's just my opinion, man. I've seen De La Hoya fight many times, and though I admit he's very good, I never saw anything spectacular from him, or anything to warrant his GOATesque status. He's a businessman, which also probably has a lot to do with how much fame and hype there is behind his name...When a better fighter, like Mayweather, is not even HALF as known as De La Hoya, what does that tell you?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 10:51:55 AM
It's not overrating because any Boxing Fan can easily make the arguement that he is indeed the Best Mexican Boxer or just best Overall.  Again, you're just making statements which leads me to believe that you really don't know what you're talking about, you're just going by what you read in threads such as these. How is it "obviously not true" NIK? Since you said it, elaborate. Where are the facts to back this up? Can one not argue that De La Hoya has proven his greatness? Can he not be mentioned among the elite? If not, then what do you say about his record? Are you saying the people he beat were nobodies? That he never beat a fighter who was consider great?

Oscar is the definition of a great fighter. If Boxing had more fighters like Oscar and less like Mayweather (backing out of boxing when they're on "top" instead of taking on the best), Boxing wouldn't be in it's current state. Nobody in the past 15 years of Boxing has defeated all the people De La Hoya has. And it's obviously true...



It's just my opinion, man. I've seen De La Hoya fight many times, and though I admit he's very good, I never saw anything spectacular from him, or anything to warrant his GOATesque status. He's a businessman, which also probably has a lot to do with how much fame and hype there is behind his name...When a better fighter, like Mayweather, is not even HALF as known as De La Hoya, what does that tell you?

Mayweather not being a bigger superstar is actually his fault more than anything. His mouth has got him in alot of trouble.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 09, 2007, 10:57:23 AM
^^But you know that there are boxers out there on his level who the majority of people haven't even heard of.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 11:01:37 AM
^^But you know that there are boxers out there on his level who the majority of people haven't even heard of.

Yeah but in Floyd's case he has a laundry list of reason why he is not a bigger name. Saying he would not sign a slave wages contract with HBO because earlier in his career he thought he should be making Oscar money. Beating on his girlfriend and catching cases for that. Doing business with J Prince and not paying him properly. I can go on and on. Most boxers if you are not with a promoter named Don King, Goosen or Bob Arum, you will be overlooked that is why I am glad Oscar is doing promotion and pulling in Mosley and Hopkins to bring a different perspective on how to do business in boxing.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 09, 2007, 01:53:41 PM

Who is left for Mayweather to fight?

Why not fight Spinx? Why not move up and fight Taylor or Wright? There's people still out there.



It's just my opinion, man. I've seen De La Hoya fight many times, and though I admit he's very good, I never saw anything spectacular from him, or anything to warrant his GOATesque status. He's a businessman, which also probably has a lot to do with how much fame and hype there is behind his name...When a better fighter, like Mayweather, is not even HALF as known as De La Hoya, what does that tell you?

I understand it's your opinion, but could you back it up with facts? No. His beating the long list of great fighters isn't spectacular? I don't see how it's not. 30 KOs in 38 wins isn't spectacular? That's damn good considering the caliber of fighters he's fought.

To say Mayweather is a better fighter is debateable. Mayweather beat Oscar pretty much at the end of a long 15 year career. Had Mayweather fought Oscar in his prime it would've been a much different story. Mayweather did not dominate in anyway. So being the "better fighter" he barely pulled off the win. He's not half as known as De La Hoya because he doesn't really fight big names like Oscar did. What does that tell you?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 01:59:28 PM

Who is left for Mayweather to fight?

Why not fight Spinx? Why not move up and fight Taylor or Wright? There's people still out there.

No one wants to see that fight. He turned down that fight to fight Oscar. Him moving up to middleweight may be a little bit too much weight for him. He is not carrying the punching power he had in the lower weight classes and he would have a hard time keeping Taylor or Wright off of him. Oscar did not look good at all at Middleweight. The only one that almost pulled that off was Trinidad.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 02:03:11 PM

Who is left for Mayweather to fight?

Why not fight Spinx? Why not move up and fight Taylor or Wright? There's people still out there.



It's just my opinion, man. I've seen De La Hoya fight many times, and though I admit he's very good, I never saw anything spectacular from him, or anything to warrant his GOATesque status. He's a businessman, which also probably has a lot to do with how much fame and hype there is behind his name...When a better fighter, like Mayweather, is not even HALF as known as De La Hoya, what does that tell you?

I understand it's your opinion, but could you back it up with facts? No. His beating the long list of great fighters isn't spectacular? I don't see how it's not. 30 KOs in 38 wins isn't spectacular? That's damn good considering the caliber of fighters he's fought.

To say Mayweather is a better fighter is debateable. Mayweather beat Oscar pretty much at the end of a long 15 year career. Had Mayweather fought Oscar in his prime it would've been a much different story. Mayweather did not dominate in anyway. So being the "better fighter" he barely pulled off the win. He's not half as known as De La Hoya because he doesn't really fight big names like Oscar did. What does that tell you?


Oscar fought ALOT of guys on your list towards the end of their careers also. Floyd IMO never cleaned out his divisions when he would move up half the time. But he was chasing the money trail.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 09, 2007, 02:11:17 PM
Chavez, Camacho and Whittaker were towards the end of their ropes.. But most others were still in a good place in their career when Oscar beat them.

As for Mayweather, he still can fight Spinx... I don't see why he wouldn't. And why not move up to Middleweight? He's in good enough shape to do it. Why not move up and fight some lesser fighters for practice and then aim for the big names? Its not too far fetched... Of course if he's looking to challenge himself.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 02:21:53 PM
Chavez, Camacho and Whittaker were towards the end of their ropes.. But most others were still in a good place in their career when Oscar beat them.

As for Mayweather, he still can fight Spinx... I don't see why he wouldn't. And why not move up to Middleweight? He's in good enough shape to do it. Why not move up and fight some lesser fighters for practice and then aim for the big names? Its not too far fetched... Of course if he's looking to challenge himself.

And Paez, Campos, Leija, Gatti, Camacho were fading also. I think early in his career he got these fights with older, fading fighters. And if Whittaker would not have clowned so much in that fight he would have beat Oscar. Floyd could fight Spinks and he would easily beat Spinks but at this point he just hit the jackpot. Who else can he fight today and make 10-15 million? Only Oscar. So yeah from a challenge standpoint the logical choice is to move up to middleweight but like I said I just don't think he can stick and move enough to keep those guys off of him. If I were Floyd I would wait it out a little bit and see what is out there. This fight was the biggest pay per view of all time so if Oscar wants a rematch, give it to him. If not retire or find another challenge. If he had the mentality of a Mosley or Trinidad he would move up and fight those guys, but Floyd is more focused on keeping that undefeated streak intact.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 02:25:12 PM
I don't blame Oscar for fighting those guys early in his career, but most were a shell of their former self when he fought them. Chavez the same thing. I heard he would fight the same opponents 3 or 4 times that he already beat or get some bum at a bar to fight so I question his earlier fights, but later in his career he fought top level opponents and beat alot of them. So has Oscar from Quartey to the present.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 09, 2007, 02:26:48 PM

Who is left for Mayweather to fight?

Why not fight Spinx? Why not move up and fight Taylor or Wright? There's people still out there.



It's just my opinion, man. I've seen De La Hoya fight many times, and though I admit he's very good, I never saw anything spectacular from him, or anything to warrant his GOATesque status. He's a businessman, which also probably has a lot to do with how much fame and hype there is behind his name...When a better fighter, like Mayweather, is not even HALF as known as De La Hoya, what does that tell you?

I understand it's your opinion, but could you back it up with facts? No. His beating the long list of great fighters isn't spectacular? I don't see how it's not. 30 KOs in 38 wins isn't spectacular? That's damn good considering the caliber of fighters he's fought.

To say Mayweather is a better fighter is debateable. Mayweather beat Oscar pretty much at the end of a long 15 year career. Had Mayweather fought Oscar in his prime it would've been a much different story. Mayweather did not dominate in anyway. So being the "better fighter" he barely pulled off the win. He's not half as known as De La Hoya because he doesn't really fight big names like Oscar did. What does that tell you?



It tells me that despite the fact that there are UNDISPUTEDLY numerous boxers out there who have been better or on the level of De La Hoya, 0% of them get as much recognition as him. No matter how great you say Oscar is, that is the definition of overrated.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 02:31:59 PM
I think Oscar has had a great career but GOAT status? I don't know about that. Sugar Ray Leonard, Hearns, Hagler, Duran, even what Trinidad accomplished, the list goes on and on. There are ALOT of hall of fame fighters but I really don't know if you put Oscar in the same breath as most of them.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: SGV on May 09, 2007, 04:19:34 PM
I just blanket statements. There's no facts showing that Oscars career wasn't as great as dudes like leonards or durans. No matter how many times someone says he's overrated they never have any proof beyond "there's people who are better."
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 09, 2007, 05:04:54 PM
I just blanket statements. There's no facts showing that Oscars career wasn't as great as dudes like leonards or durans. No matter how many times someone says he's overrated they never have any proof beyond "there's people who are better."

I think fans and reporters overrate him. I don't think skills wise he is. I think like you said he is older and alot of these fighters like a Mosley or Mayweather can outpoint him. As to when he was younger you could not get away with that. But what he has accomplished in his career is definitely Hall Of Fame worthy.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Hatesrats™ on May 10, 2007, 12:46:56 AM
De La Hoya is the number *1 Boxing draw still..
MAYWEATEHR CAN NOT FILL A 2000 PEOPLE SEAT AUDITORUIM.
REAL..

BUT YO, bOXING IS DEAD, YEAH CAUSE THE BEST DON'T WANNA FIGHT.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 10, 2007, 06:10:52 AM
De La Hoya is the number *1 Boxing draw still..
MAYWEATEHR CAN NOT FILL A 2000 PEOPLE SEAT AUDITORUIM.
REAL..

BUT YO, bOXING IS DEAD, YEAH CAUSE THE BEST DON'T WANNA FIGHT.


Real Talk.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: 7even on May 10, 2007, 06:20:45 AM
Better entertainer does not equal better boxer.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 10, 2007, 06:34:51 AM
Yeah, but Oscar is still the main draw. Like Leonard or Tyson or others in their time. I think people hold on to the thought of him winning a title again but other than a few boxers out there, I just don't see him beating the some of the best right now. I think he could beat Cory Spinks but outside of him definitely not Jermain Taylor or Winky.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 10, 2007, 10:57:26 AM
De La Hoya is the number *1 Boxing draw still..
MAYWEATEHR CAN NOT FILL A 2000 PEOPLE SEAT AUDITORUIM.
REAL..





Which is why I say De La Hoya is overrated...LOL.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 10, 2007, 11:08:31 AM
De La Hoya is the number *1 Boxing draw still..
MAYWEATEHR CAN NOT FILL A 2000 PEOPLE SEAT AUDITORUIM.
REAL..





Which is why I say De La Hoya is overrated...LOL.

How does that prove anything?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 10, 2007, 11:35:44 AM
^^If they're on the same level...And De La Hoya can sell out an auditorium while Mayweather can't...HOW IS THAT NOT THE DEFINITION OF OVERRATED?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 10, 2007, 11:41:57 AM
^^If they're on the same level...And De La Hoya can sell out an auditorium while Mayweather can't...HOW IS THAT NOT THE DEFINITION OF OVERRATED?

Maybe Meyweather doesn't sell out, cus of who he fights, and his fighting style. He fights a bunch of nobodies, and proceeds to run the whole fight. And maybe that's a sign that they're not on the same level.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 10, 2007, 12:24:44 PM
^^If they're on the same level...And De La Hoya can sell out an auditorium while Mayweather can't...HOW IS THAT NOT THE DEFINITION OF OVERRATED?

Maybe Meyweather doesn't sell out, cus of who he fights, and his fighting style. He fights a bunch of nobodies, and proceeds to run the whole fight. And maybe that's a sign that they're not on the same level.


Yea, but it's not only Mayweather...Nobody can draw a crowd like Oscar nowadays. And that's not fair cuz he's not the best=overrated.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Javier on May 10, 2007, 12:28:24 PM
Rating somebody should be based on pure skill, not popularity.  Oscar is easily in the top 20 pound for pound boxers active right now, he's justly rated.  Some people are just more likes than others, because of looks, charisma or whatever. 
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 10, 2007, 02:24:21 PM
^^He sells out because lots of people believe he's the current best.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 10, 2007, 04:46:58 PM
^^He sells out because lots of people believe he's the current best.

Maybe lots of people think that because it's true. Now I'm not saying that he's the best now or the best ever, but he is certainly up there, top 5 of his generation for sure. And ranks up there with the all time greatest. And this is all coming from someone who isn't that big of an Oscar fan. In fact most of the fights in which he "lost" I bet against him. I just call it how I see it. Not thinking he's the best is something but to say he's overrated is ludicrous.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on May 10, 2007, 05:52:47 PM
^^The only thing that's ludicrous is claiming that's it's ludicrous...Now, I'd understand thinking it's ludicrous to say he's overrated if he was barely promoted, not on top of everything, not the most sought after name in boxing, etc.. I can understand that being ludicrous...But not with how big his name is currently compared to other boxers in his league...PeACe
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: rik on May 10, 2007, 06:34:02 PM
Care to name those so called boxers in his league?
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: Javier on May 10, 2007, 07:06:31 PM
Reasons why Oscar De La Hoya is popular


-He's a chicano, and latinos in general just absolutely love their fighters
-He's good looking.  His female fan base is huge
-He can give a good interview in both English and Spanish


If he didn't have any of that, he would still be a top pound for pound boxer today.  Now if he was like ranked 30 to 50th, and didn't have many belts on him then maybe he can be seen as overrated. 
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 10, 2007, 07:56:39 PM
That welterweight class back then was stacked. Trinidad, De La Hoya, Mosley, Forrest, Quartey and a few more. Most of those guys retired or are on their way out. But no doubt Oscar did his thing. 2 very close losses to Mosley, a close one to Floyd, in waaay over his head with Hopkins and basically a win against Trinidad even though he got on his bicycle in that fight, he still won it. For me only 2 questionable wins with Strum and Quartey but the man has won titles in multiple weight classes, is doing promotion and has done it with class. So he has done alot for the sport.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 11, 2007, 01:52:41 PM
ESPN just posted their 50 greatest boxers of all time. Interesting list

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/index

Oscar #39 on the list
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: 7even on May 11, 2007, 01:57:05 PM
^Yo I think all those GOAT lists suck too much old man cock, ya dig
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: d-nice on May 11, 2007, 03:51:48 PM
^Yo I think all those GOAT lists suck too much old man cock, ya dig

Well they covered quite a few decades on there. A great fighter is not just ones we remember. It's like saying Shaq is the greatest center of all time and not knowing about Wilt or Bill Russell. And to be honest in the last 10-15 years there have been some great boxers that have had great careers. I felt like they were represented on the list.
Title: Re: MAYFEATHERS VS DE LA HOYA
Post by: 7even on May 11, 2007, 04:20:36 PM
^Yo I think all those GOAT lists suck too much old man cock, ya dig

Well they covered quite a few decades on there. A great fighter is not just ones we remember. It's like saying Shaq is the greatest center of all time and not knowing about Wilt or Bill Russell. And to be honest in the last 10-15 years there have been some great boxers that have had great careers. I felt like they were represented on the list.

I'm far from someboy who really knows boxing, but knowing how Mayweather has been the champion in 5 different leagues and has never lost a fight and shit, it just sounds funny to me that he is near the very bottom of the list. Also, Oscar de la Hoya being as popular as he is only at #39 is funny, and I really don't see (m)any European fighters on there, which is also funny. Everybody knows a mediocore boxer from today would smack a boxer from 1910 into retardation. Whatever, maybe I'm just not a GOAT-poll/list person.