West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Don Jacob on May 29, 2007, 01:32:22 PM
-
1. red a.-4
2. phil j.-4
3. pat r-4
(http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2006/writers/kelly_dwyer/06/21/heat.mavs.game6/p1.riley.jpg) VS (http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Field/2314/pjtrophy.jpg)
-
Phil
-
9 rings > 6 rings
-
Magic>Shaq ..... lol
-
Magic>Shaq ..... lol
Exactly.
-
9 rings > 6 rings
it's actually 10 >7....they won as players too
-
9 rings > 6 rings
it's actually 10 >7....they won as players too
I'm aware, but this is about coaching.
-
9 rings > 6 rings
it's actually 10 >7....they won as players too
I'm aware, but this is about coaching.
exactly that's why i added 10 and 7....do you get what i'm trying to say?
-
c'mon people vote already
-
Phil Jackson
-
phil jackson for what he did with bulls mostly :)
-
Both were excellent coaches, but I give the slight nod to Phil Jackson.
-
phil jackson for what he did with bulls mostly :)
Lakers in 2001 woulda' SMASHED on any Bulls.
-
phil jackson for what he did with bulls mostly :)
Lakers in 2001 woulda' SMASHED on any Bulls.
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
LMAO
-
^^^^ WTF , Lakers ran the triangle to the perfection in 2001... swept Portland, Sacramento AND the Spurs... once again MJ or not, the Bulls wouldn't have the answer for Shaq
-
I think with these two coaches it comes down to the 84-85 Lakers vs. the 95-96 Bulls. I think Magic in his prime, with Kareem would be MJ and Pippen and the Bulls. Reason, Kareem, Kareem was too good to let someone like Rodman get in his head, and he would control the middle and grap rebounds over Rodman. This match up would have me vote Riley over Jackson.
-
^^^^ WTF , Lakers ran the triangle to the perfection in 2001... swept Portland, Sacramento AND the Spurs... once again MJ or not, the Bulls wouldn't have the answer for Shaq
LOL, that jscrilla dude has no clue what he's laughing about. I've noticed that he only repeats what other people say in this section and copy/pastes his DUBCC hall of fame lists from other people as well. The 2001 Lakers were unstoppable, swept the playoffs with ease, and created history. The best the Bulls ever went in the playoffs were 15-3. WHO THE HELL would have an answer for Shaq on the Bulls squad? LOL@this quote machine laughing his ass off like some nutcase over nothing.
-
^dog, i been watching NBA basketball since i was fuckin 8 years old... thats damn near 17 years, dont tell me i dont know....
and any of yall who think any lakers team in the 00's could fuck with the 72 win bulls,... nevr
-
^dog, i been watching NBA basketball since i was fuckin 8 years old... thats damn near 17 years, dont tell me i dont know....
and any of yall who think any lakers team in the 00's could fuck with the 72 win bulls,... nevr
Well, then answer this. WHO would have had the answer for Shaq? He was unstoppable in 2001, at his absolute best. No team was fucking with the '01 Lakers, and best believe if the Jazz took 'em to 6, Lakers woulda SMASHED.
-
^dog, i been watching NBA basketball since i was fuckin 8 years old... thats damn near 17 years, dont tell me i dont know....
and any of yall who think any lakers team in the 00's could fuck with the 72 win bulls,... nevr
I said 80's Lakers, they faced harder challenges, more legendary players, and a league that had tougher players than the Bulls of the 90's.
-
^dog, i been watching NBA basketball since i was fuckin 8 years old... thats damn near 17 years, dont tell me i dont know....
and any of yall who think any lakers team in the 00's could fuck with the 72 win bulls,... nevr
re-watch the playoffs 2001 man... Lakers swept SAS by a 21 margin average wise... Shaq and Kobe were monsters and the role players were all on fire, including the 3point range... no team could have stopped that.. oh yeah I forgot Luc Longley would have defended Shaq 1 on 1 :-X
-
^dog, i been watching NBA basketball since i was fuckin 8 years old... thats damn near 17 years, dont tell me i dont know....
and any of yall who think any lakers team in the 00's could fuck with the 72 win bulls,... nevr
re-watch the playoffs 2001 man... Lakers swept SAS by a 21 margin average wise... Shaq and Kobe were monsters and the role players were all on fire, including the 3point range... no team could have stopped that.. oh yeah I forgot Luc Longley would have defended Shaq 1 on 1 :-X
LOL@ that shit
the bulls knew how to defend shaq, look at when he played in orlando- we always played well against him....
fuck it... let shaq get his points..... kobe aint doin nothin with either scottie or mike on him.... and Chi role players >>>> LA role players any day
-
^dog, i been watching NBA basketball since i was fuckin 8 years old... thats damn near 17 years, dont tell me i dont know....
and any of yall who think any lakers team in the 00's could fuck with the 72 win bulls,... nevr
re-watch the playoffs 2001 man... Lakers swept SAS by a 21 margin average wise... Shaq and Kobe were monsters and the role players were all on fire, including the 3point range... no team could have stopped that.. oh yeah I forgot Luc Longley would have defended Shaq 1 on 1 :-X
LOL@ that shit
the bulls knew how to defend shaq, look at when he played in orlando- we always played well against him....
fuck it... let shaq get his points..... kobe aint doin nothin with either scottie or mike on him.... and Chi role players >>>> LA role players any day
lol at comparing the "Orlando" Shaq and the "Lakers" Shaq... and a bigger lol at kobe ain"t doin nothing with scottie or mike on him ... Kobe dropped 33 on Mike in his SECOND year as a 6TH man... you're just a joke when it comes to B-Ball knowledge :-X
-
^cool
ignorance is bliss
peace be with you
-
Nothing he said was based off of ignorance.