West Coast Connection Forum

DUBCC - Tha Connection => West Coast Classics => Topic started by: lee on August 04, 2001, 03:19:31 PM

Title: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: lee on August 04, 2001, 03:19:31 PM

i dunno if any of u have these albums, but who do u think came out with the best first album Foxy or Kim ?

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: Don Jacob on August 04, 2001, 03:44:02 PM

they both suck, but hardcore is better

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 04, 2001, 06:25:26 PM

"They both suck, but 'Hardcore' is better"

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: chili on August 05, 2001, 10:34:27 AM

hardcores better

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: oUtLaW on August 05, 2001, 10:52:22 AM

hardcore my nigga ;)

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: Smooth on August 05, 2001, 11:25:14 AM

i would say Hardcore.

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: DatMuthasuckaDan on August 05, 2001, 12:27:31 PM

whatzup yall
i thought that hardcore was a pretty solid album, it was pretty much like bigs ready 2 die LP. big wrote most of that shit on their, so itz really a biggie cd but wit a chick spittin tha lyrics
KIG

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: TheShiznit227 on August 05, 2001, 02:01:56 PM

mos def hardcore if i was forced to listen to them...

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: Top-Dogg2001 on August 05, 2001, 02:24:13 PM

Hardcore. Lil' Kim was "listenable" at the time. (I didn't say she was good just listenable) Foxy Brown was just a hoe of jay-z. THe both are pretty corny.

Title: Re: ill na na or hardcore ?
Post by: West Coast Veteran on August 05, 2001, 10:25:34 PM

i'd go with Fox cause i fuckin' despise Lil' Kim...