West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Tha G-Spot => Topic started by: Mac 10 † on January 11, 2008, 06:38:38 AM

Title: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Mac 10 † on January 11, 2008, 06:38:38 AM
(http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42731000/jpg/_42731597_twinfeet203spl.jpg)

Parted-at-birth twins 'married'

A pair of twins who were adopted by separate families as babies got married without knowing they were brother and sister, a peer told the House of Lords.

A court annulled the British couple's union after they discovered their true relationship, Lord Alton said.

The peer - who was told of the case by a High Court judge involved - said the twins felt an "inevitable attraction".

He said the case showed how important it was for children to be able to find out about their biological parents.

Details of the of the identities of the twins involved have been kept secret, but Lord Alton said the pair did not realise they were related until after their marriage.

'Truth will out'

The former Liberal Democrat MP raised the couple's case during a House of Lords debate on the Human Fertility and Embryology Bill in December.

"They were never told that they were twins," he told the Lords.

"They met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation."

He told the BBC News website that their story raises the wider issue of the importance of strengthening the rights of children to know the identities of their biological parents.

"If you start trying to conceal someone's identity, sooner or later the truth will out," he said.

"And if you don't know you are biologically related to someone, you may become attracted to them and tragedies like this may occur."

Pam Hodgkins, chief executive officer of the charity Adults Affected by Adoption (NORCAP) said there had been previous cases of separated siblings being attracted to each other.

"We have a resistance, a very strong incest taboo where we are aware that someone is a biological relative," she said.

"But when we are unaware of that relationship, we are naturally drawn to people who are quite similar to ourselves.

'Incredibly rare'

"And of course there is unlikely to be anyone more similar to any individual than their sibling."

Mo O'Reilly, director of child placement for the British Association for Adoption and Fostering, said the situation was traumatic for the people involved, but incredibly rare.

"Thirty or 40 years ago it would have been more likely that twins be separated and, brought up without knowledge of each other," she said.

Today, however, adopted children grow up with a greater knowledge of their birth families - and organisations try to place brothers and sisters together.

If that were not possible, the siblings would still have some form of contact with each other.

"This sad case illustrates why, over the last 20-30 years, the shift to openness in adoption was so important," Ms O'Reilly added.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Bedford Iz Active on January 11, 2008, 06:40:55 AM
Lol if they were going to get married, it's pretty safe to presume they've already had sex and enjoyed it.

Fuck that, fucking your bro/sister  :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X

But that's some creepy shit living your life and then inevitably meeting your twin through fate in the later years without knowing she's related to you.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: QuietTruth on January 11, 2008, 07:50:41 AM
Oh - my - God.


That's nasty shit. :puke:
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: MANBEARPIG. on January 11, 2008, 12:46:55 PM
Ya'll are forgetting that they didnt know they were related.

I read before that sex between brothers and sisters does not guarantee retarded babies, I could be mistaken but whateva.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: swangin and bangin on January 11, 2008, 01:17:11 PM
yuck
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Raphael on January 11, 2008, 01:19:25 PM
marrying your brother/sister thats some jerry springer shit :grumpy:
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Doggystylin on January 11, 2008, 01:41:07 PM
oh wow, that sucks, cause there is nothing they can do about the strong feelings that they had for each other, damn that is fucked the fuck up. Imagine having strong feelings for someone but having to break up with them cause they're your sister. mind boggling.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Elevz on January 11, 2008, 02:12:02 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on January 11, 2008, 02:24:31 PM
its ashame at the amount of people who are co-signing this shit. first homosexuality is on the rise now interbreeding between siblings will be. devils will be voting on it. disgusting
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on January 11, 2008, 02:32:20 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

boy i bet your family reunion is just one big orgy huh?! lol  ;D
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Meho on January 11, 2008, 02:43:50 PM
Why do all the bad things always happen to Mauzip  :'(  Keep your head up homeboy.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Bedford Iz Active on January 11, 2008, 03:43:11 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

boy i bet your family reunion is just one big orgy huh?! lol  ;D

lmfao i was guna say something similar to that.

People who make excuses like this sound like victims to the common 'omg i didn't know she was my cousin but i fucked her' kinda people.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: The Purple Champ on January 11, 2008, 08:03:01 PM
wow.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on January 11, 2008, 08:10:41 PM
Well back in the day in europe amongst the royalty family blood line, they interbreed to keep the bloodline tight. So i can see why some on here it doesnt really turn them off at the idea.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: swangin and bangin on January 11, 2008, 10:36:39 PM
Well back in the day in europe amongst the royalty family blood line, they interbreed to keep the bloodline tight. So i can see why some on here it doesnt really turn them off at the idea.
true shit

there blood was super fine so if they got a cut they could have bleed to death
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Styles1 on January 12, 2008, 10:50:38 AM
Disgusting....

But it does give new meaning to the term, "Go fuck your sister!"
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: K.Dub on January 12, 2008, 11:53:37 AM
Lol, what are the odds?
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: T-Dogg on January 12, 2008, 12:15:30 PM
Well back in the day in europe amongst the royalty family blood line, they interbreed to keep the bloodline tight. So i can see why some on here it doesnt really turn them off at the idea.
true shit

there blood was super fine so if they got a cut they could have bleed to death

Not exactly, what was wrong was that they had haemophilia - their blood wouldn't clot.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 12, 2008, 08:07:19 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Elevz on January 13, 2008, 02:47:57 AM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Sikotic™ on January 13, 2008, 01:50:36 PM
PWN3D!
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: J @ M @ L on January 13, 2008, 01:56:06 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.

dis·gust·ing
–adjective
causing disgust; offensive to the physical, moral, or aesthetic taste.

dis·gust       
tr.v.   
1. To excite nausea or loathing in; sicken.
2. To offend the taste or moral sense of; repel.


If you don't think fucking your sister is disgusting, then you are disgusting.
Also, don't you think that something you consider to be "very wrong" is the same as being "offensive to the moral taste"?
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on January 13, 2008, 02:01:26 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.
hahah you probably tapping your sisters ass on the regular thats why u dont have no problem with it.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Joseph Bonanno on January 13, 2008, 02:03:15 PM
so racist....
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: *Z* - The Queen of Dubcc on January 13, 2008, 02:06:20 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.
hahah you probably tapping your sisters ass on the regular thats why u dont have no problem with it.

LMAO^^   :laugh:

hilarious
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: *Z* - The Queen of Dubcc on January 13, 2008, 02:08:15 PM
id screw my sister tho, if i had one  8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Lunatic on January 13, 2008, 02:08:41 PM
Disgusting....

But it does give new meaning to the term, "Go fuck your sister!"
LMAO for real. this dude was tappin his sis without knowin. oo man. poor guy got a raw deal in life :laugh:
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: K.Dub on January 13, 2008, 02:16:42 PM
id screw my sister tho, if i had one  8) 8) 8)
That's because you're one nasty chick 8)
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Lunatic on January 13, 2008, 02:20:10 PM
props to Z :D
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 13, 2008, 03:17:07 PM
id screw my sister tho, if i had one  8) 8) 8)


that's okay, though...you're female.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Elevz on January 14, 2008, 06:05:30 AM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.

dis·gust·ing
–adjective
causing disgust; offensive to the physical, moral, or aesthetic taste.

dis·gust       
tr.v.   
1. To excite nausea or loathing in; sicken.
2. To offend the taste or moral sense of; repel.


If you don't think fucking your sister is disgusting, then you are disgusting.
Also, don't you think that something you consider to be "very wrong" is the same as being "offensive to the moral taste"?

According to that definition, yes. If morals are counted, it is.

Question: is someone else fucking your sister disgusting as well?
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: swangin and bangin on January 14, 2008, 10:32:48 AM
BUST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on January 14, 2008, 12:26:18 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.

dis·gust·ing
–adjective
causing disgust; offensive to the physical, moral, or aesthetic taste.

dis·gust       
tr.v.   
1. To excite nausea or loathing in; sicken.
2. To offend the taste or moral sense of; repel.


If you don't think fucking your sister is disgusting, then you are disgusting.
Also, don't you think that something you consider to be "very wrong" is the same as being "offensive to the moral taste"?

According to that definition, yes. If morals are counted, it is.

Question: is someone else fucking your sister disgusting as well?
what ya deal like for real. you and your family be havin orgies amongst ya selves. you dipping in ya moms? your sister? you not making no sense.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Elevz on January 14, 2008, 01:33:01 PM
Let's put it like this.

Eating your own shit is disgusting.
Eating the girl next door's shit is disgusting.
Eating your sister's shit is disgusting.

Fucking yourself is not disgusting.
Fucking the girl next door is not disgusting.
Fucking your sister is disgusting.

What kind of logic is that?
I'm saying it's not disgusting (as in nasty) to have sex with your sister; it is utterly wrong however.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on January 14, 2008, 01:40:45 PM
 got to make a note never to go to europe. and yes i believe that shit in that movie ' hostel' ya on some other other other other shit.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: J @ M @ L on January 14, 2008, 01:47:28 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

WTF? LOL

It's very simple: your sister is a woman, just like all the other women. Sex with a woman is not disgusting, unless it is a very disgusting person to begin with. It simply cannot be disgusting for the mere fact that it is your sister. It is wrong though, very wrong to fuck your sister, for cultural and biological reasons. But not disgusting, just very wrong.

dis·gust·ing
–adjective
causing disgust; offensive to the physical, moral, or aesthetic taste.

dis·gust       
tr.v.   
1. To excite nausea or loathing in; sicken.
2. To offend the taste or moral sense of; repel.


If you don't think fucking your sister is disgusting, then you are disgusting.
Also, don't you think that something you consider to be "very wrong" is the same as being "offensive to the moral taste"?

According to that definition, yes. If morals are counted, it is.

Question: is someone else fucking your sister disgusting as well?

That's the definition of disgusting... if something is morally offensive, it's disgusting... someone else fucking my sister would not be morally offensive or disgusting to me.
It's not the fucking that's disgusting, it's the fact that it's incest.
Title: Re: Parted-at-birth twins 'married'
Post by: smegma on January 14, 2008, 01:48:39 PM
I just don't get why everybody's saying how nasty this is. How is having sex with your biological sister more disgusting than having sex with any other woman? The chances of retarded babies are of course huge, and it's not normal to have sex with your sister (let alone marrying her), but disgusting? No.

I don't know the figures for siblings, but the chances a non-related couple gets disfunctioned or retarded babies is like 2%. The chance of 2 cousins getting disfunctioned or retarded babies is 4% In a lot of muslim families it's normal to marry your cousin and back in the days (western) royal families had marriages between cousins to keep the power within the family.