West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: GangstaBoogy on January 14, 2008, 10:28:14 AM

Title: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 14, 2008, 10:28:14 AM
 ;D

http://www.nba.com/powerrankings/index.html
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 14, 2008, 10:30:12 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Antonio_ on January 14, 2008, 10:40:42 AM
Lakers are for real.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 14, 2008, 11:06:11 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 14, 2008, 11:39:53 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 14, 2008, 11:46:06 AM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Not in this case because they're weekly rankings.

Lakers: 4-0
Celtics: 1-2
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Antonio_ on January 14, 2008, 12:01:16 PM
30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 14, 2008, 12:13:52 PM
 8)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 14, 2008, 04:57:48 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Not in this case because they're weekly rankings.

Lakers: 4-0
Celtics: 1-2

tell that to ESPN.com
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Don Jacob on January 14, 2008, 05:01:33 PM
i'm content with that. i won't be completely happy til we start winning some playoff games
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Turf Hitta on January 14, 2008, 05:19:54 PM
;D

http://www.nba.com/powerrankings/index.html

More proof of the NBA's blatant bias against the Lakers.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: R-Tistic on January 14, 2008, 05:49:42 PM
Fuuuuck.......and this comes out the day we hear Bynum is out for 8 weeks...!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 14, 2008, 06:19:45 PM
30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

fair enough but those teams didn't have KG, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce on the same lineup
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 14, 2008, 07:43:56 PM
yall niccas gettin all geeked up like yall did something big based off ONE week on a website? hahaha...there's more to the nba than one week on a top 10 list. first you niccas talk about hittin your prime in march and april and then yall get excited about being the "best" team one week in january. hahaha. i swear if the lakers win a jump ball u groupies all get hyped like yall actually doin something. good luc without overhyped bynum  8)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 14, 2008, 09:37:12 PM
good luc without overhyped bynum  8)

lol
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 14, 2008, 09:53:29 PM
yall niccas gettin all geeked up like yall did something big based off ONE week on a website? hahaha...there's more to the nba than one week on a top 10 list. first you niccas talk about hittin your prime in march and april and then yall get excited about being the "best" team one week in january. hahaha. i swear if the lakers win a jump ball u groupies all get hyped like yall actually doin something. good luc without overhyped bynum  8)


It's just a thread...calm down, my nicca.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Antonio_ on January 14, 2008, 11:19:21 PM
30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

fair enough but those teams didn't have KG, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce on the same lineup

LMAO. What about Bryant, Shaq, Malone, Payton AND Phil Jackson?
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 08:46:28 AM
30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

fair enough but those teams didn't have KG, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce on the same lineup

LMAO. What about Bryant, Shaq, Malone, Payton AND Phil Jackson?

malone and payton were at the end of the line

kobe and shaq don't have chemistry
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: 7even on January 15, 2008, 09:12:00 AM
Congratulations to #1 in PR and NBA Standings. Enjoy it while it lasts, though. After that Bynum injury and the road games coming in Feburary, the Lakers will never see the #1 spot of their division again.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 11:06:56 AM
kobe and shaq don't have chemistry


LOL!
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 11:11:06 AM
kobe and shaq don't have chemistry


LOL!

i meant for the year 2004
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 11:13:43 AM
There's no such thing as "chemistry" for Kobe... he does whatever it takes to win.


Shaq and Kobe mighta' had their problems off the court, but on the court, they complimented each other as good as any duo in history.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 11:20:42 AM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 11:26:35 AM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 11:33:43 AM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 11:34:27 AM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 11:42:16 AM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 12:13:03 PM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.


Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 12:14:37 PM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.


Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?

who did Phil rip in his book again?
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 12:16:57 PM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.


Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?

who did Phil rip in his book again?



Who is Phil coaching again? Who did Phil diss for not staying in shape and shitting on his team? The knock on Kobe was that he had a big ego, not that he didn't try.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: "THE" MoSav on January 15, 2008, 12:17:35 PM
Kobe>Shaq
cmon nobody really thinks Shaq was more important to the Lakers..Kobe was the man when it mattered any Fan could see that...
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 07:41:20 PM
but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??



Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami  8)

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.


Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?

who did Phil rip in his book again?



Who is Phil coaching again? Who did Phil diss for not staying in shape and shitting on his team? The knock on Kobe was that he had a big ego, not that he didn't try.

money talks homie, money talks

phil pimped kobe to market his book
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 15, 2008, 07:42:46 PM
Kobe>Shaq
cmon nobody really thinks Shaq was more important to the Lakers..Kobe was the man when it mattered any Fan could see that...

LOL and what happened when Shaq leaves and Lamar Odom and Caron Butler come in?

and what happened when Shaq goes to a Heat team that just traded two of it's better players for him?

shaq's career is done now but he still had something left in the tank for 2 and a half years
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Turf Hitta on January 15, 2008, 08:19:23 PM
Kobe>Shaq
cmon nobody really thinks Shaq was more important to the Lakers..Kobe was the man when it mattered any Fan could see that...

If you're not just being sarcastic, you are delusional.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 15, 2008, 11:31:15 PM
Kobe>Shaq
cmon nobody really thinks Shaq was more important to the Lakers..Kobe was the man when it mattered any Fan could see that...

LOL and what happened when Shaq leaves and Lamar Odom and Caron Butler come in?

and what happened when Shaq goes to a Heat team that just traded two of it's better players for him?

shaq's career is done now but he still had something left in the tank for 2 and a half years


Sorry, but Shaq's supporting cast in Miami was way more built to win than Kobe's youth group after Shaq left. Like I've said many times, Shaq was not even the man in Miami's title run. Kobe not only has been the man in LA for the last 3 years, but he's also been the only all-star on the squad...PeACe
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 16, 2008, 06:37:09 AM
Kobe>Shaq
cmon nobody really thinks Shaq was more important to the Lakers..Kobe was the man when it mattered any Fan could see that...

LOL and what happened when Shaq leaves and Lamar Odom and Caron Butler come in?

and what happened when Shaq goes to a Heat team that just traded two of it's better players for him?

shaq's career is done now but he still had something left in the tank for 2 and a half years


Sorry, but Shaq's supporting cast in Miami was way more built to win than Kobe's youth group after Shaq left. Like I've said many times, Shaq was not even the man in Miami's title run. Kobe not only has been the man in LA for the last 3 years, but he's also been the only all-star on the squad...PeACe

Shaq was ALWAYS the man wherever he went

penny, kobe and wade = his sidekicks
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Man On The Moon on January 16, 2008, 01:51:45 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Suck a dick
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 16, 2008, 05:52:33 PM


(http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/3769/westlw3.jpg)


Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 16, 2008, 06:25:40 PM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 16, 2008, 06:33:23 PM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol

thank you for the future insight Ms. Cleo...  :)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 16, 2008, 07:46:01 PM
aye hac wilson, you gotta understand these laker fan niccas. they know they aint gonna win a championship again for a long time and they been a weak shiet team since shaq left to get another ring, so to them being on top of website rankings for one pointless week in january is their season highlite. oh yeah, that and kobe scoring a lot of points but still never gettin deeper in the playoffs is also a big deal to them.

hahaha @ kobe being more important. the proof is in tha numbers and they aint won jac shiet and shaq has. all that shiet about who had more players is some gay excuses, all that matters is who wins. hope yall can print out that nba.com one week power ranking and hang it in the staples rafters.  ;)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 16, 2008, 09:03:28 PM
aye hac wilson, you gotta understand these laker fan niccas. they know they aint gonna win a championship again for a long time and they been a weak shiet team since shaq left to get another ring, so to them being on top of website rankings for one pointless week in january is their season highlite. oh yeah, that and kobe scoring a lot of points but still never gettin deeper in the playoffs is also a big deal to them.

hahaha @ kobe being more important. the proof is in tha numbers and they aint won jac shiet and shaq has. all that shiet about who had more players is some gay excuses, all that matters is who wins. hope yall can print out that nba.com one week power ranking and hang it in the staples rafters.  ;)

Ok you're absolutely right. I'm a bitter Lakers fan who is upset cuz we've barely been a playoff team since Shaq left. But thats still better than being a forgotten franchise since Larry Bird retired. Ouch!
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 16, 2008, 09:54:00 PM
haha, you funny nicca. first you admit im right, which you know is true even if you were tryin to make a bad joke, and second i aint no damn boston celtics fan. so i give a fuc what u think of them hahaha, i just aint such a blind laker groupie that i would even think of boston and la in the same breath this season. you a clown yellin out "Ouch!" like that comment mattered to me. nicca tha facts is that boston is alot better than the lakers and one bad week for the celtics and ONE good season stretch by the average lakers dont change that. any unbiased nba fan could tell you that. plus these power rankings are some weekly shit, they change every week, and if u wanna be all picky, boston been doin it consistantly this season and the lakers barely got it for one week and u niccas is bustin nuts in excitement. you look like a clown since that "forgotten franchise" you makin fun of is better than yall and dominates the same exact rankin you all giggly about now. take the L nicca.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 17, 2008, 12:00:43 AM
^ Lol so only a "Lakers groupie" would mention the Lakers & Celtics in the same breath this season? You do realize that those 2 teams both lead their conferences right douche? We're only 5 games behind them. And to be real, if we were in the Eastern Conference with that easy ass schedule we'd have 30 wins now too. So would the Spurs. So would the Suns. So would the Mavs. Hell the Blazers probably would too. The Celtics are killin it right now but they're not guaranteed a ring.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 12:41:09 AM
the lakers are only at the top right now on a fluke and yall are about to plummet down the conference. stop actin like they are top conference mainstays just cuz they are the number 1 team in the west for like 3 days in the middle of january. that dont mean shiet. last year they were only a few games behind their current record and we all know how that turned out - you guys are nothin more than a glorified early playoff exit and early season "success" that gets groupies like you all excited for nothing. the lakers aint in the same breath as the celtics SEASON wise u slow muthafuca. who cares about weekly shiet. nicca go make another thread about some bullshiet like luke walton being named 8th man of the last 3 days in the pacific division or some other stupid stat/internet award. all that "if" shiet is stupid too. if this and if that, nicca save that shiet for your video games or something. heres a newsflash, "if's" dont mean shiet, numbers and playoff series wins do. and we all know these wac kobe led lakers have neither. since u like ifs, heres another for you. IF the lakers were actually anything beyond an average team they would have more to show in the nba in the last 4 years than just kids like you hypin them on sports forums and makin up every excuse in the world to cover that they are average.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: GangstaBoogy on January 17, 2008, 09:02:46 AM
Oh okay I get it! Playing better than the rest of the teams in the conference = fluke. Gotcha.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 09:29:20 AM
Both teams are playing better than they have the past few years. Laker fans are happy right now because nobody expected the team to be playing so well - but everything they have done so far has been through hard work and some of the younger players finally maturing.

For me to deny what the Celts are doing this year, would be pure haterism, because they are having a great season so far. They are one injury away from plummeting just like every team is. It's a long season that isn't even half done yet. Nobody here is a prophet so who knows what the hell is going to happen from here to June.

I say let fans be fans. If they want to be happy about their team and whatever successes, then let em'. I do give a little tease when the Celts lose but it's all in fun. It's not like I am saying "Fuck the Celts and fuck Hack Wilson!" It will be a cold day in hell that I cheer for them though.  8)

Back to the Lakers, I'm happy for them. I had low expectations coming in to this season, so to see them near the top for the past few weeks and on top right now is a cool joy....   
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: wcsoldier on January 17, 2008, 09:40:20 AM
Both teams are playing better than they have the past few years. Laker fans are happy right now because nobody expected the team to be playing so well - but everything they have done so far has been through hard work and some of the younger players finally maturing.

For me to deny what the Celts are doing this year, would be pure haterism, because they are having a great season so far. They are one injury away from plummeting just like every team is. It's a long season that isn't even half done yet. Nobody here is a prophet so who knows what the hell is going to happen from here to June.

I say let fans be fans. If they want to be happy about their team and whatever successes, then let em'. I do give a little tease when the Celts lose but it's all in fun. It's not like I am saying "Fuck the Celts and fuck Hack Wilson!" It will be a cold day in hell that I cheer for them though.  8)

Back to the Lakers, I'm happy for them. I had low expectations coming in to this season, so to see them near the top for the past few weeks and on top right now is a cool joy....   
word ... these free hate posts not backed by any arguments are played out and boring .. anyways the sport section is becoming shitty AGAIN ... I am going to take a break from here AGAIN ...
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 10:29:46 AM
Kobe>Shaq
cmon nobody really thinks Shaq was more important to the Lakers..Kobe was the man when it mattered any Fan could see that...

LOL and what happened when Shaq leaves and Lamar Odom and Caron Butler come in?

and what happened when Shaq goes to a Heat team that just traded two of it's better players for him?

shaq's career is done now but he still had something left in the tank for 2 and a half years


Sorry, but Shaq's supporting cast in Miami was way more built to win than Kobe's youth group after Shaq left. Like I've said many times, Shaq was not even the man in Miami's title run. Kobe not only has been the man in LA for the last 3 years, but he's also been the only all-star on the squad...PeACe

Shaq was ALWAYS the man wherever he went

penny, kobe and wade = his sidekicks


LMAO..Is that why Shaq would sit his ass on the bench while Kobe would close out the games with his huge 4th quarters? Is that why Shaq's relevance in Miami's title run was nowhere near Wade's? Come on, now.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 10:34:48 AM
the lakers are only at the top right now on a fluke and yall are about to plummet down the conference. stop actin like they are top conference mainstays just cuz they are the number 1 team in the west for like 3 days in the middle of january. that dont mean shiet. last year they were only a few games behind their current record and we all know how that turned out - you guys are nothin more than a glorified early playoff exit and early season "success" that gets groupies like you all excited for nothing. the lakers aint in the same breath as the celtics SEASON wise u slow muthafuca. who cares about weekly shiet. nicca go make another thread about some bullshiet like luke walton being named 8th man of the last 3 days in the pacific division or some other stupid stat/internet award. all that "if" shiet is stupid too. if this and if that, nicca save that shiet for your video games or something. heres a newsflash, "if's" dont mean shiet, numbers and playoff series wins do. and we all know these wac kobe led lakers have neither. since u like ifs, heres another for you. IF the lakers were actually anything beyond an average team they would have more to show in the nba in the last 4 years than just kids like you hypin them on sports forums and makin up every excuse in the world to cover that they are average.


A fluke, you dumb mutherfucker? We played all the top teams in the league...how is it a fluke? Dumbshit, the Lakers have been progressing every year for these past 3 years. You expected them to win a title as soon as Shaq left? How retarded can one guy be?



I tell ya 'bout these haters, boy. :stupid:
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 17, 2008, 11:26:28 AM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol

thank you for the future insight Ms. Cleo...  :)

31-7  now THATS a first place team

11-0 against the pussies in the west
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 11:33:38 AM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol

thank you for the future insight Ms. Cleo...  :)

31-7  now THATS a first place team

11-0 against the pussies in the west

LOL... pray hard that the other shoe doesn't drop from here to June. :)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 11:44:34 AM
Lakers>Celtics...Anyone heard? Boston is still tryna sign or trade for a point guard. LOL.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: cStyle on January 17, 2008, 12:04:48 PM
Celtics are on fire right now, but i think they gonna fuck up in the playoffs  ;)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 17, 2008, 01:09:55 PM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol

thank you for the future insight Ms. Cleo...  :)

31-7  now THATS a first place team

11-0 against the pussies in the west

LOL... pray hard that the other shoe doesn't drop from here to June. :)

my correction, 31-6
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 01:20:29 PM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol

thank you for the future insight Ms. Cleo...  :)

31-7  now THATS a first place team

11-0 against the pussies in the west

LOL... pray hard that the other shoe doesn't drop from here to June. :)

my correction, 31-6

all good... I figured that maybe you were counting on them losing their next game. :)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 17, 2008, 01:29:06 PM
lol check the date on that homie

it wont ever be saying april lol

thank you for the future insight Ms. Cleo...  :)

31-7  now THATS a first place team

11-0 against the pussies in the west

LOL... pray hard that the other shoe doesn't drop from here to June. :)

my correction, 31-6

all good... I figured that maybe you were counting on them losing their next game. :)

im in Football mood right now with the G-men   31-7 is a football score
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 01:34:21 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 01:52:05 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 02:05:23 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   



This nicca is a clown...pay him no mind. He's probably a bitter Sacremento Queen fan or something. His best argument is that we were 26-13 in January of last season, before the whole team got injured...LOL.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Antonio_ on January 17, 2008, 02:16:00 PM
they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS.

What the fuck are you talking about?
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 02:21:51 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   

aye nicca i aint the fat one, so i aint insecure about shiet and callin u fatboy is just statin the truth. thats just the way i talk. it aint my fault you all soft and sensitive just like it aint my fault that you overweight. and aint nobody say history is a definite unbreakable gauge that is ALWAYS right, but it does pan out most of the time. and of course both are guesses you genius, but educated guesses are right more often. the whole point is you groupie fans is bettin on some crazy ass exception to hype up your team as anythin more than middle of the pack for a whole season, when the fact still remains that they are CURRENTLY a bunch of average unable to win ANY series team, whos biggest accomplishment is being good in january. you using the example of a solid 2000 team with two superstars and a veteran bench that finally got over the finals hump. that shiet dont apply to todays team of one superstar, a rising kid in bynum and a bunch of playoff losers and nobodys off the bench. hahaha @ tryin to compare the work of a championship type of team that had been real deep in the playoffs before to some newbie scrubs and one star. i swear cuz, some of u niccas is slow.

as for the jew, go cry a river about injuries, dont nobody care about what "coulda happened", bottom line is injuries happen and other teams still gotta play and they still win, even with em. the lakers is a team filled with excuses about what they woulda, coulda and shoulda done. lets see how yall record is later in the year and if u can break the current mold yall are known for, aka a average earlly playoff exit team with a confused star.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 02:29:59 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   

aye nicca i aint the fat one, so i aint insecure about shiet and callin u fatboy is just statin the truth. thats just the way i talk. it aint my fault you all soft and sensitive just like it aint my fault that you overweight. and aint nobody say history is a definite unbreakable gauge that is ALWAYS right, but it does pan out most of the time. and of course both are guesses you genius, but educated guesses are right more often. the whole point is you groupie fans is bettin on some crazy ass exception to hype up your team as anythin more than middle of the pack for a whole season, when the fact still remains that they are CURRENTLY a bunch of average unable to win ANY series team, whos biggest accomplishment is being good in january. you using the example of a solid 2000 team with two superstars and a veteran bench that finally got over the finals hump. that shiet dont apply to todays team of one superstar, a rising kid in bynum and a bunch of playoff losers and nobodys off the bench. hahaha @ tryin to compare the work of a championship type of team that had been real deep in the playoffs before to some newbie scrubs and one star. i swear cuz, some of u niccas is slow.

as for the jew, go cry a river about injuries, dont nobody care about what "coulda happened", bottom line is injuries happen and other teams still gotta play and they still win, even with em. the lakers is a team filled with excuses about what they woulda, coulda and shoulda done. lets see how yall record is later in the year and if u can break the current mold yall are known for, aka a average earlly playoff exit team with a confused star.

LOL...well genius, if I gave a shit about what you and others might think I wouldn't put up my pic in the first place. I don't hide who I am behind a keyboard.

Back to the discussion... the point of the 2000 team was to show that history doesn't always repeat itself. That may have been a championship caliber team but they had failed for 3 seasons to win anything. They kept "choking" during a certain "part" of the season. Now this team here is different, but they are showing growth and maturity and just may have what it takes to get over the humps that they have failed to do so in the past few years. You are predicting certain failure which is your right, but it's also our right to believe otherwise.   
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 17, 2008, 02:31:55 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 02:38:00 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart

dont trip my nicca, i know yall got a tough squad over there. i was just usin what the jewish kid said to prove his own point wrong. how dumb is it to clown a team for supposedly still wanting another point guard, when the bottom line is they got a much better record than his team and they smacced his scrub team up and down the court twice already? that confused kobe groupie didnt realize that he's clownin them about some shiet that makes his own team look worse. if the celtics aint that good and they "need" a point guard and the lakers are so elite, why they lose to them each time and double more this season. hahah, its all david sterns fault in his eyes. but on some real shiet, no matter hwo u look at it, the celtics is much better than the lakers and he just cant accept it. aye, is yall gonna get another chance to step on lakers hopes again this reg. season?
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Fuck Your Existence on January 17, 2008, 02:39:46 PM
lol,i seriously cant wait til playoff time
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 02:45:15 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   

aye nicca i aint the fat one, so i aint insecure about shiet and callin u fatboy is just statin the truth. thats just the way i talk. it aint my fault you all soft and sensitive just like it aint my fault that you overweight. and aint nobody say history is a definite unbreakable gauge that is ALWAYS right, but it does pan out most of the time. and of course both are guesses you genius, but educated guesses are right more often. the whole point is you groupie fans is bettin on some crazy ass exception to hype up your team as anythin more than middle of the pack for a whole season, when the fact still remains that they are CURRENTLY a bunch of average unable to win ANY series team, whos biggest accomplishment is being good in january. you using the example of a solid 2000 team with two superstars and a veteran bench that finally got over the finals hump. that shiet dont apply to todays team of one superstar, a rising kid in bynum and a bunch of playoff losers and nobodys off the bench. hahaha @ tryin to compare the work of a championship type of team that had been real deep in the playoffs before to some newbie scrubs and one star. i swear cuz, some of u niccas is slow.

as for the jew, go cry a river about injuries, dont nobody care about what "coulda happened", bottom line is injuries happen and other teams still gotta play and they still win, even with em. the lakers is a team filled with excuses about what they woulda, coulda and shoulda done. lets see how yall record is later in the year and if u can break the current mold yall are known for, aka a average earlly playoff exit team with a confused star.

LOL...well genius, if I gave a shit about what you and others might think I wouldn't put up my pic in the first place. I don't hide who I am behind a keyboard.

Back to the discussion... the point of the 2000 team was to show that history doesn't always repeat itself. That may have been a championship caliber team but they had failed for 3 seasons to win anything. They kept "choking" during a certain "part" of the season. Now this team here is different, but they are showing growth and maturity and just may have what it takes to get over the humps that they have failed to do so in the past few years. You are predicting certain failure which is your right, but it's also our right to believe otherwise.   

hey if u proud to be fat and ugly, more power to you nicca. nobody said u was hiding or cared what i said either, it just aint fair to the rest of us that we gotta see some fat old man when we read a thread everytime. its obvious you stay assumin shiet tho, first u assume a nicca is insecure cuz he call a fat man fat, and then u assume people think you care what we say. i aint say what i said cuz i thought u cared or cuz im insecure, i said it cuz i seen u was fat. if a nicca call a duc a duc he insecure? hahahaha.. oh well cuz, do you.

we'll see who was right when tha season is done.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 02:52:37 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   

aye nicca i aint the fat one, so i aint insecure about shiet and callin u fatboy is just statin the truth. thats just the way i talk. it aint my fault you all soft and sensitive just like it aint my fault that you overweight. and aint nobody say history is a definite unbreakable gauge that is ALWAYS right, but it does pan out most of the time. and of course both are guesses you genius, but educated guesses are right more often. the whole point is you groupie fans is bettin on some crazy ass exception to hype up your team as anythin more than middle of the pack for a whole season, when the fact still remains that they are CURRENTLY a bunch of average unable to win ANY series team, whos biggest accomplishment is being good in january. you using the example of a solid 2000 team with two superstars and a veteran bench that finally got over the finals hump. that shiet dont apply to todays team of one superstar, a rising kid in bynum and a bunch of playoff losers and nobodys off the bench. hahaha @ tryin to compare the work of a championship type of team that had been real deep in the playoffs before to some newbie scrubs and one star. i swear cuz, some of u niccas is slow.

as for the jew, go cry a river about injuries, dont nobody care about what "coulda happened", bottom line is injuries happen and other teams still gotta play and they still win, even with em. the lakers is a team filled with excuses about what they woulda, coulda and shoulda done. lets see how yall record is later in the year and if u can break the current mold yall are known for, aka a average earlly playoff exit team with a confused star.

LOL...well genius, if I gave a shit about what you and others might think I wouldn't put up my pic in the first place. I don't hide who I am behind a keyboard.

Back to the discussion... the point of the 2000 team was to show that history doesn't always repeat itself. That may have been a championship caliber team but they had failed for 3 seasons to win anything. They kept "choking" during a certain "part" of the season. Now this team here is different, but they are showing growth and maturity and just may have what it takes to get over the humps that they have failed to do so in the past few years. You are predicting certain failure which is your right, but it's also our right to believe otherwise.   

hey if u proud to be fat and ugly, more power to you nicca. nobody said u was hiding or cared what i said either, it just aint fair to the rest of us that we gotta see some fat old man when we read a thread everytime. its obvious you stay assumin shiet tho, first u assume a nicca is insecure cuz he call a fat man fat, and then u assume people think you care what we say. i aint say what i said cuz i thought i cared or cuz im insecure, i said it cuz i seen u was fat. if a nicca call a duc a duc he insecure? hahahaha.. oh well cuz, do you.

we'll see who was right when tha season is done.

To be honest it is insecurity on your part.... because the discussion had absolutely nothing to do with my looks. It was about basketball. But if you want to make it about looks, lets see your pic?

But as far as seeing who was right when the season is done... you're right. If the Lakers fail, I will be the first person to acknowledge it. I've never excused any of their short-comings. 
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 03:02:05 PM

To be honest it is insecurity on your part.... because the discussion had absolutely nothing to do with my looks. It was about basketball. But if you want to make it about looks, lets see your pic?

But as far as seeing who was right when the season is done... you're right. If the Lakers fail, I will be the first person to acknowledge it. I've never excused any of their short-comings. 

haha, i thought u was smarter than that. now i see u aint. nicca when i talk to people i call em what they look like. if i see a skinny nicca i dont know say some shit ima say "that skinny nicca said it." that shiet dont mean im insecure. wtf is u smokin? maybe wherever your square ass is from they dont talk like that, but it aint my fault. like i said if i see a duc and call that shiet a duc its just the truth. i seen u was a fat old man and i called u fatboy when i addressed u about basketball. you turned it into some other shiet about niccas being inscure or whatever. thats on you. just cuz a nicca calls you fat and cracs a joke while talkin basketball dont mean the thread changed about looks u slow nicca. i can still talk basketball while referrin to u as the fat man who likes the lakers.  as for askin for my pic, that shiet is gay nicca. i barely post on this muthafuca just to see what up with some new music and then this sports talk shiet. i aint go no reason to post up pics or get thousands of posts like the rest of u mutahfucas. now u sayin a nicca gotta post his pic up when another man requests it just cuz he described what you look like? u internet niccas is crazy as fuc. get outta here with that shiet.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 03:06:28 PM

To be honest it is insecurity on your part.... because the discussion had absolutely nothing to do with my looks. It was about basketball. But if you want to make it about looks, lets see your pic?

But as far as seeing who was right when the season is done... you're right. If the Lakers fail, I will be the first person to acknowledge it. I've never excused any of their short-comings. 

haha, i thought u was smarter than that. now i see u aint. nicca when i talk to people i call em what they look like. if i see a skinny nicca i dont know say some shit ima say "that skinny nicca said it." that shiet dont mean im insecure. wtf is u smokin? maybe wherever your square ass is from they dont talk like that, but it aint my fault. like i said if i see a duc and call that shiet a duc its just the truth. i seen u was a fat old man and i called u fatboy when i addressed u about basketball. you turned it into some other shiet about niccas being inscure or whatever. thats on you. just cuz a nicca calls you fat and cracs a joke while talkin basketball dont mean the thread changed about looks u slow nicca. i can still talk basketball while referrin to u as the fat man who likes the lakers.  as for askin for my pic, that shiet is gay nicca. i barely post on this muthafuca just to see what up with some new music and then this sports talk shiet. i aint go no reason to post up pics or get thousands of posts like the rest of u mutahfucas. now u sayin a nicca gotta post his pic up when another man requests it just cuz he described what you look like? u internet niccas is crazy as fuc. get outta here with that shiet.

Thanks for proving my point. I knew you wouldn't.... meanwhile, we can keep talking basketball. I won't put you on the spot anymore.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 03:10:18 PM
LMAO.... I love it when people get so riled up at discussions that they have to start calling people names. It's insecurity at its finest..

But back to the discussion. If history is to always be used to gauge how a team will do, could you have said that the 2000 Lakers were going to choke because they lost to San Antonio in 1999? You could have but you would have been wrong, because history doesn't always repeat itself and the truth is nobody knows how the rest of the season will pan out. So yes, you can have an "educated" guess but it still remains a guess.

Will the Lakers finish the rest of the season strong? I don't know, but I know they have a better chance now since their young players are showing more maturity than last year.   

aye nicca i aint the fat one, so i aint insecure about shiet and callin u fatboy is just statin the truth. thats just the way i talk. it aint my fault you all soft and sensitive just like it aint my fault that you overweight. and aint nobody say history is a definite unbreakable gauge that is ALWAYS right, but it does pan out most of the time. and of course both are guesses you genius, but educated guesses are right more often. the whole point is you groupie fans is bettin on some crazy ass exception to hype up your team as anythin more than middle of the pack for a whole season, when the fact still remains that they are CURRENTLY a bunch of average unable to win ANY series team, whos biggest accomplishment is being good in january. you using the example of a solid 2000 team with two superstars and a veteran bench that finally got over the finals hump. that shiet dont apply to todays team of one superstar, a rising kid in bynum and a bunch of playoff losers and nobodys off the bench. hahaha @ tryin to compare the work of a championship type of team that had been real deep in the playoffs before to some newbie scrubs and one star. i swear cuz, some of u niccas is slow.

as for the jew, go cry a river about injuries, dont nobody care about what "coulda happened", bottom line is injuries happen and other teams still gotta play and they still win, even with em. the lakers is a team filled with excuses about what they woulda, coulda and shoulda done. lets see how yall record is later in the year and if u can break the current mold yall are known for, aka a average earlly playoff exit team with a confused star.


LMAO...This shithead just called Derek Fisher a "playoff loser".
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 03:11:39 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart


LOL! Hack...You did NOT just call Paul Pierce a "true point guard". :-X
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 03:12:39 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart

dont trip my nicca, i know yall got a tough squad over there. i was just usin what the jewish kid said to prove his own point wrong. how dumb is it to clown a team for supposedly still wanting another point guard, when the bottom line is they got a much better record than his team and they smacced his scrub team up and down the court twice already? that confused kobe groupie didnt realize that he's clownin them about some shiet that makes his own team look worse. if the celtics aint that good and they "need" a point guard and the lakers are so elite, why they lose to them each time and double more this season. hahah, its all david sterns fault in his eyes. but on some real shiet, no matter hwo u look at it, the celtics is much better than the lakers and he just cant accept it. aye, is yall gonna get another chance to step on lakers hopes again this reg. season?


Seriously now, are you a Queens fan?
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 03:32:28 PM

Thanks for proving my point. I knew you wouldn't.... meanwhile, we can keep talking basketball. I won't put you on the spot anymore.

think whatever helps you feel better at night nicca. u might as well try to find little victories where u can, since havin a shitty team and being fat aint really good for nobodys self esteem.

either way im out this muthafuca now, unlike you niccas with thousands and thousands of posts, some people actually log off this shiet. as for basketball, im sure one of you lakers groupies will post some new onlline stats or rankings or some shiet. u niccas are in love with the internet hahaha.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Styles1 on January 17, 2008, 03:41:09 PM

Thanks for proving my point. I knew you wouldn't.... meanwhile, we can keep talking basketball. I won't put you on the spot anymore.

think whatever helps you feel better at night nicca. u might as well try to find little victories where u can, since havin a shitty team and being fat aint really good for nobodys self esteem.

either way im out this muthafuca now, unlike you niccas with thousands and thousands of posts, some people actually log off this shiet. as for basketball, im sure one of you lakers groupies will post some new onlline stats or rankings or some shiet. u niccas are in love with the internet hahaha.

lmao... later dude.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 17, 2008, 10:20:52 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart


LOL! Hack...You did NOT just call Paul Pierce a "true point guard". :-X

whoops meant to say Ray Allen

you can tell who i meant because i used peirces name twice lol
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: blue crew on January 17, 2008, 10:24:20 PM
hahaha. nice game against the suns, yall looked unstoppable. kwame should be league mvp.

Lets see, in the last 3 games the chump lakers have two barely there luccy wins against two of the nbas worst teams and then got beat by the suns easily. if you niccas think u playing like garbage for 3 and 1/2 quarters and then tryin to 3 point shoot your way to wins in the nba is the signs of a good team then your dumber than i thought. so much for your beloved online power rankings.  8)

yall bitch ass niccas probly gonna start with the excuses. maybe yall should send a sob story letter to david stern. hahaa.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 11:03:23 PM
hahaha. nice game against the suns, yall looked unstoppable. kwame should be league mvp.

Lets see, in the last 3 games the chump lakers have two barely there luccy wins against two of the nbas worst teams and then got beat by the suns easily. if you niccas think u playing like garbage for 3 and 1/2 quarters and then tryin to 3 point shoot your way to wins in the nba is the signs of a good team then your dumber than i thought. so much for your beloved online power rankings.  8)

yall bitch ass niccas probly gonna start with the excuses. maybe yall should send a sob story letter to david stern. hahaa.


It's one game and the Lakers are extremely thin in the front-court right now. We still beat the Suns twice this year, nicca.
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on January 17, 2008, 11:03:56 PM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart


LOL! Hack...You did NOT just call Paul Pierce a "true point guard". :-X

whoops meant to say Ray Allen

you can tell who i meant because i used peirces name twice lol


LOL...Ray Allen is not a point guard either. ;)
Title: Re: The NBA's Power Rankings
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on January 18, 2008, 08:12:55 AM
these laker fans is bacwards as fuc. you got one team thats 31-7 and dominates the league and even the laker fans obsession - online web rankings, and they still try to clown boston. so what if them niccas is tryin to look for a point guard, that just proves that a team with no point guard is ten times better than your wac ass lakers team with one. and to the other nicca sayin i got no arguments, you must not read. you stupid cuz.
the facts is the lakers had damn near the same record at this time last year and choked, the facts is they aint won jac shiet since shaq left, they cant win playoff series and they have a history of playin average WHEN IT COUNTS. maybe yo blind groupie ass cant accept the shit cuz you ride they dic so hard, but any regular unbiased fan or nba expert can see it. until that average ass team actually wins something when it counts, they a bunch of unproven fucs as a team. you niccas is riding on some fairy tale desperate hope shiet, not on history of winning in the last 4 years or results. you niccas is just wishin for them to be good and postin gay lil online rankings as proof of them being a contender. your whole argument is based on january win loss records and your blind belief in your average team. the lakers is number 1 for 3 days and by barely like 1 game ahead and u act like you gonna win a championship. these free groupie posts from you niccas bacced wit no argument but january records is played out and boring. go get a box of tissue and cry and hide cuz you think this section is just too harsh, nobody like no soft ass niccas anyway.
as for that fat nicca tryin to be all dr phil wit his shiet, get offline and go joggin or something nicca. yeah aint nobody no prophet on here but niccas can make educated guesses based on performances and history, and your team is having a good january just like last year and thats it so far. thats why its safe to say the same shiet will happen, cuz yall always fit into that role. be happy all u want fatboy but the facts is them niccas aint got no real solid chance to do shiet yet. so until this wac team ever does anything besides have good januarys, you will be known as a whole lot of talk and no wins. dont take a prophet to see that shiet.

celtics got a true PG (paul peirce)  a legit shooting forward in Peirce and a legit big man in KG

and a feisty youngster in Big Baby he's got heart


LOL! Hack...You did NOT just call Paul Pierce a "true point guard". :-X

whoops meant to say Ray Allen

you can tell who i meant because i used peirces name twice lol


LOL...Ray Allen is not a point guard either. ;)

i know i dont feel like going back and editing things twice lol