West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Doggystylin on February 02, 2008, 01:33:00 AM

Title: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Doggystylin on February 02, 2008, 01:33:00 AM
I know its a bit early but I think when its all said and done Kobe will have more than Shaq, specially with the way things have been shaping up lately.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 01:40:41 AM
Obviously. 8)
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Droz on February 02, 2008, 04:12:30 AM
GOT TO AGREE TO THIS THREAD! LAKERS=SERIOUS DAMAGE NOW!
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: 7even on February 02, 2008, 04:47:11 AM
If Kobe doesn't win a ring with this team, he sucks basically.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on February 02, 2008, 09:11:28 AM
SHAQ>>>>>KOBE
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: MontrealCity's Most on February 02, 2008, 09:40:47 AM
SHAQ>>>>>KOBE

agreed with Job...


this cant be life.... lol
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 12:26:08 PM
^LOL!
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on February 02, 2008, 12:40:02 PM
If Kobe doesn't win a ring with this team, he sucks basically.

why?  there are 4-5 teams in the west who are better

not to mention 2 teams in the East who are better
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 12:48:38 PM
If Kobe doesn't win a ring with this team, he sucks basically.

why?  there are 4-5 teams in the west who are better

not to mention 2 teams in the East who are better


LMFAO! There weren't even that many teams better BEFORE the trade. :-X
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on February 02, 2008, 01:13:53 PM
If Kobe doesn't win a ring with this team, he sucks basically.

why?  there are 4-5 teams in the west who are better

not to mention 2 teams in the East who are better


LMFAO! There weren't even that many teams better BEFORE the trade. :-X

spurs, suns, mavericks, hornets blazers

then you got your Jazz and Nuggets who are decent teams.

and lets not forget the Warriors, they could knock out anyone in a best of 7.

and Detroit and Boston would wax the Lakers wtih a healthy Bynum
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 01:42:18 PM
If Kobe doesn't win a ring with this team, he sucks basically.

why?  there are 4-5 teams in the west who are better

not to mention 2 teams in the East who are better


LMFAO! There weren't even that many teams better BEFORE the trade. :-X

spurs, suns, mavericks, hornets blazers

then you got your Jazz and Nuggets who are decent teams.

and lets not forget the Warriors, they could knock out anyone in a best of 7.

and Detroit and Boston would wax the Lakers wtih a healthy Bynum


Detroit couldn't wax a mediocre Cavs team...and don't get me started about overrated Boston.

Spurs are old, Lakers already HANDLED the Suns and Hornets this year (BEFORE the Gasol acquisition), and everyone knows that Dallas is destroyable...Lakers=current best team in the league. Get over it. Jazz, Nuggets, and Warriors are currently nowhere near the Lakers.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on February 02, 2008, 01:44:46 PM
hahahahahahhahahahaha oh man

your gonnna be so sad this spring when the lakers go down.

over rated boston HAHAHAHA

you havent even seen Pau play one game in a Lakers uny and your annointing them better than the SPURS? hahahahaha

watch PHoenix was you guys again this season.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: blue crew on February 02, 2008, 01:49:32 PM
36-8 still means best team in the nba


and speakin of handling, didnt the celtics mop the floor with the lakers each time this year? (with their overrated bynum playing too)
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Droz on February 02, 2008, 01:57:29 PM
im not sayin the lakers r gunna win the championship this year.. but its just the facts with bynum comin back and gasol now on the line up the lakers shold take advantage theres no excuses.. they migh develope as a strong force in the west till 2010-11 i know they could push series in the playoffs like this! 8)
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 02:00:42 PM
LOL...the haters must be so damn furious that we got Gasol.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 02, 2008, 02:32:10 PM
I don't get it. How can someone down the Pistons for losing to the Cavs last year (and use that as a reason why they're not better than the Lakers) but turn around and big up the Lakers even though they lost to the Suns in the 1st round last year (and say that they're a better team etc. etc.)

Contradictions are a mutha...
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Nat Turner-reincarnated on February 02, 2008, 02:57:02 PM
SHAQ>>>>>KOBE

agreed with Job...


this cant be life.... lol
dont lie to yourself you know u agreed with many of things i have said.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 02:59:26 PM
I don't get it. How can someone down the Pistons for losing to the Cavs last year (and use that as a reason why they're not better than the Lakers) but turn around and big up the Lakers even though they lost to the Suns in the 1st round last year (and say that they're a better team etc. etc.)

Contradictions are a mutha...


Maybe becuase the Pistons were supposed to beat the Cavs and the Lakers weren't supposed to beat the Suns. And to top it off, the Lakers are a brand new team, while the Pistons have the same roster ...LMAO. SGV is classic.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: blue crew on February 02, 2008, 03:08:35 PM
right, cuz a team that already has championship experience as a whole and lost a close conference finals(pistons) is a lot less prepared to contend for a title than a inexperienced team with a gang of playoff losers(odom, gasol, walton,etc), players who never been there before, and a new player thrown in midseason all with an injured kid center is so much more ready to win a title.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 03:14:29 PM
LOL@Kobe and Fisher being "playoff losers". :-X

You keep proving your dumbness more and more with every post.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: blue crew on February 02, 2008, 03:16:15 PM
i thought jews could at least read?

i said "odom, walton, gasol,etc" cuz i didnt feel like naming all those no name scrubs on your team that get eliminated every year. everyone knows kobe and fisher won rings thanks to riding the shaq wave.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 02, 2008, 03:17:19 PM
And that's why it's hard to take you serious NIK.

You like to always make things conveniant for yourself. You claimed that the Lakers "owned the Suns" in the regular season. You claimed they were the better team. But now it's "they weren't supposed to win." All in all, that still means they were the lesser team. If the Lakers weren't supposed to win, then they were regarded as a weaker team and the Suns the superior (read better) team. Yet, for some reason, you like to contend that the Lakers were indeed better (which is a direct contradiction to you most recent "they weren't supposed to beat the Suns" statement). How can someone be a better team but not be favored?

Take off your Laker glasses for a second and see how ridiculous you are acting. Obviously, the Pistons were the favored team (which would mean that they're considered to be the better team) and they lost to the Cavs (so you use that as a reasoning for the Pistons being inferior to the Lakers). But yet, the favored Suns (read better) beats the Lakers (whom YOU CLAIM were better) and you find another way of spinning it to make the Lakers look good.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 03:18:39 PM
i thought jews could at least read?

i said "odom, walton, gasol,etc" cuz i didnt feel like naming all those no name scrubs on your team that get eliminated every year. everyone knows kobe and fisher won rings thanks to riding the shaq wave.

What's your point, dicchead? The Celtics have NO experience at all...and Detroit STILL lost to a mediocre Cavs team with their current roster.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 03:23:19 PM
And that's why it's hard to take you serious NIK.

You like to always make things conveniant for yourself. You claimed that the Lakers "owned the Suns" in the regular season. You claimed they were the better team. But now it's "they weren't supposed to win." All in all, that still means they were the lesser team. If the Lakers weren't supposed to win, then they were regarded as a weaker team and the Suns the superior (read better) team. Yet, for some reason, you like to contend that the Lakers were indeed better (which is a direct contradiction to you most recent "they weren't supposed to beat the Suns" statement). How can someone be a better team but not be favored?

Take off your Laker glasses for a second and see how ridiculous you are acting. Obviously, the Pistons were the favored team (which would mean that they're considered to be the better team) and they lost to the Cavs (so you use that as a reasoning for the Pistons being inferior to the Lakers). But yet, the favored Suns (read better) beats the Lakers (whom YOU CLAIM were better) and you find another way of spinning it to make the Lakers look good.


I was talking about THIS season...LMAO. The Lakers owned the Suns THIS season. LAST SEASON, we weren't supposed to win. Do you get it yet? Or should I break it down for your brain some more...And I already explained to your ass that last season, the Suns had more fire-power, while the Lakers were better as a TEAM when at FULL STRENGTH...Better game plan, way shittier fire-power and execution down the stretch...But what does that matter, we're talking about THIS season. The Lakers are a completely different team. You keep ignoring that fact...Don't make yourself look as dumb as that fake crip. I mean, I know you don't watch much basketball, but I know you still gotta be slightly more intelligent than him...PeACe
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 02, 2008, 03:26:36 PM
LMAO @ NIK really feeling stumped. Like I always say, when the insults come out, NIK is on the ropes and is throwing haymakers...
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: blue crew on February 02, 2008, 03:32:48 PM
LMAO @ NIK really feeling stumped. Like I always say, when the insults come out, NIK is on the ropes and is throwing haymakers...

for a jew, throwin a haymaker means throwin they lil top hat to the floor right? niggas better watch out for them crazy jews hahaha.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 03:34:35 PM
LMAO @ NIK really feeling stumped. Like I always say, when the insults come out, NIK is on the ropes and is throwing haymakers...


Why can't you just reply to what I said? LOL...Cuz you CAN'T. SGV=LADODGER.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 02, 2008, 03:42:10 PM
Why would I reply to what you said? You'll just dance around facts like you always do. That's why you throw out insults, cuz you can't reply to what someone said when you start to feel backed in a corner.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 03:44:14 PM
Why would I reply to what you said? You'll just dance around facts like you always do. That's why you throw out insults, cuz you can't reply to what someone said when you start to feel backed in a corner.


I replied to what you said...you're the one who didn't reply to what I said...so you're saying you feel backed in a corner? LOL.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: blue crew on February 02, 2008, 03:46:03 PM
LMAO @ NIK really feeling stumped. Like I always say, when the insults come out, NIK is on the ropes and is throwing haymakers...


Why can't you just reply to what I said? LOL...Cuz you CAN'T. SGV=LADODGER.

damn cuzz i knew your kind is paranoid but you crazy for that one. sensitive ass paranoid jews is something else. we'll see what you have to say when the lakers title hopes get burned up in flames.  ;)
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 03:49:04 PM
^Do you ever throw "Laker loss" parties?
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 02, 2008, 03:53:03 PM
Plenty of times I've read you say "The Lakers owned the Suns in the regular season" although they lost in the playoffs to them and it was NOT about this season (although 2-1 isn't exactly owning this season anyway...)

But even if I showed you that proof, you'd skip around it, throw an insult and act like you didn't just look like an idiot. It's pointless with you.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 05:11:48 PM
Plenty of times I've read you say "The Lakers owned the Suns in the regular season" although they lost in the playoffs to them and it was NOT about this season (although 2-1 isn't exactly owning this season anyway...)

But even if I showed you that proof, you'd skip around it, throw an insult and act like you didn't just look like an idiot. It's pointless with you.



The Lakers owned the Suns THIS SEASON. The Lakers were a _different team_ LAST SEASON. What the hell don't you get?...either way, what does it have to do with Kobe and Shaq's rings? SGV is lost...again.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 02, 2008, 05:34:14 PM
So were you not talking about the Pistons last season as your reasoning for them not bing able to beat the Lakers THIS year? Of course you were.

SO why can't someone bring up the fact that the so called better Lakers lost to the Suns?

Oh I know, its cuz it has to be conveniant for you.

Of course NIK, although last season you've claimed the Lakers owned the Suns in the reg season, and you claim they were the better team even though they didn't have fire power (but of course they were never supposed to beat the Suns)... lol

Geez.. what loses me is the fact that your opinion never will matches up. You change for the convo.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: hisairness on February 02, 2008, 06:08:20 PM
NIK=Owned by SGV.  He punks you time and time again.  So many people have you repeatedly bitch slapped you on this forum and you just can't let it be.  You throw out useless information and twist things around to make yourself look intelligent and, as you say, a Laker "insider."  You're just a tool that can't admit when he's wrong and resort to throwing out priceless tidbits that make you look worse and worse as each day passes.  I'm telling you like I've said before, put the barrel in your mouth and pull the trigger.  This Sports board would be so much better without you.

Let me remind the moderator of this forum...

Moderator is defined as someone who mediates disputes and attempts to avoid violence.

Sports Moderator=Horrible
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 08:14:36 PM
So were you not talking about the Pistons last season as your reasoning for them not bing able to beat the Lakers THIS year? Of course you were.

SO why can't someone bring up the fact that the so called better Lakers lost to the Suns?

Oh I know, its cuz it has to be conveniant for you.

Of course NIK, although last season you've claimed the Lakers owned the Suns in the reg season, and you claim they were the better team even though they didn't have fire power (but of course they were never supposed to beat the Suns)... lol

Geez.. what loses me is the fact that your opinion never will matches up. You change for the convo.


WOWWWW...Did you not see where I said the Lakers are a completely different team, while the Pistons have the same exact roster as last year? LMAO. You still don't get it? SERIOUSLY. The Lakers were a better team than the Suns last year, with not as much fire-power and execution. You don't have to agree with that, but it's a CLEAR opinion. What's so hard for someone who watches basketball to understand about that? And I never said anything about the Lakers owning the Suns last year...MAKE SENSE. Detroit Pistons=Same team who lost to the Cavs. Los Angeles Lakers=Different team with enhanced fire-power then when they lost to the Suns. GET IT YET?
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 02, 2008, 08:16:08 PM
NIK=Owned by SGV.  He punks you time and time again.  So many people have you repeatedly bitch slapped you on this forum and you just can't let it be.  You throw out useless information and twist things around to make yourself look intelligent and, as you say, a Laker "insider."  You're just a tool that can't admit when he's wrong and resort to throwing out priceless tidbits that make you look worse and worse as each day passes.  I'm telling you like I've said before, put the barrel in your mouth and pull the trigger.  This Sports board would be so much better without you.

Let me remind the moderator of this forum...

Moderator is defined as someone who mediates disputes and attempts to avoid violence.

Sports Moderator=Horrible


So you admit that I look intelligent? LOL... You're just another person who only posts here to ride my nuts and hate on the Lakers. :-X  Get the fuck out of here, sunny.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 03, 2008, 01:11:24 AM
Ah typical NIK.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: hisairness on February 03, 2008, 08:04:38 AM
NIK=Owned by SGV.  He punks you time and time again.  So many people have you repeatedly bitch slapped you on this forum and you just can't let it be.  You throw out useless information and twist things around to make yourself look intelligent and, as you say, a Laker "insider."  You're just a tool that can't admit when he's wrong and resort to throwing out priceless tidbits that make you look worse and worse as each day passes.  I'm telling you like I've said before, put the barrel in your mouth and pull the trigger.  This Sports board would be so much better without you.

Let me remind the moderator of this forum...

Moderator is defined as someone who mediates disputes and attempts to avoid violence.

Sports Moderator=Horrible


So you admit that I look intelligent? LOL... You're just another person who only posts here to ride my nuts and hate on the Lakers. :-X  Get the fuck out of here, sunny.

No numnuts.  I didn't admit you look intelligent.  I said "you throw out useless information and twist things around to make yourself look intelligent."  Big difference dickhead.  And for the upteenth time, riding nuts is usually when you agree with a person.  The only person that rides your nuts is yourself.  Nobody else cares what you say.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on February 03, 2008, 09:21:54 AM
tim duncan will end his career with more rings than Shaq OR Kobe
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 03, 2008, 11:34:48 AM
NIK=Owned by SGV.  He punks you time and time again.  So many people have you repeatedly bitch slapped you on this forum and you just can't let it be.  You throw out useless information and twist things around to make yourself look intelligent and, as you say, a Laker "insider."  You're just a tool that can't admit when he's wrong and resort to throwing out priceless tidbits that make you look worse and worse as each day passes.  I'm telling you like I've said before, put the barrel in your mouth and pull the trigger.  This Sports board would be so much better without you.

Let me remind the moderator of this forum...

Moderator is defined as someone who mediates disputes and attempts to avoid violence.

Sports Moderator=Horrible


So you admit that I look intelligent? LOL... You're just another person who only posts here to ride my nuts and hate on the Lakers. :-X  Get the fuck out of here, sunny.

No numnuts.  I didn't admit you look intelligent.  I said "you throw out useless information and twist things around to make yourself look intelligent."  Big difference dickhead.  And for the upteenth time, riding nuts is usually when you agree with a person.  The only person that rides your nuts is yourself.  Nobody else cares what you say.


When you're on someones nuts, you're on their nuts...Take a look at your post history, dipshit. Every other post is either about me or the Lakers. Even your sig is about me...Get a fucking life, ya damn loser.


Typical NIK = Defends his team
Typical SGV, hisairness, LADODGER, etc. = Rides NIKs nuts because he defends his team (with no subtance whatsoever).


:grumpy:
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 03, 2008, 12:29:52 PM
Typical NIK is more: Changing opions and then insulting others when he gets pointed out. THAT'S typical of NIK.

LADodger, Hack, myself, whoever... we just point it out and you get super hurt.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 03, 2008, 07:38:22 PM
Typical NIK is more: Changing opions and then insulting others when he gets pointed out. THAT'S typical of NIK.

LADodger, Hack, myself, whoever... we just point it out and you get super hurt.


Show me where I changed opinions, basketball head? Notice how nothing you say has substance. Look at the type of posters who agree with you...One cries from joy when the Lakers lose, one is a huge Celtic fan, and one has a dedication to me in his sig. Get help. You hate me so much that you started discussing basketball to hate on the Lakers...That's quite sad. :-\
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 03, 2008, 11:29:33 PM
You keep saying I hate you so much as if you really want me to hate you. It's funny. I've shown how you flip and flop back and forth in different convos and you just flip flopped around that. It makes no sense to continue to beat a dead horse.

NIK, you cry from joy when the Celtics lose (you'll deny this of course...), you're a huge Laker fan and you've dedicated threads to me. Get help. "Basketball Head."
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 12:33:02 AM
Get off my nuts, dipshit...and stop making your hate for Laker fans so obvious in every damn basketball discussion you "add" to.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 04, 2008, 08:45:13 AM
Haha. NIK knows he ain't got shit left to say. All you can say is that I hate the Lakers. Even though I don't, you love to make up stories. So, I'll continue to add to discussions and if you or any other dickrider makes comments that need to be pointed out, I will do so. You stop making your love for me so obvious in every damn discussion...
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 11:52:54 AM
I supposedly have nothing to say, yet YOU couldn't even say where I "changed opinions"...Like I said, off the nuts, dipshit.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 04, 2008, 11:55:04 AM
They've been shown. You danced around them. Off my nuts, Vanessa...
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 11:58:25 AM
Okay, then what did my opinion change about? Bubba, seriously now, grow up.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 04, 2008, 12:02:34 PM
I've explained it. No need to explain again. Just go through the thread...

You insult people. Call them names... and then you tell others to grow up? Haha. Only NIK.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 12:11:19 PM
I've explained it. No need to explain again. Just go through the thread...

You insult people. Call them names... and then you tell others to grow up? Haha. Only NIK.


LMAO...If it were so evident, it wouldn't be so hard to just say. You have NOTHING, basketball head. Now get out of this thread and grow up.....fatso.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 04, 2008, 12:21:13 PM
It's evident to everyone but yourself. But yeah continue to call people names, but tell others to grow up. It just futher adds to your hypocrisy and contradictive ways.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on February 04, 2008, 12:27:57 PM
tim duncan> shaq > kobe

and giants > patriots  8)
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 01:36:07 PM
If anyone knows what this fatass means by I "changed my opinion", post it here........









Yup, that's what I thought...SGV proves to be an incompetent loser...AGAIN.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 01:36:59 PM
tim duncan> shaq > kobe

and giants > patriots  8)





Paul Pierce > Paul Peirce


Don't get mad, young'n.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 04, 2008, 03:02:37 PM
NIK is upset.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 03:42:29 PM
SGV watches basketball.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: SGV on February 04, 2008, 08:15:35 PM
Two true statements in a row. I'm shocked.
Title: Re: Rings: Kobe: 3 Shaq: 4
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on February 04, 2008, 09:35:25 PM
^^three false ones.


Stop ruining threads.