West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Antonio_ on February 02, 2008, 03:14:31 AM
-
You know somebody had to make this poll. So.. since the Lakers acquired Gasol without loosing any player from their starting five.. the simple question is: which team has the best roster out of the two?
-
Bostons got the big 3 in their starting 5 but the Lakers have a whole lot of depth now
-
At full strength, with Bynum and Ariza at 100%, the Lakers should be better next season, and I fucking hate it.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
-
hahahahaha @ this thread. damn you lakers niccas count your eggs before they hatch.
to cuzz who said the lakers got a better startin 5, hahaha aww man. the celtics have 3 hall of famers who are still ALL of all star caliber in their starting five, lakers got one future hall of famer/all star in kobe, a one time all star in gasol and a player in bynum who MIGHT be an all star, theres no tellin if he will be injury prone or how he'll do after this year. odom is a huge disappointment and everyone knows that nicca cant be mentioned in this convo. he's a career letdown and completely unreliable. yeah the lakers did a great trade, but its barely 1 day later and you niccas is sayin shiet like this. wait to see how the shiet plays out, the celtics starting 5 have ALREADY shown that they the best in the leagut as a whole, with the best record and by handlin the west like nuthin. u niccas crac me up. might as well say this startin 5 is better than the celtics of russell and the showtime lakers too. kid ass niccas.
-
^preach
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
Kobe>Paul
Fisher> Bondo
Bynum> WHoever the fuck they're center is
Odom = Allen
Gasol < Garnett
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
What's so hard to believe?
PG Derek Fisher
SG Kobe Bryant
SF Lamar Odom
PF Pau Gasol
C Andrew Bynum
shits all over
PG Rajon Rondo
SG Ray Allen
SF Paul Pierce
PF Kevin Garnett
C Kendrick Perkins
-
hahahahaha @ this thread. damn you lakers niccas count your eggs before they hatch.
to cuzz who said the lakers got a better startin 5, hahaha aww man. the celtics have 3 hall of famers who are still ALL of all star caliber in their starting five, lakers got one future hall of famer/all star in kobe, a one time all star in gasol and a player in bynum who MIGHT be an all star, theres no tellin if he will be injury prone or how he'll do after this year. odom is a huge disappointment and everyone knows that nicca cant be mentioned in this convo. he's a career letdown and completely unreliable. yeah the lakers did a great trade, but its barely 1 day later and you niccas is sayin shiet like this. wait to see how the shiet plays out, the celtics starting 5 have ALREADY shown that they the best in the leagut as a whole, with the best record and by handlin the west like nuthin. u niccas crac me up. might as well say this startin 5 is better than the celtics of russell and the showtime lakers too. kid ass niccas.
Okay...I figured it out...Your favorite team is whoever plays the Lakers.
Your posts lack substance, you stupid nicca.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
What's so hard to believe?
PG Derek Fisher
SG Kobe Bryant
SF Lamar Odom
PF Pau Gasol
C Andrew Bynum
shits all over
PG Rajon Rondo
SG Ray Allen
SF Paul Pierce
PF Kevin Garnett
C Kendrick Perkins
you dont have a big man in the galaxy of kg (kobe's amazing, but he's not a big man), whereas we have ray allen or paul pierce to offset kobe as small players (clearly neither are as good, but both can keep up with him). i'd argue that rondo is better than derek fisher, but thats probably just because im a celtics fan; you'd argue otherwise. the only player you have thats clear-cut much better than our player, at the same position/size, is bynum.
its obviously all opinion, though, so i dont expect you to agree with that.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
What's so hard to believe?
PG Derek Fisher
SG Kobe Bryant
SF Lamar Odom
PF Pau Gasol
C Andrew Bynum
shits all over
PG Rajon Rondo
SG Ray Allen
SF Paul Pierce
PF Kevin Garnett
C Kendrick Perkins
you dont have a big man in the galaxy of kg (kobe's amazing, but he's not a big man), whereas we have ray allen or paul pierce to offset kobe as small players (clearly neither are as good, but both can keep up with him). i'd argue that rondo is better than derek fisher, but thats probably just because im a celtics fan; you'd argue otherwise. the only player you have thats clear-cut much better than our player, at the same position/size, is bynum.
its obviously all opinion, though, so i dont expect you to agree with that.
never expect him to agree to anything anti-lakers lol.
but it is true, the Celtics are still a better team. the best in the league 8)
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
Kobe>Paul
Fisher> Bondo
Bynum> WHoever the fuck they're center is
Odom = Allen
Gasol < Garnett
who the hell compares lamar to ray allen?? LOL your hilarious.
"whoever the fuck they are center is" (first off that makes no sense) - you don't even know our roster so why am I bothering debating with you lol.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
Kobe>Paul
Fisher> Bondo
Bynum> WHoever the fuck they're center is
Odom = Allen
Gasol < Garnett
who the hell compares lamar to ray allen?? LOL your hilarious.
"whoever the fuck they are center is" (first off that makes no sense) - you don't even know our roster so why am I bothering debating with you lol.
I'm comparing starting 5 you dumbfuck. And your no name center is not better thatn Bynum.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
Kobe>Paul
Fisher> Bondo
Bynum> WHoever the fuck they're center is
Odom = Allen
Gasol < Garnett
who the hell compares lamar to ray allen?? LOL your hilarious.
"whoever the fuck they are center is" (first off that makes no sense) - you don't even know our roster so why am I bothering debating with you lol.
I'm comparing starting 5 you dumbfuck. And your no name center is not better thatn Bynum.
lol someones feelings getting hurt?
all that needs to be said is that the Celtics are going to make it to the finals
the LAkers will be watching it at home.
-
We now have a better starting 5, and we been had more depth than them. So the I go with the Lakers.
are you serious about the starting five thing or are you just being idealistic?
What's so hard to believe?
PG Derek Fisher
SG Kobe Bryant
SF Lamar Odom
PF Pau Gasol
C Andrew Bynum
shits all over
PG Rajon Rondo
SG Ray Allen
SF Paul Pierce
PF Kevin Garnett
C Kendrick Perkins
you dont have a big man in the galaxy of kg (kobe's amazing, but he's not a big man), whereas we have ray allen or paul pierce to offset kobe as small players (clearly neither are as good, but both can keep up with him). i'd argue that rondo is better than derek fisher, but thats probably just because im a celtics fan; you'd argue otherwise. the only player you have thats clear-cut much better than our player, at the same position/size, is bynum.
its obviously all opinion, though, so i dont expect you to agree with that.
No big in the galaxy of KG? LOL! Gasol, buddy...it's funny that you say anyone in the league can keep up with Kobe, let alone RAY ALLEN. Also, LMAO@Rondo as good as Fisher.. even Farmar is better than Rondo. Worst of all, how can you say the only player that is clear-cut much better on our roster is Bynum when we have KOBE on our team?...Our roster is currently murdering yours...PeACe
-
Fisher > Rondo
Kobe > Allen
Odom < Pierce
Gasol < KG
Bynum > Perkins
Farmar > T.Allen
Vujacic < E. House
Ariza > Posey
Walton > Powe
Turiaf > Davis
Mihm > Pollard
-
^Nice breakdown...and you still didn't even list Radmanovic, Coby Karl, and DJ MBenga. ;)
-
no need to get your feelings hurt. pau gasol isnt seeing kg, ever. never has, never will. pierce, on the other hand, can keep up with kobe. i already said he's not as good, hands down, no question, but he can keep up.
we'll see who has the better record, second half, cus as of yet the west hasnt been able to do a thing to us. you guys go undefeated in the east (which is weaker, anyway), and then well talk.
p.s. tony allen's gangsta>>>the lakers' gangsta combined.
-
Fisher >> Rondo
Kobe >>>>>>>>>>> Allen
Odom << Pierce
Gasol << KG
Bynum >>>>> Perkins
Farmar >> T.Allen
Vujacic < E. House
Ariza > Posey
Walton > Powe
Turiaf >> Davis
Mihm >> Pollard
Radmanovic >> Scalabrine
C. Karl = Pruitt
DJ Mbenga > Empty spot
There's my version of the list. 8)
-
you goofy internet niggas can keep making up weird roster lists online to make yallselves feel better, but the REAL question is who has the better record? better seeding? which team has completely handled the other in each game head to head this season? i got a newsflash for u niggas, the nba counts what happens in the real games, not some forum. the celtics ran the lakers out the gym each game this year, even with overhyped bynum, the lakers couldnt even lose by less than 10 points.
wins and losses > online roster lists
-
no need to get your feelings hurt. pau gasol isnt seeing kg, ever. never has, never will. pierce, on the other hand, can keep up with kobe. i already said he's not as good, hands down, no question, but he can keep up.
we'll see who has the better record, second half, cus as of yet the west hasnt been able to do a thing to us. you guys go undefeated in the east (which is weaker, anyway), and then well talk.
p.s. tony allen's gangsta>>>the lakers' gangsta combined.
Wow...just, wow. Where did I get my feelings hurt? You're just saying some unreasonable stuff, that's all...There's OBVIOUSLY a bigger disparity between Kobe and Pierce than there is between Gasol and KG. LOL.
PS...Tony Allen is a dumbass.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Le8rMnL56w8
-
you goofy internet niggas can keep making up weird roster lists online to make yallselves feel better, but the REAL question is who has the better record? better seeding? which team has completely handled the other in each game head to head this season? i got a newsflash for u niggas, the nba counts what happens in the real games, not some forum. the celtics ran the lakers out the gym each game this year, even with overhyped bynum, the lakers couldnt even lose by less than 10 points.
wins and losses > online roster lists
HAHA thats just what i was thinking
these niggas can feel better about themselves with a "list" but it doesnt mean squat when their team is out in the first round again
-
you goofy internet niggas can keep making up weird roster lists online to make yallselves feel better, but the REAL question is who has the better record? better seeding? which team has completely handled the other in each game head to head this season? i got a newsflash for u niggas, the nba counts what happens in the real games, not some forum. the celtics ran the lakers out the gym each game this year, even with overhyped bynum, the lakers couldnt even lose by less than 10 points.
wins and losses > online roster lists
You fuccing moron, do you realize that we just acquired Gasol? Seriously, now...slap yourself...HARD.
-
you goofy internet niggas can keep making up weird roster lists online to make yallselves feel better, but the REAL question is who has the better record? better seeding? which team has completely handled the other in each game head to head this season? i got a newsflash for u niggas, the nba counts what happens in the real games, not some forum. the celtics ran the lakers out the gym each game this year, even with overhyped bynum, the lakers couldnt even lose by less than 10 points.
wins and losses > online roster lists
HAHA thats just what i was thinking
these niggas can feel better about themselves with a "list" but it doesnt mean squat when their team is out in the first round again
How do you feel content agreeing with this guy? LOL.
-
At this moment, you haven't seen Gasol play with the Lakers. It's a bit early to say Lakers > Celtics.
And remember, the Celt's have whooped the Lakers this year. They're still better. They still have a better win/loss.
Can't deny that on paper the Lakers starting 5 looks good, but not as good as having the big 3, IMO.
Even when Bynum comes back, dude's gonna be rusty (and if he's out the entire season, he'll be hella rusty next season). It might actually be another season until this roster gel's together.
-
^Nice breakdown...and you still didn't even list Radmanovic, Coby Karl, and DJ MBenga. ;)
What i mean is that our bench is by far the best one. And the starting 5 is basically as good as the Boston one (if not better). So overall i think our roster is better.
-
you goofy internet niggas can keep making up weird roster lists online to make yallselves feel better, but the REAL question is who has the better record?
2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons 64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.
The Boston Celtics has the better record. :-*
-
u overly excitable niggas must not remember what happened when you guys all got wet online cuz you picced up malone and payton and thought that meant you guys would win. we all know what happened then hahaha. like i said, keep makin lil online lists and watch the REALITY of the nba with your tissues close by.
payton
shaq
malone
kobe
some scrub = no ring
i still aint seen nobody answer me on how the celtics mollywhopped yall niggas each time this year and are undefeated against the west and have the leagues best record.
as for your other list again(hahaha u love to make online lists, goofy ass nigga) that shiet is the same as posting starting 5s u aint ever seen play together and thinkin it actually means anything. refer to my stuff about malone and payton above lil nigga, and then go take a timeout in the corner.
-
u overly excitable niggas must not remember what happened when you guys all got wet online cuz you picced up malone and payton and thought that meant you guys would win. we all know what happened then hahaha. like i said, keep makin lil online lists and watch the REALITY of the nba with your tissues close by.
i still aint seen nobody answer me on how the celtics mollywhopped yall niggas each time this year and are undefeated against the west and have the leagues best record.
I just replied.
as for your other list again(hahaha u love to make online lists, goofy ass nigga) that shiet is the same as posting starting 5s u aint ever seen play together and thinkin it actually means anything. refer to my stuff about malone and payton above lil nigga, and then go take a timeout in the corner.
First you gotta explain me what are you trying to say. That we didn't win the title even if the had 4 all of famers in the starting 5? Well, this team has just 1, so what's your point?
do i gotta break everything down for you slow muthafucas?
the point im making lil nigga, is that bacc then with malone, payton, shaq and kobe, you excitable lil fucs probly got all hyped cuz you had "a better roster" than other teams on paper or in TYPE, in the case of all you no life havingn forum kids, and probably made a gang of threads hahaha, yet yall still aint win jacc shiet. so for you to pull out a random online list (again) to try and say having the best record doesn't mean anything also makes your shiet about "better rosters" just as stupid. just having a "better roster" doesnt mean you are better than the nbas top team.(the celtics) get it now or u want me to write it with a crayon?
-
u overly excitable niggas must not remember what happened when you guys all got wet online cuz you picced up malone and payton and thought that meant you guys would win. we all know what happened then hahaha. like i said, keep makin lil online lists and watch the REALITY of the nba with your tissues close by.
i still aint seen nobody answer me on how the celtics mollywhopped yall niggas each time this year and are undefeated against the west and have the leagues best record.
I just replied.
as for your other list again(hahaha u love to make online lists, goofy ass nigga) that shiet is the same as posting starting 5s u aint ever seen play together and thinkin it actually means anything. refer to my stuff about malone and payton above lil nigga, and then go take a timeout in the corner.
First you gotta explain me what are you trying to say. That we didn't win the title even if the had 4 all of famers in the starting 5? Well, this team has just 1, so what's your point?
do i gotta break everything down for you slow muthafucas?
Yes, since you're making no sense at all.
the point im making lil nigga, is that bacc then with malone, payton, shaq and kobe, you excitable lil fucs probly got all hyped cuz you had "a better roster" than other teams on paper or in TYPE, in the case of all you no life havingn forum kids, and probably made a gang of threads hahaha, yet yall still aint win jacc shiet. so for you to pull out a random online list (again) to try and say having the best record doesn't mean anything also makes your shiet about "better rosters" just as stupid.
To have the best roster on the paper and to win the Championship are two totally different things, you are the one mixing them. I ain't talking about rings, about records, about this stuff. You are. That Lakers team with Malone & co. had no doubt the best roster in the League. No fucking doubt. They didn't win. But i'm not saying the Lakers already won the title this year, so what's your point? We're comparing ROSTERS, not records. And nobody knows the future. You say GREAT ROSTER doesnt automatically means NBA TITLE? Ok, i do agree. But in the last 7 year BEST RECORD did mean NO RING. So your other argument is wrong anyway.
just having a "better roster" doesnt mean you are better than the nbas top team.(the celtics) get it now or u want me to write it with a crayon?
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
-
PS...Tony Allen is a dumbass.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Le8rMnL56w8
not as dumb as kobe was to get involved with some trailer park skank when he knew to keep his dick to his wife and/or his right hand.
-
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
NIK has made a few statements saying the Lakers are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE TRADE
-
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
NIK has made a few statements saying the Lakers are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE TRADE
And you're saying the Celtics are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE RING (don't let me post that list AGAIN). So what's the difference? It's just an opinion, like your.
-
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
NIK has made a few statements saying the Lakers are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE TRADE
And you're saying the Celtics are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE RING (don't let me post that list AGAIN). So what's the difference? It's just an opinion, like your.
my team has three hall of hamers who are still all-stars and have the best record in the league.
his team has one HOF ball hog an up and coming big man and a bunch of scrubs.
-
u overly excitable niggas must not remember what happened when you guys all got wet online cuz you picced up malone and payton and thought that meant you guys would win. we all know what happened then hahaha. like i said, keep makin lil online lists and watch the REALITY of the nba with your tissues close by.
i still aint seen nobody answer me on how the celtics mollywhopped yall niggas each time this year and are undefeated against the west and have the leagues best record.
I just replied.
as for your other list again(hahaha u love to make online lists, goofy ass nigga) that shiet is the same as posting starting 5s u aint ever seen play together and thinkin it actually means anything. refer to my stuff about malone and payton above lil nigga, and then go take a timeout in the corner.
First you gotta explain me what are you trying to say. That we didn't win the title even if the had 4 all of famers in the starting 5? Well, this team has just 1, so what's your point?
do i gotta break everything down for you slow muthafucas?
Yes, since you're making NO SENSE at all.
the point im making lil nigga, is that bacc then with malone, payton, shaq and kobe, you excitable lil fucs probly got all hyped cuz you had "a better roster" than other teams on paper or in TYPE, in the case of all you no life havingn forum kids, and probably made a gang of threads hahaha, yet yall still aint win jacc shiet. so for you to pull out a random online list (again) to try and say having the best record doesn't mean anything also makes your shiet about "better rosters" just as stupid.
To have the best roster on the paper and to win the Championship are two totally different things, you are the one mixing them. I ain't talking about rings, about records, about this stuff. You are. That Lakers team with Malone & co. had no doubt the best roster in the League. No fucking doubt. They didn't win. But i'm not saying the Lakers already won the title this year, so what's your point? We're comparing ROSTERS, not records. And nobody knows the future.
just having a "better roster" doesnt mean you are better than the nbas top team.(the celtics) get it now or u want me to write it with a crayon?
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
haha, first off you internet nigga, you gotta delete your shiet to make arguments, which is some weirdo shit cuzz.
ima break the shiet down for your indecisive and slow ass.
the celtics are currently regarded by many as the top team in the nba and have the nbas best record. they are early favorites to reach the finals and possibly win it all, because they not only have 3 hall of fame/all star veterans, but they have played together very well and fit into the team nicely while wallkin all over the rest of the league. is that shiet premature on many niggas part? sure, but it at least has something real behind - a great record, owning the west, gelling together well, etc.
on the other side, the lakers are regarded by many as a strong team, but are on the outside looking into the west's elite (phx, spurs, dallas) which you lakers groupies will of course refuse to accept cuz each of those teams, especially the suns, have punked your team when it COUNTS the last 2 years. yall lost your overhyped starting center for at least the rest of this month, then he's gotta find his rhythm again and u gotta see how gasol fits into this team, all which makes your future, REALISTICALLY, pretty tough. theres no tellin how the trade will ACTUALLY work out, but you niggas are already bustin nuts. you groupies are repeating the same mistake yall made bacc with malone and payton and shaq and kobe, you niggas think just cuz the team looks good on paper, that it automatically makes you a contender for the best team in the nba(the reason why yo slow ass even thought to compare them to the celtics). the reality is yall are the 6th seed right now in the toughest conference, on a losing record the last 7 games, on a long ass road trip, with a new player who has to learn a new system mid season and see if he fits, all which can seriously fucc with you and the jewboys wet dreams. the fact that you dont pay any of that real shiet anymind and just jump to compare this unproven(even in the regular season so far) team, especially with a starting 5 that aint even ready to play yet hahaha, is stupid and shows that you niggas care more about online lists than what the real is.
in the simple way - you lakers niggas is peein your pants in excitement comparing rosters to the nba's best just cuz you added a good player on paper, while realistic niggas is saying look at facts and not online groupie fantasies. get it now lil man?
-
u overly excitable niggas must not remember what happened when you guys all got wet online cuz you picced up malone and payton and thought that meant you guys would win. we all know what happened then hahaha. like i said, keep makin lil online lists and watch the REALITY of the nba with your tissues close by.
i still aint seen nobody answer me on how the celtics mollywhopped yall niggas each time this year and are undefeated against the west and have the leagues best record.
I just replied.
as for your other list again(hahaha u love to make online lists, goofy ass nigga) that shiet is the same as posting starting 5s u aint ever seen play together and thinkin it actually means anything. refer to my stuff about malone and payton above lil nigga, and then go take a timeout in the corner.
First you gotta explain me what are you trying to say. That we didn't win the title even if the had 4 all of famers in the starting 5? Well, this team has just 1, so what's your point?
do i gotta break everything down for you slow muthafucas?
Yes, since you're making no sense at all.
the point im making lil nigga, is that bacc then with malone, payton, shaq and kobe, you excitable lil fucs probly got all hyped cuz you had "a better roster" than other teams on paper or in TYPE, in the case of all you no life havingn forum kids, and probably made a gang of threads hahaha, yet yall still aint win jacc shiet. so for you to pull out a random online list (again) to try and say having the best record doesn't mean anything also makes your shiet about "better rosters" just as stupid.
To have the best roster on the paper and to win the Championship are two totally different things, you are the one mixing them. I ain't talking about rings, about records, about this stuff. You are. That Lakers team with Malone & co. had no doubt the best roster in the League. No fucking doubt. They didn't win. But i'm not saying the Lakers already won the title this year, so what's your point? We're comparing ROSTERS, not records. And nobody knows the future. You say GREAT ROSTER doesnt automatically means NBA TITLE? Ok, i do agree. But in the last 7 year BEST RECORD did mean NO RING. So your other argument is wrong anyway.
just having a "better roster" doesnt mean you are better than the nbas top team.(the celtics) get it now or u want me to write it with a crayon?
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
Isn't it funny how Antonio speaks WAYY better English than this guy?
-
PS...Tony Allen is a dumbass.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Le8rMnL56w8
not as dumb as kobe was to get involved with some trailer park skank when he knew to keep his dick to his wife and/or his right hand.
Naah...nothing can be dumber than what Tony Allen did.
-
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
NIK has made a few statements saying the Lakers are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE TRADE
And you're saying the Celtics are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE RING (don't let me post that list AGAIN). So what's the difference? It's just an opinion, like your.
my team has three hall of hamers who are still all-stars and have the best record in the league.
his team has one HOF ball hog an up and coming big man and a bunch of scrubs.
wow...see why no one takes your opinion seriously?
-
you lakers niggas
What happened to "niccas", cuzz?
Do you realize that you're considered a joke around here? Even by Laker haters... Your dumbass is dissing us for thinking the Lakers are a good team, then you bring up the Malone-Payton Lakers as an example of how the best roster doesn't equal the best team, all while saying the Celtics are gunna win a ring, because they have 3 hall of fame players. LMAO...Quit contradicting yourself, dicchead.
-
What happened to "niccas", cuzz?
Do you realize that no one here takes you seriously? That even includes Laker haters... Your dumbass is dissing us for thinking the Lakers are a good team, then you bring up the Malone-Payton Lakers as an example of how the best roster doesn't equal the best team, all while saying the Celtics are gunna win a ring, because they have 3 hall of fame players. LMAO...Quit contradicting yourself, dicchead.
the same thing that happened to yo family, i got tired of it and threw it down the well.
and i aint say they was gonna win no ring nigga, i said that "many people consider them favorites" cuz of their cohesiveness while playing together and buyin into their system and those people feel that way cuz of the actual records during GAMES PLAYED, not just "what if" online scenarios before ever even seeing a team play together like you niggas are doing on here. get it now?
-
I get it. But who's exactly the one who said the Lakers is gonna win the title this year? I've read the whole topic, and i think nobody talked about rings and shit. Are you chatting with yourself?
NIK has made a few statements saying the Lakers are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE TRADE
And you're saying the Celtics are the best team in the NBA...BEFORE THE RING (don't let me post that list AGAIN). So what's the difference? It's just an opinion, like your.
my team has three hall of hamers who are still all-stars and have the best record in the league.
his team has one HOF ball hog an up and coming big man and a bunch of scrubs.
wow...see why no one takes your opinion seriously?
pot calling kettle what?
-
PS...Tony Allen is a dumbass.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Le8rMnL56w8
not as dumb as kobe was to get involved with some trailer park skank when he knew to keep his dick to his wife and/or his right hand.
Naah...nothing can be dumber than what Tony Allen did.
youre saying that going up for a dunk after a play's dead and fucking up is dumber than having sex with a golddigging whore when youre among the best players in the nba, a multimillionaire, and a worldwide sports icon?
-
haha, first off you internet nigga, you gotta delete your shiet to make arguments, which is some weirdo shit cuzz.
I'm italian, and english is just my 3rd language. I read what i wrote and since i thought i didn't explain it in the best way possible, i wrote it again in (hopefully) better english. Are you blaming me cause english is not my mother language? Please....
ima break the shiet down for your indecisive and slow ass.
the celtics are currently regarded by many as the top team in the nba and have the nbas best record. they are early favorites to reach the finals and possibly win it all, because they not only have 3 hall of fame/all star veterans, but they have played together very well and fit into the team nicely while wallkin all over the rest of the league. is that shiet premature on many niggas part? sure, but it at least has something real behind - a great record, owning the west, gelling together well, etc.
I ain't arguing that. But please keep in mind that the Lakers made a trade getting Ariza, which improved their team. At one point they had the #1 record in the West, with the best winning streak in the NBA and many NBA experts were starting to rank them #1 in the weekly rankings and shit. Then Ariza got injured. Then Bynum got injured. They we entered a 9 game road streak (wtf?). Shit obviously wasn't going to be funny, for us. But we acquired Gasol. So the team tomorrow will play will be hella different than the one who started the season. So what's the point comparing the past games played without Gasol to the games played by the Celtics? Lakers are different. And when Bynum will come back, they'll be different and improved again. So it's pointless to compare the Celtics to this team, cause Gasol ain't played a single game yet, and cause Ariza and Bynum are still injured anyway. We will see which team is the best one once the Lakers could have Bynum and Ariza back, and could add Gasol to the starting five.
on the other side, the lakers are regarded by many as a strong team, but are on the outside looking into the west's elite (phx, spurs, dallas) which you lakers groupies will of course refuse to accept cuz each of those teams, especially the suns, have punked your team when it COUNTS the last 2 years.
Before Bynum got injured we had the best record in the West, man. And if you know shit about basketball, you know that those Suns can't do shit against us if we play with Gasol and Bynum in the starting 5. I mean they can't defend two good post players, it'a a well known thing (shit Bynum alone destroyed them, this season). Dallas? C'mon. The Spurs? Those Spurs ain't as impressive as usual, man. And they have our same record. It's due to injuries, ok. But you can say the same to us.
yall lost your overhyped starting center for at least the rest of this month, then he's gotta find his rhythm again and u gotta see how gasol fits into this team, all which makes your future, REALISTICALLY, pretty tough. theres no tellin how the trade will ACTUALLY work out, but you niggas are already bustin nuts. you groupies are repeating the same mistake yall made bacc with malone and payton and shaq and kobe, you niggas think just cuz the team looks good on paper, that it automatically makes you a contender for the best team in the nba(the reason why yo slow ass even thought to compare them to the celtics). the reality is yall are the 6th seed right now in the toughest conference, on a losing record the last 7 games
LMAO that's classic!! A losing record in the last 7. Celtics are 6-4 in the last 10, Lakers are 5-5. I see no big differences. We were 1st in the West. We lost 4 games cause we lost our starting center and our starting SF. Now we got a new starting C (till Bynum comes back). If it works well, we could back were we were before Bynum's injury. Gasol is as good as Bynum, so why not?
on a long ass road trip, with a new player who has to learn a new system mid season and see if he fits, all which can seriously fucc with you and the jewboys wet dreams. the fact that you dont pay any of that real shiet anymind and just jump to compare this unproven(even in the regular season so far) team, especially with a starting 5 that aint even ready to play yet hahaha, is stupid and shows that you niggas care more about online lists than what the real is.
When you compare rosters, usually you include all the players. What's your point? English is not my mother language, but i made it pretty clear in the starting post of this topic i was talking about ROSTERS. If you think BEST ROSTER doesn't mean shit, simply say it. But don't try to look smart saying i compared rosters. That was the main purpose of this topic, lol.
in the simple way - you lakers niggas is peein your pants in excitement comparing rosters to the nba's best just cuz you added a good player on paper, while realistic niggas is saying look at facts and not online groupie fantasies. get it now lil man?
Realistic niggas should know that in the last 7 years the team with the best record didn't win the ring. Be realistic. We could be the Detroit Pistons and the Celtics can be Malone's Lakers.
-
What happened to "niccas", cuzz?
Do you realize that no one here takes you seriously? That even includes Laker haters... Your dumbass is dissing us for thinking the Lakers are a good team, then you bring up the Malone-Payton Lakers as an example of how the best roster doesn't equal the best team, all while saying the Celtics are gunna win a ring, because they have 3 hall of fame players. LMAO...Quit contradicting yourself, dicchead.
the same thing that happened to yo family, i got tired of it and threw it down the well.
and i aint say they was gonna win no ring nigga, i said that "many people consider them favorites" cuz of their cohesiveness while playing together and buyin into their system and those people feel that way cuz of the actual records during GAMES PLAYED, not just "what if" online scenarios before ever even seeing a team play together like you niggas are doing on here. get it now?
The only thing I don't get is why your objective in watching basketball is to hate on the Lakers...WHY CANT YOU SAY WHO YOUR FAVORITE TEAM IS? Do you cum all over yourself every time the Lakers lose a game?
-
PS...Tony Allen is a dumbass.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Le8rMnL56w8
not as dumb as kobe was to get involved with some trailer park skank when he knew to keep his dick to his wife and/or his right hand.
Naah...nothing can be dumber than what Tony Allen did.
youre saying that going up for a dunk after a play's dead and fucking up is dumber than having sex with a golddigging whore when youre among the best players in the nba, a multimillionaire, and a worldwide sports icon?
I'm saying that cheating is fucked up, but when it comes to BASKETBALL, nothing can be dumber than what Allen did...LOL...Anyways, you're a cool poster, so I don't wanna get into some dumb shit with you. But you gotta admit, that Tony Allen shit was ridiculous.
-
you lakers niggas
What happened to "niccas", cuzz?
Do you realize that you're considered a joke around here? Even by Laker haters... Your dumbass is dissing us for thinking the Lakers are a good team, then you bring up the Malone-Payton Lakers as an example of how the best roster doesn't equal the best team, all while saying the Celtics are gunna win a ring, because they have 3 hall of fame players. LMAO...Quit contradicting yourself, dicchead.
LOL, exactly.
-
PS...Tony Allen is a dumbass.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Le8rMnL56w8
not as dumb as kobe was to get involved with some trailer park skank when he knew to keep his dick to his wife and/or his right hand.
Naah...nothing can be dumber than what Tony Allen did.
youre saying that going up for a dunk after a play's dead and fucking up is dumber than having sex with a golddigging whore when youre among the best players in the nba, a multimillionaire, and a worldwide sports icon?
I'm saying that cheating is fucked up, but when it comes to BASKETBALL, nothing can be dumber than what Allen did...LOL...Anyways, you're a cool poster, so I don't wanna get into some dumb shit with you. But you gotta admit, that Tony Allen shit was ridiculous.
haha to be real, theres no denying it. on the court, what allen did was retarded. i feel you on the dumb shit tip, too.
-
next time they play perhaps odom can just tackle a few of the celtics, might give them a winning chance
-
next time they play perhaps odom can just tackle a few of the celtics, might give them a winning chance
yo this is my kinda poster
you like Chino too
-
next time they play perhaps odom can just tackle a few of the celtics, might give them a winning chance
yo this is my kinda poster
you like Chino too
no doubt
-
lakers niccas count your eggs before they hatch.
tell that to that to your homie wilson and the millions of Bandwaggoners that jumped on the collective dick of the celtics after the KG trade went down. If you gonna hate be an equal opportunity hater.
-
next time they play perhaps odom can just tackle a few of the celtics, might give them a winning chance
That was an awesome tackle. ;)
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
-
lakers niccas count your eggs before they hatch.
tell that to that to your homie wilson and the millions of Bandwaggoners that jumped on the collective dick of the celtics after the KG trade went down. If you gonna hate be an equal opportunity hater.
1-the KG trade gave us the best record in the league
2-gasol is yet to suit up for LA
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
plus 2 and 0 against they "godly super elite" lakers at full strength (by big amounts too).
yo hac, to answer your question, they have no explanation for that. they just pretend not to see it.
-
^Like we said, that doesn't matter, cuz the current Laker team is different. What did you think about the win this morning against Washington? The team that beat Boston twice this season... Did it make you cry?
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
12-0 against the West; Have they played the Spurs yet? Or the Suns? What about the Hornets? Don't let that pussy schedule fool you. I give Boston their props but I think its obvious that they've had a pretty damn easy schedule.
-
Damn...I can't believe they haven't played 3 of the top teams this late in their schedule...in one conference. :-X
-
looking at the top 6 in the west (current standings), their record is;
utah (played 1, won 1)
phoenix (havent played, due on 2/22 & 26/3)
new orleans (havent played, due on 3/22 & 3/28)
denver (played 1, won 1)
lakers (played 2, won 2)
dallas (played 1, won 1)
san antonio (havent played, due on 2/10 & 3/17)
we'll see how they go, i dont think they're going to have much trouble
-
We'll see. Boston & New Orleans are in trouble in the 2nd half. They're starters had to play A LOT of tough minutes to get those top records. Eventually their benches will have to do something and thats when its sink-or-swim time.
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
12-0 against the West; Have they played the Spurs yet? Or the Suns? What about the Hornets? Don't let that pussy schedule fool you. I give Boston their props but I think its obvious that they've had a pretty damn easy schedule.
we beat the Fakers twice thats for sure
-
Did you beat our current roster?...Didn't think so.
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
12-0 against the West; Have they played the Spurs yet? Or the Suns? What about the Hornets? Don't let that pussy schedule fool you. I give Boston their props but I think its obvious that they've had a pretty damn easy schedule.
we beat the Lakers twice thats for sure
Yes...and no one is debating that, dickhead.
-
We'll see. Boston & New Orleans are in trouble in the 2nd half. They're starters had to play A LOT of tough minutes to get those top records. Eventually their benches will have to do something and thats when its sink-or-swim time.
blah blah blah
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
12-0 against the West; Have they played the Spurs yet? Or the Suns? What about the Hornets? Don't let that pussy schedule fool you. I give Boston their props but I think its obvious that they've had a pretty damn easy schedule.
we beat the Lakers twice thats for sure
Yes...and no one is debating that, dickhead.
dickhead? somebody get his feelings hurt? want a bottle?
-
With both teams at full strength...gotta give the edge to the Lakers. I never been a homer I just tell it how I see it...at the end of the day it comes down to depth. Which bench players are reliable in the rotation?
Celtics: Posey + House + Allen
Lakers: Farmar + Ariza + Turiaf + Radmanovic + Vujacic
The Celtics will always have a better record because there's only 1 other good team in that conference.
Boston = 12-0 against the West
how do you explain that?
ps Orlando is a SOLID team.
12-0 against the West; Have they played the Spurs yet? Or the Suns? What about the Hornets? Don't let that pussy schedule fool you. I give Boston their props but I think its obvious that they've had a pretty damn easy schedule.
we beat the Lakers twice thats for sure
Yes...and no one is debating that, dickhead.
dickhead? somebody get his feelings hurt? want a bottle?
I don't have any feelings. I'm just amused at how much you're reaching. We know the Celtics beat the Lakers twice, that was never in question. So if you wanna have a debate how about saying something that has some relevance...
-
lakers niccas count your eggs before they hatch.
tell that to that to your homie wilson and the millions of Bandwaggoners that jumped on the collective dick of the celtics after the KG trade went down. If you gonna hate be an equal opportunity hater.
1-the KG trade gave us the best record in the league
2-gasol is yet to suit up for LA
lol, im talkin bout Garnetts signing before ANYONE suited up. To cry about anyone getting hyped over a signing and being a Boston fan is hilarious.
-
you goofy internet niggas can keep making up weird roster lists online to make yallselves feel better, but the REAL question is who has the better record?
2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons 64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.
The Boston Celtics has the better record. :-*
2007/2008 - Boston Celtics 66-16 record, CHAMPIONS. I was right the whole time. You lost nicca.
we beat the Fakers twice thats for sure
Did you beat our current roster?...Didn't think so.
yeah, they did. 6 out of 8 times. for the championship. 2 with bynum. 4 with gasol. you lost too chump.
-
^0 with Bynum AND Gasol. 8)
-
well I hope you feel good holding on to that claim
meanwhile my team holds the TROPHY
-
well I hope you feel good holding on to that claim
meanwhile my team holds the TROPHY
and you still hold the claim that Detroit was gunna beat Boston in the ECF...Celtics win, but you lose, regardless.
-
well I hope you feel good holding on to that claim
meanwhile my team holds the TROPHY
and you still hold the claim that Detroit was gunna beat Boston in the ECF...Celtics win, but you lose, regardless.
does that make you feel better??
BOSTON WON!!! IM ON MY WAY TO THE PARADE NIGGA