West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: OG Hack Wilson on September 12, 2009, 07:51:22 PM
-
will they tie the Lions record???
they look shitty enough to do it this year
-
Nah...shit looks chaotic there but it is Oakland after all...I think they're gonna creep towards a .500 record this season.
-
they can beat the chiefs but thats it
they look weak as fuck and are in disaray as usual
-
i say there is a 25% chance that happens, which is pretty bad lol.
if they win any games it would be against the Cheifs, Bengals, Browns or Washington.
-
they can beat the chiefs but thats it
they look weak as fuck and are in disaray as usual
I dono, they won 5 last year and started looking better towards the end. Russel was starting to look like a real good QB in those last few games so I don't think they're gonna be that bad. If Russel can get his shit together I can definitely see them approaching .500 but if not it could be another real long season.
-
jamarcus is a crap QB
they have no line
fargus is 1 on the depth charts over Mcfadden - how tihs happened I have no idea
Nhamdi Asomaugh is just sitting out there on an island of his own not getting thrown to because he's their only star player on defense (before getting Seymour)
their COACH is being investigated by the local DA for punching an assistant
they just traded away their #1 draftpick of 2011 for a 30 year old, soon to be over the hill Seymour (granted Al's track record shows that the pick in 11 will prob be a bust)
oh and they took that WR way too early...up to 20 picks too early
-
lol right. Not a chance. Virtually every analyst out there would tell you they will be better then last year and they didnt go 0-16 lol. Only a complete idiot would assume 0-16 this year. We play in a weak division. I will admit we have a pretty tough schedule this year, but thats ok. Jamarcus wont have to win games for us, just manage them. Our running game should be good and we'll see what Seymour does for our D.
Hacks just happy cus he can say the TWO (yes, I said TWO lol) teams he is a fan of are actually better then us right now. Unfortunately...Raiders franchise (historically) >>>> NYG or NYJ.
-
Raiders will win the superbowl
-
oakland is a effing mess
and Daygostyle you know nothing about football...you can't have a running game without opening up the pass (just ask the late Bill Walsh)
raiders got no passing game
-
5-6 wins is most likely
-
i wouldnt b surprised if any players kill themselves for bein on such a shit team
-
lol right. Not a chance. Virtually every analyst out there would tell you they will be better then last year and they didnt go 0-16 lol. Only a complete idiot would assume 0-16 this year. We play in a weak division. I will admit we have a pretty tough schedule this year, but thats ok. Jamarcus wont have to win games for us, just manage them. Our running game should be good and we'll see what Seymour does for our D.
Hacks just happy cus he can say the TWO (yes, I said TWO lol) teams he is a fan of are actually better then us right now. Unfortunately...Raiders franchise (historically) >>>> NYG or NYJ.
well put
-
they played a good as game tonight to bad they came a bit short
-
one down, fifteen to go. ;D
-
giants = 9 titles in 80 years
raiders = 3 in 50 years
lol @ oakland fans on this forum, how delusional!
-
Seymour played well last night. Can't say the same for Jamarcus.
-
if they keep running the ball and playing defense like that they will win 5-6 games, i think SD was sloppy but the Raiders played well, did you people watch the game? ???
-
i wouldnt b surprised if any players kill themselves for bein on such a shit team
;D LMFHO! +1 on that. If they're not a do it themselves kinda people, they can have somebody kill them for them in the streets of oakland late night on every weekend. Hang out in the hood late at night. Messed up though, not supposed to be funny :( If they were supposed to go 0-16 it shoulda happened 3 years ago but the Steelers chose to play a still injured Big Ben, & Zona team who's not sorry enough to go 0-16, but sorry enough to lose to someone that should go 0-16. 2006 & 1996. The Lions have the best chance of going 0-32 even. They're only winnable games are against the Rams & both Ohio teams.
-
oakland is a effing mess
and Daygostyle you know nothing about football...you can't have a running game without opening up the pass (just ask the late Bill Walsh)
raiders got no passing game
LOL @ you claiming somebody knows nothing about football. Cant have a running game without opening up the pass?? WTF?! Do you even watch football? Are you gonna tell me its commonplace for teams to try and set up their running game with their PASSING game first? LOL!!!. Yes, because youo hear many an offensive coordinator say..."we gotta establish the pass"...not..."we gotta establish the run". Man, you need to study up on the game. You establish the run first, THAT opens up the passing game. Ask any coach, and OC, anyBODY lol. There are rare occasions (Cardinals) where their running game is so bad and their passing game is so good that they HAVE to do the opposite. But thats completely unconventional and the reason they dont have a chance and making the Superbowl again. Go back to NFL 101 man...
-
giants = 9 titles in 80 years
raiders = 3 in 50 years
lol @ oakland fans on this forum, how delusional!
LOL at you trying to make your team seem like something its not. For one, the Giants have 3 Superbowl titles...same as us. The other "World Titles" that you talk about, were before the Raiders were even in the NFL...and how many teams were there? lol. You guys went 30 fuckin years without a "World Title", and were a bottom feeder for what....20 years?! lol. We've only been bad these last 6 yrs. Before that, in 40 yrs we only had 7 losing seasons. lol Should we count how many the Giants had? We have a higher winning percentage all time then the Giants...oh, and btw we're 7-3 all time against the Giants.
-
i say there is a 25% chance that happens, which is pretty bad lol.
if they win any games it would be against the Cheifs, Bengals, Browns or Washington.
fuck that, we are gunna surprise some ppl this year, if it wasnt for one fluke ass touchdown we would be 1-0.
-
i say there is a 25% chance that happens, which is pretty bad lol.
if they win any games it would be against the Cheifs, Bengals, Browns or Washington.
fuck that, we are gunna surprise some ppl this year, if it wasnt for one fluke ass touchdown we would be 1-0.
i said "if" the Raiders win any games it would be against the Bengals, i think based off of there schedule the Bengals are one of the weaker points.
-
If Oakland can get that passing game going and the play action, I like our chances. And to have Richard Seymour reek havoc like he did barely knowing the D plays and playing off instinct, he did a hell of a job. Raiders offensively had too many 3 N outs in that game against the Chargers. D was getting hella tired.
-
i say there is a 25% chance that happens, which is pretty bad lol.
if they win any games it would be against the Cheifs, Bengals, Browns or Washington.
fuck that, we are gunna surprise some ppl this year, if it wasnt for one fluke ass touchdown we would be 1-0.
Man, I live in SD and damn near every charger fan Ive talked to said the same thing..."the better team didnt win the Raider/Charger game.". We completely bullied them that game. Our defensive line was too much for them, our secondary played man coverage all night and still the Chargers couldnt get open. Our offensive line (the weakspot according to everyone) just completely muscled the chargers d-line and linebackers. If we would have stuck with a run a little longer would have been good, cus we were shoving it down their throats in the first half. Im not gonna say that bullshit call on the Murphy TD is the REASON we lost...but it sure did contribute to it.
-
^Ocho was reffering to the Bengals & how i said if the Raiders win it would be against them lol.
-
fuck the raiders,but they are not as bad as you want them to be. they will not be 0-16,seasons 1 week old but a .500 record isnt unrealistic
-
fuck the raiders,but they are not as bad as you want them to be. they will not be 0-16,seasons 1 week old but a .500 record isnt unrealistic
A LITTLE UNREALISTC 5-11 ISNT THO...THEY CAN RUN THE BALL AND THERE DEFENSE LOOKS TOUGH...BUT RUSSELL'S FOOTWORK IS STILL TERRIBLE SO HE WILL KEEP MAKING MISTAKES AND THEY HAVE NO PLAYMAKERS AT WR, MILLER IS THE TE AND IS HANDS DOWN THE BEST WR...LEWIS AND BEY COULD STEP UP YOU NEVER KNOW BUT I WOULDNT COUNT ON THAT FOR A WHILE...BUT I WAS DEF IMPRESSED WITH THE RUN GAME AND THE DEFENSE, HAVE THOSE 2 THINGS YOU CAN ALWAYS COMPETE, I JUST DONT SEE THE RAIDERS BEING ABLE TO CLOSE OUT ENOUGH GAMES....I DO LIKE TOM CABLE HES DOING SOME GOOD THINGS FOR THEM AND THEY PLAY HARD FOR THEM
-
fuck the raiders,but they are not as bad as you want them to be. they will not be 0-16,seasons 1 week old but a .500 record isnt unrealistic
A LITTLE UNREALISTC 5-11 ISNT THO...THEY CAN RUN THE BALL AND THERE DEFENSE LOOKS TOUGH...BUT RUSSELL'S FOOTWORK IS STILL TERRIBLE SO HE WILL KEEP MAKING MISTAKES AND THEY HAVE NO PLAYMAKERS AT WR, MILLER IS THE TE AND IS HANDS DOWN THE BEST WR...LEWIS AND BEY COULD STEP UP YOU NEVER KNOW BUT I WOULDNT COUNT ON THAT FOR A WHILE...BUT I WAS DEF IMPRESSED WITH THE RUN GAME AND THE DEFENSE, HAVE THOSE 2 THINGS YOU CAN ALWAYS COMPETE, I JUST DONT SEE THE RAIDERS BEING ABLE TO CLOSE OUT ENOUGH GAMES....I DO LIKE TOM CABLE HES DOING SOME GOOD THINGS FOR THEM AND THEY PLAY HARD FOR THEM
A lot of people are picking them to be somewhere around 7 or 8 wins. I can see that. The hard thing is that the AFC West is going against the NFC East this year. So our schedule really isnt that easy. JaMarcus obviously still needs work, but watching that Monday night game...he was getting a lot of blame even when it wasnt his fault. The commentators agenda with JaMarcus was, "lets talk about his accuracy all night". But in reality, he had a few dropped balls by receivers, and a few times where receivers ran the wrong route on a timing route. Any QB in the league would miss them completely. Also, he seems to be more concerned with not making a mistake, then with making a great pass. I think theyll be alright, but I also think Louis Murphy might emerge as the better of the two rookie receivers...at least at the beginning of their careers here.
-
fuck the raiders,but they are not as bad as you want them to be. they will not be 0-16,seasons 1 week old but a .500 record isnt unrealistic
A LITTLE UNREALISTC 5-11 ISNT THO...THEY CAN RUN THE BALL AND THERE DEFENSE LOOKS TOUGH...BUT RUSSELL'S FOOTWORK IS STILL TERRIBLE SO HE WILL KEEP MAKING MISTAKES AND THEY HAVE NO PLAYMAKERS AT WR, MILLER IS THE TE AND IS HANDS DOWN THE BEST WR...LEWIS AND BEY COULD STEP UP YOU NEVER KNOW BUT I WOULDNT COUNT ON THAT FOR A WHILE...BUT I WAS DEF IMPRESSED WITH THE RUN GAME AND THE DEFENSE, HAVE THOSE 2 THINGS YOU CAN ALWAYS COMPETE, I JUST DONT SEE THE RAIDERS BEING ABLE TO CLOSE OUT ENOUGH GAMES....I DO LIKE TOM CABLE HES DOING SOME GOOD THINGS FOR THEM AND THEY PLAY HARD FOR THEM
A lot of people are picking them to be somewhere around 7 or 8 wins. I can see that. The hard thing is that the AFC West is going against the NFC East this year. So our schedule really isnt that easy. JaMarcus obviously still needs work, but watching that Monday night game...he was getting a lot of blame even when it wasnt his fault. The commentators agenda with JaMarcus was, "lets talk about his accuracy all night". But in reality, he had a few dropped balls by receivers, and a few times where receivers ran the wrong route on a timing route. Any QB in the league would miss them completely. Also, he seems to be more concerned with not making a mistake, then with making a great pass. I think theyll be alright, but I also think Louis Murphy might emerge as the better of the two rookie receivers...at least at the beginning of their careers here.
NO CHANCE THE AFC WEST IS LIKE THE NFC EAST???? R U SERIOUS????? ???
-
fuck the raiders,but they are not as bad as you want them to be. they will not be 0-16,seasons 1 week old but a .500 record isnt unrealistic
A LITTLE UNREALISTC 5-11 ISNT THO...THEY CAN RUN THE BALL AND THERE DEFENSE LOOKS TOUGH...BUT RUSSELL'S FOOTWORK IS STILL TERRIBLE SO HE WILL KEEP MAKING MISTAKES AND THEY HAVE NO PLAYMAKERS AT WR, MILLER IS THE TE AND IS HANDS DOWN THE BEST WR...LEWIS AND BEY COULD STEP UP YOU NEVER KNOW BUT I WOULDNT COUNT ON THAT FOR A WHILE...BUT I WAS DEF IMPRESSED WITH THE RUN GAME AND THE DEFENSE, HAVE THOSE 2 THINGS YOU CAN ALWAYS COMPETE, I JUST DONT SEE THE RAIDERS BEING ABLE TO CLOSE OUT ENOUGH GAMES....I DO LIKE TOM CABLE HES DOING SOME GOOD THINGS FOR THEM AND THEY PLAY HARD FOR THEM
A lot of people are picking them to be somewhere around 7 or 8 wins. I can see that. The hard thing is that the AFC West is going against the NFC East this year. So our schedule really isnt that easy. JaMarcus obviously still needs work, but watching that Monday night game...he was getting a lot of blame even when it wasnt his fault. The commentators agenda with JaMarcus was, "lets talk about his accuracy all night". But in reality, he had a few dropped balls by receivers, and a few times where receivers ran the wrong route on a timing route. Any QB in the league would miss them completely. Also, he seems to be more concerned with not making a mistake, then with making a great pass. I think theyll be alright, but I also think Louis Murphy might emerge as the better of the two rookie receivers...at least at the beginning of their careers here.
NO CHANCE THE AFC WEST IS LIKE THE NFC EAST???? R U SERIOUS????? ???
read it again man. Im saying the AFC West plays the NFC East this year. You know that divisions play eachother right? Like the Raiders have to play the Giants, Cowboys, Redskins, Eagles this year...as does every other AFC West team. Im saying that because we go against the NFC East, our schedule will be a difficult one and that will make it harder to have a good season recordwise.
-
fuck the raiders,but they are not as bad as you want them to be. they will not be 0-16,seasons 1 week old but a .500 record isnt unrealistic
A LITTLE UNREALISTC 5-11 ISNT THO...THEY CAN RUN THE BALL AND THERE DEFENSE LOOKS TOUGH...BUT RUSSELL'S FOOTWORK IS STILL TERRIBLE SO HE WILL KEEP MAKING MISTAKES AND THEY HAVE NO PLAYMAKERS AT WR, MILLER IS THE TE AND IS HANDS DOWN THE BEST WR...LEWIS AND BEY COULD STEP UP YOU NEVER KNOW BUT I WOULDNT COUNT ON THAT FOR A WHILE...BUT I WAS DEF IMPRESSED WITH THE RUN GAME AND THE DEFENSE, HAVE THOSE 2 THINGS YOU CAN ALWAYS COMPETE, I JUST DONT SEE THE RAIDERS BEING ABLE TO CLOSE OUT ENOUGH GAMES....I DO LIKE TOM CABLE HES DOING SOME GOOD THINGS FOR THEM AND THEY PLAY HARD FOR THEM
A lot of people are picking them to be somewhere around 7 or 8 wins. I can see that. The hard thing is that the AFC West is going against the NFC East this year. So our schedule really isnt that easy. JaMarcus obviously still needs work, but watching that Monday night game...he was getting a lot of blame even when it wasnt his fault. The commentators agenda with JaMarcus was, "lets talk about his accuracy all night". But in reality, he had a few dropped balls by receivers, and a few times where receivers ran the wrong route on a timing route. Any QB in the league would miss them completely. Also, he seems to be more concerned with not making a mistake, then with making a great pass. I think theyll be alright, but I also think Louis Murphy might emerge as the better of the two rookie receivers...at least at the beginning of their careers here.
NO CHANCE THE AFC WEST IS LIKE THE NFC EAST???? R U SERIOUS????? ???
read it again man. Im saying the AFC West plays the NFC East this year. You know that divisions play eachother right? Like the Raiders have to play the Giants, Cowboys, Redskins, Eagles this year...as does every other AFC West team. Im saying that because we go against the NFC East, our schedule will be a difficult one and that will make it harder to have a good season recordwise.
o shit my bad..read it wrong
-
OAK 13
KC 10