West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Chamillitary Click on November 11, 2009, 03:43:44 PM
-
http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nba/news/story?id=4644407 (VIDEO INSIDE)
strange angle & could be the right call; but i don't think there is enough evidence to give them the loss.
Brad Miller didn't explode on anybody, so maybe he knew that he didn't get it off; crazy game. :o
-
Was not it rule that you cannot get off a shot below 0.4 seconds a long time ago ? I think so
-
Was not it rule that you cannot get off a shot below 0.4 seconds a long time ago ? I think so
I thought the rule was 0.3 seconds?
And I really think it was too close to tell, so def too close to overturn the initial ruling. I was damne xcited when watching the end of that game, and then the officials took forever with reviewing it, and in the end overturned it....shit had me pissed off. >:(
-
& they were in Chicago, i'm surprised the fans didn't rush the court in anger lol.
-
they should of given it to them hands down.
funny how billups was talking shit lol. he said "those guys were jumpin up down like they just won the sweet 16"
-
he's kind of right ... that's an early Nov game
-
i was watching this game...horrible call, nugs should of lost
-
i was watching this game...horrible call, nugs should of lost
I disagree, the replay showed the ball was in his hands when the clock hit zero, getting the call right should be important.
-
i was watching this game...horrible call, nugs should of lost
I disagree, the replay showed the ball was in his hands when the clock hit zero, getting the call right should be important.
but really, what if it was just centimeters off his fingers, the referees cant see that.
i think the reason brad miller didnt complain is because of shock and prob cuz he really doesnt know if we got it off in time, but wow what an amazing shot.