West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 04:26:35 PM

Title: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 04:26:35 PM
HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

"VINCE YOUNG CANT THROW THE BALL" = 390 pass yards, 1 TD, 0 INT (no turnovers overall)
"THEY ONLY WIN BECAUSE OF CHRIS JOHNSON" - 99 YARD TD DRIVE IN 2:30 MINS....CHRIS JOHNSON DIDN'T TOUCH THE BALL ONCEEEEEEEEEEEE

U haters are gonna have a FIELD day with this one  :D :D :D :D :D
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 04:29:12 PM
It's my fault. I should have bet on my Bills and left the Cards/Titans game off the ticket. Of course had I known Warner wasn't playing I would have.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 04:32:28 PM
"VINCE YOUNG CAN'T THROW THE BALL" - 390 PASS YARDS TODAY, 1 TD, 0 TURNOVERS, GAME WINNING, 99 YARD TD DRIVE (2:30 LEFT) ON 4TH DOWN WITH 00 SECONDS LEFT
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on November 29, 2009, 04:33:42 PM
I LIKE TYPING IN CAPS LOCKS!!!!!!
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 04:35:36 PM
I LIKE TYPING IN CAPS LOCKS!!!!!!
ME TOO!!!!!!!
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 04:36:45 PM
"VINCE YOUNG CAN'T THROW THE BALL" - 390 PASS YARDS TODAY, 1 TD, 0 TURNOVERS, GAME WINNING, 99 YARD TD DRIVE (2:30 LEFT) ON 4TH DOWN WITH 00 SECONDS LEFT


What the fuck are you talking about? I like Young. Even argued for him being able to bounce back and become a hall of famer. I just like 500 bucks more than I like Vince. If I ever said he can't throw the ball, it was when he couldn't throw the ball. And you can't argue that there was a time in his pro-career when he couldn't. If you look back through the history of my posts, back when Vince won the BCS, I said he'll never be able to be a successful power running QB. I was right about that too. He's doing very well and I'm glad, but he cost me half a grand, and the best QB of all time is going to have to do something about that next week.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 04:37:14 PM
are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 04:40:48 PM
^Your pathetic when it comes to Young. If he "couldn't do it again", that's the 9th game tying/winning 4th Q drive he's already lead in his career. Any smart (not u) football fans remember a similar miracle comeback he lead in his rookie year over the Giants overcoming a 21-0 deficit in the 4th Q (CJ wasn't on this team). Not to mention the Rose Bowl (I know, it's not the NFL)

U have finally proved that no matter what he does, u will never give him his props. The man has now won 9 straight starts.

Honestly Chamill, this is getting sad. I like U as a poster, but this is too far. I know me liking him so much and taking it so far ticks u off, but trying to take away the attention from him on this? Pathetic. U probably get a kick out of getting reactions outta me like this.

99 yards, 2:30 mins, TD pass, 00 seconds left and CJ didn't touch the ball once. Fact. 390 pass yards overall.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 04:52:34 PM
^Your pathetic when it comes to Young. If he "couldn't do it again", that's the 9th game tying/winning 4th Q drive he's already lead in his career. Any smart (not u) football fans remember a similar miracle comeback he lead in his rookie year over the Giants overcoming a 21-0 deficit in the 4th Q (CJ wasn't on this team).

U have finally proved that no matter what he does, u will never give him his props. The man has now won 9 straight starts.

Honestly Chamill, this is getting sad. I like U as a poster, but this is too far. I know me liking him so much and taking it so far ticks u off, but trying to take away the attention from him on this? Pathetic. U probably get a kick out of getting reactions outta me like this.

99 yards, 2:30 mins, TD pass, 00 seconds left and CJ didn't touch the ball once. Fact. 390 pass yards overall.

lol, i'm pathetic? yet, you just made two threads in one day about the same team, same situation, to rub it in my face? alright.

but, i'm just being honest; i would take a lot of QB's over Vince; whose the last scrambling QB to win a Super Bowl?

today was extremely impressive, but you did get 7 points for just handing the ball off at the 15 lol. "fact."

i'm trying to give him props for the last drive, you simply won't hear it.

Shallow, where are you? can you tell him teams win games, not QBs? :P
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 04:55:23 PM
are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:


80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 04:56:28 PM
^Your pathetic when it comes to Young. If he "couldn't do it again", that's the 9th game tying/winning 4th Q drive he's already lead in his career. Any smart (not u) football fans remember a similar miracle comeback he lead in his rookie year over the Giants overcoming a 21-0 deficit in the 4th Q (CJ wasn't on this team).

U have finally proved that no matter what he does, u will never give him his props. The man has now won 9 straight starts.

Honestly Chamill, this is getting sad. I like U as a poster, but this is too far. I know me liking him so much and taking it so far ticks u off, but trying to take away the attention from him on this? Pathetic. U probably get a kick out of getting reactions outta me like this.

99 yards, 2:30 mins, TD pass, 00 seconds left and CJ didn't touch the ball once. Fact. 390 pass yards overall.

lol, i'm pathetic? yet, you just made two threads in one day about the same team, same situation, to rub it in my face? alright.

but, i'm just being honest; i would take a lot of QB's over Vince; whose the last scrambling QB to win a Super Bowl?

today was extremely impressive, but you did get 7 points for just handing the ball off at the 15 lol. "fact."

i'm trying to give him props for the last drive, you simply won't hear it.

Shallow, where are you? can you tell him teams win games, not QBs? :P


Teams do win games, and in Arizona's case they lose them, but Vince showed me something tonight at the end.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on November 29, 2009, 04:57:01 PM
are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:


80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.
What about Rivers? :oi:
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 04:57:18 PM
^trying to give him props isn't staying stupid shit like "no 30 pts 'cause Cj ...blah blah blah"

Shallow: At least your man enough to admit it.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 05:00:12 PM
80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.
Exactly. Comments like that just further his hate. Non-biased football fans like yourself realize what it is. 23-11 as a starter now?
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 05:01:29 PM
are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:


80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.

LOL, forget that.

i was interested in what you were saying until i saw no Brady LMFAO.

anyway,

Peyton, Brady, Roth, Carson, Brees, Farve, McNabb, Cutler, Schaub, Warner or Leinhart, Ryan, Rivers, Stafford (will be great when he has a team), Rodgers, Romo, Eli.

then maybe Vince depending on the team & if i trusted the future of Alex Smith, Garrard, Cassell or Henne lol.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 05:06:14 PM
^trying to give him props isn't staying stupid shit like "no 30 pts 'cause Cj ...blah blah blah"

Shallow: At least your man enough to admit it.

it's true though, when he has gotten like 23-25 touches, they put up 30 points lol.

i am giving him props on the last drive, what more do you want? tell you that he is Pro-Bowl material?

it's a team game & you're turning it into an individual argument.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 05:08:17 PM
LOL. I left Brady off on purpose just to get a rise out of you. Of course he's on the list, just like Bledsoe in his prime would be.


But Chicago, Houston, Arizona, Detroit, Green Bay, Giants, and SD would all be just as good or better with the current Vince as a starter, in my opinion. Warner might be the only one on your list I'd think about, and it's an age thing. Prime, Warner for sure.




are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:


80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.
What about Rivers? :oi:


I hate Rivers more than I hate Brady.



Everything being said CJ is still the best player on that team.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 05:12:25 PM
LOL. I left Brady off on purpose just to get a rise out of you. Of course he's on the list, just like Bledsoe in his prime would be.


But Chicago, Houston, Arizona, Detroit, Green Bay, Giants, and SD would all be just as good or better with the current Vince as a starter, in my opinion. Warner might be the only one on your list I'd think about, and it's an age thing. Prime, Warner for sure.




are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:


80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.
What about Rivers? :oi:


I hate Rivers more than I hate Brady.



Everything being said CJ is still the best player on that team.

lol, thank god.

i was about to go on a rant about that lmfao.

but i don't know, Warner is somewhat of a toss up.

i mean i think if i had Fitz & Boldin, i could get into at least one Pro-Bowl.

but again, scrambling QB's don't win Super Bowl's & that's why i would take all those guys over him.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: thisoneguy360 on November 29, 2009, 05:14:59 PM
I've always liked Young, after that whole fiasco last year a lot of people thought he was done, but I always knew his better days were ahead. I think the whole benching thing really lit a fire under him and helped him push his game to another level, good shit Vince  8)
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 05:15:48 PM
The scrambling a is a bonus, like it is with Roth. What Vince showed me tonight was exactly what Ben showed me in the SB. Sure both cases were left up to bad defense at the end by the very same defense. But Vince was calm, steady, and made the throws he needed to make. What's that word they use for Brady all the time? He had poise. It doesn't mean I think he's one of the elites, but Vince Young has matured. You can't deny that.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on November 29, 2009, 05:17:56 PM
LOL. I left Brady off on purpose just to get a rise out of you. Of course he's on the list, just like Bledsoe in his prime would be.


But Chicago, Houston, Arizona, Detroit, Green Bay, Giants, and SD would all be just as good or better with the current Vince as a starter, in my opinion. Warner might be the only one on your list I'd think about, and it's an age thing. Prime, Warner for sure.




are you laughing because you know he couldn't do that again?

great drive, but i still am taking 80% of all other starting QBs lol.

you know why you didn't reach your "average of 30 points a game"? CJ - only 18 carries lol; not to mention an 85 yard touchdown.

phenominal final drive though; i saw something similar in Oakland a week ago. :laugh:


80%? No fucking way. He'd be in my top ten active QBs. His run threat is still there to keep a shadow on him and his decision making has grown exponentially during his time off. Peyton, Roth, Carson, Brees, Favre, McNabb I'd take over him with out question. Everyone else is flip a coin or Vince first.
What about Rivers? :oi:


I hate Rivers more than I hate Brady.



Everything being said CJ is still the best player on that team.
Does it have to do with the Chargers-Colts playoff games the last 2 years? ;D
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 05:22:16 PM
The scrambling a is a bonus, like it is with Roth. What Vince showed me tonight was exactly what Ben showed me in the SB. Sure both cases were left up to bad defense at the end by the very same defense. But Vince was calm, steady, and made the throws he needed to make. What's that word they use for Brady all the time? He had poise. It doesn't mean I think he's one of the elites, but Vince Young has matured. You can't deny that.

Vince is a different type of scrambler than Roth.

Roth scrambles when there is nothing available and he sees room, Vince scrambles when he sees room even if he might have a play with the pass, it's just something i never cared for.

he's less a scrambler than Vick was, but more of one than Roth is.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 05:35:13 PM
Cutler, Leinhart
U gotta be fucking kidding.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 05:41:11 PM
Cutler, Leinhart
U gotta be fucking kidding.

Leinhart? yeah somewhat, but Cutler has a lot of potential & showed it last year.

Hester isn't even a real WR & that's his number 1.

give him stronger pieces around him & i feel he could be one of the better QB's in the league; that's not even my "bias" talking.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 05:44:04 PM
^Young has never had a good WR corps. He lead this team to the playoffs with the worst WR corps in the league; Even this year, most of the time, the WR corps is bottom 5 (definitely ranks that in dropped passes -- it was 2nd last before Young started).

Young is one of those players that just have these sort of moments in his career (Rose Bowl, Giants, Bills, etc.). And no defense can do anything about it.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 05:57:54 PM
^Young has never had a good WR corps. He lead this team to the playoffs with the worst WR corps in the league; Even this year, most of the time, the WR corps is bottom 5 (definitely ranks that in dropped passes -- it was 2nd last before Young started).

Young is one of those players that just have these sort of moments in his career (Rose Bowl, Giants, Bills, etc.). And no defense can do anything about it.

but he does have the best running back in the league, you said so yourself.

& the Titans D ain't all that bad, when healthy.

yeah, he can have these moments throughout his career; but Culter might not need a game winning drive, just some kneels if he had the right pieces.

i have high hopes for Jay in his future, he could be scary in his prime; if he ever gets a team surrounding him.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 05:58:50 PM
I dunno... I'll leave that for the future.  As of right now, on way Cutler is taken over Young. Lol at his what? 19 INTs?
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 06:01:20 PM
I dunno... I'll leave that for the future.  As of right now, on way Cutler is taken over Young. Lol at his what? 19 INTs?

i see this as a bad season, on a bad offensive team.

Farve holds the record for most all-time, but i would put him in the top 5 all-time.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 06:03:36 PM
I dunno... I'll leave that for the future.  As of right now, on way Cutler is taken over Young. Lol at his what? 19 INTs?

i see this as a bad season, on a bad offensive team.

Farve holds the record for most all-time, but i would put him in the top 5 all-time.
but Favre has done far too much that u can justify ignoring that; Cutler is nowhere near..I repeat nowhere near lol..achieved enough for this type of season to not matter.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 07:22:48 PM
I dunno... I'll leave that for the future.  As of right now, on way Cutler is taken over Young. Lol at his what? 19 INTs?

i see this as a bad season, on a bad offensive team.

Farve holds the record for most all-time, but i would put him in the top 5 all-time.
but Favre has done far too much that u can justify ignoring that; Cutler is nowhere near..I repeat nowhere near lol..achieved enough for this type of season to not matter.

4,500 yards, 25 TD's, 18 picks last season; which was an improvement from a solid season before.

he's already been sacked twice as much as he was all last season & the season isn't over yet.

besides today, which was a freakish game for Vince, all he's been really doing is the Kyle Orton job, in my opinion.

he's making some throws when he needs to, but more importantly (more importantly than scoring), not turning the ball over & putting his team in a position to win.

Vince would never throw 18 interceptions because they don't rely on his arm to win Football games, they want him to hand the ball off & make some short throws when need be; besides today, where he showed he can drive 99 yards.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 07:32:34 PM
Young did throw 17 in his 2nd season
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 29, 2009, 07:35:22 PM
Young did throw 17 in his 2nd season

it was a different offensive scheme then, but that actually surprises me.

EDIT: but the point was now, like as long as they are a run-first team; he shouldn't throw many picks.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 08:42:08 PM
Young did throw 17 in his 2nd season

it was a different offensive scheme then, but that actually surprises me.

EDIT: but the point was now, like as long as they are a run-first team; he shouldn't throw many picks.
17 INTS his 2nd year
13 his first year

Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: D-Nice on November 29, 2009, 08:58:18 PM
Incredible game and to win 5 games in a row is impressive. Vince is doing his thing along with the whole team.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 29, 2009, 09:10:43 PM



I hate Rivers more than I hate Brady.



Everything being said CJ is still the best player on that team.
Does it have to do with the Chargers-Colts playoff games the last 2 years? ;D


To be honest. I just hate seeing his face when he's happy. With Brady it's because of all the the hype. With Rivers it's genuine dislike. Colts games aside. I give no credit to Rivers for those wins either. In one of them Billy Volek walked in and drove them down the field against the horrible D.




The scrambling a is a bonus, like it is with Roth. What Vince showed me tonight was exactly what Ben showed me in the SB. Sure both cases were left up to bad defense at the end by the very same defense. But Vince was calm, steady, and made the throws he needed to make. What's that word they use for Brady all the time? He had poise. It doesn't mean I think he's one of the elites, but Vince Young has matured. You can't deny that.

Vince is a different type of scrambler than Roth.

Roth scrambles when there is nothing available and he sees room, Vince scrambles when he sees room even if he might have a play with the pass, it's just something i never cared for.

he's less a scrambler than Vick was, but more of one than Roth is.


That's my point though. I think he's becoming more like Roth ad less like Vick. He's learning to hold on and look for the pass rather than run. As for who is better between the three QBs in the draft class. I did think when the draft happened that Vince would end up with the worst career of the three. So far it's Leinart. Leinart has disappointed me but he could still turn it around. I'd pick Vince for the worst team, meaning on a bad team I'd take Vince to give us a better chance at some Ws over the other two. I'd still take Cutler on a great team over those two and a lot of other QBs.

I said at the beginning of the trade that my theory on QBs would be shown true and that Orton would jump way up while Cutler could take a major hit. On a great offense with great weapons Cutler was an animal. In a joke system like Chicago he looks as bad as Orton did, while Orton looks like a QB you hope doesn't get injured because now Denver is counting on him or so it would seem. It's my own little Brady rule. Cassel really helped that out this year too.

Anyway, if I was building a dynasty and wanted the best shot at multiple SB appearances and wins, I'd take Cutler over all of the other young QBs. On the 2000s New England Cutler would give us as better chance at 3 or more than Young or Leinart. Same with the 90s Cowboys, or 80s 49ers, or 70s Steelers, or 60s Packers. Or even just one SB and had an offensive team, I'd as of now take Jay. Maybe that'll change in the coming years.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 29, 2009, 09:31:48 PM
Young is definitely doing a better job of not leaving the pocket so quick and looking pass first before run.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 30, 2009, 10:19:56 AM
0-6 to 1 game outta the playoffs  :o
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: westsiderider323 on November 30, 2009, 11:34:53 AM
titans still aint makin the playoffs
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 30, 2009, 11:57:01 AM
0-6 to 1 game outta the playoffs  :o


5-6 being one game out of he playoffs says more about the conference this than it does about the Titans. Last year the wild card teams were 12-4 and 11-5 and one 11-5 team was left out. This year I expect 1 or 2 9-7 teams in the playoffs.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 30, 2009, 12:01:18 PM
0-6 to 1 game outta the playoffs  :o


5-6 being one game out of he playoffs says more about the conference this than it does about the Titans. Last year the wild card teams were 12-4 and 11-5 and one 11-5 team was left out. This year I expect 1 or 2 9-7 teams in the playoffs.
I think 10-6 will make it, not 9-7
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on November 30, 2009, 12:08:51 PM
0-6 to 1 game outta the playoffs  :o
What are you talking about? Even if the Steelers lose next week and the Titans win, the Steelers hold the tiebreaker over the Titans.

1      Indianapolis (y)    South     11-0-0
2     Cincinnati    North    8-3-0
3     San Diego    West    8-3-0
4     New England    East    7-3-0
5     Denver    West    7-4-0
6     Jacksonville    South    6-5-0

7     Baltimore    North    6-5-0
8     Pittsburgh    North    6-5-0
9     Miami    East    5-6-0
10     N.Y. Jets    East    5-6-0
11     Tennessee    South    5-6-0
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 30, 2009, 12:09:42 PM
Forget about Miami & NYJ. They have no chance. This is coming down to Jax, Pitt, Den, Tennessee, Bal
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 30, 2009, 12:21:44 PM
0-6 to 1 game outta the playoffs  :o


5-6 being one game out of he playoffs says more about the conference this than it does about the Titans. Last year the wild card teams were 12-4 and 11-5 and one 11-5 team was left out. This year I expect 1 or 2 9-7 teams in the playoffs.
I think 10-6 will make it, not 9-7


The way schedule is I see the absolute maximum win/loss for the AFC west being 10-6 for both SD and Denver, and at both 10-6 they'll both get in. But for the other teams to get to 10-6 they have to win every game but one. Dolphins have NE, Jack, Ten, Pit, and Houston so they're out. Jacksonville has NE, Houston, Miami and Indy, before going to Cleveland so 10-6 it's not gonna happen for them. Pit has Oakland and Cleveland coming up so they need those two because after that it's Baltimore, GB, and Miami so it's still up in the air if they win the next two. They lose one and they're done. Baltimore has the best chance if they win next week against GB. Even if they don't win they'll be 6-6 going into a Lions, Bears, Steelers, Raiders stretch and they can run that table but I see them losing to Pit. Jets have to run the table against Buffalo, Tampa, Atlanta, Indy, and Cinci. Good luck. Houston might have the best chance running the table against Jack, Seattle, St Louis, Miami, and a week 17, probably resting, Patriots. Your Titans win next week and then they'll have a real shot at running the table and going in. That being said they'll never beat the Pats in New England in January. As good and as smart as Vince has been since the bye, ol' Bill is better and smarter and will think of the very best ways to destroy VY10.

But of all those scenarios I drew up I just can't see two 10-6 teams in the wildcard. I fully expect to see a very interesting week 17 this year with a lot of teams fighting for that 9-7 spot.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Chamillitary Click on November 30, 2009, 12:24:34 PM
i personally declare the Titans are losing next week.

although it is set up for them to win, in a weird way of thinking about it.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 30, 2009, 12:25:06 PM
Forget about Miami & NYJ. They have no chance. This is coming down to Jax, Pitt, Den, Tennessee, Bal


Jax is done, but Houston has a shot.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 30, 2009, 12:27:13 PM
i personally declare the Titans are losing next week.

although it is set up for them to win, in a weird way of thinking about it.


That being said, Colts are due a blowout win. Whether that comes after their first loss or not is the issue.
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Lunatic on November 30, 2009, 12:32:16 PM
Shallow: I can care less about January/New England talk lol. The idea that is even possible is a dream come true for a Titans fan right now. Let's just keep winning and fighting for a playoff spot. That's how you have to think about it after an 0-6 start to 5-6
Title: Re: TITANS
Post by: Shallow on November 30, 2009, 12:38:31 PM
Shallow: I can care less about January/New England talk lol. The idea that is even possible is a dream come true for a Titans fan right now. Let's just keep winning and fighting for a playoff spot. That's how you have to think about it after an 0-6 start to 5-6


A 10-6 or even 9-7 playoff entry for the Titans would be monstrous. I agree.


The way I see everything setting itself up it'll be Sd vs Denver in WC game 1 and NE vs the biggest loser in WC2. I can see Pit squeeking by NE in the playoffs but only them. Then it'll be NE@Cin for the Division game, and I hope Den@Indy, but I can't see this year's Indy team losing to SD a third time anyway. I can see NE losing in Cinci, and I can't see Cinci winning in Indy. So Indy now looks to me like the clear cut AFC winner, and as long as they don't play Minn, the clear cut SB winner.