West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: .:DaYg0sTyLz:. on July 22, 2010, 03:29:49 PM
-
This is just a test to see what you guys value in a players overall game. Dont overthink it as these are just generic stats I came up with. Just your first impression. And lets assume Player 1 and Player 2 both scored a LOT of points...but Player 2 scored a little more, about, 1.15 points for every 1 point that Player 1 scored (in other words, if Player 1 scored 20 points...Player 2 scored 23. If Player 1 scored 30 points...Player 2 scored 34 points, etc). Also, in this test...to keep things in perspective, Player 1 is a bigman....Player 2 is a perimeter guy.
Min. FG% REB ASSTS BLKS STLS
Player 1 44 .634 14 5 2 0
Player 2 42 .608 6 2 1 3
-
This is just a test to see what you guys value in a players overall game. Dont overthink it as these are just generic stats I came up with. Just your first impression. And lets assume Player 1 and Player 2 both scored a LOT of points...but Player 2 scored a little more, about, 1.15 points for every 1 point that Player 1 scored (in other words, if Player 1 scored 20 points...Player 2 scored 23. If Player 1 scored 30 points...Player 2 scored 34 points, etc). Also, in this test...to keep things in perspective, Player 1 is a bigman....Player 2 is a perimeter guy.
Min. FG% REB ASSTS BLKS STLS
Player 1 44 .634 14 5 2 0
Player 2 42 .608 6 2 1 3
rather take the big man gettin 5 assits and double doubles
-
its obviously 2 different types of players so its unfair to compare......but stat wise you have to go with player 1
-
This is just a test to see what you guys value in a players overall game. Dont overthink it as these are just generic stats I came up with. Just your first impression. And lets assume Player 1 and Player 2 both scored a LOT of points...but Player 2 scored a little more, about, 1.15 points for every 1 point that Player 1 scored (in other words, if Player 1 scored 20 points...Player 2 scored 23. If Player 1 scored 30 points...Player 2 scored 34 points, etc). Also, in this test...to keep things in perspective, Player 1 is a bigman....Player 2 is a perimeter guy.
Min. FG% REB ASSTS BLKS STLS
Player 1 44 .634 14 5 2 0
Player 2 42 .608 6 2 1 3
rather take the big man gettin 5 assits and double doubles
Not to sway your thinkin...but also remember, Player 2 will have scored more points.
-
I'm feeling the big man.
-
as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.
-
as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.
So youre stickin with that?
Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...
-
as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.
So youre stickin with that?
Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...
of course stats, in some cases, could help SUPPORT an argument...but they should never be the main argument as to why someone is better or someone played better. ive always held this belief.
-
as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.
So youre stickin with that?
Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...
of course stats, in some cases, could help SUPPORT an argument...but they should never be the main argument as to why someone is better or someone played better. ive always held this belief.
Did this belief come into affect AFTER a certain someone who averages 30, 7 & 7 was drafted?
-
as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.
So youre stickin with that?
Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...
of course stats, in some cases, could help SUPPORT an argument...but they should never be the main argument as to why someone is better or someone played better. ive always held this belief.
Did this belief come into affect AFTER a certain someone who averages 30, 7 & 7 was drafted?
did you realize that i don't even take you serious enough to respond to your basketball related posts? LOL. come on, cham, do yourself the favor..
-
^Obviously. You have no response for me. It's a classic NIK move, to just act like somebody else has no clue what their talking about.
Just look through your old posts, all your arguments are "LOL, YOU'RE DELUSIONAL", "LOL, YOU'RE A MORON", "LOL, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BASKETBALL" & that's your counter argument to anyone's argument & then just speak your biased ass opinion.
Cap letter the "LOL" or "LMFAO" to show as if you're geniunley finding it funny & to give off some appeal as if what you're saying is "obviously" right.
You're act got old years ago & is beyond simple to figure out; just look at your continuous arguments with Daygo right now lmfao.
-
^Obviously. You have no response for me. It's a classic NIK move, to just act like somebody else has no clue what their talking about.
Just look through your old posts, all your arguments are "LOL, YOU'RE DELUSIONAL", "LOL, YOU'RE A MORON", "LOL, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BASKETBALL" & that's your counter argument to anyone's argument & then just speak your biased ass opinion.
Cap letter the "LOL" or "LMFAO" to show as if you're geniunley finding it funny & to give off some appeal as if what you're saying is "obviously" right.
You're act got old years ago & is beyond simple to figure out; just look at your continuous arguments with Daygo right now lmfao.
I still respond/debate with people on here, even ones who share opposite views (daygo, 7even). you're just simply a fucking moron, and if anyone here disagrees, please say something................
-
^Obviously. You have no response for me. It's a classic NIK move, to just act like somebody else has no clue what their talking about.
Just look through your old posts, all your arguments are "LOL, YOU'RE DELUSIONAL", "LOL, YOU'RE A MORON", "LOL, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BASKETBALL" & that's your counter argument to anyone's argument & then just speak your biased ass opinion.
Cap letter the "LOL" or "LMFAO" to show as if you're geniunley finding it funny & to give off some appeal as if what you're saying is "obviously" right.
You're act got old years ago & is beyond simple to figure out; just look at your continuous arguments with Daygo right now lmfao.
I still respond/debate with people on here, even ones who share opposite views (daygo, 7even). you're just simply a fucking moron, and if anyone here disagrees, please say something................
I dont see Cham as a moron, just a difference of opinions. No big deal.
Now being a Budden fan on the other hand.... :-X
-
^you honestly think dude knows his basketball? LOL
-
^you honestly think dude knows his basketball? LOL
Are we grading on a curve? Cham has made it clear that basketball isnt his number one sport. Im sure he knows more about basketball than you know about any other sport but basketball.
-
^you honestly think dude knows his basketball? LOL
Are we grading on a curve? Cham has made it clear that basketball isnt his number one sport. Im sure he knows more about basketball than you know about any other sport but basketball.
LOL...I'd be willing to bet I know more football than he knows basketball, and i dont even follow any nfl teams.
-
^Look at what you're arguing; not even discussion related. If what I said in other threads was "so retarded", a man of your NBA IQ should be able to dismantle what I have to say.
But that's what you do, just pick & choose the fights you think you can rebuttle something that shows you may have won the argument, but clearly just ignore the rest & say "not even response worthy" to act like you don't have to. But you know, as well as I do, you just can't respond. It's cool, I'm not looking for people to be like "God, he knows his ball...much more than NIK", just as long as you & I know you can't reply, I'm good. 8)
EDIT: Just look through your recent posts in your on-going debates with Daygo, you REPETATIVELY, almost every single one, call him a "biased", "moron" that knows "nothing", who is "as stupid as Cham"; yet, he gets a reply because he's fighting an argument you believe you can win. Face it, you're a joke.
-
^Look at what you're arguing; not even discussion related. If what I said in other threads was "so retarded", a man of your NBA IQ should be able to dismantle what I have to say.
But that's what you do, just pick & choose the fights you think you can rebuttle something that shows you may have won the argument, but clearly just ignore the rest & say "not even response worthy" to act like you don't have to. But you know, as well as I do, you just can't respond. It's cool, I'm not looking for people to be like "God, he knows his ball...much more than NIK", just as long as you & I know you can't reply, I'm good. 8)
EDIT: Just look through your recent posts in your on-going debates with Daygo, you REPETATIVELY, almost every single one, call him a "biased", "moron" that knows "nothing", who is "as stupid as Cham"; yet, he gets a reply because he's fighting an argument you believe you can win. Face it, you're a joke.
what is it that you think I can't reply to? LOL...honestly. say it here so i can put another one of your moronic beliefs to rest. really, though, the reason i don't reply to your posts is because they're usually filled with a whole lot of ignorance and idiocy, and usually to an extreme extent, straight up.
-
^Look at what you're arguing; not even discussion related. If what I said in other threads was "so retarded", a man of your NBA IQ should be able to dismantle what I have to say.
But that's what you do, just pick & choose the fights you think you can rebuttle something that shows you may have won the argument, but clearly just ignore the rest & say "not even response worthy" to act like you don't have to. But you know, as well as I do, you just can't respond. It's cool, I'm not looking for people to be like "God, he knows his ball...much more than NIK", just as long as you & I know you can't reply, I'm good. 8)
EDIT: Just look through your recent posts in your on-going debates with Daygo, you REPETATIVELY, almost every single one, call him a "biased", "moron" that knows "nothing", who is "as stupid as Cham"; yet, he gets a reply because he's fighting an argument you believe you can win. Face it, you're a joke.
what is it that you think I can't reply to? LOL...honestly. say it here so i can put another one of your moronic beliefs to rest. really, though, the reason i don't reply to your posts is because they're usually filled with a whole lot of ignorance and idiocy, and usually to an extreme extent, straight up.
LOL how on Earth can you of all people comment on ignorance? I can't think of anything off the top of my head. But I'll keep my eye on you, boss.
-
^Look at what you're arguing; not even discussion related. If what I said in other threads was "so retarded", a man of your NBA IQ should be able to dismantle what I have to say.
But that's what you do, just pick & choose the fights you think you can rebuttle something that shows you may have won the argument, but clearly just ignore the rest & say "not even response worthy" to act like you don't have to. But you know, as well as I do, you just can't respond. It's cool, I'm not looking for people to be like "God, he knows his ball...much more than NIK", just as long as you & I know you can't reply, I'm good. 8)
EDIT: Just look through your recent posts in your on-going debates with Daygo, you REPETATIVELY, almost every single one, call him a "biased", "moron" that knows "nothing", who is "as stupid as Cham"; yet, he gets a reply because he's fighting an argument you believe you can win. Face it, you're a joke.
what is it that you think I can't reply to? LOL...honestly. say it here so i can put another one of your moronic beliefs to rest. really, though, the reason i don't reply to your posts is because they're usually filled with a whole lot of ignorance and idiocy, and usually to an extreme extent, straight up.
LOL how on Earth can you of all people comment on ignorance? I can't think of anything off the top of my head. But I'll keep my eye on you, boss.
that's what i thought, chammy...
-
lol@ NIK once again making a fool of himself...
-
lol@ Daygo once again lickin my nuts...
-
lol@ Daygo once again lickin my nuts...
You think that when someone makes fun of you, they are on your nuts. Yet you have a whole keystyle text about Sikotic in your sig along with a picture of him lol