West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: OG Hack Wilson on September 23, 2010, 01:03:44 PM

Title: NL mvp discussion
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on September 23, 2010, 01:03:44 PM

who wins

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on September 23, 2010, 01:05:36 PM

Adjusted OPS+ Leaders:

1. Votto (CIN) 171
2. Pujols (STL) 166
3. Gonzalez (SDP) 154
4. Holliday (STL) 148
5. Gonzalez (COL) 146
6. Zimmerman (WSN) 142
7. Tulowitzki (COL) 142
8. Dunn (WSN) 141
9. Fielder (MIL) 141
10. Werth (PHI) 141


Home Run Leaders
1. Pujols (STL) 41
2. Dunn (WSN) 35
 Votto (CIN) 35
4. Reynolds (ARI) 32
 Gonzalez (COL) 32
6. Uggla (FLA) 31
7. Fielder (MIL) 30
 Howard (PHI) 30
9. Hart (MIL) 29
 Gonzalez (SDP) 29


Runs Batted In Leaders

1. Pujols (STL) 112
2. Gonzalez (COL) 107
3. Votto (CIN) 106
4. Howard (PHI) 104
5. Holliday (STL) 100
6. McGehee (MIL) 99
7. Uggla (FLA) 98
8. Gonzalez (SDP) 97
9. Dunn (WSN) 96
10. LaRoche (ARI) 95
 Wright (NYM) 95

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: Chamillitary Click on September 23, 2010, 01:43:20 PM

Albert.

But Votto & Cargo are my fuckin' boys. 8)

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: Twentytwofifty on September 23, 2010, 04:04:34 PM

Pretty close race this year, but I think I'm going with Votto right now.

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: Tha A on September 23, 2010, 04:19:34 PM

phat albert

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: The Come Up Shuffle on September 23, 2010, 05:25:48 PM

Votto

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: theremedy360 on September 23, 2010, 05:57:20 PM

Albert or Votto, both good choices.

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on September 23, 2010, 06:24:21 PM

glad to see nobody is buying into Carlos Gonzalez    he's good but not as good as his stats indicate

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: white Boy on September 26, 2010, 05:37:20 PM

give it to votto.

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: The Come Up Shuffle on September 27, 2010, 08:55:49 PM

Quote from: Hans Moleman on September 23, 2010, 06:24:21 PM

glad to see nobody is buying into Carlos Gonzalez    he's good but not as good as his stats indicate

His home and away splits are night and day.

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: S P I C E on September 28, 2010, 12:08:18 AM

Votto easily.  Pujols shouldnt even be mentioned lol, you should not win the mvp on a team that misses the playoffs unless you do something spectacular like winning the triple crown or breaking a huge single season record (ex: Bonds in 2001).  Pujols doesnt deserve the award at all this year, should definitely go to Votto without much debate.

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on September 28, 2010, 02:30:35 PM

NL MVP UPDATE MOTHERFUCKERS


Player - Batting Avg/On Base / SLugging % / HR / RBI / OPS+


Joey Votto:  326 .426 .607 , 37 HR, 111 RBI, 175 OPS+
Albert Pujols:  .313/.414/.602, 47 HR, 135 RBI, 172 OPS+


these are the only 2 legit candidates.....i say give it to Votto becuase Pujols has 3 MVPs already but to be honest it's almost a fucking tie

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on September 28, 2010, 02:33:05 PM

Quote from: The Come Up Shuffle on September 27, 2010, 08:55:49 PM

Quote from: Hans Moleman on September 23, 2010, 06:24:21 PM

glad to see nobody is buying into Carlos Gonzalez    he's good but not as good as his stats indicate

His home and away splits are night and day.

you are correct sir


home: .386/.432/.755
away: .293/.327/.459



WHAT THE FUCK  :o

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: white Boy on September 28, 2010, 03:25:54 PM

Quote from: Hans Moleman on September 28, 2010, 02:30:35 PM

NL MVP UPDATE MOTHERFUCKERS


Player - Batting Avg/On Base / SLugging % / HR / RBI / OPS+


Joey Votto:  326 .426 .607 , 37 HR, 111 RBI, 175 OPS+
Albert Pujols:  .313/.414/.602, 47 HR, 135 RBI, 172 OPS+


these are the only 2 legit candidates.....i say give it to Votto becuase Pujols has 3 MVPs already but to be honest it's almost a fucking tie

pujols has 42 hrs

Title: Re: NL mvp discussion
Post by: OG Hack Wilson on September 29, 2010, 09:10:59 AM

i think i took some stats from 2009 by mistake