West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: LooN3y on March 01, 2011, 04:44:40 PM
-
1. Jason Terry
2. Chauncey Billups
3. Stephen Curry
4. Mo Williams
5. Chris Duhon
6. Kirk Hinrich
7. Jordan Farmar (yea i said it)
i picked mainly PGs that would fit in the triangle, and not in terms of overall talent.
the PG in the lakers triangle with kobe is basically a 2 guard, all the PG is supposed to do is make open 3s, pass down low, and defend other PGs.
i didnt pick PG that are major ball handlers or PGs that arnt good off ball.
if id include shooting/combo guards
1. Eric Gordon
2. OJ Mayo
3. Ben Gordon
4. Rudy Fernandez
-
BJ Armstrong
-
Are you not counting all-stars?
Russell Westbrook will be your PG soon enough lol.
-
Are you not counting all-stars?
Russell Westbrook will be your PG soon enough lol.
I think that he didn't include Westbrook because he doesn't have much of a jumpshot which is an important part of the triangle, regardless, Westbrook on the Lakers would be crazy lol
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
-
Kirk Hinrich would be awesome there
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
because rose and cp3 need the ball to be 100% effective, and they arnt good 3 point shooters let alone catch and shoot. all the crazy stuff they do would be limited because they wouldnt be handling the ball kobe will.
terry, billups, mo, curry, duhon, kirk are good off ball and their proven to be good off the ball. and would thrive think about all the open shots that fisher or blakes get or open lanes. i just think it would be a major upgrade.
i mean i dont see rose and cp3 thriving playing off ball and just catching and shooting. and with kobe handling the ball so much i doubt theyd tally up the assists.
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
because rose and cp3 need the ball to be 100% effective, and they arnt good 3 point shooters let alone catch and shoot. all the crazy stuff they do would be limited because they wouldnt be handling the ball kobe will.
terry, billups, mo, curry, duhon, kirk are good off ball and their proven to be good off the ball. and would thrive think about all the open shots that fisher or blakes get or open lanes. i just think it would be a major upgrade.
i mean i dont see rose and cp3 thriving playing off ball and just catching and shooting. and with kobe handling the ball so much i doubt theyd tally up the assists.
man...
Rose or Paul would STILL be better lol. Remember, you are watching these guys...and their style of play is sometimes due to what they are NEEDED to do with their current team. Rose is needed to dominate right now. Paul is needed to dominate the ball as well. Their talent is at a level where Im sure they could adjust their game. If the Lakers had a chance to land either of those two, they would do it in a heartbeat. Its getting to be about that time where Kobe should be playing off Pau more anyways, and not be dominating the ball so much himself.
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
because rose and cp3 need the ball to be 100% effective, and they arnt good 3 point shooters let alone catch and shoot. all the crazy stuff they do would be limited because they wouldnt be handling the ball kobe will.
terry, billups, mo, curry, duhon, kirk are good off ball and their proven to be good off the ball. and would thrive think about all the open shots that fisher or blakes get or open lanes. i just think it would be a major upgrade.
i mean i dont see rose and cp3 thriving playing off ball and just catching and shooting. and with kobe handling the ball so much i doubt theyd tally up the assists.
man...
Rose or Paul would STILL be better lol. Remember, you are watching these guys...and their style of play is sometimes due to what they are NEEDED to do with their current team. Rose is needed to dominate right now. Paul is needed to dominate the ball as well. Their talent is at a level where Im sure they could adjust their game. If the Lakers had a chance to land either of those two, they would do it in a heartbeat. Its getting to be about that time where Kobe should be playing off Pau more anyways, and not be dominating the ball so much himself.
but i would think its waste of talent, and i know kobes gonna be the dominant guard, i mean u know this niggas ego. i mean billups, terry , curry etc etc are better 3 point shooters. their talent just isnt needed we need pgs that good off ball, and hit open 3s,
the only upgrade would be defense imo.
-
i think all other 29 teams have a better PG than Fisher at this point lol
-
LOL, if the Lakers had any top PG, they would be unbeatable.
You can say "triangle this, triangle that" but lets not act like Kobe gets away from that at times & goes into free-flow-rogue mode & just does whatever. If you got a top PG, penatrating & kicking out & hitting threes, it wouldn't even be fair. Kobe would get better looks, would be set up, would even be better.
Rondo can't hit a jumpshot outside of six feet, it's a fact. But he would be better for the Lakers then anyone on that list.
Sure, everybody you named is an upgrade from Derek Fisher & those would be good realistic replacements. But analysts think Russell Westbrook could be heading to LA when his contract is up & even though he's not a deadly three point shooter, he would make the Lakers virtually unbeatable.
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
hack, you are easily the dumbest guy when it comes to analyzing the nba....no offense, because you used to be chill before you hopped on the bandwaggon of riding my nuts, but do you seriously know anything about basketball? aside from some of the trades u vetoed in your league this year, I've NEVER seen you drop any legit knowledge or insight in regards to the sport of basketball....i hope you're not this bad with football.
-
LOL, if the Lakers had any top PG, they would be unbeatable.
You can say "triangle this, triangle that" but lets not act like Kobe gets away from that at times & goes into free-flow-rogue mode & just does whatever. If you got a top PG, penatrating & kicking out & hitting threes, it wouldn't even be fair. Kobe would get better looks, would be set up, would even be better.
Rondo can't hit a jumpshot outside of six feet, it's a fact. But he would be better for the Lakers then anyone on that list.
Sure, everybody you named is an upgrade from Derek Fisher & those would be good realistic replacements. But analysts think Russell Westbrook could be heading to LA when his contract is up & even though he's not a deadly three point shooter, he would make the Lakers virtually unbeatable.
yea sure kobe says fuck the offense n does his own thing, but even when they set pick and rolls the PG or SF always gets leaved open when they come in for the double team, if we have rondo and westbrook and they dont hit that open J it just goes against the whole teams offense.
these guys arnt gonna run the offense with kobe on the team period. i dont see them doing anything excepting dishing down low, hitting open 3s, and gettin inside transition points. we're an older team, y not have PGs that can defend, play off ball, and HIT AN OPEN 3, it makes our life at lot easier, rather than having a top notch point guard not being able to do what is asked of him.
the only thing that we benefit from having a super star PG is the defense, and the inside transition points which are bonus because we dont need out PG penetrating inside, we have much more options and bigs to do that.
its just way waste of talent and im not sure i want another perimeter player being the 2nd or 3rd option leaving gasol, bynum, and odom behind. i rather have kobe chuck all the shots he want, the bigs pounding it inside, and my PG and sf's to hit an occasional or needed clutch 3 pointer or drive it inside (but we all know its almost impossible with our blake/fisher tandem)
because i really cant see kobe playing with cp3, rondo, or anyone ele running the offense. i mean shit id trust kobe running shit than anyother player in the league, thats why hes a legend and imo the best in the league.
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
Mr Basketball can't even follow other sports because they are too complex :D
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
Mr Basketball can't even follow other sports because they are too complex :D
Because his LA teams in other sports don't steal players so their best player can win rings.
-
and NIK is a Raiders fan...a team without a good season since 2003 :D
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
fact: in 2005 he was rooting for Boston because LA was 40-42 :D there's a thread he started about it
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
fact: in 2005 he was rooting for Boston because LA was 40-42 :D there's a thread he started about it
Who was the Lakers big men in 2005? Just wondering. I don't know enough about basketball apparently to know the answer to that.
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
fact: in 2005 he was rooting for Boston because LA was 40-42 :D there's a thread he started about it
Who was the Lakers big men in 2005? Just wondering. I don't know enough about basketball apparently to know the answer to that.
I'd rather us turn this discussion into the guy the Heat had for center ;)
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
i never said that, u retarded retard...but i did say that this thread is about TRIANGLE FITS at the point, not random superstars we can acquire. godamn, u are dumb.
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
fact: in 2005 he was rooting for Boston because LA was 40-42 :D there's a thread he started about it
dumbest shit ever, it's documented on this site that even in our horrible years i was well known as a die-hard laker fan, not like u, a bandwaggon fan who had 3 different favorite teams in the last 5 years lmao.
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
i never said that, u retarded retard...but i did say that this thread is about TRIANGLE FITS at the point, not random superstars we can acquire. godamn, u are dumb.
Clearly understand that lol.
But Rondo can't shoot & he'd still be better then somebody who can hit 3's & apparently your other Laker faithful don't agree. Just read.
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
fact: in 2005 he was rooting for Boston because LA was 40-42 :D there's a thread he started about it
dumbest shit ever, it's documented on this site that even in our horrible years i was well known as a die-hard laker fan, not like u, a bandwaggon fan who had 3 different favorite teams in the last 5 years lmao.
lmao it's documented on this site that your mom is hot too
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
i never said that, u retarded retard...but i did say that this thread is about TRIANGLE FITS at the point, not random superstars we can acquire. godamn, u are dumb.
Clearly understand that lol.
But Rondo can't shoot & he'd still be better then somebody who can hit 3's & apparently your other Laker faithful don't agree. Just read.
i just dont see anybody else running the offense as good as kobe, what kobes just gonna catch and shoot all day waiting to get set up? i highly doubt that.
-
Still, regardless of a jumpshot, if he truly believes that Jason Terry would be better for the Lakers then Chris Paul & Derrick Rose, that's sick lol.
i guess u dont understand the meaning of this thread, dumbshit...TRIANGLE point guard, meaning a point guard suited for the traingle offense. this is not a thread about pipe-dreams and which superstars would be cool to see in LA. it's about which point guard is ideal for the triangle offense ala bj armstrong, ron harper, brian shaw, etc.
LOL, TELL ME RIGHT NOW, MR. BASKETBALL. Tell me right now you'd "rather have" Jason Terry then Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook or Derrick Rose.
This nigga straight up said he'd prefer Jason Terry because he fits the system better. GTFO.
Hop off the nut sack like "I read it wrong". Don't a selective reader, son. ::)
i never said that, u retarded retard...but i did say that this thread is about TRIANGLE FITS at the point, not random superstars we can acquire. godamn, u are dumb.
Clearly understand that lol.
But Rondo can't shoot & he'd still be better then somebody who can hit 3's & apparently your other Laker faithful don't agree. Just read.
i just dont see anybody else running the offense as good as kobe, what kobes just gonna catch and shoot all day waiting to get set up? i highly doubt that.
If Rondo penetrates, the defense has no choice but to collapse on him. Meaning Kobe will get more open looks.
You going to tell me Kobe would shoot a better percentage backing down, trying to jay people then sitting there getting open looks?
-
Lets say the Lakers don't make a big free agent signing in a couple of years, Kobe's gone & the rest of the team gets old & they become irrelevant when these super teams take over. He will stop talking about them.
He won't be on here saying, "Yeah, I'm hyped for the Basketball season. I'm hyped for a under .500 year, missing the playoffs. I'm hyped to see who we're drafting".
fact: in 2005 he was rooting for Boston because LA was 40-42 :D there's a thread he started about it
dumbest shit ever, it's documented on this site that even in our horrible years i was well known as a die-hard laker fan, not like u, a bandwaggon fan who had 3 different favorite teams in the last 5 years lmao.
lmao it's documented on this site that your mom is hot too
lol...and based on the way u look, i'm willing to bet your mom is ugly as shit and has to take prozac to deal with having a son like u.
-
and NIK is a Raiders fan...a team without a good season since 2003 :D
Easy now Jets fan. Dont let your current little run of playoff appearances with absolutely nothing to show for it get to your head. The Jets are still a fail as a franchise overall lol. Wouldnt be surprised to see the Raiders win a superbowl again before the Jets lol.
And NIK is NOT a Raider fan.
-
and NIK is a Raiders fan...a team without a good season since 2003 :D
Easy now Jets fan. Dont let your current little run of playoff appearances with absolutely nothing to show for it get to your head. The Jets are still a fail as a franchise overall lol. Wouldnt be surprised to see the Raiders win a superbowl again before the Jets lol.
And NIK is NOT a Raider fan.
until we get a team in LA, i am
-
and NIK is a Raiders fan...a team without a good season since 2003 :D
Easy now Jets fan. Dont let your current little run of playoff appearances with absolutely nothing to show for it get to your head. The Jets are still a fail as a franchise overall lol. Wouldnt be surprised to see the Raiders win a superbowl again before the Jets lol.
And NIK is NOT a Raider fan.
until we get a team in LA, i am
Then youre not a Raider fan.
-
^actually, i am...not die hard, but i do prefer them to any other football team......shoulda never left LA, i probably woulda been much bigger on football if that were the case.