West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Hack Wilson - real on October 13, 2013, 09:36:34 PM
-
(https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/995500_532636446817307_1370629095_n.jpg)
by cheating
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NontHR4KTJI
Pats were given an extra timeout too
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NontHR4KTJI
Pats were given an extra timeout too
Lol graphic on TV was wrong. Don't be mad at the greatness that is Thomas Brady.
Giants 0-6 thooooo. :laugh:
-
Whatever,The Saints had a lucky half ass throw to take the lead, so it serves them right that a lucky half ass throw makes them lose the game.
That last TD pass pretty much sums up the career of Tom Brady. A mediocre throw thrown too short that was caught by a WR that had to do 90% of the work, and was made a hell of a lot easier by an idiot DB that had no concept of positioning. Why is Greer even watching the ball? He has safety help to the inside. All he has to do is play the man, and it's an easy break up for even a mediocre CB. A decent CB gets an INT off that throw every time.
And yet I've heard at least 3 major pundits say only Tom Brady could throw the ball in a perfect spot like that. There are two major rules the NFL tells its media if it wants to stay in the good graces of the league; never say the refs had anything to do with the outcome, and always give the QB credit a when a team wins and blame when a team loses. Unless the losing QB is Tom Brady, then look for key drops by WRs to blame for the loss.
-
I've been trying to figure out for years why the Patriots are good or why Bellichek is a good coach and I still can't figure out what sets them a part. I even tried to read some insider book on the Patriots thinking I would figure something out, and all it was was bellichek bitching and complaining. But any coach can say, "Try harder, do better, you guys stink, only 10 first downs, you got to do better in the red zone, we got to be more efficient on 3rd down"... that's all I got from the book.
Maybe this is a plausible explaination put forth on this thread. Maybe they are good because they cheat. Certainly possible, they've been busted for cheating before
-
I've been trying to figure out for years why the Patriots are good or why Bellichek is a good coach and I still can't figure out what sets them a part. I even tried to read some insider book on the Patriots thinking I would figure something out, and all it was was bellichek bitching and complaining. But any coach can say, "Try harder, do better, you guys stink, only 10 first downs, you got to do better in the red zone, we got to be more efficient on 3rd down"... that's all I got from the book.
Maybe this is a plausible explaination put forth on this thread. Maybe they are good because they cheat. Certainly possible, they've been busted for cheating before
Franchise QB is the most important in sports, now even more so with so many rules leaning towards the offense, and they've got that. Of course, most years they've put good play-makers/O-linemen around him, but the guy's been doing it a while.
-
Franchise QB is the most important in sports, now even more so with so many rules leaning towards the offense, and they've got that. Of course, most years they've put good play-makers/O-linemen around him, but the guy's been doing it a while.
I don't know about the Tom Brady theory. Remember, they did go 11-5 with Matt Cassel.
-
Whatever,The Saints had a lucky half ass throw to take the lead, so it serves them right that a lucky half ass throw makes them lose the game.
That last TD pass pretty much sums up the career of Tom Brady. A mediocre throw thrown too short that was caught by a WR that had to do 90% of the work, and was made a hell of a lot easier by an idiot DB that had no concept of positioning. Why is Greer even watching the ball? He has safety help to the inside. All he has to do is play the man, and it's an easy break up for even a mediocre CB. A decent CB gets an INT off that throw every time.
And yet I've heard at least 3 major pundits say only Tom Brady could throw the ball in a perfect spot like that. There are two major rules the NFL tells its media if it wants to stay in the good graces of the league; never say the refs had anything to do with the outcome, and always give the QB credit a when a team wins and blame when a team loses. Unless the losing QB is Tom Brady, then look for key drops by WRs to blame for the loss.
LOL at Shallow of course Tom Bradys throw is "Mediocre" according to you if that was Peyton Manning you would've sucked him off saying it was the greatest throw in the history of the NFL. Tom Brady drove them 70 yards with no timeouts in 1:13 seconds and made one hell of a throw on the 17 yard completion to Kembrell Thomkins and put the ball in the corner of the end zone where only he could make the catch or drop it like the rookies have been all year. Tom Brady is the only QB that has done so much with so little Manning has had Hall of Fame WR's his whole career and now has the best receiving corps in all of the NFL and you know how to stop Manning? Simple, you tell him the Playoffs have started and he chokes games away like always not clutch at all. 9-11 post-season but of course when they lose its the teams fault not mannings yet when pats win you say brady stunk it up but when they win and Brady has a tremendous game you say well teams win championships Brady sucks blah blah LOL same arguments with you all the time. Tom Brady will go down as the Greatest Of All Time if not he'll be right behind Joe Montana and Peyton Manning will go down as the best regular season QB who continously finds way to choke and lose in the playoffs simple as that.
-
Brady is probably the greatest ever.
-
Whatever,The Saints had a lucky half ass throw to take the lead, so it serves them right that a lucky half ass throw makes them lose the game.
That last TD pass pretty much sums up the career of Tom Brady. A mediocre throw thrown too short that was caught by a WR that had to do 90% of the work, and was made a hell of a lot easier by an idiot DB that had no concept of positioning. Why is Greer even watching the ball? He has safety help to the inside. All he has to do is play the man, and it's an easy break up for even a mediocre CB. A decent CB gets an INT off that throw every time.
And yet I've heard at least 3 major pundits say only Tom Brady could throw the ball in a perfect spot like that. There are two major rules the NFL tells its media if it wants to stay in the good graces of the league; never say the refs had anything to do with the outcome, and always give the QB credit a when a team wins and blame when a team loses. Unless the losing QB is Tom Brady, then look for key drops by WRs to blame for the loss.
you know how to stop Manning? Simple, you tell him the Playoffs have started and he chokes games away like always not clutch at all.
LOL
-
I've been trying to figure out for years why the Patriots are good or why Bellichek is a good coach and I still can't figure out what sets them a part. I even tried to read some insider book on the Patriots thinking I would figure something out, and all it was was bellichek bitching and complaining. But any coach can say, "Try harder, do better, you guys stink, only 10 first downs, you got to do better in the red zone, we got to be more efficient on 3rd down"... that's all I got from the book.
Maybe this is a plausible explaination put forth on this thread. Maybe they are good because they cheat. Certainly possible, they've been busted for cheating before
Franchise QB is the most important in sports, now even more so with so many rules leaning towards the offense, and they've got that. Of course, most years they've put good play-makers/O-linemen around him, but the guy's been doing it a while.
The problem with that statement, is that most people don't understand that 90% of Franchise QBs are extensions of their offensive co-ordinators. But the OC/playcaller isn't a marketable role and most OCs can't be sold to the public, so the media just gives all the credit to the QB. Tom Brady is one of those QBs. And nothing I actually see with my eyes ever tells me any different.
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
That's incorrect. Tom Brady has only had 3 OCs and each successor was the understudy before taking over. Also, each of the three have experienced great offensive success with much lesser QBs after leaving Brady. Wies made studs out of Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in college, and brought a broken Matt Cassel back to the probowl. McDaniels took Cassel to the probowl, and for a while almost made Kyle Orton look like a probowler, and Kyle Orton is a complete scrub of a QB. And Bill O'Brien is just getting started at Penn St, already getting offers to return to the NFL as HC by the end of last season.
We've seen the NE Offensive system succeed without Brady. I want to see Brady succeed outside of the system. I don't think he can.
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
That's incorrect. Tom Brady has only had 3 OCs and each successor was the understudy before taking over. Also, each of the three have experienced great offensive success with much lesser QBs after leaving Brady. Wies made studs out of Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in college, and brought a broken Matt Cassel back to the probowl. McDaniels took Cassel to the probowl, and for a while almost made Kyle Orton look like a probowler, and Kyle Orton is a complete scrub of a QB. And Bill O'Brien is just getting started at Penn St, already getting offers to return to the NFL as HC by the end of last season.
We've seen the NE Offensive system succeed without Brady. I want to see Brady succeed outside of the system. I don't think he can.
The problem and hypocrisy with statements like that is we won't ever see if theyre true or not, so you can sit safely and say things without ever having to be called on them. I know you think Brady is overrated and that's fine, but the problem is you think and can argue he's overrated because of something you'll never be able to be proven wrong on and you know that ;)
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
That's incorrect. Tom Brady has only had 3 OCs and each successor was the understudy before taking over. Also, each of the three have experienced great offensive success with much lesser QBs after leaving Brady. Wies made studs out of Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in college, and brought a broken Matt Cassel back to the probowl. McDaniels took Cassel to the probowl, and for a while almost made Kyle Orton look like a probowler, and Kyle Orton is a complete scrub of a QB. And Bill O'Brien is just getting started at Penn St, already getting offers to return to the NFL as HC by the end of last season.
We've seen the NE Offensive system succeed without Brady. I want to see Brady succeed outside of the system. I don't think he can.
The problem and hypocrisy with statements like that is we won't ever see if theyre true or not, so you can sit safely and say things without ever having to be called on them. I know you think Brady is overrated and that's fine, but the problem is you think and can argue he's overrated because of something you'll never be able to be proven wrong on and you know that ;)
Bullshit! I predicted 10-6 to 12-4 the day Brady got injured in 08. I predicted Cassel to be exposed his first year in KC, and to be a stud his second year. I predicted Kyle Orton to put up very solid numbers his first year in Denver. These weren't hypotheticals, and certainly not hypocrisies. They were before the fact predictions that all came through. And they were all based on my understanding of he Erhardt-Perkins offensive system, mastered in the modern times by Charlie Wies, and taught to McDaniels and O'Brien. And if you doubt any of what I say, go look through my post history.
And going back to college, you can see Brady Quinn, and Clausen look like studs with it.
So I go back 10 years and say Tom Brady is an overrated QB that's propped up by a great system, and since then we get to see 4 QBs who look like shit before and after that system, look like pro-bowlers with in that system, and I'm crazy for thinking Brady would fall apart with out it?
On record, I will say that Tom Brady is better than all those guys and wouldn't just end up a back up in a few weeks, but after a couple failed years in a place like Oakland or Buffalo, Tom Brady would be out of a job looking for another, just like Drew Bledsoe, who won 2 AFC Titles with that system, ended up.
And I never could have predicted the Colts cutting Peyton, so who knows what the future holds for Brady. We may get to see my theory shown true or false.
-
Yeah but if Peyton was three centimeters shorter, he'd be garbage. So if you weren't allowed to wear two pairs of socks he'd get destroyed. He's so overrated.
-
Yeah but if Peyton was three centimeters shorter, he'd be garbage. So if you weren't allowed to wear two pairs of socks he'd get destroyed. He's so overrated.
That's not the same thing. My argument is that Brady looks better than he really is because of the coordinators and play callers around him. I said the same thing about Drew Brees and last year helped me feel better about my opinion of Drew.
These opinions are not based around success and numbers, but what I actually see with my own eyes. For example Aaron Rodgers has both a great OC and play caller but I have never said he looks so much better because of that. I think Rodgers is good enough to excel as one of the very best in most existing systems. What I see from him looks that good.
What I see from Brady when the offense is clicking is a lot of time in the pocket, a large a gap, and wide open WRs and TEs who have to adjust to most of the throws. And when all of that isn't there I see a very mediocre QB. I think he would look terrible on over 50% of the teams in the NFL.
Where as I feel Peyton could make 95% of the NFL teams contenders to make the playoffs with double digit wins.
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
That's incorrect. Tom Brady has only had 3 OCs and each successor was the understudy before taking over. Also, each of the three have experienced great offensive success with much lesser QBs after leaving Brady. Wies made studs out of Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in college, and brought a broken Matt Cassel back to the probowl. McDaniels took Cassel to the probowl, and for a while almost made Kyle Orton look like a probowler, and Kyle Orton is a complete scrub of a QB. And Bill O'Brien is just getting started at Penn St, already getting offers to return to the NFL as HC by the end of last season.
We've seen the NE Offensive system succeed without Brady. I want to see Brady succeed outside of the system. I don't think he can.
The problem and hypocrisy with statements like that is we won't ever see if theyre true or not, so you can sit safely and say things without ever having to be called on them. I know you think Brady is overrated and that's fine, but the problem is you think and can argue he's overrated because of something you'll never be able to be proven wrong on and you know that ;)
Bullshit! I predicted 10-6 to 12-4 the day Brady got injured in 08. I predicted Cassel to be exposed his first year in KC, and to be a stud his second year. I predicted Kyle Orton to put up very solid numbers his first year in Denver. These weren't hypotheticals, and certainly not hypocrisies. They were before the fact predictions that all came through. And they were all based on my understanding of he Erhardt-Perkins offensive system, mastered in the modern times by Charlie Wies, and taught to McDaniels and O'Brien. And if you doubt any of what I say, go look through my post history.
And going back to college, you can see Brady Quinn, and Clausen look like studs with it.
So I go back 10 years and say Tom Brady is an overrated QB that's propped up by a great system, and since then we get to see 4 QBs who look like shit before and after that system, look like pro-bowlers with in that system, and I'm crazy for thinking Brady would fall apart with out it?
On record, I will say that Tom Brady is better than all those guys and wouldn't just end up a back up in a few weeks, but after a couple failed years in a place like Oakland or Buffalo, Tom Brady would be out of a job looking for another, just like Drew Bledsoe, who won 2 AFC Titles with that system, ended up.
And I never could have predicted the Colts cutting Peyton, so who knows what the future holds for Brady. We may get to see my theory shown true or false.
One problem w all that. You arent talking about brady youre talking about jimmy clausen and matt cassel. I'll say it again...u will never be able to prove that tom brady is overrated because of that system cuz he aint leaving it..which is why u "prove" ur point using other lesser qbs.
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
That's incorrect. Tom Brady has only had 3 OCs and each successor was the understudy before taking over. Also, each of the three have experienced great offensive success with much lesser QBs after leaving Brady. Wies made studs out of Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in college, and brought a broken Matt Cassel back to the probowl. McDaniels took Cassel to the probowl, and for a while almost made Kyle Orton look like a probowler, and Kyle Orton is a complete scrub of a QB. And Bill O'Brien is just getting started at Penn St, already getting offers to return to the NFL as HC by the end of last season.
We've seen the NE Offensive system succeed without Brady. I want to see Brady succeed outside of the system. I don't think he can.
The problem and hypocrisy with statements like that is we won't ever see if theyre true or not, so you can sit safely and say things without ever having to be called on them. I know you think Brady is overrated and that's fine, but the problem is you think and can argue he's overrated because of something you'll never be able to be proven wrong on and you know that ;)
Bullshit! I predicted 10-6 to 12-4 the day Brady got injured in 08. I predicted Cassel to be exposed his first year in KC, and to be a stud his second year. I predicted Kyle Orton to put up very solid numbers his first year in Denver. These weren't hypotheticals, and certainly not hypocrisies. They were before the fact predictions that all came through. And they were all based on my understanding of he Erhardt-Perkins offensive system, mastered in the modern times by Charlie Wies, and taught to McDaniels and O'Brien. And if you doubt any of what I say, go look through my post history.
And going back to college, you can see Brady Quinn, and Clausen look like studs with it.
So I go back 10 years and say Tom Brady is an overrated QB that's propped up by a great system, and since then we get to see 4 QBs who look like shit before and after that system, look like pro-bowlers with in that system, and I'm crazy for thinking Brady would fall apart with out it?
On record, I will say that Tom Brady is better than all those guys and wouldn't just end up a back up in a few weeks, but after a couple failed years in a place like Oakland or Buffalo, Tom Brady would be out of a job looking for another, just like Drew Bledsoe, who won 2 AFC Titles with that system, ended up.
And I never could have predicted the Colts cutting Peyton, so who knows what the future holds for Brady. We may get to see my theory shown true or false.
One problem w all that. You arent talking about brady youre talking about jimmy clausen and matt cassel. I'll say it again...u will never be able to prove that tom brady is overrated because of that system cuz he aint leaving it..which is why u "prove" ur point using other lesser qbs.
Bullshit. If you knew anything about football, you'd know Tom Brady is nothing more than an average QB who has been fortunate in his career. Peyton on the other hand is virtually equivalent to a prophet and has been making miracles throughout his career despite horrible supporting casts. If Tom Brady didn't play in Bill's system he'd be nothing more than Chad Henne, whereas Peyton is a god among mortals and could take the Jaguars to a Superbowl.
-
the patriots go through offensive coordinators like toilet paper and tom brady is def a top 10 QB...probably 6 or 7 if you ask me.
with that said before the patriots changed their system in '07 when they got Moss and Welker, the Patriots were a low risk team that ran the ball a lot. They won 3 titles that way. Then Brady tried to turn into Peyton Manning and hasn't won a ring since but had 2 MVP seasons, one pretty historic. The irony there is delicious 8)
That's incorrect. Tom Brady has only had 3 OCs and each successor was the understudy before taking over. Also, each of the three have experienced great offensive success with much lesser QBs after leaving Brady. Wies made studs out of Brady Quinn and Jimmy Clausen in college, and brought a broken Matt Cassel back to the probowl. McDaniels took Cassel to the probowl, and for a while almost made Kyle Orton look like a probowler, and Kyle Orton is a complete scrub of a QB. And Bill O'Brien is just getting started at Penn St, already getting offers to return to the NFL as HC by the end of last season.
We've seen the NE Offensive system succeed without Brady. I want to see Brady succeed outside of the system. I don't think he can.
The problem and hypocrisy with statements like that is we won't ever see if theyre true or not, so you can sit safely and say things without ever having to be called on them. I know you think Brady is overrated and that's fine, but the problem is you think and can argue he's overrated because of something you'll never be able to be proven wrong on and you know that ;)
Bullshit! I predicted 10-6 to 12-4 the day Brady got injured in 08. I predicted Cassel to be exposed his first year in KC, and to be a stud his second year. I predicted Kyle Orton to put up very solid numbers his first year in Denver. These weren't hypotheticals, and certainly not hypocrisies. They were before the fact predictions that all came through. And they were all based on my understanding of he Erhardt-Perkins offensive system, mastered in the modern times by Charlie Wies, and taught to McDaniels and O'Brien. And if you doubt any of what I say, go look through my post history.
And going back to college, you can see Brady Quinn, and Clausen look like studs with it.
So I go back 10 years and say Tom Brady is an overrated QB that's propped up by a great system, and since then we get to see 4 QBs who look like shit before and after that system, look like pro-bowlers with in that system, and I'm crazy for thinking Brady would fall apart with out it?
On record, I will say that Tom Brady is better than all those guys and wouldn't just end up a back up in a few weeks, but after a couple failed years in a place like Oakland or Buffalo, Tom Brady would be out of a job looking for another, just like Drew Bledsoe, who won 2 AFC Titles with that system, ended up.
And I never could have predicted the Colts cutting Peyton, so who knows what the future holds for Brady. We may get to see my theory shown true or false.
One problem w all that. You arent talking about brady youre talking about jimmy clausen and matt cassel. I'll say it again...u will never be able to prove that tom brady is overrated because of that system cuz he aint leaving it..which is why u "prove" ur point using other lesser qbs.
Where did I say "prove"? And I can only use the QBs that have played in that system by the same guys that Brady had calling his plays. And I'm not so sure how much lesser a QB Drew Bledsoe is. He did win two AFC Championship games. It's not like he's a scrub.
Another QB in another currently great system with a great playcaller, is Drew Brees. With Sean Payton he's near the top of the heap; an MVP argument. With out Sean Payton, he's not even close. I called that on Brees years ago. So why shouldn't I use the same logic for Brady?