West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: TraceOneInfinite on December 31, 2013, 12:42:19 AM
-
Guaranteed.
We almost beat the Chargers if not for two horribly botched calls by the refs at the end. And that was with all backups in the game.
Expect Jamaal Charles to have a Michael Jordan like performance. If not for Peyton, Charles should be MVP this year. And he steps it up in big games. The only other playoff game he played in was against the ravens a few years back and he broke a big one, and was almost singlehandedly taking over the game until some baltimore D-lineman pulled a cheap shot and landed on charles leg while he was already down. Charles got shooken up but still had heart to return to the game but it wasn't the same after that.
Charles had a week off and is hundred percent healthy. Also chiefs are getting justin houston back who is the reason our defense lead us to a 9-0 start before his injury.
-
Based on how many games the Chiefs won during the regular season I would expect it to be a major disappointment if they blew it in the first round. I see 'em moving on, Luck is very good but the Colts don't really seem like a team that's ready to take the next step, especially with the ineffectiveness of Richardson, and Wayne out. That defense is gonna give 'em problems.
-
Man what a bold guarantee.
-
It should be a tough game. I don't think I can call it either way. I'm a big fan of both teams. Obviously I want Peyton to take it all this year, but I'd have no issue with the Chiefs hoisting the Lombardi.
-
Man what a bold guarantee.
well the Chiefs are the underdog, technically.
...But they had the same record during the regular season as the Colts, and they would of won another one last weekend but they sat all their starters.
-
Go colts
-
It wouldn't shock me at all if they lost. They only have two legit wins against the Cowboys (if you want to even call that legit) and the Eagles. The three other good teams they played were the Chargers, Broncos and Colts and went 0-5.
And no 2.5 dog can ever be "guaranteed" to win.
Stop trolling.
-
Tt
It wouldn't shock me at all if they lost. They only have two legit wins against the Cowboys (if you want to even call that legit) and the Eagles. The three other good teams they played were the Chargers, Broncos and Colts and went 0-5.
And no 2.5 dog can ever be "guaranteed" to win.
Stop trolling.
That's a terrible arguement. So you would feel better if they beat the Broncos but got dropped by the Jaguars? Because that's how the Colts have been all year, inconsistent.
I think its better if a team shows consistency and they beat the teams they are supposed to beat week in and week out which is what the Chiefs did all year. They were the most consistent team in football. And now they rested their starters last week and they are ready to put it all on the line against the Colts so there is no stopping them.
And trolling is following someone into an unrelated sports thread to hate on them. Trolling isn't rooting for your hometown team in a big playoff game.
I know all about trolling now, because when I was trippin out on my boy sccit I actually trolled him for a few days. Id check his recent posts and follow him into an unrelated sports thread to say Kobe sucks. So I can now see life through a trolls eyes because I've been one.
-
No, actually my argument is they lost to the three best teams they played on their easy ass schedule five times.
What I'm saying is they beat all the 2-3/5 teams on the schedule and then went 0-5 against the 4/5 and 5/5 teams.
With the lone exception being the Eagles...when they didn't have the identity they have now.
THEREFORE, there's absolutely not reason to believe the 2.5 dog is a guarantee.
-
T
No, actually my argument is they lost to the three best teams they played on their easy ass schedule five times.
What I'm saying is they beat all the 2-3/5 teams on the schedule and then went 0-5 against the 4/5 and 5/5 teams.
With the lone exception being the Eagles...when they didn't have the identity they have now.
THEREFORE, there's absolutely not reason to believe the 2.5 dog is a guarantee.
Have you ever seen Jamal Charles perform in a big game? In fact, have you ever seen him play, in any game?
The Chiefs last two losses didn't even count. They would not have changed their seeding for the playoffs at all, win or lose.
So really they only had 3 legit losses all year long. The legit lost to the Broncos, in Denver. And if you want to say that Denver is a better team then the Chiefs, that's fine because I actually believe the Chiefs are the second best team in the league, behind Denver.
They also legit lost to Denver at home. But that was a game that could have easily gone the other way. The Chiefs were within one score at the end of the game and drivin, when they got stopped in the redzone in the final seconds on a missed holding call.
The loss to San Diego was their only legit loss besides Denver. In that game the Chiefs had it all wrapped up when in the final moments Rivers got one by Sean Smith in the corner of the endzone for a dramatic game winning touchdown. It was back and forth all day, a shootout. No way that game becomes a shootout if Justin Houston was playing. Justin Houston is back now, bitches!
Chiefs Gauranteed!
-
TNo, actually my argument is they lost to the three best teams they played on their easy ass schedule five times.
What I'm saying is they beat all the 2-3/5 teams on the schedule and then went 0-5 against the 4/5 and 5/5 teams.
With the lone exception being the Eagles...when they didn't have the identity they have now.
THEREFORE, there's absolutely not reason to believe the 2.5 dog is a guarantee.
And if you want to say that Denver is a better team then the Chiefs, that's fine because I actually believe the Chiefs are the second best team in the league, behind Denver.
In the league? I'd take the Hawks and the 49ers over them.
-
Yes, I've seen Charles play before LMAO.
-
Yes, I've seen Charles play before LMAO.
The guy just might be the best athlete in the game. His dash times at Texas in college were good enough to qualify for the Olympics. He ran track but obviously footbal got in the way of him participating in the Olympics. And he's not like Darrius Heyward Bey, a speedster who can't do anything else. Jammal can get it done in all 3 phases, running, catching, blocking. Against the Raiders he had like 4 receiving touchdowns and 1 running.
Funny backstory on him though is that they thought he was too small to make it when he was first drafted. He didn't get much playing time and had fumble issues and a couple of minor injuries. Finally, one game his second season Todd Haley just had him inactive. Didn't even put him on the 55 man roster! The running back who did play is a guy who wasn't even in the league the next year.
Maybe this lit a fire under Jamaal or maybe Larry Johnson completely falling off, did the trick. But the next week Larry lashed out at Haley saying he didn't like taking direction from a coach, "who'd never played the game" Haley was a golfer not a football player growing up. Johnson was also playing horribly, the team was 1-7, so they were like fuck it, and cut their highest paid player.
So Jamaal suits up back up on the 55 man roster, mid-season and then explodes for over 1,000 yards in the final half of the season, including a 200 yard performance against Denver. And the rest is history.
By the way, same thing happened to Derrick Johson. Haley sat him for a guy who is not even in the league anymore. Johnson got so pissed off that last game of the season against Denver he had two interceptions returned for a touchdown and lead the team in tackles. He's been in the probowl every year since.
-
Anyway, the Chiefs are pretty overrated as far as being a legit contender goes. I personally think they'll find a way to beat Indianapolis, but it should end after that.
-
colts are winning this.
-
Well, folks, today is the big day. The day the Chiefs break their 20 year run without a playoff victory. The last playoff win for the Chiefs was when Montana shredded Buddy Ryans 46 defense in a big win over the Houston Oilers to get the Chiefs to the AfC championship game. Then Bruce Smith knocked Montana out and the rest was history.
Not that the Chiefs haven't had some good teams in between. Marty had another 13-3 team in 97, when out kicker missed 3 field goals that caused us to lose to Harbaughs Colts. Vermiel also had a 13-3 team with Trent Green and Tony Gonazalez and lost in a game with no punts, against.... you guessed it... The Colts.
Today the streak ends... 8). Go Chiefs!
-
Lmao @ this nigga posting a mini biography about Charles and that nigga goes down in the first. Not returning.
Fucking jinx. Chiefs played a strong first half though.
-
allah is answering infant's prayers
-
8)
-
8)
Don't get cocky yet. This is a nail biter.
-
LMAO @ this potential fail. Would be on of the worst collapses of all-time.
Nigga has to delete his account when the inevitable happens.
-
this is a crazy game
-
:-X :-X :-X :-X :-[
-
How do you score 38 points in the first 31 minutes and only 6 in the last 29 minutes? What a disaster.
But here is what killed the Cheifs; they decided to play pre-vent D without keeping a safety deep. So all they did was let guys run open and run deep. That last TD to Hilton was disgraceful.
-
I knew it.
-
Choke job. Almost as bad as the 1992 Houston Oilers. I had an eerie feeling that the chiefs woulda blown it. Even when it was 38-10 at early 3rd quarter. I took a nap happy that the dolts were gonna lose & get blown out....BUT >:(
-
Only Andrew Luck can throw three picks and win.
-
LMAO. "Guaranteed". Kill yourself.
-
I didn't know Marty Shottenhiemer was still coaching the Chiefs. We used to experience heartbreak like this every year in the 90's.
Got to give props to Rieds playcalling and the performance of Alex Smith. Alex really put the team on his back.
I don't want to talk about what went wrong because its too depressing. Maybe Shallow can provide some more good analysis for why Luck looked like Manning on steroids in the second half.
...anyway, when does royals season start?
-
that shit was unbelievable, i wouldnt have even watched that game if it wasnt for infant's guarantee but im glad i did
-
That was brutal.
-
I didn't know Marty Shottenhiemer was still coaching the Chiefs. We used to experience heartbreak like this every year in the 90's.
Got to give props to Rieds playcalling and the performance of Alex Smith. Alex really put the team on his back.
I don't want to talk about what went wrong because its too depressing. Maybe Shallow can provide some more good analysis for why Luck looked like Manning on steroids in the second half.
...anyway, when does royals season start?
It's simple; you can't play prevent defense if you don't have a deep safety. I mean it was such a joke watching Hilton get behind the secondary the way he did. And it's not like it was one fluke play of blown coverage, the Chiefs consistently let guys beat them deep. That's not bad playing, that's bad coaching. Andy Ried should be ashamed of himself. If all they did was drop back on defense and take sacks on offense they would have won the game after going up 38-10.
The offensive just seemed to shut down. Losing Charles made them afraid to pound it later in the game. I mean that fumble came on a play that never should have been called.
I've seen collapses in games before but never so mistake free. Usually a team needs at least three turnovers to blow a lead like that.
Ah well. As for next week; Go Colts.
-
ill give it to the Queef's they played a great game, but the Colts and Andrew Luck are known to be a true second half team and they proved it... it was a great game nonetheless
-
It's simple; you can't play prevent defense if you don't have a deep safety. I mean it was such a joke watching Hilton get behind the secondary the way he did. And it's not like it was one fluke play of blown coverage, the Chiefs consistently let guys beat them deep. That's not bad playing, that's bad coaching. Andy Ried should be ashamed of himself. If all they did was drop back on defense and take sacks on offense they would have won the game after going up 38-10.
The offensive just seemed to shut down. Losing Charles made them afraid to pound it later in the game. I mean that fumble came on a play that never should have been called.
I've seen collapses in games before but never so mistake free. Usually a team needs at least three turnovers to blow a lead like that.
Ah well. As for next week; Go Colts.
D-coordinator Bob Sutton runs the defense. Andy Ried calls all the plays for the offense so he run the defense as well.
And 38-10 is not a big enough lead to just be able to take sacks every play. It was early in the 3rd quarter when it was 38-10.
-
It's simple; you can't play prevent defense if you don't have a deep safety. I mean it was such a joke watching Hilton get behind the secondary the way he did. And it's not like it was one fluke play of blown coverage, the Chiefs consistently let guys beat them deep. That's not bad playing, that's bad coaching. Andy Ried should be ashamed of himself. If all they did was drop back on defense and take sacks on offense they would have won the game after going up 38-10.
The offensive just seemed to shut down. Losing Charles made them afraid to pound it later in the game. I mean that fumble came on a play that never should have been called.
I've seen collapses in games before but never so mistake free. Usually a team needs at least three turnovers to blow a lead like that.
Ah well. As for next week; Go Colts.
D-coordinator Bob Sutton runs the defense. Andy Ried calls all the plays for the offense so he run the defense as well.
And 38-10 is not a big enough lead to just be able to take sacks every play. It was early in the 3rd quarter when it was 38-10.
The sacks part was hyperbole. I know Sutton is DC, but the buck stops at the HC and for Andy Ried as HC and offensive genius to sit and watch a situation that invites big plays to occur and to watch all second half without saying anything to the DC to change the approach is embarrassing. That doesn't happen to Marty. Marty's playoff woes came in close games with unlucky breaks near the end. You give Marty a 38-10 lead and the game is over. Of course Marty probably wouldn't have gotten to the 38-10 to begin with.
To play prevent D with out a deep safety is the equivalent, for any hockey fans, of playing trap defense with a lead but pulling your goalie.
-
The sacks part was hyperbole. I know Sutton is DC, but the buck stops at the HC and for Andy Ried as HC and offensive genius to sit and watch a situation that invites big plays to occur and to watch all second half without saying anything to the DC to change the approach is embarrassing. That doesn't happen to Marty. Marty's playoff woes came in close games with unlucky breaks near the end. You give Marty a 38-10 lead and the game is over. Of course Marty probably wouldn't have gotten to the 38-10 to begin with.
To play prevent D with out a deep safety is the equivalent, for any hockey fans, of playing trap defense with a lead but pulling your goalie.
I don't disagree with your analysis. I just feel like Reid did an amazing job with the playcalling for the offense. So it's kind of hard for me to get on his case about the defense, but I certainly get your point.
-
The sacks part was hyperbole. I know Sutton is DC, but the buck stops at the HC and for Andy Ried as HC and offensive genius to sit and watch a situation that invites big plays to occur and to watch all second half without saying anything to the DC to change the approach is embarrassing. That doesn't happen to Marty. Marty's playoff woes came in close games with unlucky breaks near the end. You give Marty a 38-10 lead and the game is over. Of course Marty probably wouldn't have gotten to the 38-10 to begin with.
To play prevent D with out a deep safety is the equivalent, for any hockey fans, of playing trap defense with a lead but pulling your goalie.
I don't disagree with your analysis. I just feel like Reid did an amazing job with the playcalling for the offense. So it's kind of hard for me to get on his case about the defense, but I certainly get your point.
The first 31 minutes of playcalling was masterful. He made Alex Smith look like John Elway. It was the playcalling with the lead that I don't understand. The sack fumble came on a play that should 100 out of 100 times be a run play. And the 4th down bomb was way too risky. It's a 4th down for the game and you risk a sideline pass down the field? No way do I agree with that. My critique of Reid in Philly all those years with Westbrook was he was way too pass happy when he didn't need to be, and while I was wrong in my prediction for the whole season that Charles would get lost in the shuffle because of it, it was the too much passing that did them in during the 2nd half.
Now, I whole heartedly feel if Charles didn't get taken out the Chiefs would have ran away with it because you can't deny JC his touches with a 38-10 lead and he would have worn down the Indy D, but even with out him and the back up, McCluster should have simply been handed the ball to run the clock and win the game. Peyton Hillis sure would have come in handy with the 38-10 lead as well.
-
The first 31 minutes of playcalling was masterful. He made Alex Smith look like John Elway. It was the playcalling with the lead that I don't understand. The sack fumble came on a play that should 100 out of 100 times be a run play. And the 4th down bomb was way too risky. It's a 4th down for the game and you risk a sideline pass down the field? No way do I agree with that. My critique of Reid in Philly all those years with Westbrook was he was way too pass happy when he didn't need to be, and while I was wrong in my prediction for the whole season that Charles would get lost in the shuffle because of it, it was the too much passing that did them in during the 2nd half.
Now, I whole heartedly feel if Charles didn't get taken out the Chiefs would have ran away with it because you can't deny JC his touches with a 38-10 lead and he would have worn down the Indy D, but even with out him and the back up, McCluster should have simply been handed the ball to run the clock and win the game. Peyton Hillis sure would have come in handy with the 38-10 lead as well.
Peyton Hillis is terrible. Please don't remind me of the Hell that was the Chiefs 2012 season.