West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Hack Wilson - real on February 24, 2014, 04:37:26 PM
-
officially ranked #15 of 15
don't worry, Kobe will take them to the playoffs when he returns 8)
-
and we swept the celtics this year lmfao /endthread
-
and we swept the celtics this year lmfao /endthread
1-yes, yes the Lakers did.
2-I didn't see anything about the Celtics in this thread, what exactly do they have to do with the western conference? or the Lakers being the worst team in the west? thanks in advance for any elaboration 8)
-
and we swept the celtics this year lmfao /endthread
1-yes, yes the Lakers did.
2-I didn't see anything about the Celtics in this thread, what exactly do they have to do with the western conference? or the Lakers being the worst team in the west? thanks in advance for any elaboration 8)
3-Lakers got slaughterhoused tonight....Marshall almost lead them to victory with his amazing 0 points and 4 assists though ;)
-
dantoni goin wit the kent bazemore experiment
lakers still > celtics
-
both teams suck ass right now
but 17 titles > 16 titles
and that's all that matters 8)
-
lakers have 17 titles + more division titles, more finals appearances, more playoff appearances...better franchise in every which way
-
lakers have 17 titles + more division titles, more finals appearances, more playoff appearances...better franchise in every which way
17 titles now? basketball reference says you lie.
and since when does LOSINg in the finals count as a bragging right??? you Laker fans sure got shit backwards son. Peyton Manning isn't bragging about MAKING the superbowl and losing 43-8, is he? that's what i thought.
-
lakers have 17 titles + more division titles, more finals appearances, more playoff appearances...better franchise in every which way
17 titles now? basketball reference says you lie.
and since when does LOSINg in the finals count as a bragging right??? you Laker fans sure got shit backwards son. Peyton Manning isn't bragging about MAKING the superbowl and losing 43-8, is he? that's what i thought.
are u retarded? winning a conference title is definitely a plus on a franchises resume......and wikipedia is not a credible source, because it's not listening george mikan's first championship with the lakers in the nbl
-
where the fuck did i say WIKIPEDIA?
:eh: :grumpy:
-
where the fuck did i say WIKIPEDIA?
:eh: :grumpy:
point stands....laker franchise has 17 titles. basketball-reference doesnt accumulate nbl stats
-
lmao
son is depressed the LAkers worthless title was not recognized. aww poor guy.
-
i dont see where the desperation is....ur the one starting threads tryin ur hardest to prove a point here.
-
i dont see where the desperation is....ur the one starting threads tryin ur hardest to prove a point here.
Hack starts thread: Lakers are worst team in the west
NIK: YEAH BRU BUT YOU KNOW, MAN, WE DID BEAT THE CELTICS TWICE DUDE
hack: what's that got to do with the Lakers and the western conference?
NIK: GO KOBE!
-
actually, more like this......
hack: LOL LAKERS SUCK LAKERS ARE WORST TEAM IN THE WEST LOL LAKERS
sccit: Celtics got swept by the Lakers this year
hack: OH YEA? HAHA LOL LAKERS WELL ARE NOT GOOD HAHA LAKERS SUCK WE ARE THE BEST FRANCHISE WITH THE MOST TITLES LAKERS
sccit: lol not really, lakers have 17 titles too, as well as way more playoff+finals appearances (relevancy in every era)
hack: HAHA LAKERS LOL LAKERS ARENT BETTER THAN CELTICS BASKETBALL-REFERENCE SAYS 16 TITLES BECAUSE THEY DONT COUNT NBL TITLES LAKERS KOBE
sccit: that doesn't matter, because the Lakers still have 17 titles as a FRANCHISE
hack: KOBE LAKERS I STARTED THIS THREAD TO TALK ABOUT LAKERS AND ALL U CAN SAY IS GO KOBE LAKERS LAKERS TALK ABOUT LAKERS HAHA NIK
-
nice try but you could have done a lot better
-
2-I didn't see anything about the Celtics in this thread, what exactly do they have to do with the western conference? or the Lakers being the worst team in the west? thanks in advance for any elaboration 8)
LOL. It's kind of hypocritical of you to point this out. You'll find any excuse to mention how the Lakers/Kobe sucks in every thread NIK makes. How does it feel to be on the other side of that?
-
don't worry, Kobe Jabbari Parker will take them to the playoffs when he returns 8)
Fixed. ;D
-
2-I didn't see anything about the Celtics in this thread, what exactly do they have to do with the western conference? or the Lakers being the worst team in the west? thanks in advance for any elaboration 8)
LOL. It's kind of hypocritical of you to point this out. You'll find any excuse to mention how the Lakers/Kobe sucks in every thread NIK makes. How does it feel to be on the other side of that?
NIK is free to make "brooks owned the celtics" type of threads. I could care less, I find them funny.
-
yea, but then u act like a butthurt bitch when i show u that lakers>celtics in every which way
-
you can make up whatever stats you want
factz:
1-celtics are 9-3 in the nba finals against the lakers
2-anyone with a fucking brain knows Boston has one more title than the Lakers. 17 > 16. make up all the petty crap you want but NBA.com even says 17 > 16.
3-you mad
-
Fuck both your faggot ass franchises
8)
-
you can make up whatever stats you want
factz:
1-celtics are 9-3 in the nba finals against the lakers
2-anyone with a fucking brain knows Boston has one more title than the Lakers. 17 > 16. make up all the petty crap you want but NBA.com even says 17 > 16.
3-you mad
i know u a lil slow, but lets try one last time...nba.com doesn't recognize NBL titles. Lakers, as a franchise, have 17 titles. 1 in the NBL, 1 in the BAA, and 15 in the NBA....u can say whatever u want and try to base shit off technicalities, but thats the reality of the situation.
also, relevancy in every era means a lot more than winning 11 out of 16 titles in one era back when there was only 8 teams...
lakers have won titles in every era and have never had dry spells like the celtics...more all-stars, hall-of-famers....were better in every aspect. so u can hang on to that 17>16 technicality all u want, but any1 livin in reality knows whats good.
-
The Lakers won an NBL title, which the NBA doesn't recognize. Just like the NBA doesn't recognize the ABA titles. Still, the Lakers have 17 titles, especially since they won the BBA (Later NBA) title the very next year after winning the NBL title. Also, prior to the merger the NBL did allow some black players to play, the BBA did not and 4 other teams besides the Lakers joined the BBA/NBL merged league, officially called the NBL. Too bad the NBA doesn't recognize that title. I think the Lakers should put it on the wall.
-
The Lakers won an NBL title, which the NBA doesn't recognize. Just like the NBA doesn't recognize the ABA titles. Still, the Lakers have 17 titles, especially since they won the BBA (Later NBA) title the very next year after winning the NBL title. Also, prior to the merger the NBL did allow some black players to play, the BBA did not and 4 other teams besides the Lakers joined the BBA/NBL merged league, officially called the NBL. Too bad the NBA doesn't recognize that title. I think the Lakers should put it on the wall.
yea, the NBL was far more competitive than the BAA...it's all a technicality. the NBL and BAA merged to form the NBA, but since the owners of the BAA were the ones who officially bought out the NBL and not the other way around, they recognize BAA as the NBA and the NBL as a defunct league, despite the fact that more NBL teams were taken. It's a technicality, but in reality, we have 17 titles as a franchise.
-
lol @ crying over a meaningless title in 1947
the NBA recognizes it as 17-16 and no crybaby technicality is going to save that. And being 9-3 against the Lakers in the finals is more proof that Boston is better 8)
-
THE TECHNICALITY IS THAT IT DOESNT COUNT...IN REALITY, IT IS A TITLE JUST AS MUCH AS THE BAA CHAMPIONSHIPS WERE.
-
How the Knicks get Shannon Brown and the Lakers didn't?
WE HAVE MORE THAN ENOUGH GUARDS
-
blah blah blah
boston still owns LA in the finals 9-3, and 17 > 16. live with these facts. go Rondo.
-
lol all those wins came in the 60s smh......17+31+34>17+21+21
-
lol @ thinking your team is the best franchise with less titles and a 3-9 record against the same team with one more title than yours
silly Lakers
-
lol@thinkin 11 titles in the span of one era makes u better than a franchise who has won titles in every era
-
the Steelers are considered the most succesful NFL team in the superbowl era and they went a good 28 years without a title
Yankees had a long dry spell in the 80s and early 90's before Jeter and Mo came around.
All that matters is 9-3 and 17-16 8)
-
yankees and steelers didnt win a majority of their titles in one era...and steelers aint even considered the best franchise either way