West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Hack Wilson - real on May 14, 2014, 05:21:36 PM
-
WARRIORS
Phil loses already
-
Warriors are about as good a job as you'll find as a coach, as far as a roster ready to be an contender, rare that a job like that would ever be open , guess that speaks to the strange management situation. Still, no surprise he would choose that over the shitshow that is the NY Knicks.
-
well I think short term they are the best job available
but can that roster really be a title contender? i'm not sure if they are good enough to make it out the west in the next couple years. At least in NYK he can put somtehing together when Marshmelo leaves for the Bulls.
-
well I think short term they are the best job available
but can that roster really be a title contender? i'm not sure if they are good enough to make it out the west in the next couple years. At least in NYK he can put somtehing together when Marshmelo leaves for the Bulls.
Well that Clipper series coulda gone either way, don't know that I'd see them beating the Thunder or Heat but they'd at least have a fighters chance. I wouldn't say they're a favorite or anything, just making the point that it would be an easy decision to take over a roster like that as opposed to most coaching vacancies when the team is in bad shape.
-
yeah but they aren't seeing OKC in a series and LAC should be up 3-2. LAC has a better playoff built team. too bad the refs hate 'em tho.
-
WARRIORS WOULDA WON VS THE CLIPPERS THIS YEAR HAD BOGUT NOT BEEN INJURED....GOOD CHOICE BY KERR.
-
WARRIORS WOULDA WON VS THE CLIPPERS THIS YEAR HAD BOGUT NOT BEEN INJURED....GOOD CHOICE BY KERR.
if that is the case then the Lakers wouldn't have won the NBA finals in 2010 because Perkins couldn't play game 7.....
anyways I hope the Knicks either bring Phil back just for pure entertainment purposes or go ahead someone like Tom Thibideau. Maybe Kerr turned the Knicks down because he felt like he would be replaced in a two or three year span if the Knicks got good over time....
-
WARRIORS WOULDA WON VS THE CLIPPERS THIS YEAR HAD BOGUT NOT BEEN INJURED....GOOD CHOICE BY KERR.
if that is the case then the Lakers wouldn't have won the NBA finals in 2010 because Perkins couldn't play game 7.....
anyways I hope the Knicks either bring Phil back just for pure entertainment purposes or go ahead someone like Tom Thibideau. Maybe Kerr turned the Knicks down because he felt like he would be replaced in a two or three year span if the Knicks got good over time....
LOL at comparing Perkins to Bogut
-
clearly the idea of a starting 5 for golden state means something to you in this thread yet the champion Celtics starting 5 means nothing?
-
You're comparing an all-star caliber player to one of the worst starting centers in the league
-
You're comparing an all-star caliber player to one of the worst starting centers in the league
Perkins was a starting center for an NBA champion
Bogut is a surfer from krazysumwhat's sick country and probably looks at illegal photos when he's not on the court. and let' not act like Bogut is the next fuckin Shaq or something.
-
We all know bogut is much better than Perkins, I don't know what point ur tryna prove here, other than ur bad a trollin
-
that was pretty damn bad....give the ball to joe johnson in the corner wit no set play smfh. every1 knows the sideline acts as an extra defender in that situation. only dumb muthafuckaz who don't know shit about basketball (but think they do cuz they smoke crack) think that's an acceptable play.
-
barsketball?
-
You play mate? Or you more of a Netball, Rounders and Croquet gentlemen ye?
rounders is the first american sport i fell in love with because it is our past time. howevz my gee i gots 2 say da the bars-skit-bawl is a better product to watch on TV than the roundball. but both take a baak seet to the feetbawl.