West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: SADERO on May 30, 2003, 05:36:59 PM

Title: Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: SADERO on May 30, 2003, 05:36:59 PM
what do you think about this game?
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Skindiana bon3z on May 30, 2003, 05:40:36 PM
2003 NBA champion Spurs....
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: The Big Bad Ass on May 30, 2003, 06:56:21 PM
Nets in 6.
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: SADERO on May 30, 2003, 09:01:06 PM
I think the San Antonio is gonna win the title.
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: LiqwidNitrogen on May 30, 2003, 09:34:49 PM
Spurs in 6
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: KING VerbalAssaulta on May 30, 2003, 10:29:11 PM
i've been telling everyone...nets in 6....martin can contain duncan...spurs have no answer for kid  8)
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: 7even on May 31, 2003, 02:42:19 AM
martin is aight... but containing duncan? noone can contain duncan :D
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: GuEsStStAr on May 31, 2003, 04:56:01 AM
lol Nets won't win!!!!!!!! no team from the Eastern Conference could beat the Spurs at these Finals in my opinion....

so I think

Spurs in 6

they could make it in 4 but the 6th game is in San Antonio so they'll wait 'til then..... ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: .:DayGoStyLz:. on May 31, 2003, 05:26:45 AM
what do you think about this game?

game? so yur saying Spurs in 1??  ;D

I say, Spurs in 6. Could be 5, but id be surprised if it goes past 6 at all. The east is just too weak IMO. But i do think, out of anyone in the East....Jersey does stand the best chance. The point guard matchup is HUGE. Maybe even bigger then Duncan/Martin. If Parker can stay offensive, and get into the lane consistently...jersey will have problems. Key for the Spurs: offensive rebounding and keep the pace half court. We'll see tho, should be a good series.

SPURS 2003 Champs!!!!!  ;)
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Sub-Z on May 31, 2003, 08:15:16 PM
nets in 7
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: truemaster on June 01, 2003, 01:11:05 AM
Spurs won the championship when they beat the Lakers. Spurs over New Jers no doubt!!!
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: PLANT on June 01, 2003, 04:44:45 PM
I think Nets in 6 or 7.  Theres no doubt this will be a great series tho.
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Hatesrats™ on June 01, 2003, 05:52:53 PM

Spurs in 5..
possibly an easy sweep, but who know's 4 sure.
Gonna be a very fast paced seris tho.

Duncan is gonna be impossible to stop.
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: white Boy on June 01, 2003, 06:04:40 PM
i garantee at least 6 if not 7, spurs without a doubt will win, but martin will stick duncan, and stick him well, and jason - parker
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: ·SiNiStEr· on June 01, 2003, 06:38:01 PM
Spurs in 5


i dont care if the spurs were underdog by 40 points.. i live in san antonio. heirgo i must root for them spurs.

GO SPURS GO!
CHAMPS '00 '03
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: pappy on June 01, 2003, 07:00:54 PM
besides duncan,  position 4 position where r the spurs better than the nets.  stephon marbury owned tony parker,  this is goin be a lot closer series than most think
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: .:DayGoStyLz:. on June 02, 2003, 02:46:58 PM
besides duncan,  position 4 position where r the spurs better than the nets.  stephon marbury owned tony parker,  this is goin be a lot closer series than most think

San Antonio is in the finals though, and Pheonix is at home. Marbury outplayed Parker, but Parkers team won. So whats the measure of a point guard? How many points/assists/etc. that they have? Or whether or not they lead their team to victory. U could say the same for the Lakers. Their number 2 player, is much better then SA's number 2 right now, but SA won. Also, i think Parker might even come out on top in this matchup with Kidd. Im not saying he WILL, but i wouldnt be surprised. Theres NO WAY that Kidd, defensively can stay in front of Parker if he keeps attacking. Parker outplayed Nash IMO, in the Dallas series. If the Spurs do win, jus think....Parker went up against Marbury, Nash, and Kidd in the playoffs. Pretty good.
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Black_Smoke on June 02, 2003, 09:16:10 PM
SPURS
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: white Boy on June 05, 2003, 12:19:49 PM
i expoected that from game 1, nets will boucnce back tho
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Duncan1 on June 05, 2003, 03:22:17 PM
Spurs in five games, East teams are an embarrassment to the NBA


Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: 7even on June 05, 2003, 03:26:12 PM
why is it like that btw (http://warcraft3.ingame.de/error/peon.gif)
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Hater Player on June 06, 2003, 10:20:01 PM
fuck dem weak ass spurs i want da nets 2 win byron scot all da way holmes
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Blood Rain on June 08, 2003, 08:00:50 PM
i think ima go for the nets i hate the spurs
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Perfection on June 13, 2003, 02:50:49 PM
Spurs in 7 games with Tim Duncan or Tony Parker winning the MVP award.



Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: IKON on June 13, 2003, 07:24:06 PM
damn this serious has been sloppy from what i have seen, im just sittin back and the spurs just cannot put the nets away, the spurs have looked good at time but the nets just somehow find a way to get back in the game or win, damn i give them big props cause they got heart, this is kinda like a david vs. goliath thing

right now its game 5 and its all tied up at 2 and the game right now is real close, i never would have thought that the series would be this close :o
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: KING VerbalAssaulta on June 14, 2003, 04:09:00 PM
damn...this is the most boring series i have seen ever since i've been watching hoops (12 years)....i've only watched 2 full games....usually i watche every min of every game....its a joke...no one can make a jump shot past 15 ft...you get guys like steve kerr and tony parker who hit a couple 17 footers and they're stars all of a sudden...since when was hit an open short range jumper an incredible feet...damn where is dallas or the lakers...and damn the pacers!!
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: IKON on June 14, 2003, 07:24:45 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
yeah no doubt, this series has been one of the most boring ever >:( >:( >:(  both teams just cannot play good at times, i cannot watch these games in their entirety i gotta switch channels and shit lol lol

Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Skindiana bon3z on June 14, 2003, 08:25:40 PM
Yeah this series is pretty boring, BTW who's leading the series?  Last I heard it was tied up a 2....I forgot all about it yesterday...lol
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: .:DayGoStyLz:. on June 14, 2003, 08:55:40 PM
yall are wack lol. I understand tho if yall feel its boring. i mean, it aint boring for me as a Spurs fan. but yah, it hasnt been that up n down high scoring shit yall love. Its just been the best team from the west, against the best team from the east. Poor shooting by each, is actually a direct result of very good defense on both sides. Missing an open jumper, doesnt ALWAYS mean poor offense. Constant pressure on offensive players, can disrupt an offenses rhythm.

Oh, and verbalassaulta...Parker has become a star way before this series. It isnt because of one or two open jumpers. Its because oh his play throughout the season. And his dominance in the Laker series, and over Nash, and against Payton last year in the playoffs, etc...etc. Kerr...well...he can shoot good lol.

So stop hatin yall, havin the Lakers or Mavs in the finals wouldnt make it more exciting...it would jus be a runners up match. lol
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: Skindiana bon3z on June 14, 2003, 09:01:50 PM
yall are wack lol. I understand tho if yall feel its boring. i mean, it aint boring for me as a Spurs fan. but yah, it hasnt been that up n down high scoring shit yall love. Its just been the best team from the west, against the best team from the east. Poor shooting by each, is actually a direct result of very good defense on both sides. Missing an open jumper, doesnt ALWAYS mean poor offense. Constant pressure on offensive players, can disrupt an offenses rhythm.

Oh, and verbalassaulta...Parker has become a star way before this series. It isnt because of one or two open jumpers. Its because oh his play throughout the season. And his dominance in the Laker series, and over Nash, and against Payton last year in the playoffs, etc...etc. Kerr...well...he can shoot good lol.

So stop hatin yall, havin the Lakers or Mavs in the finals wouldnt make it more exciting...it would jus be a runners up match. lol

It's just that the 2 teams look horrible on the court in this series....They don't score much...I'll even admit last years Finals Lakers vs. Nets was really boring because the Nets were no match for the Lakers...I'm not sayin having the Lakers in the Finals would make it more exicting
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: .:DayGoStyLz:. on June 14, 2003, 09:32:47 PM
yall are wack lol. I understand tho if yall feel its boring. i mean, it aint boring for me as a Spurs fan. but yah, it hasnt been that up n down high scoring shit yall love. Its just been the best team from the west, against the best team from the east. Poor shooting by each, is actually a direct result of very good defense on both sides. Missing an open jumper, doesnt ALWAYS mean poor offense. Constant pressure on offensive players, can disrupt an offenses rhythm.

Oh, and verbalassaulta...Parker has become a star way before this series. It isnt because of one or two open jumpers. Its because oh his play throughout the season. And his dominance in the Laker series, and over Nash, and against Payton last year in the playoffs, etc...etc. Kerr...well...he can shoot good lol.

So stop hatin yall, havin the Lakers or Mavs in the finals wouldnt make it more exciting...it would jus be a runners up match. lol

It's just that the 2 teams look horrible on the court in this series....They don't score much...I'll even admit last years Finals Lakers vs. Nets was really boring because the Nets were no match for the Lakers...I'm not sayin having the Lakers in the Finals would make it more exicting

i feel u. Nobody likes a defensive struggle really. But u still gotta appreciate it u know. The Spurs are reall puttin the clamps on New jerseys run n gun style.
Title: Re:Nets - Spurs ?-?
Post by: IKON on June 15, 2003, 04:52:50 PM
im not hatin on them, i just feel in a way it has been boring, yeah maybe the defense has alot to do with it but there has been strech by both teams in which they cant throw a pea in the ocean and its not because of defense,

i feel maybe that san antonio should have dominated this series like the lakers last year did, the spurs dont attack with duncan enough at times they forget about him but their defense is awesome,

the nets are a terrible team when the game is not a fast paced game, they have no low post threat besides kenyon martin, the inconsistency of jason kidd, jefferson, martin has been seen this whole series

i just hope the spurs put them away tonight already, its painful to watch this series

yo daygostylz i know u a spurs fan but man u gotta admit that it has been borin, even more than the lakers series, congrats your team is gonna win the championship ;D, i just hope they do it already

also, did u as a San Antonio fan expect the Spurs to dominate the nets?????