West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Tha G-Spot => Topic started by: TraceOneInfinite on June 24, 2026, 05:52:51 PM
-
I'm so proud of myself. A great achievement. After one year I once again reign supreme on the dubb as the last poster in every forum. Check the time stamp
-
u missed the i love big butts forum
:magic:
-
u missed the i love big butts forum
:magic:
When I dominate the forum I don't take over sub-sections. I just make sure I'm the last post in all the major cities but there can still be malcontents in the small towns.
And by the way, fun fact about me is I've never watched porn...
REASONS INFINITE DOESN'T WATCH PORN
1. Why would I wanna see some dude's dick? That would ruin everything. So the only porn I would watch would be lesbian, but even that I don't watch.. why you ask.. see reason number two for clarification
2. The pussy wasn't necessarily designed by God to be aesthetically (visually) pleasing. It was designed for functionality and to be functionally pleasing.
3. A bit of mystery in life is better. So looking at that too much takes away the novelty.
-
When I dominate the forum I don't take over sub-sections. I just make sure I'm the last post in all the major cities but there can still be malcontents in the small towns.
And by the way, fun fact about me is I've never watched porn...
REASONS INFINITE DOESN'T WATCH PORN
1. Why would I wanna see some dude's dick? That would ruin everything. So the only porn I would watch would be lesbian, but even that I don't watch.. why you ask.. see reason number two for clarification
2. The pussy wasn't necessarily designed by God to be aesthetically (visually) pleasing. It was designed for functionality and to be functionally pleasing.
3. A bit of mystery in life is better. So looking at that too much takes away the novelty.
pussy is not aesthetically pleasing?
:pause:
-
pussy is not aesthetically pleasing?
:pause:
God didn't invent it for that... obviously many guys think that it is.
Perhaps I need to provide an analogy for greater clarity on the matter. God created a flower to be aesthetically pleasing to man, but it doesn't taste good. Bread pudding doesn't look that great visually but it is very pleasing to eat.
Okay.. maybe that analogy wasn't that good nor helpful, digging a deeper hole for myself here. I'll think of a worse one and come back later
-
God didn't invent it for that... obviously many guys think that it is.
Perhaps I need to provide an analogy for greater clarity on the matter. God created a flower to be aesthetically pleasing to man, but it doesn't taste good. Bread pudding doesn't look that great visually but it is very pleasing to eat.
Okay.. maybe that analogy wasn't that good nor helpful, digging a deeper hole for myself here. I'll think of a worse one and come back later
lmao who are u to say God didn't invent it for that
it's literally made to attract mean .. speak for yaself, not God
:zesty:
-
lmao who are u to say God didn't invent it for that
it's literally made to attract mean .. speak for yaself, not God
:zesty:
Come on homie.. it's not speaking for God to say that God created women for men. If you look at the parts they all fit and line up.
...but yet the same Scientific Experts (trust the Science) idiots who taught you the world is a globe and lockdowns, masks, and boosters should be mandatory (Neil Degrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Anthony Fauci, Yuvul Harari, etc) also try to claim that God didn't create men and women to match and mate with each other. Cause they have the gay and trans agenda to promote.
Anyway... getting lost here, so back to my o.g point. How about this... I will do it in a question...
Is it safe to say God created horses and camels for human to ride on as transportation? Or is that speaking for God and assuming too much? (because I think it's pretty obvious when you consider their shape and ability to travel and carry humans long distances)
-
Come on homie.. it's not speaking for God to say that God created women for men. If you look at the parts they all fit and line up.
...but yet the same Scientific Experts (trust the Science) idiots who taught you the world is a globe and lockdowns, masks, and boosters should be mandatory (Neil Degrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Anthony Fauci, Yuvul Harari, etc) also try to claim that God didn't create men and women to match and mate with each other. Cause they have the gay and trans agenda to promote.
Anyway... getting lost here, so back to my o.g point. How about this... I will do it in a question...
Is it safe to say God created horses and camels for human to ride on as transportation? Or is that speaking for God and assuming too much? (because I think it's pretty obvious when you consider their shape and ability to travel and carry humans long distances)
yes... God created women for men .. that's why he made women aesthetically pleasing to men, so that we can want them ... and what we want most of all is the pussy ..... that's arguably Gods most aesthetically pleasing creation, as it was invented in part to turn men on
you saying pussys aren't aesthetically pleasing is just the gay side of u speaking
either that or you've only seen ugly vaginas (which do exist)
but nothing beats a pretty pussy