West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: mrtonguetwista on October 22, 2003, 08:02:22 AM
-
Suit filed over 'Grand Theft Auto' game
By DUNCAN MANSFIELD - Associated Press
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) -- A $246 million lawsuit was filed against the designer, marketer and a retailer of the video game series "Grand Theft Auto" by the families of two people shot by teenagers apparently inspired by the game.
The suit claims marketer Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., designers Take-Two Interactive Software and Rockstar Games, and Wal-Mart, are liable for $46 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages.
Aaron Hamel, 45, a registered nurse, was killed and Kimberly Bede, 19, of Moneta, Va., was seriously wounded when their cars were hit June 25 by .22-caliber bullets as they passed through the Great Smoky Mountains.
Stepbrothers William Buckner, 16, and Joshua Buckner, 14, of Newport, were sentenced in August to an indefinite term in state custody after pleading guilty in juvenile court to reckless homicide, endangerment and assault.
The boys told investigators they got the rifles from a locked room in their home and decided to randomly shoot at tractor-trailer rigs, just like in the video game "Grand Theft Auto III."
In a suit filed Monday in Cocke County Circuit Court on behalf of the victims, Miami lawyer Jack Thompson and local lawyer Richard Talley alleged the game "inspires and trains players to shoot at vehicles and persons."
"These kids simply decided to take the thrill of that game out to Interstate 40 and started pointing at cars," Thompson said in a telephone interview Tuesday.
Thompson, who said he sent letters to Sony and Wal-Mart to drop the game before the shootings, said, "It's not like this is coming out of the blue, they chose to ignore this danger."
San Mateo, Calif.-based Sony and Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart did not return calls for comment Tuesday. The lawsuit alleges the retail giant sold the game to the Buckners about a year before the shootings.
Douglas Lowenstein, president of the industry Entertainment Software Association, called the shootings "an unspeakable tragedy" but said blaming a game played by millions for the boys' actions was "misguided and counterproductive."
"There is no credible evidence that violent games lead to violent behavior," he said. "While video games may provide a simple excuse for the teenagers involved in this incident, responsibility for violent acts belongs to those who commit them."
Thompson has made similar claims in the past and lost, notably a $33 million lawsuit against video game makers stemming from the 1997 school shooting near Paducah, Ky., by a 14-year-old boy.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the case last year that it was "simply to far a leap from shooting characters on a video screen to shooting people in a classroom
-
fuck thats lame. Hope they lose....That makes me wanna play some GTA.
-
god im so tired of this bullshit..."kids shot up a school" "MUSTA BEEN MARILYN MANSONS FAULT!", "Kids murdered some people" "Musta Been GTA!"....fucking blame the right people...jesus christ...how about the parents? no fuck that dont even blame the parents...blame the stupid ass faggot kids who cant think for themselves...fucking homosexual retards.
-
^ fa shoooooo
-
Idiots.
Hopefully the judge sentence them to pay $246 million to Rockstar/Take Two instead.
Now they will have unlimited budgets to spend on GTA-series. 8)
-
the kids will win, society is starting to take shit like this seriously
-
stupid fucks will do anything for money.
-
stupid fucks will do anything for money.
-
dont these games have ratings?
sue the parents / store they got it from
-
They won't win, these cases never do. Marilyn Manson, Black Sabbath, the Rolling Stones, etc. etc. etc. goes on and on and on.
-
I'm suing everyone who sues, because it inspires me to sue as well, which causes me to waste valuable time, and time is money...
-
dont these games have ratings?
sue the parents / store they got it from
True, normally there's some kind of age-limit to buy these games.
Anyway, it's stupid they blame GTA, they should blame the parents, they're the ones who failed in giving their sons a proper education.
-
dont these games have ratings?
sue the parents / store they got it from
Yes, but they're not enforceable, because there's no standard set by law. It's just a rating the manufacturers got together and made, not all games have ratings, and some have different ratings.
-
the kids will win, society is starting to take shit like this seriously
Not really. Look @ the responses from this board, everybody said blame the parents. Older people are also all about personal responsibility, so I agree, there has been a disturbing trend lately to sue over stuff like this (Ciggarette companies, fast food companies), most people realize that everyone has a personal responsibility in this. First ammendment rights are very touchy, too, so I doubt a court would severly decimate the first ammendment like that.
-
The real problem here is the way these kids got their weapons.
-
There's a whole bit about this thing in Max Payne 2... There's this woman (a ho) who comes to the police station and reports a crime. Apparently her boyfriend, who likes to play video games, is threatning to kill her. If you listen to the conversation she has with the clerk, you hear all sorts of things like "Those video games teach you how to shoot and handle a gun very well. Holding that controller is just like holding a gun!". In the game the moment is all rediculous and funny, but then I read stuff like this and it seems that people really think like that... Guns don't kill people, video games kill people.
-
I just realized that I eat alot and the boys in blue chase me often...so I'm going to sue the makers of Pac-Man. ;D
-
It's like this.. WE all understand that playing violent video games really doesn't make everyone violent in real life. But look @ the older folks and others who have never played these games... its but natural for them to think that these are the root causes of all these murders committed by juveniles..
Also look @ the guy who's suing the Company. Well there's two angles to it:
1. he might have never TOUCHED a video game in his life and will try to win the suit purely on the basis of conjecture and the statements of two *homos* who want to save their own asses.
2. Win back some lost ground (he lost the previous suit on similar charges).. and so in the end it all turns out to be kinda PERSONAL..