West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Javier on November 10, 2003, 10:27:14 PM
-
7. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre - 73.3 Million in 4 weeks
11. Kill Bill Volume 1- 64.8 Million in 5 weeks
how can a well liked movie like Texas Chainsaw Massacre gets remade by a first time director and produced by the wackest director of our time can outshine Kill bill in the box office, which was done by Tarantino...who has made the latest big impact in the movie industry?
-
Simple...TCM was a classic already...kill bill looked stupid as fuck
-
Simple...TCM was a classic already...kill bill looked stupid as fuck
have you seen Kill Bill Vol.1? It has oscar buzz, i dont consider that stupid
-
no i havent...i said it LOOKED stupid as fuck...not it was stupid as fuck...i havent seen it so i dont know...but c'mon...that looked like the stupidest shit on earth...theres a reason i havent seen it yet.
-
its all about the previews for the movie. i didnt like the look of Kill Bill Vol 1 from the previews and wasn't going to see it until it was the last thing on @ the movies which I hadn't seen. People know what TCM is so they know what they're getting
in saying that, Kill Bill Vol 1 is probably one of the greatest movies i've seen, ever. Anybody who thinks im lame or whatever can follow Daz's words and "succ a dicc"
-
Just like in Hip Hop, just because it does larger numbers doesn't mean it's better.
-
no i havent...i said it LOOKED stupid as fuck...not it was stupid as fuck...i havent seen it so i dont know...but c'mon...that looked like the stupidest shit on earth...theres a reason i havent seen it yet.
yea i get what ur saying, but now that people have said its one of the best films they haveever seen, and more good stuff...ur stil not interested?
The previews ofKill bill made it seem like Charies Angels 3 with swords...but man this movie its in its own leauge
-
no i havent...i said it LOOKED stupid as fuck...not it was stupid as fuck...i havent seen it so i dont know...but c'mon...that looked like the stupidest shit on earth...theres a reason i havent seen it yet.
yea i get what ur saying, but now that people have said its one of the best films they haveever seen, and more good stuff...ur stil not interested?
The previews ofKill bill made it seem like Charies Angels 3 with swords...but man this movie its in its own leauge
i've heard both sides...i've heard it was horrible and i've heard it was awesome...either way the previews turned me off so much that i will wait until its out on dvd...those previews were horrid
-
Why, you ask? Because "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" was a classic horror film, and the trailor for the remake made it look awesome (which it was)...Just because it's done by a first time director, doesn't mean shit...Lots of first time directors have their first movie be their biggest...I dunno if you saw the movie or not, but it was really good...And Michael Bay is a good director, you dumbass, so why the hell are you dissing him?...The answer to why "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003" did those numbers is quite simpe...Horror is coming back baby!
-
By the way, your figures are wrong buddy..."Kill Bill Vol. 1" made $64,797,396 so far, and the "TCM" remake made $75,149,000...Nice try though, but not while I'm on this board...PeACe
-
Why, you ask? Because "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" was a classic horror film, and the trailor for the remake made it look awesome (which it was)...Just because it's done by a first time director, doesn't mean shit...Lots of first time directors have their first movie be their biggest...I dunno if you saw the movie or not, but it was really good...And Michael Bay is a good director, you dumbass, so why the hell are you dissing him?...The answer to why "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003" did those numbers is quite simpe...Horror is coming back baby!
Michael Bay a good director? And ur calling me the dumbass?
The point wasnt if its a good movie or not, about him being a first director...how can he get his hands on a classic like that? would u like the Godfather to be redone by a music video director?
-
Why, you ask? Because "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" was a classic horror film, and the trailor for the remake made it look awesome (which it was)...Just because it's done by a first time director, doesn't mean shit...Lots of first time directors have their first movie be their biggest...I dunno if you saw the movie or not, but it was really good...And Michael Bay is a good director, you dumbass, so why the hell are you dissing him?...The answer to why "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003" did those numbers is quite simpe...Horror is coming back baby!
Michael Bay a good director? And ur calling me the dumbass?
The point wasnt if its a good movie or not, about him being a first director...how can he get his hands on a classic like that? would u like the Godfather to be redone by a music video director?
As long as it turns out good...
-
Why, you ask? Because "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" was a classic horror film, and the trailor for the remake made it look awesome (which it was)...Just because it's done by a first time director, doesn't mean shit...Lots of first time directors have their first movie be their biggest...I dunno if you saw the movie or not, but it was really good...And Michael Bay is a good director, you dumbass, so why the hell are you dissing him?...The answer to why "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003" did those numbers is quite simpe...Horror is coming back baby!
Michael Bay a good director? And ur calling me the dumbass?
How the FUCK is Michael Bay a bad director? LMAO...He's directed "Bad Boys", "Pearl Harbor", "Armageddon", "The Rock", and "Bad Boys 2"...All of those movies were fuckin huge, and were also good as hell...You are indeed a dumbass, my friend.
-
Bad Boys 1- his only good movie
The Rock- sucked
Armageddon- Also sucked
Pearl Harbor- Horrible
Bad Boys 2- no interest in watching it
-
Bad Boys 1- his only good movie
The Rock- sucked
Armageddon- Also sucked
Pearl Harbor- Horrible
Bad Boys 2- no interest in watching it
Bad Boys 1 - Classic, made big bucks
The Rock - Good movie, made big bucks
Armageddon - Good movie, made big bucks
Pearl Harbor - Decent, made big bucks
Bad Boys 2 - Better than the first, made big bucks
Sccit says - You're a dumbass
-
Michael Bay is a not a good director! Only Bad Boys brought something new to movie industry. But the rest are fcken WEAK ASS MOVIES! they were just promoted well.
Pearl Harbor was suppose to be his oscar nominated film, but nobody even paid attention to it
-
the rock is a dope movie
-
User Ratings at IMDB.com (all these movies have at least 24,000 user votes)
Bad Boys -6.3/10
The Rock- 7.0/10
Armageddon- 5.7/10
Pearl Harbor- 5.5/10
Bad Boys 2- 6.1/10
This is not good at all
-
Michael Bay is a not a good director! Only Bad Boys brought something new to movie industry. But the rest are fcken WEAK ASS MOVIES! they were just promoted well.
Pearl Harbor was suppose to be his oscar nominated film, but nobody even paid attention to it
Have you seen his movies? Because if you're going to criticize Bay as a director, that's fine, as long as you really know and understand Bay's style...Have you looked at the unique and intricate detail he puts into every single shot? Have you seen the colors and the unprecedented camera techniques he regularly uses?...Look at how he uses the sky in his shots...Nobody can capture it like he can. He makes each scene look like a painting...Pay attention to how he starts his scenes, the movements he uses. He masters the low angle shots...Furthermore, he didn't write any of the films which he directed. Bay takes mediocre scripts and turns them into films that all people can enjoy...Let me break it down for you...
Bad Boys - $65,647,413
The Rock - $134,069,511
Armageddon - $201,578,182
Pearl Harbor - $198,539,855
Bad Boys 2 - $138,540,870
End of discussion.
-
User Ratings at IMDB.com (all these movies have at least 24,000 user votes)
Bad Boys -6.3/10
The Rock- 7.0/10
Armageddon- 5.7/10
Pearl Harbor- 5.5/10
Bad Boys 2- 6.1/10
This is not good at all
You said that Bad Boys was the only good movie by him and that the rest sucked. These "user reviews" show that "The Rock" is better than the others. So, maybe if you go to other sites you will find that different people consider different movies as good. Maybe the majority of people who voted for this shit are 80 year olds drinking prune juice in Florida.
-
User Ratings at IMDB.com (all these movies have at least 24,000 user votes)
Bad Boys -6.3/10
The Rock- 7.0/10
Armageddon- 5.7/10
Pearl Harbor- 5.5/10
Bad Boys 2- 6.1/10
This is not good at all
You said that Bad Boys was the only good movie by him and that the rest sucked. These "user reviews" show that "The Rock" is better than the others. So, maybe if you go to other sites you will find that different people consider different movies as good. Maybe the majority of people who voted for this shit are 80 year olds drinking prunce juice in Florida.
Seriously...and IMDB gives almost every movie a bad rating...but that doesn't matter, because either way, most of America loves Michael Bay's movies...Just look at the fuckin bank they make, and you'll see.
-
i cant believe some of you say he's a bad director...
bad boys: one of my favs of all time...damn good movie
the rock: sean connery & nick cage...great combo, great storyline, enough said
armageddon: nobody else could've pulled this movie off the way he did...it had action, emotion, everything a good movie needs
pearl harbor: not one of my favorites but it had its good points, it wasnt a bad movie
bad boys 2: like sccit said...better than the first...i love bad boys 2...
my conclusion...dudes a damn good director...can't wait for his next film...
-
The Teen market of today have fucked up hollywood good and proper and any old shit can reach number 1 and make millions in the box office.
Kill bill shits all over TCM but the general public who watch movies (mainly teens) prefer to watch trash.
Having seen both its obvious TCM is wak as fuck. Infact US horror has been shit for close to 7+ years, its got so bad that they now remaking old classics and making them worse.
Its wak slashers aimed at dumb teens that are making a come back.
The Europeans and Jap have got Horror on Lock fuck hollywood.
-
im not sure if 28 days later was a european movie because there were all euro actors in it. But if u say they got it on lock than Euro movies must be fuckin stupid. I agree about the Japs making good horror because that is where the Ring movies originated and those in my opinon were pretty freaky.
-
im not sure if 28 days later was a european movie because there were all euro actors in it. But if u say they got it on lock than Euro movies must be fuckin stupid. I agree about the Japs making good horror because that is where the Ring movies originated and those in my opinon were pretty freaky.
yeah i agree...28 days later was fuckin horrible...the only thing scary about that movie was the fact that someone could live with themselves after making bullshit like that.
-
Firstly there are loads of horrors made in Europe not just 28 Days Later.
Secondly "the Eye", The ring, Audition, Ichi the Killer and damn near all movies by Takishie Miike DESTROY any horror made in the US in the last 10 years.
-
Sorry, but I highly disagree with you saying the TCM Remake was whack...I think it was a damn good movie, and was wonderfully directed...Also, by "The Ring" I think you meant "Ringu"..."Ringu" was a good movie, but the sequal he did was probably the worst sequal in horror history...He totally destroyed the original with that piece of shit...I'm extremely glad the America sequal is gunna go in a different direction...I think US rules in horror (Even though a lot of whack movies come out here and there)..Horror is back!
PS...I also thought "28 Days Later" was a pretty good movie.
-
whoever said TMC is a bad movie should fucking shoot themselves in the face!
-
for some reason i really like some of steven kings movies.. 'It' was a dope movie.
-
for some reason i really like some of steven kings movies.. 'It' was a dope movie.
that was random ???
-
for some reason i really like some of steven kings movies.. 'It' was a dope movie.
LMAO...A Stephen King film hasn't even been mentioned once in this whole thread...Crackhead.
-
the guy that made 6th sense and signs is a dope horror writer
-
I agree wit Sccit...
-
LMAO i was a little high earlier. I still thin stephen kings films are dope.
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
You fuckin' shithead, did you even read my post? You're dumb as hell, man...The "Halloween" remake shit was just a rumor...lol....Scroll back up, and read what I said about Michael Bay, and then try arguing that...If you wanna diss Michael Bay, you better know his movies first...PeACe
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
-
Michael Bay is a not a good director! Only Bad Boys brought something new to movie industry. But the rest are fcken WEAK ASS MOVIES! they were just promoted well.
Pearl Harbor was suppose to be his oscar nominated film, but nobody even paid attention to it
Have you seen his movies? Because if you're going to criticize Bay as a director, that's fine, as long as you really know and understand Bay's style...Have you looked at the unique and intricate detail he puts into every single shot? Have you seen the colors and the unprecedented camera techniques he regularly uses?...Look at how he uses the sky in his shots...Nobody can capture it like he can. He makes each scene look like a painting...Pay attention to how he starts his scenes, the movements he uses. He masters the low angle shots...Furthermore, he didn't write any of the films which he directed. Bay takes mediocre scripts and turns them into films that all people can enjoy...Let me break it down for you...
any fucken director these days can master low angle shots, they teach you that in film class for crying out loud. a film student can do that. It just that it takes him a shitload of money to make a movie? Big Budget looking ok translates into money somehow here in the states. if ur impressed by Michael Bay's camera movement, check out Kill Bill. lol and relax with the insults...arent we trying to make our points?
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
-
Michael Bay is a not a good director! Only Bad Boys brought something new to movie industry. But the rest are fcken WEAK ASS MOVIES! they were just promoted well.
Pearl Harbor was suppose to be his oscar nominated film, but nobody even paid attention to it
Have you seen his movies? Because if you're going to criticize Bay as a director, that's fine, as long as you really know and understand Bay's style...Have you looked at the unique and intricate detail he puts into every single shot? Have you seen the colors and the unprecedented camera techniques he regularly uses?...Look at how he uses the sky in his shots...Nobody can capture it like he can. He makes each scene look like a painting...Pay attention to how he starts his scenes, the movements he uses. He masters the low angle shots...Furthermore, he didn't write any of the films which he directed. Bay takes mediocre scripts and turns them into films that all people can enjoy...Let me break it down for you...
any fucken director these days can master low angle shots, they teach you that in film class for crying out loud. a film student can do that. It just that it takes him a shitload of money to make a movie? Big Budget looking ok translates into money somehow here in the states. if ur impressed by Michael Bay's camera movement, check out Kill Bill. lol and relax with the insults...arent we trying to make our points?
Whatever dude, you're wrong...Michael Bay is one of the highest grossing directors in history...There's no way you can argue with that...PeACe
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I think we should just leave Javier alone...He's making retarded ass arguments, and by arguing with him, we're bringing ourselves down to his level...LoL
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I think we should just leave Javier alone...He's making retarded ass arguments, and by arguing with him, we're bringing ourselves down to his level...LoL
good point...*jumps on kazaa to download texas chainsaw massacre*
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I was talking bout Michael Bay's movies he directed, which isnt TCM.
and to NIK, so Nelly is one of the best rappersof alltime huh? just check out what SGV said earlier in this topic
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I was talking bout Michael Bay's movies he directed, which isnt TCM.
and to NIK, so Nelly is one of the best rappersof alltime huh? just check out what SGV said earlier in this topic
Movies are different...When a movie makes it big, 90% of the time it's because it's good...All of Michaels movies are good...End of discussion...PeACe
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I was talking bout Michael Bay's movies he directed, which isnt TCM.
and to NIK, so Nelly is one of the best rappersof alltime huh? just check out what SGV said earlier in this topic
Movies are different...When a movie makes it big, 90% of the time it's because it's good...All of Michaels movies are good...End of discussion...PeACe
lol okay man. so Tarantino is not a good filmmaker? since most of his movies have flopped in the box office except for Pulp Fiction. But he has 4 classics already.
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I was talking bout Michael Bay's movies he directed, which isnt TCM.
and to NIK, so Nelly is one of the best rappersof alltime huh? just check out what SGV said earlier in this topic
Movies are different...When a movie makes it big, 90% of the time it's because it's good...All of Michaels movies are good...End of discussion...PeACe
lol okay man. so Tarantino is not a good filmmaker? since most of his movies have flopped in the box office except for Pulp Fiction. But he has 4 classics already.
see you're twisting words around...nobody said that if it does bad in the box office the filmmaker sucks...i havent seen kill bill for one reason and one reason only....the preview made me want to shoot myself
-
usually a Michael Bay film costs around 70 million dollars...if somebody is gonna waste at least 70 million bucks, I better fucken see the beauty of 70 million on screen. And u can never see that in a Michael Bay...just big explosions and big everything...its not even a film its just fucken big bangs. if u guys like that shit, fine whatever stick with your big bangs...and I will stick with my low budget movies that look like it was made for twce as what it was actually made for. Michael bay might even think about doin a Halloween Remake, wtf is that? Cant he get a music video director and find a fucken screenplay for HIM! not give him the chance to just do a remake. Thats just disrespectful. Didnt people get pissed when Ja Rule made that 2pac song? Its the same shit....its disrespectful. But whatever, the truth is...Michael Bay is to movies as Nelly is to Hip Hop
glad to know you're only happy with a movie if it has nice shiny things in it... ::)
i was just pointing out the style. How am I gonna diss Bay's films if he didnt even write it? Tahts why im talking about the money u can see in the movie, it represents what can he do with a certain amount of money.
man i dont give a fuck who writes it, who directs it, how much they put into it or any of that other bullshit...as long as its well made...did you really expect TCM to be all focused on special effects? all they can really do is use chainsaws and shit...theres no tight ass matrix fight scenes, no chrome rims on the hillbilly's cars...theres nothing that needs to look like a 70 million dollar movie...i really could care less how much he spent to make it...the point is he made it and did a good job.
I was talking bout Michael Bay's movies he directed, which isnt TCM.
and to NIK, so Nelly is one of the best rappersof alltime huh? just check out what SGV said earlier in this topic
Movies are different...When a movie makes it big, 90% of the time it's because it's good...All of Michaels movies are good...End of discussion...PeACe
lol okay man. so Tarantino is not a good filmmaker? since most of his movies have flopped in the box office except for Pulp Fiction. But he has 4 classics already.
When did I say that he wasn't good?
-
Sorry, but I highly disagree with you saying the TCM Remake was whack...I think it was a damn good movie, and was wonderfully directed...Also, by "The Ring" I think you meant "Ringu"..."Ringu" was a good movie, but the sequal he did was probably the worst sequal in horror history...He totally destroyed the original with that piece of shit...I'm extremely glad the America sequal is gunna go in a different direction...I think US rules in horror (Even though a lot of whack movies come out here and there)..Horror is back!
PS...I also thought "28 Days Later" was a pretty good movie.
Firstly The Jap version is called "The Ring" NOT Ringu. Being a horror fan i though u might have known this, The Americans renamed it when it was released worldwide so ppl didn't confuse it with the US version. But the Jap version IS called the Ring, its named Ringu outside of Japan coz of dumb hollywood.
;D
Secondly Us horror is wak and apart from Freddy v Jason and maybe the odd other film most horror made in the last 10 years have been shit as fuck. Best US horrors came out in the 80's
Finaly i am a massive horror fan but TCM is wak, the original was a classic for its time and never needed to be remade but thats dumb hollywood for you.
Oh and Im not a Michael Bay fan either, Give me James Cameron ANY day.
8)
-
Sorry, but I highly disagree with you saying the TCM Remake was whack...I think it was a damn good movie, and was wonderfully directed...Also, by "The Ring" I think you meant "Ringu"..."Ringu" was a good movie, but the sequal he did was probably the worst sequal in horror history...He totally destroyed the original with that piece of shit...I'm extremely glad the America sequal is gunna go in a different direction...I think US rules in horror (Even though a lot of whack movies come out here and there)..Horror is back!
PS...I also thought "28 Days Later" was a pretty good movie.
Firstly The Jap version is called "The Ring" NOT Ringu. Being a horror fan i though u might have known this, The Americans renamed it when it was released worldwide so ppl didn't confuse it with the US version. But the Jap version IS called the Ring, its named Ringu outside of Japan coz of dumb hollywood.
;D
Secondly Us horror is wak and apart from Freddy v Jason and maybe the odd other film most horror made in the last 10 years have been shit as fuck. Best US horrors came out in the 80's
Finaly i am a massive horror fan but TCM is wak, the original was a classic for its time and never needed to be remade but thats dumb hollywood for you.
Oh and Im not a Michael Bay fan either, Give me James Cameron ANY day.
8)
Oh, I didn't really know about "The Ring" thing, because I'm not a huge fan of foreign films, but I remember hearing something like that...I agree the best horrors came out in the 1980's (and 1970's as well), but like I said, I think horror is coming back...PeACe