West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Tha G-Spot => Topic started by: GangstaBoogy on December 14, 2003, 11:39:54 PM

Title: Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: GangstaBoogy on December 14, 2003, 11:39:54 PM
Post photos of the best shiet that happened in 2003...

(http://www.britney-pix.com/brits/0430/vma03%20(03b).jpg)
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Smoke on December 15, 2003, 08:38:40 AM
(http://delivery.gettyimages.com/comp/2574746.jpg?x=x&dasite=POD&ef=1&ev=1&dareq=4C0F11125C534644445647455C594D)
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Don Rizzle on December 15, 2003, 04:21:10 PM
^^^ they look like their gonna start shooting a gay porn video

baby g got it spot on either that or jacko hangin his baby out the window
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: [Stoned]Jesus H. Christ[Wheat] on December 15, 2003, 05:00:34 PM
^^^ they look like their gonna start shooting a gay porn video


it does  ;D
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Visualize what you can't see on December 17, 2003, 05:05:30 PM
^^^ they look like their gonna start shooting a gay porn video
hahahahhahahahahha
shit too funny   ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: bez on December 17, 2003, 06:07:14 PM
(http://delivery.gettyimages.com/comp/2574746.jpg?x=x&dasite=POD&ef=1&ev=1&dareq=4C0F11125C534644445647455C594D)
THATS BULLSHIT.

The wayans brothers did fuck all in 2003.
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Da WCC Hopar! on December 17, 2003, 06:23:50 PM
^^^ they look like their gonna start shooting a gay porn video
hahahahhahahahahha
shit too funny   ;D ;D ;D
LMFAOOOOO wow man u have a brawd imagination man lol ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Trauma-san on December 17, 2003, 08:26:33 PM
Here's a couple
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39074000/jpg/_39074513_tip.jpg)

(http://media.bonnint.net/ksl/0/21/2191.jpg)

Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: [Stoned]Jesus H. Christ[Wheat] on December 17, 2003, 08:38:44 PM
Here's a couple
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39074000/jpg/_39074513_tip.jpg)

(http://media.bonnint.net/ksl/0/21/2191.jpg)



who cares about that smart shit thats not part of the "Best" of 2003
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Trauma-san on December 17, 2003, 09:58:00 PM
Sure it is, if you're a rational, compassionate human being.  A girl dissapearing for 9 months then being found alive is something anybody would say is great.  
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Suga Foot on December 18, 2003, 12:23:08 PM
I never heard about that girl  :-\
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: [Stoned]Jesus H. Christ[Wheat] on December 18, 2003, 12:54:03 PM
I never heard about that girl  :-\

There adon never heard of it so it's out. ;D
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: ecrazy on December 19, 2003, 12:43:01 AM


(http://media.bonnint.net/ksl/0/21/2191.jpg)



Ok, here's what I think:

I really think Elizabeth smart WANTED, (WAS NOT FORCED, yes i said it) To Be With her Allegied "Kidnapper". I think that while he was working at her house, she had a relationship with him and that she took it too far and ran away with him...Because honestly, she probubly had so many chances to run away and look for help, but she didnt, she didnt want to go home, she wanted to be with him....but it is fucked up that he did get with her,that was wrong all the way, im just saying she was not really kidnapped, she ran away IMO!

sorry 4 wastin ur time
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: ZILLA THA GOODFELLA on December 19, 2003, 02:04:20 AM
^true that mane.......and just look @ that guy, i wouldnt wanna live wit him either......
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Trauma-san on December 19, 2003, 07:32:18 AM
We'll never know, but what it comes down to is: the world assumed this girl was dead, and after 9 months, she just walked back into the world.  
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: JTSimon on December 19, 2003, 09:28:53 AM
You guys are forgeting about Stockholm Syndrome. IMO I say she was kidnapped and afraid for her family but not to worry she will be writing a book and have a tv deal like everyone else  ;D

Since Elizabeth Smart's safe return home, one of the most asked questions is: Why didn't she run for help when she had the chance? Why did she refuse to reveal her true identity when she was first approached by the police who arrested her captors?

Citing Patty Hearst, many pundits have concluded that Elizabeth Smart is another case of Stockholm syndrome, and that she must have been brainwashed by her captors.

Since we don't know the details of what has actually happened to Elizabeth Smart in the last nine months, and how she has managed to cope with her captivity, we cannot say anything for sure about her mental state. However, we do know that no one can go through kidnapping and captivity without being touched by the ordeal psychologically.

It would be instructive for us to examine this intriguing phenomenon of Stockholm syndrome and ask ourselves: How would we cope, if we were kidnapped or held hostages? What is the likelihood that we would fall victim to Stockholm syndrome?

What is Stockholm syndrome?

The term "Stockholm syndrome" was first coined by Professor Nils Bejerot to explain the phenomenon of hostages bonding with their captors. In Stockholm, Sweden in 1973, two bank robbers held four people hostages for six days. The Norrmalmstorg Bank robbery received wide publicity because the hostages came to care about their captors and perceive them as protecting them against the police.

There is no precise, universally accepted definition of Stockholm syndrome. It generally refers to a cluster of symptoms often observed in hostages, cult members, battered women and victims of sexual and physical abuse. These symptoms include:

Emotional bonding with the captor/abuser
Seeking favor and approval from the perpetrator
Depending on the perpetrator for security and purpose of existence
Befriending and caring for the captor
Resenting police and proper authorities for their rescue attempts
Losing one's own identify in order to identify with the captor/abuser
Seeing things from the perspective of the perpetrator
Valuing every small gesture of kindness, such as letting them live
Refusing to seek freedom even given the opportunity
Is Stockholm syndrome a survival strategy?

Many psychologists and psychiatrists have considered the Stockholm syndrome a survival strategy in extreme conditions, where there is:

The constant threat to physical and psychological survival
A condition of helplessness and hopelessness
Isolation and loss of support systems from the outside world
A context of trauma and terror that shatters previously held assumptions
The perception that survival depends on total surrender and compliance
What are the psychological processes underlying Stockholm syndrome?

There are five powerful motivations working together to contribute to the development of the Stockholm syndrome:

The motivation to survive physically and psychologically
The motivation to avoid pain and fear
The motivation to find hope and meaning
The motivation to find significance and security
The motivation to seek acceptance and relationship
Although these are primary motivations operating in all sorts of situations, most of the time only one or two motivations may predominate.

However, in a hostage or abuse situation, all these motivations are operating and contributing to the bonding between the victim and the abuser. Such a relationship is strengthened both by the negative reinforcement of relief from pain and fear, and the positive reinforcement of approval and recognition.

Who are vulnerable to Stockholm syndrome?

It is obvious that not everyone in a hostage situation will fall victim to Stockholm syndrome. Individuals with any combination of the following characteristics are most vulnerable:

Lacking a clear set of core values that define one's identify
Lacking a clear sense of meaning and purpose for one's life
Lacking a track record of overcoming difficulties
Lacking a strong personal faith in God's character and goodness
Feeling that one's life has always been controlled by powerful others
Feeling unhappy with one's life circumstances
Having a strong need for approval by authority figures
Wishing to be somebody else
In view of the above, parents may not be doing their children a favour if they over-protect and micro-manage their children. In so doing, they actually deprive their children of the opportunity to develop the necessary strength of character to survive in extreme situations. In a curious way, the obedient, good kids are often more vulnerable than the strong willed, difficult to manage kids.

Generally speaking, those with courage, character and faith will adopt a different sort of survival strategy in a hostage situation. They will comply without compromising their integrity; they will always maintain their hope, waiting for their chance to escape.

That's why it is much more difficult for the captors to break the spirit of individuals with a strong sense of the self and a strong faith in God, like Senator McCain and Dr. Viktor Frankl.

How can we help those with Stockholm syndrome?

In most cases, individuals with Stockholm syndrome can benefit from psychotherapy, because they need professional support in order to confront and work through past trauma. They also need professional help to gain a better understanding of their distorted thinking and confusing feelings towards their captor/abuser. Finally, healing will take place, when they are able to integrate the kidnapping and abuse with their present reality and create a more meaningful future.

Lay people can also help them repair shattered assumptions and restore their lives. Here are some suggestions:

Allow them sufficient time and space to recover
Encourage them to seek support groups
Walk with them and show understanding and empathy
Provide them with a strong and consistent support system
Pray for them and encourage them to find spiritual support
Let's remember Elizabeth Smart and her family in our prayers. After the initial flurry of excitement and celebration, there is a tough road ahead. However, no matter how tortuous the road of recovery, there is hope and grace for a better future for this young person.

http://www.meaning.ca/articles/stockholm_syndrome.htm (http://www.meaning.ca/articles/stockholm_syndrome.htm)

 
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: JTSimon on December 19, 2003, 09:37:15 AM
Has been schooling you fools since June 2003  ;D
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: ecrazy on December 19, 2003, 10:06:43 AM
Stockholm Syndrome Is the Scapegoat for the real reason IMO.....
Thats just a coverup, its not a diesese, there had to be a reason anyway to fall for her capture, and I still think that she will probubly say something like that in court to help out her "FRIEND", but people will say she has "Stockholm Syndrome" and dismiss it
Quote
Has been schooling you fools since June 2003  
Schoolin Who?? What did u do?
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: JTSimon on December 19, 2003, 10:38:14 AM
Schoolin Who?? What did u do?
The truth is out there.

Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: ecrazy on December 19, 2003, 10:55:23 AM
^^^^
Huh?
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: JTSimon on December 19, 2003, 11:24:18 AM
^^^^
Huh?
;D exactly
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: Smoke on December 21, 2003, 05:02:11 AM
^true that mane.......and just look @ that guy, i wouldnt wanna live wit him either......

ROFL
Title: Re:Best of 2003 - In Photos!
Post by: [Stoned]Jesus H. Christ[Wheat] on December 21, 2003, 04:18:04 PM
if I wanted to read that much I'd open a book  ;D