West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: mauzip on July 05, 2004, 03:56:24 AM

Title: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: mauzip on July 05, 2004, 03:56:24 AM
For me that's Totti. He's the biggest star from Italy and then he got that ban. Really sad.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: 7even on July 05, 2004, 04:01:20 AM
Kluivert. He used to be an Icon and now he is nothing.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Meho on July 05, 2004, 04:02:22 AM
i voted for raul.he really sucks this whole year.he had to great 100% chanches to score a goal but he missed.he doesnt do shit anymore
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: bez on July 05, 2004, 04:56:28 AM
Deffo Totti, fucked himself up. 
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: o g s u e s o n e on July 05, 2004, 05:43:49 AM
totti...what a dumbass
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Jay ay Beee on July 05, 2004, 07:46:33 AM
Beckham
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: mauzip on July 05, 2004, 10:44:14 AM
Quote from: Jay ay Beee on July 05, 2004, 07:46:33 AM
Beckham

d'oh! how could i leave him out of this poll ??? ::) :-X
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: eS El Duque on July 05, 2004, 11:23:41 AM
Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on July 05, 2004, 04:01:20 AM
Kluivert. He used to be an Icon and now he is nothing.

The dumbass Coach didn't even play him. I read somewhere that the coach doesn't like Kluivert very much so that's the reason he didn't play him. Kliuvert didn't even play one minute  >:(. Shameful.

I voted for Raul, becuase he disapointed me in the fantasy league =/
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: bez on July 05, 2004, 12:11:25 PM
Thats cos Kluivert doesnt do enough in a game of football.  Sure he scores goals but he was probably lacking in match fitness because he hasnt played for barca alot. 

Beckham ain't no loser at all, didnt have a great tourney but hey thats football.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Jay ay Beee on July 05, 2004, 12:52:08 PM
Beckham

Did nothing for two years at United, got dropped in favour of Solskjaer for the big games, went to Madrid for 25 million, they had their worst season ever, got sent off twice, and had his fourth succesuve awful tournament internationally.

"But he was awesome against Greece"

One match, years ago.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: mauzip on July 05, 2004, 03:06:17 PM
Quote from: eS El Duque on July 05, 2004, 11:23:41 AM
Quote from: 7even the Harbinger on July 05, 2004, 04:01:20 AM
Kluivert. He used to be an Icon and now he is nothing.

The dumbass Coach didn't even play him. I read somewhere that the coach doesn't like Kluivert very much so that's the reason he didn't play him. Kliuvert didn't even play one minute  >:(. Shameful.

I voted for Raul, becuase he disapointed me in the fantasy league =/

Dude, get your facts straight. Kluivert didn't have a good season, but Advocaat did let him play in nearly every match before the tournament and he played like chicken shit.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Leggy Hendrix on July 05, 2004, 03:44:21 PM
i voted Totti, but i think Beckham was a bit of a loser. he had a poor tournament, didnt really look as sharp as he usually is, and then tried to blame Real Madrid by making comments about the training...

also, i thought Kevin Kuranyi was a loser in this tournament, i mean this guy is Germany's number 1 striker, and he was terrible, but then again he was 22nd highest scorer in Bundesliga this past season.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Smoke on July 05, 2004, 03:53:57 PM
Totti no doubt.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: bez on July 05, 2004, 05:22:27 PM
Nar Kuranyi is a bit harsh, I mean he had hardly anything to work.  I don't think he had one good chance in the whole tourney to be honest.  To score goals you need players around you that can set em up, Germany just didnt have that this time around and to be honest, he doesn't look that good!!!
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Jome on July 05, 2004, 06:40:48 PM
I'd say Totti.. but Kuryani & Pauleta was horrible as well.. Totti just made a ass out of himself, but he didn't play that bad.
LOL @ naming Kluivert, poor fella didn't even get a chance to prove anything.

Beckham was never a big player, can't say he's done anything to impress for the last 10 years.
I said it from jump: The only thing he can do is free-kicks and crosses, other than that he's worthless.
Like Pele said: "He can't run, he can't head, and he doesn't have technique"

Quote
Nar Kuranyi is a bit harsh, I mean he had hardly anything to work.  I don't think he had one good chance in the whole tourney to be honest.

That's very much his own fault.
He had several chances for goal, and he had lots of opportunities to get into scoring position, but he can't do anything on his own.

Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Jay ay Beee on July 06, 2004, 02:41:02 AM
George Best said it best about Beckham:

"He can't run, he can't beat a player, he can't head the ball, he can't tackle, he can't defend, but apart from that, he's the best player in the world."

Beckham's average free kicks scored a season = 2.
Title: Re: Loser of EURO 2004
Post by: Sikx on July 06, 2004, 11:28:26 AM
Quote
Beckham was never a big player, can't say he's done anything to impress for the last 10 years

wasnt he kinda good when ManU won FA,Premier League and Champions League? I know he hasnt done many goals but he isnt a scorer he is the one who gives ur so good passes u can just put ur leg/head on the way and its goal.

i know he kinda sucked at Real this year, but u cant really shine when theres ppl like figo,zidane,carlos also giving free kicks and great passes.

About tourney i think Totti was biggest joke and Pauleta/kuranauy(how ever u type it) the worst players.