West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Sports & Entertainment => Topic started by: Thirteen on August 06, 2004, 08:45:49 AM

Title: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 06, 2004, 08:45:49 AM
here's what they have planned in the making

28 WEEKS LATER
No official plot yet.

ANACONDAS: THE HUNT FOR THE BLACK ORCHID
A scientific expedition travels to the darkest jungles of Borneo in pursuit of a rare black orchid that blooms only once every seven years and just might, maybe, could hold the secret to immortality and is therefore worth a fortune to the pharmaceutical company sponsoring the expedition.

BLADE TRINITY
Blade joins forces with two vampire hunters part of a group called the Nightstalkers as they tackle the powerful and ruthless villain Danica Talos.

BLAIR WITCH 3 (PREQUEL)
This film chronicles the events that led to the township of Blair driving an accused witch named Elizabeth Kedward into the woods, and the subsequent hauntings that plaqued the town for decades after her supposed death.

CANDYMAN 4
Set in New England in an all-girls college where a professor there is a descendant of Candyman, yet she doesn't know who or what he is.

DAY OF THE DEAD: CONTAGIUM (PREQUEL)
Sometime in 1968 a strange viral outbreak is contained within the walls of a military hospital in Pennsylvania: all those exposed are destroyed and burned to the ground. A wall of silence befalls the incidence, and soon enough only a vague myth remains. The hospital becomes a civilian mental treatment center.

THE DEVIL'S REJECTS
The story centers on a band of bounty hunters led by Sheriff Wydell's brother who is fueled by revenge when he finds out that his kin was slain by the Firefly family.

DOG SOLDIERS: FRESH MEAT
Picks up after the first film left off. No official plot yet.

DRACULA 2: ASCENSION
A direct sequel from the first film, where Dracula’s body, which was hanging from the cross and burning at the end of the last movie, is found and brought to a morgue.

DRACULA 3: LEGACY
Follows two characters from the previous film, who hook up and become vampire hunters. They hunt down Dracula, who has become a recluse.

EXORCIST:THE BEGINNING (PREQUEL)
Tells the story of Father Merrin's journey as a young priest to Africa in the early 20th century, which led to his first encounter with the evil forces.

FINAL DESTINATION 3
Plot is currently not known.

GINGER SNAPS BACK: THE BEGINNING
Ginger Fitzgerald and her sister Brigitte, travel for miles through bleak wilderness until they seek refuge at a remote Trading Company outpost. Inside they discover a group of God fearing, tormented men, terrorized by monstrous beasts that have laid siege to the fort.

HALLOWEEN 9
Plot is currently not known.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME 2
No official plot yet.

HELLBOY 2
No official plot yet.

HELLRAISER: DEADER
A female reporter for a London newspaper, who is sent to Bucharest to investigate an underground suicide cult known as the ‘Deaders.’

HELLRAISER: HELLWORLD
Five edgy-type friends obsessed with Hellworld.com, a computer game, are invited by ‘invitation only’ to a party to play the real game and go into the world of Hellraiser.

LAND OF THE DEAD
Two years have passed since Day of the Dead, and there are only a few humans left on Earth. The zombies are no longer a threat, because of their advanced state of decomposition, they're only anoying.

THE LECTER VARIATIONS (PREQUEL)
Follows the serial killer from his childhood in Lithuania through a period in Paris in his teens to his arrival in the US.

MY BLOODY VALENTINE
No plot yet.

THE PROPHECY: UPRISING
This and the next film will be reportedly about an ancient manuscript which is still writing itself, known as the Lexicon, which fortells of the coming of the anti-christ. It falls into the hands of a woman (Kari Wuhrer) who is pursued by angels intent on obtaining the information in the book.

THE PROPHECY: FORSAKEN
This will be a continuation from the previous film about an ancient manuscript which is still writing itself, which fortells of the coming of the anti-christ. It falls into the hands of a woman (Kari Wuhrer) who is pursued by angels intent on obtaining the information in the book.

RESIDENT EVIL: APOCALYPSE
Takes place in Raccoon city after the events of the first film.

RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD 4: NECROPOLIS
No official plot yet, but it's said that it's about kids (skateboard punks with shotguns) who break into an experimental mutation lab.

RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD 5: RAVE FROM THE GRAVE
No official plot yet, but it's said that it's about these kids that realize if you take Trioxin in very small doses you can have a life-after-death experience, "so it becomes like a big rave drug."

RETURN TO SLEEPAWAY CAMP
Ronnie (Paul DeAngelo), now a co-owner of a new Camp becomes very suspicious when kids and camp staff begin falling victims to gruesome "accidents" again. Ronnie can't seem to shake what happened 20 years ago at Camp Arawak and with good reason.

THE RING 2
Immediately follows the events of the first movie, where reporter Rachel Keller (Watts) and son Aidon (Dorfman) move away from the big city life of Seattle to the small town of Asheville, Oregon.

SEED OF CHUCKY
Story centers on Chucky's son, Glen, who discovers that a movie is being made about his folks' exploits. He travels to Hollywood and brings Chucky and Tiffany back to life, and they immediately resume their murderous ways—much to peace-loving Glen's horror.

SOCIETY 2: BODY MODIFICATION
Plot is currently not known.

STRANGELAND 2: THE CULT OF PERSONALITY
Plot is currently not known.

THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE PREQUEL (PREQUEL)
Plot is currently not known.

UNDERWORLD 2
Plot is currently not known.

UNDERWORLD 3 (PREQUEL)
Plot is currently not known.

VAMPIRES: TEMPLE OF BLOOD
No official plot yet.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Sikotic™ on August 06, 2004, 12:26:51 PM
I really wanna see Resident Evil and The Ring 2
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Gotti......Xl on August 06, 2004, 12:41:30 PM
I really wanna see Resident Evil and The Ring 2
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: white Boy on August 06, 2004, 01:51:28 PM
I really wanna see Resident Evil and The Ring 2
them and exorsist the prequel
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 06, 2004, 02:13:19 PM
Forgetting some?


Elm Street Prequal, Freddy vs Jason 2,  Cabin Fever 2, Alien vs Predator, Alien 5, and Final Destination 3-D...
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: davida.b. on August 06, 2004, 02:26:32 PM
The only one the really sparks my interest is Seed of Chucky, and maybe Exorcist: The Beginning
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Da WCC Hopar! on August 06, 2004, 03:26:21 PM
I really wanna see Resident Evil and The Ring 2
them and exorsist the prequel
WTF i seen that exorsist moive where the father goes to africa i seen that movie its like a old ass movie but i dont get it are these movies that are goin to come out in the future or both out and future?
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 06, 2004, 03:48:06 PM
I really wanna see Resident Evil and The Ring 2
them and exorsist the prequel
WTF i seen that exorsist moive where the father goes to africa i seen that movie its like a old ass movie but i dont get it are these movies that are goin to come out in the future or both out and future?

You're thinking of "Exorcist 2: The Heretic"...These movies are upcoming movies.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 06, 2004, 05:32:33 PM
Land Of The Dead!! - I can't wait for this movie George A. Romero finally getting funding to do a fourth "Dead" movie was the best news of the last couple of months.

thats all i really want to see out of that list. Maybe The Ring 2 but eh....I fuckin' wish those hacks would stay away from Texas Chainsaw Massacre - the remake fucked up the concept bad enough and now they want to make a prequel? Fuckin' hacks!

Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Smoke on August 06, 2004, 05:43:19 PM
FUCK THIS FRIDAY PT.2 (yes, i did it again!)
Sequel to the classic FUCK THIS FRIDAY PT.1 where Lakers' Owner J.Buss sent Shaq to Miami. In this sequel he sends Payton & Fox to Boston for Mihm. :-\
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 06, 2004, 10:05:09 PM
Forgetting some?


Elm Street Prequal, Freddy vs Jason 2,  Cabin Fever 2, Alien vs Predator, Alien 5, and Final Destination 3-D...

not really, those films aren't too far along, the site i go to tells of films that are definites.... plus aliens are considered sci fi, not horror movies
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Entreri117 on August 06, 2004, 11:27:35 PM
If anyone puts Alien vs Predator into the horror category, they're movie-retarded.  Its definitely going to be a sci-fi action, probably with suespense.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 06, 2004, 11:42:27 PM
If anyone puts Alien vs Predator into the horror category, they're movie-retarded.  Its definitely going to be a sci-fi action, probably with suespense.

thats true but the first Alien film was more horror then sci-fi so its understandable why some may think AVP will be horror. The Alien sequels and the predator movies were defiently sci-fi/action
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 07, 2004, 12:42:22 AM
Forgetting some?


Elm Street Prequal, Freddy vs Jason 2,  Cabin Fever 2, Alien vs Predator, Alien 5, and Final Destination 3-D...

not really, those films aren't too far along, the site i go to tells of films that are definites.... plus aliens are considered sci fi, not horror movies


"Freddy vs Jason 2", "Cabin Fever 2", "Aliens vs Predator, & "Final Destination 3-D" are all definite... ::)

"Elm Street Prequel" & "Alien 5" are extremely likely... :D
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 07, 2004, 12:45:16 AM
If anyone puts Alien vs Predator into the horror category, they're movie-retarded.  Its definitely going to be a sci-fi action, probably with suespense.



You're the only movie-retard...It's Horror/Sci-Fi/Action.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0370263/
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Leggy Hendrix on August 07, 2004, 08:31:18 AM
imo most of those sound stupid...
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 07, 2004, 11:52:56 AM
Forgetting some?


Elm Street Prequal, Freddy vs Jason 2,  Cabin Fever 2, Alien vs Predator, Alien 5, and Final Destination 3-D...

not really, those films aren't too far along, the site i go to tells of films that are definites.... plus aliens are considered sci fi, not horror movies


"Freddy vs Jason 2", "Cabin Fever 2", "Aliens vs Predator, & "Final Destination 3-D" are all definite... ::)

"Elm Street Prequel" & "Alien 5" are extremely likely... :D

what i'm saying is that they are missing key parts such as; Cast, director, scripts... so they're not definite. right now they're just ideas

and Aliens is more Sci Fi than horror - takes place in the future, aboard spaceships, in space, with futuristic weaponry, the enemies are aliens....
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Throwback on August 07, 2004, 11:56:11 AM
I really wanna see Resident Evil and The Ring 2
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 07, 2004, 05:08:06 PM
Forgetting some?


Elm Street Prequal, Freddy vs Jason 2,  Cabin Fever 2, Alien vs Predator, Alien 5, and Final Destination 3-D...

not really, those films aren't too far along, the site i go to tells of films that are definites.... plus aliens are considered sci fi, not horror movies


"Freddy vs Jason 2", "Cabin Fever 2", "Aliens vs Predator, & "Final Destination 3-D" are all definite... ::)

"Elm Street Prequel" & "Alien 5" are extremely likely... :D

what i'm saying is that they are missing key parts such as; Cast, director, scripts... so they're not definite. right now they're just ideas

and Aliens is more Sci Fi than horror - takes place in the future, aboard spaceships, in space, with futuristic weaponry, the enemies are aliens....

Alien, the first one not aliens, is still a story told with the visual style and all the charateristics of the horror genre. and as for your definition of definitie - 28 Weeks Later has no director, cast or script as far as being announced. Same with Blair Witch 3, it got announced during the release of the first and hasnt being mentioned since. No confirmed director, cast or script for Candyman 4. Dracula II: Ascension is already on video. No director, cast or script yet announced for Halloween 9 or The Lecter Variations or The TCM prequel. so in your definition of definite films - about half your, what appears to be an old, list isnt valid

and even when you do have a script, cast and director its still difficult to argue its definitie
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: hector on August 07, 2004, 08:44:27 PM
exactly anyone who calls either predator or alien horror is a fuckin idiot.  and the og ring sucked, fuck a sequel.  blair witch and hell boy sucked balls and whoever created those movies should die.  and hellboy isn't a horror movie anyways, unless you consider it so bad your scared to see the sequel.  28 weeks later sucked.  I ain't really interested in any of those sequels.  Nothing beats an 80's horror movie.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 07, 2004, 09:02:44 PM
exactly anyone who calls either predator or alien horror is a fuckin idiot.  and the og ring sucked, fuck a sequel.  blair witch and hell boy sucked balls and whoever created those movies should die.  and hellboy isn't a horror movie anyways, unless you consider it so bad your scared to see the sequel.  28 weeks later sucked.  I ain't really interested in any of those sequels.  Nothing beats an 80's horror movie.

how can you say Alien isn't a horror? Do you even know what the genre is? Ridley Scott has described it as a horror so you're calling the film's director a fuckin idiot. You sound like you're thinking slasher is the only subgenre of horror.

again i will say that has the style and all the characteristics of a horror movie. genre is not solely concerning the plot. yes it has sci-fi elements but alot of horror movies do.
Frankenstein
Creature Of The Black Lagoon
King Kong
Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde
etc etc
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: hector on August 07, 2004, 09:21:12 PM
exactly anyone who calls either predator or alien horror is a fuckin idiot.  and the og ring sucked, fuck a sequel.  blair witch and hell boy sucked balls and whoever created those movies should die.  and hellboy isn't a horror movie anyways, unless you consider it so bad your scared to see the sequel.  28 weeks later sucked.  I ain't really interested in any of those sequels.  Nothing beats an 80's horror movie.

how can you say Alien isn't a horror? Do you even know what the genre is? Ridley Scott has described it as a horror so you're calling the film's director a fuckin idiot. You sound like you're thinking slasher is the only subgenre of horror.

again i will say that has the style and all the characteristics of a horror movie. genre is not solely concerning the plot. yes it has sci-fi elements but alot of horror movies do.
Frankenstein
Creature Of The Black Lagoon
King Kong
Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde
etc etc

alien is a sci fi plain and simple.  Might as well put the terminator in horror if your gonna put alien in there.  Is ET a horror film?  do you know what science fiction is?  Maybe the star wars trilogy should be considered horror.  Afterall, that was pretty scary when Luke was fighting that big monster in Return of the Jedi.  And Darth Vader is one of the scariest villains ever. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Machiavelli on August 07, 2004, 09:56:15 PM
Holloween 9...wtf?
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 07, 2004, 10:18:31 PM
exactly anyone who calls either predator or alien horror is a fuckin idiot.  and the og ring sucked, fuck a sequel.  blair witch and hell boy sucked balls and whoever created those movies should die.  and hellboy isn't a horror movie anyways, unless you consider it so bad your scared to see the sequel.  28 weeks later sucked.  I ain't really interested in any of those sequels.  Nothing beats an 80's horror movie.

how can you say Alien isn't a horror? Do you even know what the genre is? Ridley Scott has described it as a horror so you're calling the film's director a fuckin idiot. You sound like you're thinking slasher is the only subgenre of horror.

again i will say that has the style and all the characteristics of a horror movie. genre is not solely concerning the plot. yes it has sci-fi elements but alot of horror movies do.
Frankenstein
Creature Of The Black Lagoon
King Kong
Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde
etc etc

alien is a sci fi plain and simple.  Might as well put the terminator in horror if your gonna put alien in there.  Is ET a horror film?  do you know what science fiction is?  Maybe the star wars trilogy should be considered horror.  Afterall, that was pretty scary when Luke was fighting that big monster in Return of the Jedi.  And Darth Vader is one of the scariest villains ever. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

that reply made no sense. I said Alien has the visual style and characteristics of a horror film and now youre trying to argue that i think all these other films are horrror as well. I never confused any science-fiction element as being horror so I'm not really sure what your trying to do. I understand what science-fiction is and I did state that Alien had sci-fi elements. All I'm arguging that calling Alien horror is valid. You seem to think Alien has no aspect of horror in it which is simply false. And you're also suggesting that horror is defined by how scary something is which can only indicate to me you get scared in 80s slasher films, you know little about horror as a genre as it is not simply defined by fear and you know little about genre in film.

and while I wouldn't classify The Terminator as horror it does borrow a few minor elements from it - the dark lighting, the skulls of humans and and skeletal appearance of the machine.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Machiavelli on August 07, 2004, 10:33:58 PM
Quote
and while I wouldn't classify The Terminator as horror it does borrow a few minor elements from it - the dark lighting, the skulls of humans and and skeletal appearance of the machine

 Doesn't that belong in the Sci-Fi category, because all those things you mentioned are  "Science Fiction".
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 07, 2004, 10:43:17 PM
Quote
and while I wouldn't classify The Terminator as horror it does borrow a few minor elements from it - the dark lighting, the skulls of humans and and skeletal appearance of the machine

 Doesn't that belong in the Sci-Fi category, because all those things you mentioned are  "Science Fiction".


No,  skulls and the skeleton as a symbol of death is not science-fiction. It's quite characteristic of horror actually. Why do you think the appearance of skeletons figure so much into Halloween? you think Sci-Fi developed the skeletal appearance and skulls symbolic of death in film?

certain visuals, styles and characteristics were developed primarily by different genres. nowadays films are talking more of leap in combining many genres in order to tell a narrative, thats why its becoming harder to place film in one particular genre.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: hector on August 07, 2004, 10:47:52 PM
exactly anyone who calls either predator or alien horror is a fuckin idiot.  and the og ring sucked, fuck a sequel.  blair witch and hell boy sucked balls and whoever created those movies should die.  and hellboy isn't a horror movie anyways, unless you consider it so bad your scared to see the sequel.  28 weeks later sucked.  I ain't really interested in any of those sequels.  Nothing beats an 80's horror movie.

how can you say Alien isn't a horror? Do you even know what the genre is? Ridley Scott has described it as a horror so you're calling the film's director a fuckin idiot. You sound like you're thinking slasher is the only subgenre of horror.

again i will say that has the style and all the characteristics of a horror movie. genre is not solely concerning the plot. yes it has sci-fi elements but alot of horror movies do.
Frankenstein
Creature Of The Black Lagoon
King Kong
Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde
etc etc

alien is a sci fi plain and simple.  Might as well put the terminator in horror if your gonna put alien in there.  Is ET a horror film?  do you know what science fiction is?  Maybe the star wars trilogy should be considered horror.  Afterall, that was pretty scary when Luke was fighting that big monster in Return of the Jedi.  And Darth Vader is one of the scariest villains ever. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

that reply made no sense. I said Alien has the visual style and characteristics of a horror film and now youre trying to argue that i think all these other films are horrror as well. I never confused any science-fiction element as being horror so I'm not really sure what your trying to do. I understand what science-fiction is and I did state that Alien had sci-fi elements. All I'm arguging that calling Alien horror is valid. You seem to think Alien has no aspect of horror in it which is simply false. And you're also suggesting that horror is defined by how scary something is which can only indicate to me you get scared in 80s slasher films, you know little about horror as a genre as it is not simply defined by fear and you know little about genre in film.

and while I wouldn't classify The Terminator as horror it does borrow a few minor elements from it - the dark lighting, the skulls of humans and and skeletal appearance of the machine.

LOL, ok think what you wanna think.  Terminator, Alien, Predator are all horrors. So is robocop and star wars.  and ET.  and Critters.  so funny the people you encounter on the net.  Not one person I've ever met in my life would consider any of those horrors, but since you said so it must be true.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 07, 2004, 11:01:58 PM
If you go back when I first posted in this thread. you will see that I said I didn't think Predator or any of the Alien sequels were horror. You will see that all I've being trying to suggest is that its valid to call Alien horror. I never tried to argue that you couldn't call it science-fiction. If I did, please show me where. If you read my post you just replied to you will see I don't think of The Terminator as horror. You seem to think genre is a black-and-white case. That if its science-Fiction it cant be labelled by any other genre. That a film has to fit in about 6-7 genres. You can't classify film that simply. You're the one that assumed that what you said must be right when you called anyone that would think Alien could be called a horror must be an idiot. I never said that anyone that calls Alien a science-fiction is a fuckin idiot so I don't really get why you're trying to say "but since you said so it must be true" as you were the one trying to assume superiority.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: hector on August 08, 2004, 01:01:18 AM
I never read any of your previous posts, nor do I care to.  I stand by my words, anyone who think the predator or the alien movies are horror movies is a fuckin idiot.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 08, 2004, 01:04:02 AM
^^You're a fuckin' stuborn dumbass..."Alien" is a Horror/Sci-Fi film...If you don't know that, you're simply an idiot..."Predator" isn't horror, but it has elements of horror in it...You wanna argue the directors and producers of the movies?


Search www.imdb.com (http://www.imdb.com), and see what category it falls under.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 08, 2004, 01:10:45 AM
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078748/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103644/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118583/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093773/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100403/

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0370263/
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 08, 2004, 02:46:19 AM
Forgetting some?


Elm Street Prequal, Freddy vs Jason 2,  Cabin Fever 2, Alien vs Predator, Alien 5, and Final Destination 3-D...

not really, those films aren't too far along, the site i go to tells of films that are definites.... plus aliens are considered sci fi, not horror movies


"Freddy vs Jason 2", "Cabin Fever 2", "Aliens vs Predator, & "Final Destination 3-D" are all definite... ::)

"Elm Street Prequel" & "Alien 5" are extremely likely... :D

what i'm saying is that they are missing key parts such as; Cast, director, scripts... so they're not definite. right now they're just ideas

and Aliens is more Sci Fi than horror - takes place in the future, aboard spaceships, in space, with futuristic weaponry, the enemies are aliens....

Alien, the first one not aliens, is still a story told with the visual style and all the charateristics of the horror genre. and as for your definition of definitie - 28 Weeks Later has no director, cast or script as far as being announced. Same with Blair Witch 3, it got announced during the release of the first and hasnt being mentioned since. No confirmed director, cast or script for Candyman 4. Dracula II: Ascension is already on video. No director, cast or script yet announced for Halloween 9 or The Lecter Variations or The TCM prequel. so in your definition of definite films - about half your, what appears to be an old, list isnt valid

and even when you do have a script, cast and director its still difficult to argue its definitie

28 weeks later... they already picked who's going to write the script, fox already announced it, and they're in talks of getting the original director and producer in on this

Blair witch 3 already has the director and a script

as for candy man 4:

Tony Todd got to chat with one of the guys from Fango about the film, saying "Right now we’re prepping a fourth CANDYMAN film. It’s going to be big-budget—we’re looking at $25 million. There have been a lot of successful horror films made since we did the last movie, and Clive [Barker] and I have had three or four meetings about the film, talking about storyboarding ideas."

He then goes on to reveal a little about the story... "It’s going to be set in New England, and the initial image will be of Candyman in a blizzard. The story is about a double identity. I can tell you that it’s set at an all-girls college where there is a descendant of Candyman—a professor who doesn’t actually know who or what Candyman is."

He also explains how it will have nothing to do with the previous Candyman film, which even he was disappointed with... "It’s going to be stand-alone. There will be no number attached to it.”

When talking about Clive Barker's involvement he reveals that he'll be, "absolutely hands-on -- he’s a story consultant and an executive producer."

the lectar variations already has a script and a producer plus universal already stated that they were going to release it

TCM prequel: the guy that played leatherface is signed up for it, they have someone writing the script and they already have the production company

the only think i haven't found much info on is halloween 9

so i was right on all these movies except for 1

Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 08, 2004, 03:08:38 AM
"Freddy vs Jason 2" has Ken Kirzinger & Robert Englund signed up for it.

"Cabin Fever 2" has Robert Harris signed up for it

"Alien vs Predator" is being released in under a week, with horror being one of the categories.

"Final Destination 3-D" is already in pre-production

"Alien 5" will be made as long as Sigourney Weaver agrees to star in it again

"Elm Street Prequel" Is still being discussed, but we know Robert Englund is read to do it
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 08, 2004, 03:35:31 AM

28 weeks later... they already picked who's going to write the script, fox already announced it, and they're in talks of getting the original director and producer in on this

Blair witch 3 already has the director and a script

as for candy man 4:

Tony Todd got to chat with one of the guys from Fango about the film, saying "Right now we’re prepping a fourth CANDYMAN film. It’s going to be big-budget—we’re looking at $25 million. There have been a lot of successful horror films made since we did the last movie, and Clive [Barker] and I have had three or four meetings about the film, talking about storyboarding ideas."

He then goes on to reveal a little about the story... "It’s going to be set in New England, and the initial image will be of Candyman in a blizzard. The story is about a double identity. I can tell you that it’s set at an all-girls college where there is a descendant of Candyman—a professor who doesn’t actually know who or what Candyman is."

He also explains how it will have nothing to do with the previous Candyman film, which even he was disappointed with... "It’s going to be stand-alone. There will be no number attached to it.”

When talking about Clive Barker's involvement he reveals that he'll be, "absolutely hands-on -- he’s a story consultant and an executive producer."

the lectar variations already has a script and a producer plus universal already stated that they were going to release it

TCM prequel: the guy that played leatherface is signed up for it, they have someone writing the script and they already have the production company

the only think i haven't found much info on is halloween 9

so i was right on all these movies except for 1



sources please
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 08, 2004, 08:36:07 AM

28 weeks later... they already picked who's going to write the script, fox already announced it, and they're in talks of getting the original director and producer in on this

Blair witch 3 already has the director and a script

as for candy man 4:

Tony Todd got to chat with one of the guys from Fango about the film, saying "Right now we’re prepping a fourth CANDYMAN film. It’s going to be big-budget—we’re looking at $25 million. There have been a lot of successful horror films made since we did the last movie, and Clive [Barker] and I have had three or four meetings about the film, talking about storyboarding ideas."

He then goes on to reveal a little about the story... "It’s going to be set in New England, and the initial image will be of Candyman in a blizzard. The story is about a double identity. I can tell you that it’s set at an all-girls college where there is a descendant of Candyman—a professor who doesn’t actually know who or what Candyman is."

He also explains how it will have nothing to do with the previous Candyman film, which even he was disappointed with... "It’s going to be stand-alone. There will be no number attached to it.”

When talking about Clive Barker's involvement he reveals that he'll be, "absolutely hands-on -- he’s a story consultant and an executive producer."

the lectar variations already has a script and a producer plus universal already stated that they were going to release it

TCM prequel: the guy that played leatherface is signed up for it, they have someone writing the script and they already have the production company

the only think i haven't found much info on is halloween 9

so i was right on all these movies except for 1



sources please

look around the internet.....i got most of the info from www.upcominghorrormovies.com, then there's fangoria's website, comingsoon.net......
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 08, 2004, 09:02:15 AM
"Freddy vs Jason 2" has Ken Kirzinger & Robert Englund signed up for it.

"Cabin Fever 2" has Robert Harris signed up for it

"Alien vs Predator" is being released in under a week, with horror being one of the categories.

"Final Destination 3-D" is already in pre-production

"Alien 5" will be made as long as Sigourney Weaver agrees to star in it again

"Elm Street Prequel" Is still being discussed, but we know Robert Englund is read to do it


go to a store that sells DVD's, you'll see that Aliens is in the sci fi section at Sam Goody, Best Buy, Circuit City..... plus it's also in the sci fi section of amazon.com

i know to you this is hard to understand and believe....but it is 75% more sci fi than it is anything else

and other than final destination 3-d all the other ones are still too early to tell, i'm not saying that they're not coming out...but the website i go to just posts the big news
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 09, 2004, 02:03:46 AM
"Freddy vs Jason 2" has Ken Kirzinger & Robert Englund signed up for it.

"Cabin Fever 2" has Robert Harris signed up for it

"Alien vs Predator" is being released in under a week, with horror being one of the categories.

"Final Destination 3-D" is already in pre-production

"Alien 5" will be made as long as Sigourney Weaver agrees to star in it again

"Elm Street Prequel" Is still being discussed, but we know Robert Englund is read to do it


go to a store that sells DVD's, you'll see that Aliens is in the sci fi section at Sam Goody, Best Buy, Circuit City..... plus it's also in the sci fi section of amazon.com

i know to you this is hard to understand and believe....but it is 75% more sci fi than it is anything else

and other than final destination 3-d all the other ones are still too early to tell, i'm not saying that they're not coming out...but the website i go to just posts the big news


I've seen "Alien" in the horror section, as well as in other sections...I don't think you get that a movie can fall under more than one category...Take "Rush Hour" for example; Action/Comedy...You get it yet?
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 09, 2004, 08:13:02 AM
but you'd find it in the comedy section 9 out of 10 times
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 09, 2004, 01:58:09 PM
I went to Amoeba on Sunset and Vine today, and "Alien" is under the horror section...PeACe
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 09, 2004, 01:59:57 PM
i went to best buy, media play, sam goody, FYE amazon.com and aliens is all in sci fi

sonned
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 09, 2004, 02:20:28 PM
i went to best buy, media play, sam goody, FYE amazon.com and aliens is all in sci fi

sonned


Sonned? LMAO...My point was that "Alien" falls under more than one genre, which was already proven...Holy shit, you're a moron.


I've seen interviews with Ridley Scott (the director of "Alien") where he says it's a horror movie, and explains why...But you're obviously too stupid to understand that. :D
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 09, 2004, 02:27:44 PM
the director of showgirls said that movie was one of his best works and that it was a great movie.... i guess everyone else is wrong in saying it sucks

so far you're not winning any of these arguements...you should give up

Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 09, 2004, 02:38:52 PM
the director of showgirls said that movie was one of his best works and that it was a great movie.... i guess everyone else is wrong in saying it sucks

so far you're not winning any of these arguements arguments...you should give up


I take filming classes, and anyone who knows anything about the horror genre, knows that "Alien" is a horror flick with the Alien playing a slasher...I've studied horror, and know the genre like the back of my hand...You're just a moron who doesn't know shit about movies, and thinks just because a movie has aliens in it, it must be only Sci-Fi..."The Fly" is another example of Horror/Sci-Fi...Oh, but wait, maybe that isn't horror either. Maybe since "South Park" is animation, it can't be comedy...You, my friend, are a moron...You think you know more about a movie than the creators; it just shows what an egotistical idiot you are...And I bet you know it's a horror. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, which is pretty sad.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 09, 2004, 02:44:52 PM
When science-fiction meets horror...

Every now and then a daring combination has a good and unique movie as a result. "Alien" is one of those movies, along with it's sequel "Aliens" that mixes science-fiction, horror and action.

The best thing about the movie is its atmosphere which makes it notable that Ridley Scott is the one that directed this movie. His style might be a bit slow for some but it makes the atmosphere very chilling and mysterious. It's the most atmospheric horror movie ever made also thanks to the chilling musical score by Jerry Goldsmith, good camera work and lighting

The most surprising thing about the movie is the character Ripley played by Sigourney Weaver. She begins as a small character but later in the movie she turns into the main (heroin) character. She really is one of the best female characters in movie history and is even better in "Aliens".

The movie is filled with some unforgettable scene's (the dinner scene is a classic) and some scene's that will bring you to the edge of your seat even though some of the horror is at times predictable (splitting up is always asking to get yourself killed).

The acting is top class, thanks to the directing and some good dialogue. Tom Skerritt, Sigourney Weaver, Veronica Cartwright, Harry Dean Stanton, John Hurt, Ian Holm and Yaphet Kotto are all unforgettable.

A must see classic science-fiction/horror movie.

10/10




"sonned"
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 09, 2004, 02:55:53 PM
the director of showgirls said that movie was one of his best works and that it was a great movie.... i guess everyone else is wrong in saying it sucks

so far you're not winning any of these arguements arguments...you should give up


I take filming classes, and anyone who knows anything about the horror genre, knows that, "Alien", is a horror flick with the Alien playing a slasher...I've studied horror, and know the genre like the back of my hand...You're just a moron who doesn't know shit about movies, and thinks just because a movie has aliens in it, it must be only Sci-Fi..."The Fly" is another example of Horror/Sci-Fi...Oh,! but wait,! maybe Maybe that isn't horror either. Maybe since "South Park" is animation, it can't be comedy...You, my friend, are a moron...You think you know more about a movie than the creators; it just shows what an egotistical idiot you are... And I bet you know it's a horror. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, which is pretty sad.

If you'd like to be funny, you should take more English classes.

Since you have your PhD in film studies, maybe you should go to all the chains nation wide that sell DVD's and tell them that their filing system is wrong.
Explain to them that since the Aliens have sharp claws, and that it takes place in a inadequately lit space, and that these reasons alone make the movie a horror movie. Tell them to forget about the spaceship/planets the movies take place on, to forget about the movies taking place in the future, that the movie involves Aliens, high tech. weaponry along with high tech. gadgetry and lets not forget the androids.

I'm sure they will see things your way, you film expert you.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 09, 2004, 02:57:49 PM
look aliens up at any of the places i've listed

it's all in the sci fi area...i don't give a shit what a reviewer says it is...cause i'll go to amazon.com right now, review the movie, give it 0 stars and say it's a musical/animated comedy

son that little bitch
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Rain on August 09, 2004, 05:21:49 PM
the director of showgirls said that movie was one of his best works and that it was a great movie.... i guess everyone else is wrong in saying it sucks

so far you're not winning any of these arguements arguments...you should give up


I take filming classes, and anyone who knows anything about the horror genre, knows that, "Alien", is a horror flick with the Alien playing a slasher...I've studied horror, and know the genre like the back of my hand...You're just a moron who doesn't know shit about movies, and thinks just because a movie has aliens in it, it must be only Sci-Fi..."The Fly" is another example of Horror/Sci-Fi...Oh,! but wait,! maybe Maybe that isn't horror either. Maybe since "South Park" is animation, it can't be comedy...You, my friend, are a moron...You think you know more about a movie than the creators; it just shows what an egotistical idiot you are... And I bet you know it's a horror. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing, which is pretty sad.

If you'd like to be funny, you should take more English classes.

Since you have your PhD in film studies, maybe you should go to all the chains nation wide that sell DVD's and tell them that their filing system is wrong.
Explain to them that since the Aliens have sharp claws, and that it takes place in a inadequately lit space, and that these reasons alone make the movie a horror movie. Tell them to forget about the spaceship/planets the movies take place on, to forget about the movies taking place in the future, that the movie involves Aliens, high tech. weaponry along with high tech. gadgetry and lets not forget the androids.

I'm sure they will see things your way, you film expert you.

no one has ever said you can't call Alien a sci-fi. the whole argument has been that it is valid to call it horror as well.

and retail/rental places arent the authority on genre. most dont even have a film-noir section and yet it is the most fundamental cinematic genre, how do you explain that?
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: platinumk777 on August 09, 2004, 05:35:54 PM
I agree with NIK... I had the same freakin argument with my friend about The Sixth Sense. Now, my friends insist that sixth sense is solely classified as thriller, and I said that's bullshit. Sixth Sense is horror/thriller, because after all, ghosts are classified as an element of horror

Same with Alien... granted, it is sci-fi, but when the movie creates fear due to something unexplained (supernatural, etc.), such as the aliens all of a sudden killing the humans, that creates what we call nowadays as horror. So at the end, this movie is sci-fi/horror, and if you must speak otherwise, do so to a fucking wall
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 09, 2004, 09:03:11 PM
TV Guide, one of the most subscribed to magazines in the country classifies alians as sci fi, along with the digital cable company that i subscribe to...

sorry, you bitches lose
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 10, 2004, 12:21:05 AM
Jesus Christ, does anything get through your fucking thick skull? Nobody is denying it to be a Sci-Fi...But it is Horror as well...That makes it Horror/Sci-Fi...Are you that stupid? Is "Star Wars" and "Alien" the same type of movie? God fucking damn, I never knew someone could be so stubborn and dumb at the same time.


And what was that about English classes? I was the one who corrected YOUR spelling. Your corrections were bullshit. The only error I made was the comma after genre, which was simply a typo...Now son my fucking nuts in your mouth, moron.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Leggy Hendrix on August 10, 2004, 01:51:11 AM
TV Guide, one of the most subscribed to magazines in the country classifies alians as sci fi, along with the digital cable company that i subscribe to...

sorry, you bitches lose

having read all the posts u made in this thread, ive come to the conclusion, that like NIK said, u are a fucking moron...

Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 10, 2004, 05:03:29 AM
nik you had more mistakes than that, incorrect punctuation, not capitilizing the first letter in sentences. if you didn't notice that, you really are dumb

and i'm not arguing that it isn't more than one thing. what i'm saying is that it's mostly sci fi, and 9 out of 10 times you'll find it in sci fi

i might be a moron, but in this case i'm a correct moron and you are all bitches
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 10, 2004, 01:45:55 PM
nik you had more mistakes than that, incorrect punctuation, not capitilizing the first letter in sentences. if you didn't notice that, you really are dumb

and i'm not arguing that it isn't more than one thing. what i'm saying is that it's mostly sci fi, and 9 out of 10 times you'll find it in sci fi

i might be a moron, but in this case i'm a correct moron and you are all bitches


When did I not capititlize the first letter in a sentence? Stop making up shit to look cooler.


As for saying it's mostly Sci-Fi; it could be...But you started by saying there's no way it could be Horror, so you lose... :D
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 10, 2004, 02:32:53 PM
nik you had more mistakes than that, incorrect punctuation, not capitilizing the first letter in sentences. if you didn't notice that, you really are dumb

and i'm not arguing that it isn't more than one thing. what i'm saying is that it's mostly sci fi, and 9 out of 10 times you'll find it in sci fi

i might be a moron, but in this case i'm a correct moron and you are all bitches


When did I not capititlize the first letter in a sentence? Stop making up shit to look cooler.


As for saying it's mostly Sci-Fi; it could be...But you started by saying there's no way it could be Horror, so you lose... :D

in your response you wrote "Oh, but wait, maybe that isn't horror either" which is two seperate sentences and should look more like "Oh, but wait! Maybe that isn't horror either"

and as for me saying it's mostly sci fi...it is, so far for every reason you gave for it being horror, i'v given 2 for being sci fi

and lastly, i never said it didn't have horror elements, i said that it wasn't on a horror website because it's a sci fi movie, i even agreed that rush hour is comedy/action....but you'll find it in comedy

so you're a dumb little bitch here and you lose again  ;D


Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 10, 2004, 09:03:35 PM
nik you had more mistakes than that, incorrect punctuation, not capitilizing the first letter in sentences. if you didn't notice that, you really are dumb

and i'm not arguing that it isn't more than one thing. what i'm saying is that it's mostly sci fi, and 9 out of 10 times you'll find it in sci fi

i might be a moron, but in this case i'm a correct moron and you are all bitches


When did I not capititlize the first letter in a sentence? Stop making up shit to look cooler.


As for saying it's mostly Sci-Fi; it could be...But you started by saying there's no way it could be Horror, so you lose... :D

in your response you wrote "Oh, but wait, maybe that isn't horror either" which is two separate sentences and should look more like "Oh, but wait! Maybe that isn't horror either"

and as for me saying it's mostly sci fi...it is, so far for every reason you gave for it being horror, i'v given 2 for being sci fi

and lastly, i never said it didn't have horror elements, i said that it wasn't on a horror website because it's a sci fi movie, i even agreed that rush hour is comedy/action....but you'll find it in comedy

so you're a dumb little bitch here and you lose again  ;D


You know you're sad when your corrections are incorrect...By the way, "Alien vs Predator" is ALL OVER Horror websites. It's just that the stupid site you got it from would rather list "Hellboy" as a Horror than "Alien"...Check www.bloody-disgusting.com (http://www.bloody-disgusting.com)...That's a Horror website, and they're flooded with news about "Alien vs Predator"..."Alien" has more blood and gore than "Halloween", if that's any indication..."Alien" is just as much Horror as it is Sci-Fi...Maybe not the sequels, but the originals are...Moron.
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 11, 2004, 12:12:34 AM
south park bigger longer and uncut has more blood than most horror movies so by your reasoning i should see it on the website....once again give up on the argument little bitch

and my puncuation was correct, you might not have been taught that in the slow classes though
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on August 11, 2004, 12:47:30 AM
and my puncuation was correct, you might not have been taught that in the slow classes though


That whole "sentence" is astonishing...
Title: Re: horror movie sequels
Post by: Thirteen on August 11, 2004, 09:25:48 PM
i already schooled you in the little english lesson since you wanted to be a smart girl, i have no need to use proper grammer any further... i spelled one thing wrong and you made a dozen errors in a paragraph...better luck next time little bitch