West Coast Connection Forum

DUBCC - Tha Connection => West Coast Classics => Topic started by: Tha_Reverend on August 20, 2002, 09:16:13 PM

Title: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Tha_Reverend on August 20, 2002, 09:16:13 PM
yo, why wasn't warren g on the chronic 2001?  I saw him in the "making of 2001" photos in the booklett, but why wasn't he on the fuking album?  I mean, what the fuck is wrong wit Dre?  Warren is his fuking half brother or what ever and has alot of tallent at that.  and all he gets is one stupid pic in the book??  I don't get it.  or is he in there and I just don't see it.  That would suck to sit out on such a project.  

"oh Warren, my brother, you can come in the studio and watch us record this super classic, but sorry homez, you can't be in it.  tuff."  

I can just hear Dre's words.  


man fuk that.  that's fuked.



-Tha Rev



BTW is that Daz I see in one of the pics too?  was he cool wit Dre back then?  but just couldn't be on the album cause he was with the row or something?
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: channelxero on August 20, 2002, 09:29:09 PM
You should 2way Dre with that...

CX
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: themovie on August 20, 2002, 09:40:45 PM
Warren was at the bar drinkin hennessey
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: +[=PHI@SK0=]+ on August 20, 2002, 09:51:53 PM
Quote
yo, why wasn't warren g on the chronic 2001?  I saw him in the "making of 2001" photos in the booklett, but why wasn't he on the fuking album?  I mean, what the fuck is wrong wit Dre?  Warren is his fuking half brother or what ever and has alot of tallent at that.  and all he gets is one stupid pic in the book??  I don't get it.  or is he in there and I just don't see it.  That would suck to sit out on such a project.  

"oh Warren, my brother, you can come in the studio and watch us record this super classic, but sorry homez, you can't be in it.  tuff."  

I can just hear Dre's words.  


man fuk that.  that's fuked.



-Tha Rev



BTW is that Daz I see in one of the pics too?  was he cool wit Dre back then?  but just couldn't be on the album cause he was with the row or something?


man im sure it had nothing to do with that at all as far as Dre tellin' warren he can't be on the album. It could be due to many reasons beyond even our understandment of the industry or what was going on with their record labels. It's not that easy most of the times. Like I don't know too much about it, but for example, a record label has to give an artist permission to record on someone elses album. Now for sure Deathrow would not allow any of it's artists to be on a Dre album, so that cancels out Daz. Now I donno what was up with Warren, but I'm sure it wasn't because Dre didn't allow him to be on it. And we know they cool, not only cuz they half brothers, but Dre did produce his hit song on his latest album... ONE!
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Don Seer on August 20, 2002, 10:27:06 PM
then up in smoke tour....

and the game dont wait remix.........

remember the 'free warren g' t-shirts?

hmm

Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Juice on August 20, 2002, 10:32:13 PM
Who knows the reasons? One thing is for sure: sometimes it's not because Dre didnt want him. Look at "Looking At You" from the last Warren G album. Dre was in it with a rap verse, but Aftermath didnt give him authorization to be in the song. Shit is fucked up. But it's like that. Warren must be the most unlucky cat in LBC, haha..
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Don Seer on August 20, 2002, 10:39:46 PM
word.... Interscope not Aftermath wasnt it?

but Dre did spend a whole month crafting the track for warren!


they've always had these problems, remember back in the past... theres always been rumours dre helped with warren's first album, plus theres that odd Dre cameo in the video for Do You See.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Juice on August 20, 2002, 10:45:02 PM
I dont remember it, homie. Dont have time to check it. But Warren made names. It's Aftermath or Interscope, dunno.. He said who didnt want Dre to be in his album.

Btw yea, it happened the same in Do You See. I'm sure Dre helped Warren G underground, at least in his first album. They brothers, dont need credits, money and shit like that.. Warren always showed love to Dre, and Dre put him in the Up In Smoke tour, when Warren had problems..
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Juice on August 20, 2002, 10:48:50 PM
Although his brother Dr. Dre produced the first single from his December 4 release, Return of the Regulator, Warren said he expected a larger contribution from the hip-hop legend. The two were supposed to rhyme on the same song for the first time.

"A lot of people ask me why Dre never raps on my album," Warren said, "but I can't explain it. He was on 'Lookin' at Me' at first but then he told me he couldn't do it. I didn't understand it. I ain't trippin', though. I still got big love for him, but this record company sh-- is crazy."
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Don Seer on August 20, 2002, 11:10:26 PM
from an interview myrealname posted up.

http://forum.igangsta.com/cgi-bin/wcc/YaBB.pl?board=general;action=display;num=1009519230;start=0


What’s the longest you’ve ever taken on one song?


Damn near a month with dre on the first single, "Lookin At You." We’d be in the studio for two days rewriting verses. We’d do it and he’d come back the next day and be like ‘naw, I don’t like that. Let’s do it over.’ dre is the hardest working man in the business. That’s real. He will stay in the studio for three days with no sleep. He don’t even nod!  

Why didn’t he rhyme on the song with you?


What he told me was that Interscope wouldn’t let it happen because he has so much music coming out at the same time with The Wash soundtrack and the Training Day stuff. But I was like ‘Dog, this is me!’ But they was like it can’t happen. But I’m cool. We’ll do it next time.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Juice on August 20, 2002, 11:13:50 PM
Yeah, good locking out..

It's still fucked up btw.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Don Seer on August 20, 2002, 11:14:37 PM
word....... fuck interscope not aftermath  ;D
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: themovie on August 20, 2002, 11:55:30 PM
Jimmy Iovine, Co-Chairman of Interscope Geffen A&M, and Doug Morris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Universal Music Group (UMG) has not authorized dre to appear on the song.
Why ?
Only god knows...
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Juice on August 21, 2002, 01:15:15 AM
Quote
Jimmy Iovine, Co-Chairman of Interscope Geffen A&M, and Doug Morris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Universal Music Group (UMG) has not authorized dre to appear on the song.
Why ?
Only god knows...

Yeah, those are the names. Good looking out.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: =[Euthanasia]= on August 21, 2002, 04:32:49 AM
Yeah, these type of situations suck ass. I'm not sure of the reasons why Warren didn't appear on "2001", but it's prolly along the same lines as why Dre couldn't appear on Warren's album. I bet the single would of done 10 times better sales wise if Dre rhymed on the actual song, although I think "Lookin' At You" is a banger regardless, don't know why some people on here hated on it. Am I the only one that thinks Warren's version is better than Sticky's version ???
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: budsmokeronly on August 21, 2002, 04:40:55 AM
Quote
Am I the only one that thinks Warren's version is better than Sticky's version


warren's is really dope, but for some reason I liked sticky's version a lot better.  Anyone have that cdq uncensored?
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Tha_Reverend on August 21, 2002, 08:41:17 AM
that shit sucks.  Damn, record labels fuk up every thing.





-Tha Rev
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: budsmokeronly on August 21, 2002, 08:44:57 AM
Quote
that shit sucks.  Damn, record labels fuk up every thing.



actually money fucks everything up
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Tha_Reverend on August 21, 2002, 08:50:42 AM
Yup.  and what are labels about?


MONEY MONEY MONEY!!! >:( >:( >:(




-Tha Rev
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: budsmokeronly on August 21, 2002, 08:52:17 AM
yeah record label ceo's don't give a fuck about their artists I bet.  All they care about is money.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Tha_Reverend on August 21, 2002, 08:52:57 AM
BTW, Miss Berry is lookin hella fine today. ;)





-Tha Rev
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: themovie on August 21, 2002, 08:56:32 AM
Jimmi Iovine is a cold ass muthafucka,he dont give a fuck about a featuring on warren album......if he can't earn enough money from it.


".....As the '90s opened, Jimmy began to draw away from producing. He founded the record company Interscope Records, which soon established itself as a major force in the music industry. Interscope now has on its label such acts as Primus, No Doubt, Bush, and the Wallflowers. The label at the same time has been involved in controversy concerning its connection with Death Row-the infamous rap label. Interscope also signed the one and only, Marilyn Manson, putting it in the spotlight even more as Marilyn Manson takes the heat for more and more of the violence in America. Jimmy Iovine is today a powerful record executive who rarely, if ever, produces an album anymore. However, his legacy as one of the major producers of the '80s speaks for itself-the man was magic in the studio. As Stevie Nicks said to him once, whether or not he wanted to hear it, "You're very Rhiannon."
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: +[=PHI@SK0=]+ on August 21, 2002, 09:55:25 PM
Quote


warren's is really dope, but for some reason I liked sticky's version a lot better.  Anyone have that cdq uncensored?


Which one is this, I haven't heard it. Is it Sticky Fingaz? What should I type in WinMX to look for it?
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: +[=PHI@SK0=]+ on August 21, 2002, 09:58:13 PM
Quote
Jimmi Iovine is a cold ass muthafucka,he dont give a fuck about a featuring on warren album......if he can't earn enough money from it.


".....As the '90s opened, Jimmy began to draw away from producing. He founded the record company Interscope Records, which soon established itself as a major force in the music industry. Interscope now has on its label such acts as Primus, No Doubt, Bush, and the Wallflowers. The label at the same time has been involved in controversy concerning its connection with Death Row-the infamous rap label. Interscope also signed the one and only, Marilyn Manson, putting it in the spotlight even more as Marilyn Manson takes the heat for more and more of the violence in America. Jimmy Iovine is today a powerful record executive who rarely, if ever, produces an album anymore. However, his legacy as one of the major producers of the '80s speaks for itself-the man was magic in the studio. As Stevie Nicks said to him once, whether or not he wanted to hear it, "You're very Rhiannon."


Jimmy wouldn't even be rich right now if it wasn't for Dre. Dre saved the record label, it was about to file for bankrupcy before they signed him and he started his Aftermath label.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: =[Euthanasia]= on August 22, 2002, 02:37:02 AM
Quote
+ link=board=general;num=1029914173;start=20#22 date=08/22/02 at 02:55:25]

Which one is this, I haven't heard it. Is it Sticky Fingaz? What should I type in WinMX to look for it?


Yeah, it's basically Sticky Fingaz over the same Dre beat as Warren's "Lookin' At You". It's called "Feel It". If you can't find it on WinMX get on mIRC and i'll hook you up.
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Don Seer on August 22, 2002, 11:47:45 AM
i got it from WinmX... but....

is there a version out there without Dj Whoo Kid shouting on it?
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Lil Jay on August 22, 2002, 11:59:36 AM
Yea There is one Overseer






















and I really want that  lol
Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: Don Seer on August 22, 2002, 12:10:25 PM
haha - does anyone claim to have it?

Title: Re: WHY WASN"T WARREN ON 2001???
Post by: LAZY on August 22, 2002, 02:31:49 PM
yeah bad azz iz n alotta pics but i cant think of a song hes on either