West Coast Connection Forum

Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Ant on May 31, 2006, 05:43:45 PM

Title: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: Ant on May 31, 2006, 05:43:45 PM

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002891.htm

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: Teddy Roosevelt on May 31, 2006, 05:44:21 PM

Doesn't Rolling Stones ever get tired?

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: King Tech Quadafi on May 31, 2006, 05:45:16 PM

as bad of a jack move 2004 might have been , it still doesnt compare to the travesty that was 2000, which u dumb fuck americans eagerly swallowed. like a cum starved whore

so who honestly do u expect to give a shit? when a music magazine has to be the one to report this?

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: Real American on May 31, 2006, 06:11:36 PM

Yes of course. Whenever the Democrats lose an election, it was because it was stolen from them. Not because the Republicans got more votes. And the fact that Republicans dominate the Senate and the House....that is because of voter fraud as well.

Just stop with the nonsense....

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: J Bananas on May 31, 2006, 07:23:15 PM

just like virtuoso questions his sexuality every night.....tell me virtuoso, why the fascination with government spying? its not like you have several gigs of male on male pornography on your drive that you'd be ashamed of right? muahahahaha

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: Ant on May 31, 2006, 08:34:11 PM

Quote from: Real American on May 31, 2006, 06:11:36 PM

Yes of course. Whenever the Democrats lose an election, it was because it was stolen from them. Not because the Republicans got more votes. And the fact that Republicans dominate the Senate and the House....that is because of voter fraud as well.

Just stop with the nonsense....

What do you care if people investigate this issue?  If its BS its really inconsequential.  It's well known, both sides cheat in election time.  Even in local campaigns there is cheating.  It's obvoiusly over and done with, but if there was intentional fruad, and there was, people should pay the consquences,... and if you were in the know, u'd realize, some of your republican buddies are paying the consequences for election related fraud in ohio.

TOLEDO, Ohio - A coin dealer and prominent GOP fundraiser at the center of an Ohio political scandal pleaded guilty Wednesday to federal charges he illegally funneled about $45,000 to President Bush's re-election campaign.

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14708901.htm

This isn't about whining over winning or losing.  Scrutiny of the political process is good for dems and republicans alike.  If we're going to make a move to electronic voting systems, we need people to investigate and raise concerns about the validity of our process.

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: Don Rizzle on June 01, 2006, 01:14:34 AM

whats next the Beano scrutinising the UN?

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: virtuoso on June 01, 2006, 09:55:47 AM

J Bananas completely off topic again why mention spying when this is a topic about the elections. Lol in your own retarded way I guess your kind of unique but since you asked me.....the government says nothing to hide nothing to fear and yet government is more secretive than ever before and dont exactly inspire confidence.

Title: Re: Rolling Stone questions the validity of 2004 Elections
Post by: Ant on June 01, 2006, 07:09:00 PM

here is the actual article. I havent' read it yet.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen/print