West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Tha G-Spot => Topic started by: Mo Z. Dizzle on November 19, 2008, 03:33:53 PM
-
http://www.youtube.com/v/1b7oy0jo5tU
new King of the jungle?
-
If anyone knows anything about the feline family they would understand that they're just playing around with each other lol... They arent actually fighting at all...
-
yea, they're just playing...either way, it's an even match-up. either the tiger or the lion can win, it's a toss up depending on the cat.
-
^they in captivity at that probably hella tame
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
-
for some reason eye always thought in that tigers were bigger than lions?or is that just the bengal?
-
for some reason eye always thought in that tigers were bigger than lions?or is that just the bengal?
They are. I was watching some show about this on discovery (could have been another channel) where they were saying how a full grown tiger can typically kill a full grown lion. The lions only advantage is that they usually hunt in packs.
-
LOL @ the Lion just rollin over and laying there. Male Lions are lazy as hell the females tend to be more active.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
-
for some reason eye always thought in that tigers were bigger than lions?or is that just the bengal?
they are...the maine on the lion just makes him appear to be bigger.
-
LOL @ the Lion just rollin over and laying there. Male Lions are lazy as hell the females tend to be more active.
that's cuz the lion is a true g. he kicks back and posts in the cut while his female hunts for his food. king status.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
-
Lion>>>Tiger all day.
that was some bitch lion lol, go get me some crazed mother fucker off the African plains & he would whoop ass!
-
tiger>lion :D
-
LOL @ the Lion just rollin over and laying there. Male Lions are lazy as hell the females tend to be more active.
that's cuz the lion is a true g. he kicks back and posts in the cut while his female hunts for his food. king status.
Word Up. Im a Leo so its funny seein the similarities between the actual animal and my personality. Somedays all I do is lay around and eat and fuck all day.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
-
they are playing.
thats a siberian tiger. ( biggest wild cat )
lions are #1.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
i'm not arguing to argue, i know a lot about big cats and trust me when i say lions can definitely toss tigers. animal experts say it'd be a pretty even fight...PeACe
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
neither of these is true though. The tiger hunts on its own while the lion hunts in packs (or prides, whatever). The lion has more massively built shoulders, but the tiger has more developed legs. Overall the tiger is more massively built then a lion. Even pound for pound, they say, the tiger has anatomy-advantage over the lion in the forequarters.
Tigers are also known to have more bite-force then lions.
While lions hunt, just like tigers hunt. Tigers are far more prone to fighting, either with other tigers, or other animals like leopards, bears, wild dogs and elephants. %30 of tiger deaths occur due to territorial disputes with other tigers.
Tigers also typically have better skills of fighting techniques. Its can swipe faster then a lion, can use both the front legs at the same time to swipe, has bigger paws and canines, is faster and more agile then a lion...not to mention, typically larger.
People typically have the misconception that lions are more aggressive then tigers. But that is incorrect also. Being that lions live in prides, and hunt in prides...they are sometimes more prone to attacking right away. Tigers are more likely to assess a situation before attacking as they hunt on their own. Once drawn into a fight, they are known to be the most aggressive large cat (particularly the Bengal). Also, they are more likely to fight larger and more aggressive animals like the ones i mentioned earlier due to the fact that those animals shy away from lions (because there are usually a large group of lions). So tigers become more accustomed to one on one combat.
-
well i thought we were talking about 1 on 1 the whole time.....
-
well i thought we were talking about 1 on 1 the whole time.....
exactly. Lions hunt, but usually in a group and dont tend to fight in one on one situations nearly as much as tigers do.
-
well i thought we were talking about 1 on 1 the whole time.....
exactly. Lions hunt, but usually in a group and dont tend to fight in one on one situations nearly as much as tigers do.
ive seen videos and tigers always own em.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
sooo true elior......lions are first off the smartest felines of the wild ( house cats are the smartest ).
lions are the only cats to differ from appearence depending on gender due to the social structure.
Male lions are built all in the chest/arms....if u compare a 600lbs lion vs a 800lbs tiger....the front arms/chest will be around the same..yet the back legs of the lion are much smaller.
lions psend the 1st 5yrs of their lives trinaing to fight.....all the male lion is supposed to do is protect the pride and nothing else...they are the true fighters of the cats.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
k u r wrong.... 1st off if ur gonna take them at the same wieght....the lion wins....male lions have shitty hunting skills...they are fighters not hunters..the females do that.
now u also have to be more specific in which tiger...cuz bengals have the best chance to fight a lion simply cuz they fight more often...but siberians are the biggest wild cat yet they are not viciuos or as aggressive as the bengal..
now if u wanna know who is the top meat eater....its a grizzly ofc....they found 2 900+ siberian tigers dead next to eachother with their skulls crushed.....experts think it was 1 grizzly who took them out cuz only he has the power to shatter bones like that....
aswell as the documented spanish pit fights in the 19th century...they put bulls against grizzly and the grizzly broke ne part he would hit...( head/back/shoulders all crushed with one hit )
ppl got bored seeing the bull get raped so they paid more for tigers//lions..the lion was known for bravery bcuz just as he was put in the cage with the bear... he did not hesitate and he rushed the bear always....but yet the lion died as fast as the bull, and the tiger didnt do ne better...
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
k u r wrong.... 1st off if ur gonna take them at the same wieght....the lion wins....male lions have shitty hunting skills...they are fighters not hunters..the females do that.
now u also have to be more specific in which tiger...cuz bengals have the best chance to fight a lion simply cuz they fight more often...but siberians are the biggest wild cat yet they are not viciuos or as aggressive as the bengal..
now if u wanna know who is the top meat eater....its a grizzly ofc....they found 2 900+ siberian tigers dead next to eachother with their skulls crushed.....experts think it was 1 grizzly who took them out cuz only he has the power to shatter bones like that....
aswell as the documented spanish pit fights in the 19th century...they put bulls against grizzly and the grizzly broke ne part he would hit...( head/back/shoulders all crushed with one hit )
ppl got bored seeing the bull get raped so they paid more for tigers//lions..the lion was known for bravery bcuz just as he was put in the cage with the bear... he did not hesitate and he rushed the bear always....but yet the lion died as fast as the bull, and the tiger didnt do ne better...
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
^ knows whattsup
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
-
i think a bear would fuck them both up lol.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
lol, ur talking to a soon to be zoologist....i know my shit...now if u do ur research..ull see that there was a guy who had over 60+ fights between bengals and lions....he said that the lion would win on avg but he had 1 bengal that couldnt be beaten....im guessing it was a 650+ bengal...which would make it much larger than ne healthy lion ur gonna find.he said that the lions would win the majority..thats 1st hand knownlegde from a man who recorded all his fights on document.Also all these cats were str8 from the wild or self raised in wild-like conditions..
Yet again may i state that pound for pound a lion is stronger in the upper body while the tiger is stronger in the hind legs...the hind legs only come into effect when the cat is on his back as a defense move.
learn ur shit.
btw...i dont give opinions , i give facts and educated guesses.
let me also add that a full grown bengal is bigger on the avg than a full grown lion. Hence the reason i said pound-for-pound.
hahah 1more thing, lion doesnt live in the jungle....tiger does, yet hes not the king? gorrillas see's a tiger, stands up, lil stare down and then the tiger bounces....a lion on the other hand would confront the gorilla. ( i know there reasons for this, due to the fact that tigers are solitary like 99% of cats, so that they will only pick a fight usually knowning they are gonna win.On the other hand, lions has his bitches working for him so he can get injured and most likely still survive.)
-
^oh, shit...daygostylz gettin done dirtay! :laugh:
-
i think a bear would fuck them both up lol.
ofc....no predator can beat the grizzly...simply bcuz it has adapted to fight and steal due to the fact that they are shitty ass hunters lol
but their bone density is amazing and their claws alone can get over 6 inches while the biggest cats get 3inch long teeth
-
^oh, shit...daygostylz gettin done dirtay! :laugh:
lol
SMOKE ME OUT!
-
master peezy in the bleezy as soon as you touch down from d-ceezy. 8)
-
master peezy in the bleezy as soon as you touch down from d-ceezy. 8)
lolLOL
HANDLE IT NOW..!!!
SHOULD I DRIVE CROSS COUNTRY?
-
Do it macroscule. 8)
-
Do it macroscule. 8)
lol if i get my moms car, ima drive it across country.
-
^your mama would slap you
-
^your mama would slap you
MATRIX THAT SHIT
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
lol, ur talking to a soon to be zoologist....i know my shit...now if u do ur research..ull see that there was a guy who had over 60+ fights between bengals and lions....he said that the lion would win on avg but he had 1 bengal that couldnt be beaten....im guessing it was a 650+ bengal...which would make it much larger than ne healthy lion ur gonna find.he said that the lions would win the majority..thats 1st hand knownlegde from a man who recorded all his fights on document.Also all these cats were str8 from the wild or self raised in wild-like conditions..
Yet again may i state that pound for pound a lion is stronger in the upper body while the tiger is stronger in the hind legs...the hind legs only come into effect when the cat is on his back as a defense move.
learn ur shit.
btw...i dont give opinions , i give facts and educated guesses.
let me also add that a full grown bengal is bigger on the avg than a full grown lion. Hence the reason i said pound-for-pound.
hahah 1more thing, lion doesnt live in the jungle....tiger does, yet hes not the king? gorrillas see's a tiger, stands up, lil stare down and then the tiger bounces....a lion on the other hand would confront the gorilla. ( i know there reasons for this, due to the fact that tigers are solitary like 99% of cats, so that they will only pick a fight usually knowning they are gonna win.On the other hand, lions has his bitches working for him so he can get injured and most likely still survive.)
once again, the words i typed were not just my own words. You being a "soon to be zoologist (lol)" means shit, because you arent arguing against MY points....youre arguing against other experts points. If I were a "soon to be doctor" arguing against someone who wasnt a doctor, but they were using points from already established doctors in their argument....my "soon to be knowledge" would not outweigh the esablished doctors knowledge, no matter who its being repeated through. You can go on and on with your theories, and i could go on and on with counter arguments from myself or other animal experts and it will go nowhere. Most of what Ive read estimates that a full grown tiger will win in a fight against a full grown lion almost 80% of the time, and even if it were pound for pound, due to the fighting skills/techniques of a tiger and the tendency to be involved in more one on one confrotations then lions, it would be closer to a 70/30 split. These are theories ive read from other experts. I know youre a "soon to be zoologist", but i believe them over you. Sorry.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
lol, ur talking to a soon to be zoologist....i know my shit...now if u do ur research..ull see that there was a guy who had over 60+ fights between bengals and lions....he said that the lion would win on avg but he had 1 bengal that couldnt be beaten....im guessing it was a 650+ bengal...which would make it much larger than ne healthy lion ur gonna find.he said that the lions would win the majority..thats 1st hand knownlegde from a man who recorded all his fights on document.Also all these cats were str8 from the wild or self raised in wild-like conditions..
Yet again may i state that pound for pound a lion is stronger in the upper body while the tiger is stronger in the hind legs...the hind legs only come into effect when the cat is on his back as a defense move.
learn ur shit.
btw...i dont give opinions , i give facts and educated guesses.
let me also add that a full grown bengal is bigger on the avg than a full grown lion. Hence the reason i said pound-for-pound.
hahah 1more thing, lion doesnt live in the jungle....tiger does, yet hes not the king? gorrillas see's a tiger, stands up, lil stare down and then the tiger bounces....a lion on the other hand would confront the gorilla. ( i know there reasons for this, due to the fact that tigers are solitary like 99% of cats, so that they will only pick a fight usually knowning they are gonna win.On the other hand, lions has his bitches working for him so he can get injured and most likely still survive.)
once again, the words i typed were not just my own words. You being a "soon to be zoologist (lol)" means shit, because you arent arguing against MY points....youre arguing against other experts points. If I were a "soon to be doctor" arguing against someone who wasnt a doctor, but they were using points from already established doctors in their argument....my "soon to be knowledge" would not outweigh the esablished doctors knowledge, no matter who its being repeated through. You can go on and on with your theories, and i could go on and on with counter arguments from myself or other animal experts and it will go nowhere. Most of what Ive read estimates that a full grown tiger will win in a fight against a full grown lion almost 80% of the time, and even if it were pound for pound, due to the fighting skills/techniques of a tiger and the tendency to be involved in more one on one confrotations then lions, it would be closer to a 70/30 split. These are theories ive read from other experts. I know youre a "soon to be zoologist", but i believe them over you. Sorry.
are you reading what he said? somebody had documented over 60 fights between lions and tigers and said the lion was the victor in most cases...how can you argue that?
-
lmao the tiger wants to fuck the lion ;D
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
lol, ur talking to a soon to be zoologist....i know my shit...now if u do ur research..ull see that there was a guy who had over 60+ fights between bengals and lions....he said that the lion would win on avg but he had 1 bengal that couldnt be beaten....im guessing it was a 650+ bengal...which would make it much larger than ne healthy lion ur gonna find.he said that the lions would win the majority..thats 1st hand knownlegde from a man who recorded all his fights on document.Also all these cats were str8 from the wild or self raised in wild-like conditions..
Yet again may i state that pound for pound a lion is stronger in the upper body while the tiger is stronger in the hind legs...the hind legs only come into effect when the cat is on his back as a defense move.
learn ur shit.
btw...i dont give opinions , i give facts and educated guesses.
let me also add that a full grown bengal is bigger on the avg than a full grown lion. Hence the reason i said pound-for-pound.
hahah 1more thing, lion doesnt live in the jungle....tiger does, yet hes not the king? gorrillas see's a tiger, stands up, lil stare down and then the tiger bounces....a lion on the other hand would confront the gorilla. ( i know there reasons for this, due to the fact that tigers are solitary like 99% of cats, so that they will only pick a fight usually knowning they are gonna win.On the other hand, lions has his bitches working for him so he can get injured and most likely still survive.)
once again, the words i typed were not just my own words. You being a "soon to be zoologist (lol)" means shit, because you arent arguing against MY points....youre arguing against other experts points. If I were a "soon to be doctor" arguing against someone who wasnt a doctor, but they were using points from already established doctors in their argument....my "soon to be knowledge" would not outweigh the esablished doctors knowledge, no matter who its being repeated through. You can go on and on with your theories, and i could go on and on with counter arguments from myself or other animal experts and it will go nowhere. Most of what Ive read estimates that a full grown tiger will win in a fight against a full grown lion almost 80% of the time, and even if it were pound for pound, due to the fighting skills/techniques of a tiger and the tendency to be involved in more one on one confrotations then lions, it would be closer to a 70/30 split. These are theories ive read from other experts. I know youre a "soon to be zoologist", but i believe them over you. Sorry.
Lol, when i said i was a soon to be zoologist, i was tring to show u that im not speaking out of my ass.those experts who say tigers will win have not actually put it to the test bcuz ofc they feel like thats animal abuse.but the ppl who did mentioned that the lion was always the braver and more effiecent fighter.Unlike tigers, lions have 2 ways to kill...( throat ofc and another is putting their mouth over their victims to keep them from breathing ).Tiger only kills by biting the neck.Now with that being said.....with the lions mane it will make it much more difficult to get an accurate bite, bcuz if he misses the throat its done for him.Also, unlike tigers ...lions know that their stamina is low and that they must use their energy wisely in a fight...tigers ( bengals ) just go all out while the lion would hold his ground and conserve his energy....not saying lions dont go all out either just saying that the avg lion is a much smarter fighter...
also the look what i said...i said that there was some1 who did this shit and tested it and he said that the lion won most of the time and has all that shit documented.....he did say that he had 1 bengal tiger that was undeafeted but like i said earlier, im guessing it was a huge bengal.
Too show u that experts are not always right due to the fact that they dont believe in testing these kind of things bcuz of the cruelity in it, they believed til recently yhat polar bears would rape grizzly...but then they actaully saw a fight with a grizzly and polar bear and the grizzly Dominated changing their theory that polars bear are victorious.
let me know what u think haha
i love debating....just hope u dont take this too seriously ahha
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
lol, ur talking to a soon to be zoologist....i know my shit...now if u do ur research..ull see that there was a guy who had over 60+ fights between bengals and lions....he said that the lion would win on avg but he had 1 bengal that couldnt be beaten....im guessing it was a 650+ bengal...which would make it much larger than ne healthy lion ur gonna find.he said that the lions would win the majority..thats 1st hand knownlegde from a man who recorded all his fights on document.Also all these cats were str8 from the wild or self raised in wild-like conditions..
Yet again may i state that pound for pound a lion is stronger in the upper body while the tiger is stronger in the hind legs...the hind legs only come into effect when the cat is on his back as a defense move.
learn ur shit.
btw...i dont give opinions , i give facts and educated guesses.
let me also add that a full grown bengal is bigger on the avg than a full grown lion. Hence the reason i said pound-for-pound.
hahah 1more thing, lion doesnt live in the jungle....tiger does, yet hes not the king? gorrillas see's a tiger, stands up, lil stare down and then the tiger bounces....a lion on the other hand would confront the gorilla. ( i know there reasons for this, due to the fact that tigers are solitary like 99% of cats, so that they will only pick a fight usually knowning they are gonna win.On the other hand, lions has his bitches working for him so he can get injured and most likely still survive.)
once again, the words i typed were not just my own words. You being a "soon to be zoologist (lol)" means shit, because you arent arguing against MY points....youre arguing against other experts points. If I were a "soon to be doctor" arguing against someone who wasnt a doctor, but they were using points from already established doctors in their argument....my "soon to be knowledge" would not outweigh the esablished doctors knowledge, no matter who its being repeated through. You can go on and on with your theories, and i could go on and on with counter arguments from myself or other animal experts and it will go nowhere. Most of what Ive read estimates that a full grown tiger will win in a fight against a full grown lion almost 80% of the time, and even if it were pound for pound, due to the fighting skills/techniques of a tiger and the tendency to be involved in more one on one confrotations then lions, it would be closer to a 70/30 split. These are theories ive read from other experts. I know youre a "soon to be zoologist", but i believe them over you. Sorry.
Lol, when i said i was a soon to be zoologist, i was tring to show u that im not speaking out of my ass.those experts who say tigers will win have not actually put it to the test bcuz ofc they feel like thats animal abuse.but the ppl who did mentioned that the lion was always the braver and more effiecent fighter.Unlike tigers, lions have 2 ways to kill...( throat ofc and another is putting their mouth over their victims to keep them from breathing ).Tiger only kills by biting the neck.Now with that being said.....with the lions mane it will make it much more difficult to get an accurate bite, bcuz if he misses the throat its done for him.Also, unlike tigers ...lions know that their stamina is low and that they must use their energy wisely in a fight...tigers ( bengals ) just go all out while the lion would hold his ground and conserve his energy....not saying lions dont go all out either just saying that the avg lion is a much smarter fighter...
also the look what i said...i said that there was some1 who did this shit and tested it and he said that the lion won most of the time and has all that shit documented.....he did say that he had 1 bengal tiger that was undeafeted but like i said earlier, im guessing it was a huge bengal.
Too show u that experts are not always right due to the fact that they dont believe in testing these kind of things bcuz of the cruelity in it, they believed til recently yhat polar bears would rape grizzly...but then they actaully saw a fight with a grizzly and polar bear and the grizzly Dominated changing their theory that polars bear are victorious.
let me know what u think haha
i love debating....just hope u dont take this too seriously ahha
What was the guys name who did the study? Just curious as i can control the result of any study i do.
-
tigers own lions, i thought yall knew
not necessarily true...while the tiger is bigger, the lion has better hunting skills and has a stronger upper body.
i ment own as in, a 1 on 1 fight the tiger always wins
again, that's not true...sometimes the lion wins, sometimes the tiger wins. it all depends on the circumstances.
dude, youre just arguin to argue lol. True, anythng can happen. But most animal experts always agree that on average...a full grown Tiger will defeat a full grown Lion in a one on one confrontation. Its true what u said about the hunting skills of a Lion, but in a one on one fight...the Tiger is much more accustomed to one on one encounters then the Lion is, seeing as how they hunt in packs.
jsut some random knownlegde to u guys.
very randon. See, the words i posted arent just from my own thoughts...they are from animal websites. Most of what people think about Lions being the "king of the jungle" are myths. But some people are so in love with lions (lol) that they wont believe the facts. Its a hard subject to judge because conflicts between lions and tigers are not often documented. But all the physical aspects of the two cats suggests that tigers have a decided advantage over a lion. Not just phyisically, but in their habits aswell as they are more accustomed to fighting in one on one situations.
lol, ur talking to a soon to be zoologist....i know my shit...now if u do ur research..ull see that there was a guy who had over 60+ fights between bengals and lions....he said that the lion would win on avg but he had 1 bengal that couldnt be beaten....im guessing it was a 650+ bengal...which would make it much larger than ne healthy lion ur gonna find.he said that the lions would win the majority..thats 1st hand knownlegde from a man who recorded all his fights on document.Also all these cats were str8 from the wild or self raised in wild-like conditions..
Yet again may i state that pound for pound a lion is stronger in the upper body while the tiger is stronger in the hind legs...the hind legs only come into effect when the cat is on his back as a defense move.
learn ur shit.
btw...i dont give opinions , i give facts and educated guesses.
let me also add that a full grown bengal is bigger on the avg than a full grown lion. Hence the reason i said pound-for-pound.
hahah 1more thing, lion doesnt live in the jungle....tiger does, yet hes not the king? gorrillas see's a tiger, stands up, lil stare down and then the tiger bounces....a lion on the other hand would confront the gorilla. ( i know there reasons for this, due to the fact that tigers are solitary like 99% of cats, so that they will only pick a fight usually knowning they are gonna win.On the other hand, lions has his bitches working for him so he can get injured and most likely still survive.)
once again, the words i typed were not just my own words. You being a "soon to be zoologist (lol)" means shit, because you arent arguing against MY points....youre arguing against other experts points. If I were a "soon to be doctor" arguing against someone who wasnt a doctor, but they were using points from already established doctors in their argument....my "soon to be knowledge" would not outweigh the esablished doctors knowledge, no matter who its being repeated through. You can go on and on with your theories, and i could go on and on with counter arguments from myself or other animal experts and it will go nowhere. Most of what Ive read estimates that a full grown tiger will win in a fight against a full grown lion almost 80% of the time, and even if it were pound for pound, due to the fighting skills/techniques of a tiger and the tendency to be involved in more one on one confrotations then lions, it would be closer to a 70/30 split. These are theories ive read from other experts. I know youre a "soon to be zoologist", but i believe them over you. Sorry.
Lol, when i said i was a soon to be zoologist, i was tring to show u that im not speaking out of my ass.those experts who say tigers will win have not actually put it to the test bcuz ofc they feel like thats animal abuse.but the ppl who did mentioned that the lion was always the braver and more effiecent fighter.Unlike tigers, lions have 2 ways to kill...( throat ofc and another is putting their mouth over their victims to keep them from breathing ).Tiger only kills by biting the neck.Now with that being said.....with the lions mane it will make it much more difficult to get an accurate bite, bcuz if he misses the throat its done for him.Also, unlike tigers ...lions know that their stamina is low and that they must use their energy wisely in a fight...tigers ( bengals ) just go all out while the lion would hold his ground and conserve his energy....not saying lions dont go all out either just saying that the avg lion is a much smarter fighter...
also the look what i said...i said that there was some1 who did this shit and tested it and he said that the lion won most of the time and has all that shit documented.....he did say that he had 1 bengal tiger that was undeafeted but like i said earlier, im guessing it was a huge bengal.
Too show u that experts are not always right due to the fact that they dont believe in testing these kind of things bcuz of the cruelity in it, they believed til recently yhat polar bears would rape grizzly...but then they actaully saw a fight with a grizzly and polar bear and the grizzly Dominated changing their theory that polars bear are victorious.
let me know what u think haha
i love debating....just hope u dont take this too seriously ahha
What was the guys name who did the study? Just curious as i can control the result of any study i do.
i would have to wait til i got back home and check my book marks....pretty sure its book marked on my comp at home..
doggy...u know who i am?
ITS MARLEY!
-
^That ain't Doggy...LOL. Doggy's name is "doggystlin" on here.
-
doggy...u know who i am?
ITS MARLEY!
^That ain't Doggy...LOL. Doggy's name is "doggystlin" on here.
LMMFAO...why would u think thats doggy?
-
doggy...u know who i am?
ITS MARLEY!
^That ain't Doggy...LOL. Doggy's name is "doggystlin" on here.
LMMFAO...why would u think thats doggy?
i know his name....i realized it wasnt him AFTER i posted LOL...
was a lil drunk lol
-
siberian tigers> lions
-
siberian tigers> lions
would like to think so bcuz they are just soo much bigger, but sadly no.
not nearly as aggressive and only a bengal tiger can fight a lion.