West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: you gon always be my latin queen bitch on February 23, 2010, 08:49:20 PM
-
History Mystery
Have a history teacher explain this----- if they can
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.
Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.
Both Presidents were shot in the head
Now it gets really weird.
Lincoln 's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's Secretary was named Lincoln .
Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of fifteen letters.
Now hang on to your seat.
Lincoln was shot at the theater named 'Ford'.
Kennedy was shot in a car called ' Lincoln ' made by 'Ford'.
Lincoln was shot in a theater and his assassin ran and hid in a warehouse.
Kennedy was shot from a warehouse and his assassin ran and hid in a theater.
Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
WHO FIGURED THIS OUT?
-
That's the type of shit that makes you wonder about those David Icke aliens run the world theories.
-
thats some crazy shit tho....are they true? lol
-
thats some crazy shit tho....are they true? lol
pretty fucked up if it's true!
-
for real
have you seen the one about the 20 dollar bill?
thats some crazy shit tho....are they true? lol
pretty fucked up if it's true!
-
This reminds me of all those 2pac/Makaveli theories.
-
This reminds me of all those 2pac/Makaveli theories.
agree, case closed
-
It's called coincidence
-
First off, I hate to sound like a bigger conspiracy theorist but Oswald did not kill Kennedy. It's nice for numbers, but there is not way he did it, at least alone.
Now that I'm done with that.
The congress election year, that's pretty good, though Lincoln only served one term and went back to Illinois politics, Kennedy stayed in the congress, first the House then the Senate, until he was president.
Other presidents elected in a zero year got killed as well, James Garfield and William McKinley. That was a rumored Indian curse to last 100 years, but if you count all the dead presidents it lasted 120 years.
Lincoln may have cared about slavery, but it wasn't a priority of his presidency, Kennedy may have cared about civil rights, but he didn't want the nation to blow apart because of it. Well both may have cared about it, it wasn't part of their presidencies. This gets over blown about in both.
Shot in the head, it's a good place to kill someone you want to make sure dies, or at least can't recover to lead any more. One thing you miss to make this less threatening, Lincoln was shot in his second term after 5 years, Kennedy only in his first term after only 2 years, 10 months.
Unless you are talking about personal secretaries, the secretary fact is actually fiction.
It's obvious why both were killed by southerners, it also obvious why both thought having a southerner on their ticket would make them politically more appealing.
Their birth year was also pretty impressive.
Lincoln was rumored to have loved the theater, and Ford theater was one of his favorites. Killing an American in a Ford car in the 1960's would too easy. Coincidence that it was a Ford, but it would either be a Ford Lincoln or a Cadillac. Both were the high class luxury car of their time. Of course Ford would name their car after a great president. Notice that both Ford and GM tried to go with really American names. GM even used Native American tribes to name their cars. Ford went with themes that fit what they thought Americana is. And the president should drive a car named after a president.
Both Lincoln and Kennedy had enough fans, that someone would killed them before their trail.
-
damn m dogg....thats crazy dogg
-
damn m dogg....thats crazy dogg
Social Students Education major through US History degree. These are fun to me. And I meant to say because of the presidents' fans, someone would have killed Booth and Oswald before their trails, not kill the presidents. But most of these are coincidence. I mean a car named Lincoln. In 1960, it would either be a Lincoln or a Cadillac. Too easy. And neither had a secretary named after the other. Lincoln I don't even think had a personal secretary.
-
aite what about the 20 dollar bill theory?
have you heard or seen that 1?
-
aite what about the 20 dollar bill theory?
have you heard or seen that 1?
explain those
-
aite what about the 20 dollar bill theory?
have you heard or seen that 1?
explain those
it foils into the twin towers on fire. kind of weird. i never even tried to touch it.
-
haha yeah m dogg got it check this out
1) Fold a new $20 bill in half...
2) Fold again
3) Fold the other end
4) Now, simply turn it over...
aite what about the 20 dollar bill theory?
have you heard or seen that 1?
explain those
-
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/lincoln-kennedy.asp
-
(http://i112.photobucket.com/albums/n195/doomsought/gifs/boom.gif)
-
nuthin there^^^^
-
nuthin there^^^^
It was an image of what would happen if you thought about this too hard.
-
i cant sleep at night cuz of this damn
-
:o
-
The coincidences are weird but M Dogg a question for you, since you have studied history at university, then let me ask you this, is Oswald not being the real shooter the conclusion you have reached or the fundamentals of what you have been taught?
I know that several mainstream articles have stated that sir hand sir hand was not the killer of Robert Kennedy and indeed John Pilger who was also on the scene, said shots were fired even after the alleged perpetrator was lying on the ground.
Have you studies Robert Kennedy to?
-
i cant sleep at night cuz of this damn
You think that's disturbing, how do you explain how 15 people can be identified as hijackers when the FBI now admits they had stolen passports? and 7 of them have been found alive and well.
So since that's the case, then they can't have ANY footage of them boarding the plane
However we are led to believe that 19 people with box cutters for weapons took over 4 commercial planes, somehow taking control of all the cockpits.
We are also led to believe that a passport can survive a smoldering hot wreckage intact
Sounds like the plot of a dodgy film with lots of holes in it
-
haha i was jokin bout the sleepin part but yeah that whole passport deal is crazy
but the 20 dollar bill might be even crazier.....how can that be a coincidence?
-
Sure is
CIA were running drills that day of hijacked planes being flown into the towers
Condoleeza Rice appears after in front of the commission saying we had no way of knowing that people would use planes as weapons
Hold on bitch, but the CIA already were planning for that
There were crazy put options being placed on the airliners stocks crashing in the days before
Only a catastrophic event can ensure those crazy bets will be successful and sure enough..... stocks crash through the ceiling
911 Commission report says carry on nothing to see here
Nothing to see here, apparently no one knows who placed those bets, so here is the most heavily funded, technologically advanced intelligence service in the world, saying we can't track down who placed the bets.
Snopes rebuttal.....the 911 Commission report
-
damn so virtuoso who you think did the 9/11 attacks?
or at least were involved or behind it?
and kams got a dope line bout that bitch rice
-
is it really in god they trust?
do collin powell and Condoleezza Rice really represent us?
damn what a dope line by og kam
-
That is something that no one can say for sure, but I do know that the official line is the a pile of bullshit.
Look at who it benefits.....
The day before 911 Rumsfeld was talking about the 2 plus trillion which was missing from the pentagon and said that things had to change. Now of course I am not saying that he isn't a scumbag he is, it's not who said it, it's what he says. Of course after 911 the apparent theft of 2 trillion dollars of american people's money didn't matter because there was supposedly a new enemy at the games and the only way of combating this enemy was to launch a massive pre emptive war against anyone deemed to sympathise, support, or fund "terrorists". This new war called the war on terrorism, has allowed them to massively expand the budget and create an even bigger deficit BUT no one cared about this, because it was seen as vital to the security of the west, that we now no longer ask questions first, we shoot first, ask questions later. However what Rumsfeld also said during his address to the pentagon was that there needed to be reform, to get rid of the "inefficency" of the system. Sure enough, what happened after 911 was a clamour for mercenaries in demand to join the fight. This is important because as bad as soldiers can be, there is at least a semblance of oversight, when you add mercenaries into the mix, it is much harder to control them because they are under no ones command per sa and are essentially immune from oversight. A mercs job detail is get the job done, how that's done is left to their discretion.
After 911 you notice that not just in America, but elsewhere there was a sweeping co-ordinated effort to "tighten" legislation. The patriot act for example without getting into too much detail has been used in lots of civil cases which had nothing to with terrorism. This is important because it illustrates the sweeping powers of the legislation and underlines that the legislation has been deliberately crafted against the general population. Around the horror of 911 they have been given public backing to build a huge police state which has sought to dismantle the very rights which kept the person safe, in the name of safety (how ironic). The reason being, it goes back to the first paragraph, America has been and is being looted and these control mechanisms are being implemented because this is how the elite of society are going to attempt to consolidate their power. At some point, things will really blow up, and these devices/legislation will be used to quell and crack down on pissed off americans.
Consider for instance (also in the name of security) Obama passing warrantless wiretapping, sure it doesn't effect you right now, but it's intention is to be potentially used on anyone, anyone who becomes a threat to this game. So then you have to ask okay, so what is their end goal, they want to create a new global government, one in which individual nation sovereignty is redirected to empower central regional control. Just to underline this, we had the head of the CFR writing an article explains that sovereignty of the nation needed to be sacrificed in order to protect us against terrorism.
So I can't say specifically who planned it but everything was too co-ordinated for there not to have been widespread complicity throughout many intelligence agency's (outside of america also)
-
damn so virtuoso who you think did the 9/11 attacks?
or at least were involved or behind it?
and kams got a dope line bout that bitch rice
zeitgeistmovie.com
-
damn so virtuoso who you think did the 9/11 attacks?
or at least were involved or behind it?
and kams got a dope line bout that bitch rice
zeitgeistmovie.com
TRUTHER!!
-
are they listenin on the phone calls of people right now?
jus regular people?
-
If I say yes, then apparently that's paranoia, so no it's not true, everything is fine, those arabs did hijack those planes, it's just they then teleported out before the planes were destroyed to make themselves look innocent and the government guilty.
Of course when you tell yourself that the arabs teleported to make the government look bad, be sure to be suitably donned with a tinfoil hat
Anyways in seriousness, they have a key stroke programme to record any buzz words on the internet and as for telephone conversations, they aren't actively listening, they couldn't practically do that, but yes they record it all, this has been going on for ages. The difference is that by approving warrantless wiretapping, they have formally declared that they can spy on whoever the fuck they want i.e. the law is saying you have no right to privacy. Which is kind of ironic when that same gang of criminals is slapping gagging order on people, is preventing the disclosure of information, seems they have the right to privacy.
-
aite but are they tappin the phones of regular people?
-
aite but are they tappin the phones of regular people?
Yep... actually they are.
-
damn thats crazy is there anyway of findin out who they are listenin in on? lol
thats crazy tho
-
if you mention certain words then you get liastened too and no I have no idea how they know who to listen too.......
-
hah thats crazy certain words like terror or twin towers...lol
-
nah man words like the president and murder..........and you do not know who is watching you on the net either.........who knows one of them could be watching thsi conversation............
-
this shit is very very very deep. and is fascinating reading and i believe everyone should educate themselves on what is actually going on in the world. we are all been minupulated every day without even knowing it, theres a ton of videos out there that people should download and watch, not all of it is gospel but its good to watch these tings and make your mind up.
about the telephone wire tapping issue, here in england (ive long believed england is the testing ground for laws that will be later passed in america) the police not so long back passed a bill that would enable all thats ALL phone calls to be stored on a database for 5 years. also notice how slowly but surely people have been not pushed but nudged to use mobile phones instead of phone boxes? its because they want to know exactley who is making all the calls and makes things alot easier to trace........the games big everyone and everyone is part of it.
i like the line that the comedian george carlin once came out with, "The american dream? its only called that because you have to be asleep to believe it"!
-
but if they are 300 million people
lets say 150 million of em...even tho its more
use celly's, how can they trace all 150 million at one given time?
even if they have a million employees
shit is impossible
-
they have a computer that does it get...........it is the easiest way to do it...........