West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Tha G-Spot => Topic started by: when it rains it pours on August 12, 2010, 11:39:08 PM
-
NEW YORK – Floods, fires, melting ice and feverish heat: From smoke-choked Moscow to water-soaked Iowa and the High Arctic, the planet seems to be having a midsummer breakdown. It's not just a portent of things to come, scientists say, but a sign of troubling climate change already under way.
The weather-related cataclysms of July and August fit patterns predicted by climate scientists, the Geneva-based World Meteorological Organization says — although those scientists always shy from tying individual disasters directly to global warming.
The experts now see an urgent need for better ways to forecast extreme events like Russia's heat wave and wildfires and the record deluge devastating Pakistan. They'll discuss such tools in meetings this month and next in Europe and America, under United Nations, U.S. and British government sponsorship.
"There is no time to waste," because societies must be equipped to deal with global warming, says British government climatologist Peter Stott.
He said modelers of climate systems are "very keen" to develop supercomputer modeling that would enable more detailed linking of cause and effect as a warming world shifts jet streams and other atmospheric currents. Those changes can wreak weather havoc.
The U.N.'s network of climate scientists — the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) — has long predicted that rising global temperatures would produce more frequent and intense heat waves, and more intense rainfalls. In its latest assessment, in 2007, the Nobel Prize-winning panel went beyond that. It said these trends "have already been observed," in an increase in heat waves since 1950, for example.
Still, climatologists generally refrain from blaming warming for this drought or that flood, since so many other factors also affect the day's weather.
Stott and NASA's Gavin Schmidt, at the Goddard Institute of Space Studies in New York, said it's better to think in terms of odds: Warming might double the chances for heat waves, for example. "That is exactly what's happening," Schmidt said, "a lot more warm extremes and less cold extremes."
The WMO pointed out that this summer's events fit the international scientists' projections of "more frequent and more intense extreme weather events due to global warming."
In fact, in key cases they're a perfect fit:
RUSSIA
It's been the hottest summer ever recorded in Russia, with Moscow temperatures topping 100 degrees Fahrenheit (37.8 degrees C) for the first time. Russia's drought has sparked hundreds of wildfires in forests and dried peat bogs, blanketing Moscow with a toxic smog that finally lifted Thursday after six days. The Russian capital's death rate doubled to 700 people a day at one point. The drought reduced the wheat harvest by more than one-third.
The 2007 IPCC report predicted a doubling of disastrous droughts in Russia this century and cited studies foreseeing catastrophic fires during dry years. It also said Russia would suffer large crop losses.
PAKISTAN
The heaviest monsoon rains on record — 12 inches (300 millimeters) in one 36-hour period — have sent rivers rampaging over huge swaths of countryside, flooding thousands of villages. It has left 14 million Pakistanis homeless or otherwise affected, and killed 1,500. The government calls it the worst natural disaster in the nation's history.
A warmer atmosphere can hold — and discharge — more water. The 2007 IPCC report said rains have grown heavier for 40 years over north Pakistan and predicted greater flooding this century in south Asia's monsoon region.
CHINA
China is witnessing its worst floods in decades, the WMO says, particularly in the northwest province of Gansu. There, floods and landslides last weekend killed at least 1,100 people and left more than 600 missing, feared swept away or buried beneath mud and debris.
The IPCC reported in 2007 that rains had increased in northwest China by up to 33 percent since 1961, and floods nationwide had increased sevenfold since the 1950s. It predicted still more frequent flooding this century.
UNITED STATES
In Iowa, soaked by its wettest 36-month period in 127 years of recordkeeping, floodwaters from three nights of rain this week forced hundreds from their homes and killed a 16-year-old girl.
The international climate panel projected increased U.S. precipitation this century — except for the Southwest — and more extreme rain events causing flooding.
ARCTIC
Researchers last week spotted a 100-square-mile (260-square-kilometer) chunk of ice calved off from the great Petermann Glacier in Greenland's far northwest. It was the most massive ice island to break away in the Arctic in a half-century of observation.
The huge iceberg appeared just five months after an international scientific team published a report saying ice loss from the Greenland ice sheet is expanding up its northwest coast from the south.
Changes in the ice sheet "are happening fast, and we are definitely losing more ice mass than we had anticipated," said one of the scientists, NASA's Isabella Velicogna.
In the Arctic Ocean itself, the summer melt of the vast ice cap has reached unprecedented proportions in recent years. Satellite data show the ocean area covered by ice last month was the second-lowest ever recorded for July.
The melting of land ice into the oceans is causing about 60 percent of the accelerating rise in sea levels worldwide, with thermal expansion from warming waters causing the rest. The WMO'S World Climate Research Program says seas are rising by 1.34 inches (34 millimeters) per decade, about twice the 20th century's average.
Worldwide temperature readings, meanwhile, show that this January-June was the hottest first half of a year since recordkeeping began in the mid-19th century. Meteorologists say 17 nations have recorded all-time-high temperatures in 2010, more than in any other year.
Scientists blame the warming on carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases pouring into the atmosphere from power plants, cars and trucks, furnaces and other fossil fuel-burning industrial and residential sources.
Experts are growing ever more vocal in urging sharp cutbacks in emissions, to protect the climate that has nurtured modern civilization.
"Reducing emissions is something everyone is capable of," Nanjing-based climatologist Tao Li told an academic journal in China, now the world's No. 1 emitter, ahead of the U.S.
But not everyone is willing to act.
The U.S. remains the only major industrialized nation not to have legislated caps on carbon emissions, after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid last week withdrew climate legislation in the face of resistance from Republicans and some Democrats.
The U.S. inaction, dating back to the 1990s, is a key reason global talks have bogged down for a pact to succeed the expiring Kyoto Protocol. That is the relatively weak accord on emissions cuts adhered to by all other industrialized states.
Governments around the world, especially in poorer nations that will be hard-hit, are scrambling to find ways and money to adapt to shifts in climate and rising seas.
The meetings of climatologists in the coming weeks in Paris, Britain and Colorado will be one step toward adaptation, seeking ways to identify trends in extreme events and better means of forecasting them.
A U.N. specialist in natural disasters says much more needs to be done.
Salvano Briceno of the U.N.'s International Strategy for Disaster Reduction pointed to aggravating factors in the latest climate catastrophes: China's failure to stem deforestation, contributing to its deadly mudslides; Russia's poor forest management, feeding fires; and the settling of poor Pakistanis on flood plains and dry riverbeds in the densely populated country, squatters' turf that suddenly turned into torrents.
"The IPCC has already identified the influence of climate change in these disasters. That's clear," Briceno said. "But the main trend we need to look at is increasing vulnerability, the fact we have more people living in the wrong places, doing the wrong things."
-
o fuckin well
-
we should invest time into creating a waterproof/fireproof/floating device in which we can store swishers and weed in
-
we should invest time into creating a waterproof/fireproof/floating device in which we can store swishers and weed in
+1
and some vodka
-
http://www.youtube.com/v/A7AYSLfvJ2M
the end of the world should be something like that (but BIGGER)
-
It has been about 70 degrees Fahrenheit average this summer here in Seattle. No flooding, heatwaves, thunderstorms etc... Nice time. Not apocalyptic at all.
Your rebuttal?
-
My nigga Stephen Hawking said the other day that humans are doomed unless we can colonize space within the next 100 years:
Stephen Hawking says humanity is doomed unless it takes to the stars
Stephen Hawking says that if humanity is going to survive in the long run, we must escape our planet.
(http://www.csmonitor.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/images/media/images/0812-stephen-hawking-humanity/8474048-1-eng-US/0812-stephen-hawking-humanity_full_380.jpg)
British theoretical physicist professor Stephen Hawking, shown here speaking in Waterloo, Ontario, in June
By Clara Moskowitz, SPACE.com Senior Writer / August 12, 2010
If humanity is to survive long-term, it must find a way to get off planet Earth — and fast, according to famed astrophysicist Stephen Hawking.
Skip to next paragraph
Related Stories
* Stephen Hawking aliens warning: Should we hide?
* Stephen Hawking alien warning: Could we talk to them?
* Moon base: Location, location, location
In fact, human beings may have less than 200 years to figure out how to escape our planet, Hawking said in a recent interview with video site Big Think. Otherwise our species could be at risk for extinction, he said.
"It will be difficult enough to avoid disaster in the next hundred years, let alone the next thousand or million," Hawking said. "Our only chance of long-term survival is not to remain inward-looking on planet Earth, but to spread out into space."
Humans stuck on Earth are at risk from two kinds of catastrophes, Hawking said. First, the kind we bring on ourselves, such as possible devastating impacts from climate change, or nuclear or biological warfare.
A number of cosmic phenomena could spell our demise, too. An asteroid could slam into Earth, killing large swaths of the population and rendering the planet uninhabitable. Or a supernova or gamma-ray burst near our spot in the Milky Way could prove ruinous for life on Earth.
Life on Earth could even be threatened by an extraterrestrial civilization, Hawking has pointed out on his Discovery Channel television series, "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking."
Dangerous aliens may want to take over the planet to use its resources for themselves, he said in the series. It would be safer for the survival of our species if we had people living on other worlds as a backup plan, Hawking proposed.
"The human race shouldn't have all its eggs in one basket, or on one planet," he told Big Think. "Let's hope we can avoid dropping the basket until we have spread the load."
-
My nigga Stephen Hawking said the other day that humans are doomed unless we can colonize space within the next 100 years:
damnnnnn
we too busy finding osama and building bigger and better bombs
-
My nigga Stephen Hawking said the other day that humans are doomed unless we can colonize space within the next 100 years:
damnnnnn
we too busy finding osama and building bigger and better bombs
hell yes thats more important right now
matter fact i wanna find osama bincockhead myself and cut his head off, bring it back to america and show it to all the people and we burn his head
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
-
We all die anyway.
-
we should invest time into creating a waterproof/fireproof/floating device in which we can store swishers and weed in
We already have ductape
-
My nigga Stephen Hawking said the other day that humans are doomed unless we can colonize space within the next 100 years:
lmao
-
While y'all are looking for Osama, I'll be orbiting Mars, sippin on Tang and eating dinner out of a toothpaste tube. BALLLLLLLLLLLLLLIN'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
were all gon fuckin die!!!!!!!!
-
HAH!! I ain't worried
http://www.youtube.com/v/-SK6gbhuEXQ
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
That's what I've been saying! Given there is no RIDICULOUS discovery in science that allows us to live longer, everybody you know will NEVER see the effects of this.
I'll be dead, so good luck, great, great, grandson; although I wouldn't be surprised if you're 100% fine.
-
Humans are a plague, we'll live.
A large percentage may die but we'll survive as a species.
We're not supposed to be able to live in allot of places where we live now.
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
That's what I've been saying! Given there is no RIDICULOUS discovery in science that allows us to live longer, everybody you know will NEVER see the effects of this.
I'll be dead, so good luck, great, great, grandson; although I wouldn't be surprised if you're 100% fine.
seriously, scientists need to get their shit together and discover immortality if they expect us to give a fuck what happens in a couple hundred years
-
SEND EVERYONE OVER 60 INTO SPACE.
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
That's what I've been saying! Given there is no RIDICULOUS discovery in science that allows us to live longer, everybody you know will NEVER see the effects of this.
I'll be dead, so good luck, great, great, grandson; although I wouldn't be surprised if you're 100% fine.
seriously, scientists need to get their shit together and discover immortality if they expect us to give a fuck what happens in a couple hundred years
Blame god damn conservatives who fear advancement in science. They're holding progress back more than anything.
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
That's what I've been saying! Given there is no RIDICULOUS discovery in science that allows us to live longer, everybody you know will NEVER see the effects of this.
I'll be dead, so good luck, great, great, grandson; although I wouldn't be surprised if you're 100% fine.
seriously, scientists need to get their shit together and discover immortality if they expect us to give a fuck what happens in a couple hundred years
Blame god damn conservatives who fear advancement in science. They're holding progress back more than anything.
I don't mind. We all die. Plus, if everyone lived to 200, there would be like 15 billion people on the planet lol. But fuck those conservatives anyway. :P
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
That's what I've been saying! Given there is no RIDICULOUS discovery in science that allows us to live longer, everybody you know will NEVER see the effects of this.
I'll be dead, so good luck, great, great, grandson; although I wouldn't be surprised if you're 100% fine.
seriously, scientists need to get their shit together and discover immortality if they expect us to give a fuck what happens in a couple hundred years
Blame god damn conservatives who fear advancement in science. They're holding progress back more than anything.
I don't mind. We all die. Plus, if everyone lived to 200, there would be like 15 billion people on the planet lol. But fuck those conservatives anyway. :P
Theres already way too many people on this planet. Non smoking should be illegal.
-
face it we all goin to hell
-
hell is gonna be fuccin packed
-
hell is gonna be fuccin packed
they gon hafta make hell 2
-
I'll be dead by then so who cares?
That's what I've been saying! Given there is no RIDICULOUS discovery in science that allows us to live longer, everybody you know will NEVER see the effects of this.
I'll be dead, so good luck, great, great, grandson; although I wouldn't be surprised if you're 100% fine.
seriously, scientists need to get their shit together and discover immortality if they expect us to give a fuck what happens in a couple hundred years
Blame god damn conservatives who fear advancement in science. They're holding progress back more than anything.
I don't mind. We all die. Plus, if everyone lived to 200, there would be like 15 billion people on the planet lol. But fuck those conservatives anyway. :P
I doubt it, people hate their lives now what makes you think they would want it lasting twice as long
-
^I can't speak for everyone, but personally if someone said you can live 100 more years, I'd take it.
-
^I can't speak for everyone, but personally if someone said you can live 100 more years, I'd take it.
Me to but I'd probably kill myself because life would be fucking boring after 200 years.
What are you going to do to keep yourself entertained for so long?
-
^I can't speak for everyone, but personally if someone said you can live 100 more years, I'd take it.
Me to but I'd probably kill myself because life would be fucking boring after 200 years.
What are you going to do to keep yourself entertained for so long?
Porn. ;D
-
^I can't speak for everyone, but personally if someone said you can live 100 more years, I'd take it.
Me to but I'd probably kill myself because life would be fucking boring after 200 years.
What are you going to do to keep yourself entertained for so long?
Porn. ;D
sex....and video games...and all the crazy shit that happens. If life ain't boring after 80 years, I'm sure the rest will be the same.
-
fuck that people over 70 need assisted living most of the time, can u imagine being 120 year old, your bones and skin would be so fucked. i'd rather die young and healthy then old and miserable.
-
fuck that people over 70 need assisted living most of the time, can u imagine being 120 year old, your bones and skin would be so fucked. i'd rather die young and healthy then old and miserable.
You would obviously age slower if they could make you live to 200.
It's a crazy thought anyway, it'll never happen; not in the next 100 years anyway, so it's too late lol.
& people who always say "I wouldn't want to live for that long" are taking life for granted; who knows what happens when you die? Don't let a second go to waste, brah.
-
fuck that people over 70 need assisted living most of the time, can u imagine being 120 year old, your bones and skin would be so fucked. i'd rather die young and healthy then old and miserable.
You would obviously age slower if they could make you live to 200.
It's a crazy thought anyway, it'll never happen; not in the next 100 years anyway, so it's too late lol.
& people who always say "I wouldn't want to live for that long" are taking life for granted; who knows what happens when you die? Don't let a second go to waste, brah.
I'm not taking life for granted I'm just being realistic.
-
Ah well, we knew it was coming i guess - this planet is pretty much fucked lol
-
fuck that people over 70 need assisted living most of the time, can u imagine being 120 year old, your bones and skin would be so fucked. i'd rather die young and healthy then old and miserable.
You would obviously age slower if they could make you live to 200.
It's a crazy thought anyway, it'll never happen; not in the next 100 years anyway, so it's too late lol.
& people who always say "I wouldn't want to live for that long" are taking life for granted; who knows what happens when you die? Don't let a second go to waste, brah.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ching_Yun
^^^ this guy lived for a pretty long ass time. not sure if it's true but it seems legit. i wouldn't mind living that long or longer just to see how things evolve.
-
fuck that people over 70 need assisted living most of the time, can u imagine being 120 year old, your bones and skin would be so fucked. i'd rather die young and healthy then old and miserable.
You would obviously age slower if they could make you live to 200.
It's a crazy thought anyway, it'll never happen; not in the next 100 years anyway, so it's too late lol.
& people who always say "I wouldn't want to live for that long" are taking life for granted; who knows what happens when you die? Don't let a second go to waste, brah.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Ching_Yun
^^^ this guy lived for a pretty long ass time. not sure if it's true but it seems legit. i wouldn't mind living that long or longer just to see how things evolve.
256 years old seems legit? I hate to sound realistic, but I smell major bullshit.
-
For real, no one in the day of modern technology, where it would seem more realistic has done that & he pulled it off when the average age of death was probably like 65-70 with the lack of medicine.
One in 100 billion; hard to believe, but I personally would want to live forever, if possible (obviously not).
-
For real, no one in the day of modern technology, where it would seem more realistic has done that & he pulled it off when the average age of death was probably like 65-70 with the lack of medicine.
One in 100 billion; hard to believe, but I personally would want to live forever, if possible (obviously not).
If I could live forever I most certainly would. You gotta be depressed if you don't want that lol. Imagine all the fine ass bitches that have yet to be born, flying cars, muthafuccin time machines, go to other planets for vacation, all the other good shit u dont know about, I'd have a muthafuccin ball man.
-
For real, no one in the day of modern technology, where it would seem more realistic has done that & he pulled it off when the average age of death was probably like 65-70 with the lack of medicine.
One in 100 billion; hard to believe, but I personally would want to live forever, if possible (obviously not).
If I could live forever I most certainly would. You gotta be depressed if you don't want that lol. Imagine all the fine ass bitches that have yet to be born, flying cars, muthafuccin time machines, go to other planets for vacation, all the other good shit u dont know about, I'd have a muthafuccin ball man.
Although, according to this thread, you're dying in 120 years from today anyway, even if your body would push on forever. :P
It's funny though, thinking like 100+ years ago from today they were convinced everything had been discovered and built; you kind of have to think the same. How much better can things get? But I'm sure they will.
-
For real, no one in the day of modern technology, where it would seem more realistic has done that & he pulled it off when the average age of death was probably like 65-70 with the lack of medicine.
One in 100 billion; hard to believe, but I personally would want to live forever, if possible (obviously not).
If I could live forever I most certainly would. You gotta be depressed if you don't want that lol. Imagine all the fine ass bitches that have yet to be born, flying cars, muthafuccin time machines, go to other planets for vacation, all the other good shit u dont know about, I'd have a muthafuccin ball man.
Although, according to this thread, you're dying in 120 years from today anyway, even if your body would push on forever. :P
It's funny though, thinking like 100+ years ago from today they were convinced everything had been discovered and built; you kind of have to think the same. How much better can things get? But I'm sure they will.
Just knowing you're never gonna die has gotta be a beautiful feeling. All the bustas you gonna outlive lol. I'd love every minute.
-
^For real. 8)
-
As log as my penis works, I want to live. When that muthafucka withers away or stops working, Dr. Kevorkian my ass.
-
I'm a co-sign that shit...living forever with a ruined penis has got to take it's toll on a person's mental health
-
I'm a co-sign that shit...living forever with a ruined penis has got to take it's toll on a person's mental health
and pussy gettin health
-
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3329065877451441972#
Documentary about eternal life, dude says that there are people who live today that will make it to live a millennia.