West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Russell Bell on May 04, 2011, 09:13:17 PM
-
So this topic came up in a G-Spot thread, and I thought this would be a better place to discuss it.
Should we, assuming that Bin Laden is dead and was killed when the gov't says he was, show the picture of Bin Laden after the Navy SEAL raid?
I say, yes, absolutely.
Heres why: You can't use tolerance and compassion towards people who hate your guts for simply existing how you exist and for policies that will not change in a hundred years, and hope that being respectful will actually win anyone over. Being "the nice guy" in our terms by not showing the photo does nothing for us in their eyes because we are still "evil" to them no matter what. Showing the picture will confirm this even happening, which has been handled little shady to say the least.
The real issue is why they hate us and it isn't because of something trivial like showing a picture or not showing a picture (the first thing we shouldn't and wont change, the second we should and could change):
1) We are literally Sodom and Gomorrah to them and basically piss on their holy laws by having equal rights, las vegas, binge drinking, drug usage, whores galore, etc. We are the devil to them.
2) We have retarded foreign policy. Whether or not youre on the right or left, chances are, if youre involved at all in mainstream politics, you support this, and definetley do if you vote any of these 2 party guys into office. Democrats and Republicans both support undeclared wars on nations full of muslims and other races/religions because of protecting allies and resources. We also medal in other countries political decisions when we should keep out of it (regime changes, sending weapons/supplies to one side and denying the other). Newsflash: people don't like that! Especially when it is literally killing your neighbors or effecting your everyday life in a negative way.
My main point - We need to stop getting ourselves involved via entangling alliances (that goes for the UN, too. not just israel and the usual allies). They hurt more than they help, especially now in this political climate. If we did that, these guys wouldn't be scheming ways to blow our shit up and wouldn't be so pissed everytime family guy shows muhammed on tv.
-
No.
The whole discussion is retarted to begin with. Why? Because USA wouldn't say they killed him if they didn't actually kill him.
-
No.
The whole discussion is retarted to begin with. Why? Because USA wouldn't say they killed him if they didn't actually kill him.
Youre probably right.
That doesn't mean that showing the pic wouldn't do any good.
Then again, our gov't relies on people assuming things.
-
release it where is the proof i need more than a photo OBAMA
-
release it where is the proof i need more than a photo OBAMA
:sign_werd:
-
why?
so u could feel that the government isnt corupt n lyrin? is that what its all about?
what makes more sense, avoiding possible retaliation from passionate n enthusiastic alquaida-affiliates - or makin some paranoid people feel better about the government?
thats a no-brainer.
-
No.
The whole discussion is retarted to begin with. Why? Because USA wouldn't say they killed him if they didn't actually kill him.
I 100% agree with this.
-
Anyone who says "no" has very little concern and respect for the truth. I mean not only would a photo be key evidence in proving Bin Laden was killed, but it is also key in proving the narrative of the US seals and their account of how the events too place... because you can ascertain from such photos how he was killed, advanced people could maybe even recognize a time of death, whether or not he was resisting, and so much more.
But if you just want to be a blind monkey, then
-
Anyone who says "no" has very little concern and respect for the truth. I mean not only would a photo be key evidence in proving Bin Laden was killed, but it is also key in proving the narrative of the US seals and their account of how the events too place... because you can ascertain from such photos how he was killed, advanced people could maybe even recognize a time of death, whether or not he was resisting, and so much more.
But if you just want to be a blind monkey, then
If you want the truth and nothing but the truth, don't read newspapers or the internet. You will never get the full story, but if you just want to be a blind monkey, then
-
yes
-
Obviously. They can't come up with a picture, because they don't have one lol.
-
Obviously. They can't come up with a picture, because they don't have one lol.
I think thats a possibility, but I dont think that its true.
Funny side note: Remember obama talking all about "transparency" all the time and how the people were going to be informed blah blah. Sounds like obama promised way more than he could deliver, and a buncha suckers took the bait hook, line, and sinker because he wasnt an old white guy and not a republican.
-
The type of damage Al Qaeda can do disproving the assasination of Osama is fucking huge. Now how come their asses haven't said shit about it?
-
The type of damage Al Qaeda can do disproving the assasination of Osama is fucking huge. Now how come their asses haven't said shit about it?
That's a good point
-
Osama died years ago
-
Osama died years ago
December 2001 to be almost exact.
May 1st is the second most important day in Illuminati lore. Hitler was also declared dead to the World on May 1st. Coincidence? Nope. 66 years from the date. Coincidence? Nope.
-
Ah yes the elusive loved Osama
So unchallenged they take out Osama, up close and personal and then disappear, no firefights, no masses of al queda around him?
Thought this guy was revered?
Who the fuck are al queda anyway? a bunch of islamist fighters, with no real co-ordination, or leadership, puppets of the west, employed in Kosovo, no doubt employed in Libya and god knows where else
If the real Osama was still alive, why did the real Osama turn into a different person each time? lol
Why did Bhutto say he was killed back in 2007
How many times must the same man be killed?
Funniest/most disturbing thing though, is he was never convicted of anything to do with 9/11, the Taliban offered to hand him over if proof was provided of his involvement. Even the later video in which he uses the words we did this, would be inadmissible as evidence becauae it is NOT an admittance of personal responsibility.
The whole thing stinks to high heaven, however don't let that get in the way, keep eating from the trough of bullshit, bon appetite.
-
Ah yes the elusive loved Osama
So unchallenged they take out Osama, up close and personal and then disappear, no firefights, no masses of al queda around him?
Thought this guy was revered?
Who the fuck are al queda anyway? a bunch of islamist fighters, with no real co-ordination, or leadership, puppets of the west, employed in Kosovo, no doubt employed in Libya and god knows where else
If the real Osama was still alive, why did the real Osama turn into a different person each time? lol
Why did Bhutto say he was killed back in 2007
How many times must the same man be killed?
Funniest/most disturbing thing though, is he was never convicted of anything to do with 9/11, the Taliban offered to hand him over if proof was provided of his involvement. Even the later video in which he uses the words we did this, would be inadmissible as evidence becauae it is NOT an admittance of personal responsibility.
The whole thing stinks to high heaven, however don't let that get in the way, keep eating from the trough of bullshit, bon appetite.
Now I don't believe much if anything the US gov't says but it's funny you tell people to continue eating through the bullshit when you eat just as much bullshit that comes from the other side.
-
Okay, which part is bullshit?
-
What would a picture do for anybody? lol Make a few people feel good cus they get to see a dead bin Laden? It COULD give radicals even more reason to attack innocent people. It may do nothing, but who knows. Doesnt seem like its really worth the risk. Not to mention, its a fuckin picture lol. For conspiracy theorists who dont believe ANYthing the government says, will they really believe that a picture proves anything about when he died? At this point, releasing the picture would only be a lose lose situation for the government.