West Coast Connection Forum
Lifestyle => Train of Thought => Topic started by: Immortal on January 11, 2003, 07:30:09 PM
-
i would personally prefer Clinton. He was always cool and especially with the middle east..always going for peace talks...a really dope president who certainly is better than bush. I would want him back
-
clinton is better the both bushs combined but altho it seemed he had a soft approch on drugs, the rate of marrijuan arrests went up, also did the anount of money spent on the drug war
-
I voted for Clinton, but I don't think you can really say who's better because Clinton didn't have to deal with 9-11 and stuff.
-
hands down clinton...to me he is probably one of the best presidents ever....he was more of a regular person...tho bush is the shit for havin a dui!!!!...cuz u aint a man til u get ur first dui
-
clinton is better...made the economy better, more peaceful than bush
-
Hands down Clinton...
-
BUSH U FAGGOTS~~~!!!!! FUCK ALL OF U!!!!!!
lol na i am jus messin, i gotta go with clinton to.
-
I don't know enough about politics to make a good choice. I'd pick clinton, but only because I like his speeches, and he seems like anice guy (though bush does too to me). I think the days of clear cut demo/republicans is gone, bush isn't as hardcore as most republicans, and clinton wasn't a clear cut democrat. On one hand, I agree with republicans on some issues, and I agree with democrats on some issues. Republicans want to save everyone tax money, democrats want to make the government even bigger than it already is. I can't really ever decide.
-
Clinton, because Clinton wasn't a war-monger and he wasn't a member of the top 1% that is trying to rule the whole world. And he didn't have his hand in the oil industry.
-
Tha only reason ppl dont like bush is because of tha situation he was put in. If Clinton was in this situation he would more than likley be handling it tha same way. Yall need to give bush some SLIZACK!
-
I partially agree. I think if it was clinton, his reaction to 9/11 would have been almost identical. Clinton would have us at war with terrorism, also, he'd have us in afganistan, he probably would have pushed it as far as Bush has, ESPECIALLY when you take into account his security cabinet would be similarly staffed. Basically, the heads of the armed forces are CONSTANTLY in the presidents ear, whoever he is, to start war with somebody (in my opinion). I think Bush is doing a good job trying to keep everybody happy by not invading Iraq, or whatever. I DO, however, think that Clinton probably would have worked a little harder for peace. That's not entirely the most important thing to me, though, i'm much more concerned with schools, and medical coverage, we need to worry about that stuff more. Peace~
-
I agree with Cracker Wagon and E.Trauma.
-
clinton was my favrite president of our generation...what worrys where there in the clinton era...none...no one complaining about jobs, economy, war....and now look at the state of the nation since the disgraceful george bush has taken over
-
I have to say Clinton, because during his Presidency, his slogan for the office was "It's the Economy Stupit"... LOL, now that's classic. Clinton was always trying to keep the issues home, and he was working to keep money and stuff flowing into the poorer community. Bush lowered taxes, but it resulted in the government surplus ending, and the economy, which was finally seeing a downfall at the end of Clinton's presidency, fall even faster.
As for 9-11, I think that the three days of Bush not being seen would not happen with Clinton. He knew how to ease people, and knew that by appearing, it would pick up public moral, and he would have spoke right away, that night. Clinton would have done many things also to boost his public opinion polls, as he had his way of making a situation work fo him, even cheating on his wife. Clinton was a political genious, and for that, I'm voting for him, even though under him, most the rest of the world's economy sank because of the U.S. growth in his presidency.
-
even though I dont kno too much bout politix Id say CLINTON...yeah Bush is a dumbass, heard the Bushisms? LLMAO!!! :D cokehead and alkaholik...average rich kid wit nuthin better to do..CLinton on the other hand CAME UP from middle class...he rose up wit struggles. Also Bush and the Kyoto treaty...fools not caring about the environment when now the problem is worse than ever adn we have to take drastic steps! :(
-
also Im liberal and down wit Democrats much more than republicans
-
As for 9-11, I think that the three days of Bush not being seen would not happen with Clinton. He knew how to ease people, and knew that by appearing, it would pick up public moral, and he would have spoke right away, that night.
Man, I don't know where you were, but he DID speak that night (bush). What are you talking about? Remember, when it happened, he was on air force one, spoke briefly in Florida, was flown 'to an undisclosed location', and spoke LIVE from the white house on national t.v. that night!
-
well i am from india .. but to me .. clinton is the better president.. his handling of internation affairs was top notch .. he tried towards the end of his term to solve the middle east crisis but was unsuccessful ..
he was liked by the international community in general.. and his speech delivery was excellent
bush on the other hand.. has this certain arrogancy you can sense in his speeches..and he has sent world politics into haywire by simply waging war against iraq and causing trouble in north korea.. in which i think in both cases the clinton administration would have handled much much better
-
Yeah, Clinton deserves a lot of credit for what he did with Sharon and Arafat. That was big.
-
ight yall, thanks for the votes
-
Clinton dude was a rock star
-
Clinton...
-
clinton for election 2004.
-
^^ He can't, it's illegal.
-
^^ He can't, it's illegal.
who cares... better than Al Gore...lol