West Coast Connection Forum

DUBCC - Tha Connection => West Coast Classics => Topic started by: kalliweed on September 22, 2002, 04:07:14 PM

Title: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: kalliweed on September 22, 2002, 04:07:14 PM
church to the palace is growin on me......i think neptunes did a good job....especially the scratch..it will difinately blow trust me..better single than laylow and snoop dogg
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Suga Foot on September 22, 2002, 04:09:24 PM
ok
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Nosak on September 22, 2002, 04:12:51 PM
ya i prefer the new shit instead of lay low, don't ask me why, i don'T kn0w. more bumpin , don'T know
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: E. J. Rizo on September 22, 2002, 04:18:20 PM
well i respect your decisions but im laughing at the same time cause lay low was straight westcoast gangsta beat with a tight as flow and just a bad ass song in general im not saying this new shit sucks or anything its aight but not as good as lay low... maybe about the same as snoop dogg
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: .:Hercy Buggz:. on September 22, 2002, 04:21:58 PM
Quote
well i respect your decisions but im laughing at the same time cause lay low was straight westcoast gangsta beat with a tight as flow and just a bad ass song in general im not saying this new shit sucks or anything its aight but not as good as lay low... maybe about the same as snoop dogg


thats right!!!

Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: LIL GUY on September 22, 2002, 04:23:11 PM
I think from the chuuch to the palace too.  this shit grows on you fast. you got a lot of fans who love dre so since neptunes are hotter than dre right now they kinda hatin'.  but the shit is diffrent I always like new shit.  Im tired of hearing the same ol dre beat.  same ol base like same snare same sound.  Neptunes tried some different shit with snoop.  that second and third verse is some cool shit.  plus law low had master p rappin on it and goldie had a bad verse.  whoever says this song will not blow up i crazy.  Snoop pays bet and mtv to play his video's.  he pays the radio stations.  do ya'll remeber that song "we want the funk"  that shit was number 4 on 106 and park, that song was not tight at all.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: .:Hercy Buggz:. on September 22, 2002, 04:25:35 PM
Quote
I think from the chuuch to the palace too.  this shit grows on you fast. you got a lot of fans who love dre so since neptunes are hotter than dre right now they kinda hatin'.  but the shit is diffrent I always like new shit.  Im tired of hearing the same ol dre beat.  same ol base like same snare same sound.  Neptunes tried some different shit with snoop.  that second and third verse is some cool shit.  plus law low had master p rappin on it and goldie had a bad verse.  whoever says this song will not blow up i crazy.  Snoop pays bet and mtv to play his video's.  he pays the radio stations.  do ya'll remeber that song "we want the funk"  that shit was number 4 on 106 and park, that song was not tight at all.


thats right!!!

Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: TOOTHBRUSH on September 22, 2002, 04:43:40 PM
people are forgetting they are hearing bad quality.........the beat is nice and in good quality it'll be nice it's got a real eastcoast feel to it.............it and actually got that upbeat shit that kinda makes you wanna dance too and nobody is gonna hate on the flow.................remember "snoop dogg" got mad radio play so you know this shit will it reminds me of "snoop dogg" on steroids or somethin
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Nosak on September 22, 2002, 04:43:56 PM
Quote
 do ya'll remeber that song "we want the funk"  that shit was number 4 on 106 and park, that song was not tight at all.

thats right lol at first i tought snoop was doin a collabo, and a wack one, than i saw it was his video and shit. i said dawm ... but it grew on me but this new one betta
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Jome on September 22, 2002, 04:46:50 PM
Lay Low is about 1000 times better than the new one.
Yall gotta be joking if you like this better than Lay Low.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: teecee on September 22, 2002, 04:49:26 PM
Lay Low was pretty basic, whereas this new song is some next shit man..although i still can't say i like it completely.  At least it ain't that tired old gangsta shit....Plus, Snoop sounds awesome on his new song, despite te odd beat.....
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: E. J. Rizo on September 22, 2002, 04:55:13 PM
"for the nigga who be  talkin loud and holdin his dick talkin shit.....he better lllaaaaay llloooooowwww"

-Nate Dogg-

man lay low is just a classic track i dont care if P was on it you guys act like if he was in it no matter what it sucks and he sounded best there flow wise then any other songs he is in.......no doubt that lay low is better than this new stuff....but like i said like both just cant compare from chuuch to the palace with lay low
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: GangstaBoogy on September 22, 2002, 05:06:50 PM
Quote
church to the palace is growin on me......i think neptunes did a good job....especially the scratch..it will difinately blow trust me..better single than laylow and snoop dogg


Eww. Tha new single iz ass!
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: AFTERMATH_FAN on September 22, 2002, 06:01:44 PM
I have to agree with you ejrizo.The new single is horrible and not even in the same league as Lay Low!!Just listen to lay low how its mixed and how it flows,its just a classic.Like I said earlier Snoop shouldn't stray away from what works but in the long run he will learn the hard way.Im a firm believer in if its not broke then dont fix it!!Comparing the two is like comparing a lexus to a kia,theres just no comparison.Basically the neptunes style doesnt fit Snoop dog,thats just my opinion.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Lil Jay on September 22, 2002, 10:08:26 PM
Quote
man lay low is just a classic track i dont care if P was on it you guys act like if he was in it no matter what it sucks and he sounded best there flow wise then any other songs he is in.......no doubt that lay low is better than this new stuff....but like i said like both just cant compare from chuuch to the palace with lay low

Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: EastsideLBC on September 23, 2002, 05:35:22 AM
Word......Lay Low was alot hotter when that shit dropped.....even tho this is a radio rip, there is no way that it will beat out Lay Low imo..........Lay Low was just str8 bangin ass gangsta shit........now on tha talk of this joint blowin' up.......hearin' radio quality and cdq is big ass diff. so only time will tell.......oh, and again Snoop proves that he has upped his lyrical game since his last time blazin' tha green.........Snoop has been droppin' some tight ass lyrics here lately.......
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: DPGC2001 on September 23, 2002, 05:59:51 AM
Lay Low was dope but it was basically a gangsta track the same shit we've been hearing for years with the same ass Dre beat...This shit is something new, props to Snoop for trying some new producers instead of relying on the same cats...
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Nosak on September 23, 2002, 07:19:13 AM
the same people talkin shit about lay low being better than this one are the same people who bitch when they first hear lay low sayin it was always the same shit we've hear from snoop, get your mind right people
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Myrealname on September 23, 2002, 07:24:58 AM
Snoop comes on point with the lyrics on this new single but LAY LOW is a fuckin classic to me.
Killer beat from dre and snoop hard like never before!
Imagine Lay low only with nate dogg on the hook and only snoop on it. B A N G I N
This neptunes beat is too weird to me, i hope the other beat for the song "Beautiful" feat.charlie wilson could be better
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: AFTERMATH_FAN on September 23, 2002, 07:40:53 AM
Hey DPGC2001 explain something to me please,what the hell is the same old Dre beat?Does "forgot about Dre","FamilyAffair","let me blow youe mind","break Your Neck","whats The Differnce",do all of these sound the same or like "the same old Dre beat".No I dont think so .So what in the hell are you talkin about when you say same old Dre beat.You need to give respect where its due,hes the most creative mutha fucka out there as far as producing oes in the hip hop game.You want to know who sounds the same all the time?The Neptunes!!
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: dexter on September 23, 2002, 01:36:50 PM
Snoop doesnt pay radio Stations!
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Liger187 on September 23, 2002, 03:54:51 PM
Lay Low had an incredible beat. Snoop, Nate and Butch were very tight on it, but the song was brought down a lot for me because of Master P and Glodie Loc's verse. If those two were not on it and Dre or Xzibit were on it. It would be a classic song.

This new Snoop song is tight, because of Snoop's improved flow. He has improved his flow since the Last Meal Days. He got better on Deuces and Trays and he's gotten even better now. I hate the Neptunes and think that they arent even in the same sport as Dre and Quk, but I'm feeling this beat it's very catchy.

To me Lay Low was a 4.5/5 would have been 5/5 if it wasn't ruined. And this song is also a 4.5/5. I think it's a better first single than Snoop Dogg produced by Timbo, and about as good as Lay Low, but don't even compare the beats.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Trauma-san on September 23, 2002, 05:48:49 PM
Honestly, I think from the chutch to da palace is better.  It's pretty catchy, and it'll be a huge single, in my opinion.  
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: E. J. Rizo on September 23, 2002, 07:04:25 PM
well i respect all of your opinions but i honestly cant believe that it seems like the majority of you guys like cuuuch to the palace more than lay low ??? ??? ??? im honestly baffled by this ??? ???
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: TOOTHBRUSH on September 23, 2002, 07:39:14 PM
Quote
i honestly cant believe that it seems like the majority of you guys like cuuuch to the palace more than lay low ??? ??? ??? im honestly baffled by this ??? ???


me too.............but my opinion on this is that chuuuch to the palace might  be a bigger single than lay low even though lay low was a classic westcoast song.........they are too different to compare i do think this will be much bigger than "snoop dogg" and just think what the video could be like it could be tight as fuck maybee they'll get bill gates on that shit lol

oh yeah why the fuck is this called from the church to the palace?? a don't get it
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: AFTERMATH_FAN on September 23, 2002, 07:39:44 PM
Im baffled by this also cause that new single is straight garbage.Lay low was some heat and it bumped hard in my ride.Hell just listen to the neptunes songs they dont flow like Dre's songs do,they arent mixed very well either.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Myrealname on September 23, 2002, 07:46:12 PM
This topic would be..... "Snoop dogg vs Chuuch to the palace".
Its better compare the first single from the last meal produced by another hitmaker named Timbaland and this new one by the neptunes.
What's the best combo for snoop ?
To me.....timbaland,cuz "snoop dogg" beat is an head nodder.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: E. J. Rizo on September 23, 2002, 07:49:05 PM
Quote
This topic would be..... "Snoop dogg vs Chuuch to the palace".
Its better compare the first single from the last meal produced by another hitmaker named Timbaland and this new one by the neptunes.
What's the best combo for snoop ?
To me.....timbaland,cuz "snoop dogg" beat is an head nodder.

word so far i like snoop dogg more than this.....but this can grow on me but i know right now that there is no way in hell that it can grow on me to the point where its better than lay low
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: S.G.V. on September 23, 2002, 08:08:43 PM
this song is nothin like lay low....lay low is much better
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Smooth on September 23, 2002, 08:10:23 PM
Quote
this song is nothin like lay low....lay low is much better


Word I think Lay low was the better song to... but I like Snoops flow better on this...
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Hatesrats™ on September 23, 2002, 08:13:22 PM
Quote
Lay Low is about 1000 times better than the new one.
Yall gotta be joking if you like this better than Lay Low.


Speak on it homie....
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: AFTERMATH_FAN on September 23, 2002, 08:13:40 PM
EXACTLY hands down Lay low is the better song.
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: E. J. Rizo on September 23, 2002, 08:17:03 PM
man thank good you guys have been coming and backin us lay low fans cause shit i was just thinking somehting was wrong with us....hands down lay low kicks this new singles ass
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: .: God Is One :. on September 23, 2002, 08:39:10 PM
Quote
I think from the chuuch to the palace too.  this shit grows on you fast. you got a lot of fans who love dre so since neptunes are hotter than dre right now they kinda hatin'.


Oh man i cant believe someone actually wrote that!?

Neptunes better than Dre, NIGGA PLEAZE!!!!
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: E. J. Rizo on September 23, 2002, 08:44:11 PM
Quote


Oh man i cant believe someone actually wrote that!?

Neptunes better than Dre, NIGGA PLEAZE!!!!

"I started this gangsta shit, This the motha fuckin thanks i get"
Dr. Dre
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: D.R.E.-Dogg on September 24, 2002, 10:44:33 AM
Quote
Lay Low is about 1000 times better than the new one.
Yall gotta be joking if you like this better than Lay Low.

word
This new shit's not even close!
In my opinion the beat is wack, not average.. wack!
That's my opinion but it never beats Lay Low
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: Now_Im_Not_Banned on September 25, 2002, 04:27:22 PM
I aint even tryna hear this new song...I already know its garbage in advance...PeAcE
Title: Re: church to the palace vs laylow
Post by: JAE on September 25, 2002, 04:52:16 PM
WHy is everyone bitchin about this song? Im not a snoop or neptunes fan but I like this alot. I mean even snoop fans have a problem with it.



PS: is that really Bill Gates in the song?