West Coast Connection Forum

DUBCC - Tha Connection => West Coast Classics => Topic started by: wildgremlin on September 06, 2002, 07:47:04 PM

Title: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: wildgremlin on September 06, 2002, 07:47:04 PM
They got part to of the article at thaformula.com  It's even more stupid then the first part.  The L.A. Times are a bunch of idiots!!
What do you all think?
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: HBKid_Jr on September 06, 2002, 07:49:45 PM
wtf,  i read it at LA times.com.  shit, it was already stuff we basically knew about.  Unless i missed it,  there was no mention of biggie what so ever.  How he got in vegas,  how these meeting went down,  nutin.  This shit was jus another theory like tha one in rolling stone.  They provided no evidence of biggies influence,  bull shit,  i hope Big's mom sues tha la times
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: wildgremlin on September 06, 2002, 07:59:16 PM
exactly!! I can't believe they built up all this hype just to put up some garbage like that! Fucc the L.A. Times!
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: ROCCY on September 06, 2002, 08:23:42 PM
WE NEED SOMEONE LIKE MDOGG TO WORK AT LATIME NOT THESE IDIOTS
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: wildgremlin on September 06, 2002, 08:35:01 PM
Word!
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: T-Dogg on September 07, 2002, 12:20:18 AM
The L.A. Times must be doing bad to try a sales stunt like this... Biggies estate already released a statement that basically said 'bullshit'. I have to agree.
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: Nima - Dubcnn.com on September 07, 2002, 12:25:49 AM
the hole article sounds like a diss to the las vegas police...
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: =[Euthanasia]= on September 07, 2002, 12:35:05 AM
I dunno, I still have strong doubts about them naming Biggie as being involved, sure alot of the things make you think, but it's all too obvious and it just sounds like another theory imo. And I think it's disgusting that a credible newspaper has gone ahead and published this without any real evidence, it's disgusting, this is gonna cause more harm than good.
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: Woodrow on September 07, 2002, 12:57:34 AM
Quote
The L.A. Times must be doing bad to try a sales stunt like this... Biggies estate already released a statement that basically said 'bullshit'. I have to agree.


The Los Angeles times dosnet make shit up.

I REALLY need to get some sleep.

Here is some proof

"We're not surprised that today's (9/6) Los Angeles Times concludes that Tupac Shakur was murdered by an L.A. gang member named Orlando Anderson, because that was what investigators believed immediately following the rapper's killing, according to this search warrant affidavit filed by Compton police in September 1996, just weeks after Shakur was gunned down in Las Vegas. Detective Tim Brennan's affidavit states that the Shakur murder triggered several shootings involving members of rival L.A. street gangs. Death Row Records, for whom Shakur recorded, was aligned with the Bloods gang, while Crips members provided security for Bad Boy Records, the label on which Notorious B.I.G. (real name: Christopher Wallace) appeared. Brennan noted that there "is an ongoing feud between Tupac Shakur and the 'blood' related Death Row Records with rapper 'Biggie Smalls' and the East Coast's 'Bad Boy Records'." The Times report contends that Anderson shot Shakur with a .40 Glock pistol supplied to him by Wallace, who had promised the Crips a $1 million bounty for Shakur's murder. In the Brennan affidavit, a Compton police source is quoted as saying--a week after the rapper's killing--that Anderson had murdered Shakur and that an Anderson associate "is telling people 'Southside Crips' just got money from the East Coast and are looking to buy guns."  

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/doc_o_day/doc_o_day.shtml
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: Lil Jay on September 07, 2002, 05:24:40 AM
Quote
Crips gang members say Anderson and his accomplices passed in front of video cameras as they gathered at the Treasure Island and MGM Grand hotels to plot the killing and, later that night, when they picked up the white Cadillac in the valet parking circle outside Treasure Island.

Because casinos routinely tape over surveillance footage every seven days, the potential evidence was lost.



read what it sais up there, str8 from the article...man, that CANT be true. they passed in front of the camera but a week later they lost the footage? man, that was the evidence for real, and they lost it. how can they be so stupid and lose that shieet
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: Kill on September 07, 2002, 06:26:02 AM
I considered information found in the LA times more reliable... :-/
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: bez on September 07, 2002, 08:09:39 AM
Fuck the L.A times, fuck the police fuck everyone involved in this madness.  You dont just loose a piece of evidence, it either gets locked away for no 1 to see or destroyed.  The whole things fucked up.  Its all a scandal.
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: Nosak on September 07, 2002, 09:18:41 AM
this LA TIME SHIT is just about bullshit, they took the most evident shit and made an article with it, they need the detective that was on biggies case on the pac case, u know the one one rolling stone,, micheal pole i think , this is the real shit
Title: Re: Part 2 of L.A. Times 2Pac article here!!
Post by: wildgremlin on September 07, 2002, 10:41:21 AM
These murders will never be solved unless somebody who was in that car that shot up Pac and Biggie step up to the table. But that ain't ever happening so we will never know!