Nah

So that luxury view penthouse in burnaby
Is ignorant and stupid opinion

Walking out like he's God's gift to earth

Sounds dated, also listening to this you can feel that its a bunch of acapellas over some beats. Try agsjn Edub

some missin cd again:

Use your heart in everything
Every post

Lotta people go nuts cause free telephone
Like they're missing out on free phone
In there youth

Use your heart to give world idea

So your giving an idea to the world
When cars drive by
Give ass get ass

On craigslist it's vancouver
NAVA BEST CHOICE

the world might learn something
Stupid cars are ignorant

He who pays for the studio time owns the reels or recorded, owns the masters, that’s the parts artist don’t understand.

Get your paper and business right. If he didn’t have his business right there then don’t cry now. It’s been years since tha last meal, tha Eastsidaz and dogghouse days. Very good music he had there but from my understanding he chose to leave and was given no debt to recoup the music.

Not sure if it’s bad music but you can’t always walk away with out paying your debt to music and expenses.  If kokane signed another deal with any other label after dogghouse typically that label also has to pay his red debts at dogghouse. That didn’t happen.

That’s what No Limit paid Death Row what they felt he owed and or could have made the next few albums. 

It’s business he left debt free. His choice.

You can own the master recording to a song but not own the copyright to the music or lyrics. Owning the rights to the master recording doesn't mean you can release it and not have to pay the copyright holders. That's why there is a fee pay to the master recording owner and a separate payout for the copyright owners (producer/rapper) when dealing with song placements in movies, tv etc. As long as he has the copyright he's supposed to get paid something. If a split sheet was done back then or not to say who should get what, that doesn't change the fact that he has ownership in the song and rights to get paid.

I disagree that whoever pays for the studio time owns the master. I have heard that before though. That is something that would have to be put in writing and the artist would have to sign off on. Not something that is just common law if you will.