San Antonio SUCKS!

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

^Because this is a different Laker era. If you wanna combine all the eras, 15/60>4/40...LOL.

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

3 titles in 3 years > 4 titles in 10 years.

lol convenient to only count the three years you were good and skip the rest of them.

Winningest team in sports in the last decade, 4 titles in the last decade, consistent contender every year of the last decade> 3 titles in the last decade.

[S P I C E]

The Lakers dickriding in this section is why I fuck w/ Sportsline when it comes to discussing sports,  fuck talking sports on dubcc,  to many blind Laker nutriders that don't give any other teams or players credit ever, lame.

[Old Man]

The Lakers dickriding in this section is why I fuck w/ Sportsline when it comes to discussing sports,  fuck talking sports on dubcc,  to many blind Laker nutriders that don't give any other teams or players credit ever, lame.

Thats why I discuss sports on SOHH.com

[Turf Hitta]

realgm.com is the best basketball forum on the web

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

3 titles in 3 years > 4 titles in 10 years.

lol convenient to only count the three years you were good and skip the rest of them.

Winningest team in sports in the last decade, 4 titles in the last decade, consistent contender every year of the last decade> 3 titles in the last decade.

Lakers>Spurs. The end (especially after we win a title this year).

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

3 titles in 3 years > 4 titles in 10 years.

lol convenient to only count the three years you were good and skip the rest of them.

Winningest team in sports in the last decade, 4 titles in the last decade, consistent contender every year of the last decade> 3 titles in the last decade.

Lakers>Spurs. The end (especially after we win a title this year).

in basketball history....yes, Lakers > Spurs. For the last 10 years....easy, Spurs > Lakers. Even if you win the title this year. That only pulls you even during the last 10 years as far as titles....but not in win percentage, victories, etc...etc.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

3 titles in 3 years > 4 titles in 10 years.

lol convenient to only count the three years you were good and skip the rest of them.

Winningest team in sports in the last decade, 4 titles in the last decade, consistent contender every year of the last decade> 3 titles in the last decade.

Lakers>Spurs. The end (especially after we win a title this year).

in basketball history....yes, Lakers > Spurs. For the last 10 years....easy, Spurs > Lakers. Even if you win the title this year. That only pulls you even during the last 10 years as far as titles....but not in win percentage, victories, etc...etc.

LMAO...Ya'll failed to win back-to-back titles...that is the biggest accomplishment in basketball. What don't you get? Pretend this was a video game-  if winning a title gives you 1,000 points, then winning that second one in a row would give you 2,000, and winning that threepeat title gives you 3,000. Laker titles combine for 6,000 points. Spurs...only 4,000. ya feel? And if the Lakers win this year, there's NO QUESTION. Plus, add the fact that we went through the Spurs for every one of our titles, and Boom!...outta here.

[wcsoldier]

I don't know this tread was meant to be serious .. you have to respect SA a lot .. it's a great and classy organization .. this Lakers- SAS rivarly which began in 99 has given epic series .. both teams have a lot of respect for each other and SAS took the loss like men , just admitting they lost to a better team

[M Dogg™]

3 titles in 3 years > 4 titles in 10 years.

lol convenient to only count the three years you were good and skip the rest of them.

Winningest team in sports in the last decade, 4 titles in the last decade, consistent contender every year of the last decade> 3 titles in the last decade.

Lakers>Spurs. The end (especially after we win a title this year).

in basketball history....yes, Lakers > Spurs. For the last 10 years....easy, Spurs > Lakers. Even if you win the title this year. That only pulls you even during the last 10 years as far as titles....but not in win percentage, victories, etc...etc.

difference, the Lakers won more series against the Spurs. The Spurs won titles during the Laker's rebuilding, not having to go through LA, the Lakers went into San Antonio and beat them, Shaq or no Shaq.

[Stone Cold is Bout It, Bout It]

The Lakers have a chance to be the team of the 2000's......they've been to the finals more times then the spurs & have the same amount of championships as the Spurs....if we win the championship this season....Lakers 4 championships>>>>>>>spurs 3

and the Lakers are 4-1 in the playoffs against the spurs this decade.....

[dexter]

go lakers

[OG Hack Wilson]

^Because this is a different Laker era. If you wanna combine all the eras, 15/60>4/40...LOL.

16 > 14

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

^Because this is a different Laker era. If you wanna combine all the eras, 15/60>4/40...LOL.

16 > 14

It's okay...the Lakers have more than enough time to surpass that number. Celtics have about 3 years before they crumble and go back to what they were in the 90's. LOL.