It's May 25, 2024, 05:41:27 AM
They played better the second half... What about the first half? The Clippers must've played better then. So, first half was the Clips, second half was the Lakers. Playoffs, obviously went to the Clips. Yes, they played Denver, but they ended with the better record and got the spot they deserved (Don't be mad cuz the Lakers didn't end with a better record). Lakers were one rebound away... Great. That don't mean shit. Almost doesn't mean nothing in sports. So and So ALMOST won the Championship. That's a nice way of saying, we lost, but wanna make it seem like we didn't. Point blank, Lakers ended with a worse record and didn't make it past the 1st round. Clippers did. They were the better team for a second year in a row. (50 bucks says NIK would've been using the Lakers record in this arguement if they had actually done better than the Clippers).Calling that this thread would go ten pages at the start was to show that one tiny joke would get your g-strings moist and bunched up, in turn making a ten page+ thread of posts of you trying to act smart. All the while you make gay remarks and name call like a 4 year old. The Life and Times of an Internet Legend: This is the Story of NIK.
Calling a 10 page thread is your new way to say "I'm about to get shitted on"...It's obvious, why do you even feel the need to point that out, as if you won't be taking any part of it? LMFAO...It MIGHT be cool to call a 10 page thread in an arguement you're not involved in, but you're actually contributing, thus making you look like a complete idiot who constantly gets sonned...
So according to you little elior, the 6th seed was so underserving correct, well as you know, the 6th seed is well above the 7th and 8th seed, and THE CLIPPERS PLAYED WITH THEIR RESERVES THE LAST WEEK IN ORDER TO GET THE 6th SEED and not seed high. The clippers were in contention to win the Pacific Division, the Clippers were basically the 4th seed in the playoffs, they strategically placed themselves in a position to advance. Denver was basically the 6th seed that did not deserve to be there. Clippers win, Clippers advance In the playoffs, Yet The Lakers are better, because they learned late in the year
Let me tell my story once again, this is basically what you are saying:so the Atlanta Hawks, have the worst record in the league, but they won their last 2 games, oh man, they are on fire, they just got their shit together at the end of the season, man they Obviously are better than the Spurs or Pistons, they just needed to get organized and well, they did it at the end of the season."
Dude, he's calling it because he knows you wont listen to the truth and will cry and cry untill your crybaby ass gets in your last word. Its the truth, and Its funny to see. You cry and cry, you make the dumbest "opinion" ever, go way off topic and go to insults and then assume you have "Sonned" someone. Endless circle. you cant go a thread without having the final say, even if its a period, a dot, whatever, if you cannot have the final word, you will kill yourself, let me demonstrate with the continuation of this thread with only periods.The End
Better record and made it to the second round. Clippers had a better season. Better season = Better team. Sorry NIK. You just can't prove the fact that the Lakers were better, when they didn't even fair better than the Clippers. If the Lakers would've won three more games, instead of being two behind the Clippers, they would've been playing Denver and you would have been singing a whole different tune. You're just upset that they couldn't pull it out.
You can use all the excuses, they had to play Phoenix. They had to learn this and that. Those are excuses. Laker fans can't admit that they just didn't do as well as the Clippers. Hell, it's RARE that Laker fans can admit to anything the Lakers do wrong. If they lose, it's the ref's fault. They don't do well in a season, they're learning to be a team. LOL. Ain't nobody getting shitted on... That's why you're on the defense.
^^no, you cry me a river, if you were so right, you would not need to continue this "argument" Yet you continue because your a little crybaby. boo fuckin hoo.
Quote from: E-Crazy Hates Taylor Hicks on May 25, 2006, 11:37:50 AM^^no, you cry me a river, if you were so right, you would not need to continue this "argument" Yet you continue because your a little crybaby. boo fuckin hoo.LMFAO! What kind of logic is that? If someone is right, they need to be the ones to stop arguing with the person who is wrong to prove that they're right? Didn't you say you were in debate clubs, you fucking nerd? I can just imagine how well that went. "Ummm, yea. I'm right, I don't think I really have to argue this anymore."...You are just too dumb.
I'm asking you again, if how far a team went in the playoffs or how well a team did during the regular season isn't enough to prove who a better team is, what is? Obviously you know. Shed a little light on us. How can we determine who a better team is, if Stats, which ARE FACTS, aren't sufficient enough?Again, this is YOU trying to prove that the Lakers were better. Clipper fans don't have to prove shit, the STATS speak for themselves. So, Now I'm Slow, prove your point. LMAO @ Pop fan. You got "sonned" in that thread too.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on May 25, 2006, 11:47:46 AMQuote from: E-Crazy Hates Taylor Hicks on May 25, 2006, 11:37:50 AM^^no, you cry me a river, if you were so right, you would not need to continue this "argument" Yet you continue because your a little crybaby. boo fuckin hoo.LMFAO! What kind of logic is that? If someone is right, they need to be the ones to stop arguing with the person who is wrong to prove that they're right? Didn't you say you were in debate clubs, you fucking nerd? I can just imagine how well that went. "Ummm, yea. I'm right, I don't think I really have to argue this anymore."...You are just too dumb. If your so right, then there is no need for you to continue your argument. the person that is "wrong", why not have them ramble and sound like a dumbass (which is you 100% of the time)??LMAO @ calling me a nerd. Its not my fault your a fuckin spoiled ass retard who never did anything in school.
Quote from: E-Crazy Hates Taylor Hicks on May 25, 2006, 11:53:18 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on May 25, 2006, 11:47:46 AMQuote from: E-Crazy Hates Taylor Hicks on May 25, 2006, 11:37:50 AM^^no, you cry me a river, if you were so right, you would not need to continue this "argument" Yet you continue because your a little crybaby. boo fuckin hoo.LMFAO! What kind of logic is that? If someone is right, they need to be the ones to stop arguing with the person who is wrong to prove that they're right? Didn't you say you were in debate clubs, you fucking nerd? I can just imagine how well that went. "Ummm, yea. I'm right, I don't think I really have to argue this anymore."...You are just too dumb. If your so right, then there is no need for you to continue your argument. the person that is "wrong", why not have them ramble and sound like a dumbass (which is you 100% of the time)??LMAO @ calling me a nerd. Its not my fault your a fuckin spoiled ass retard who never did anything in school. According to you, SGV and you are both NEVER right, since you continue your arguements all the damn time...LMAO. You shit on yourself from every possible angle. At least SGV lets me shit on him and doesn't do it for me...LMAO@I never did anything in school...I was dunkin' on muthafuckaz while you were sitting in a room debating with a bunch of geeks, fuckin' debate club nerd...
Yes, the Spurs were the better team, but they were unable to capitalize on that so they lost, making them a lesser team. A better Regular season record is just the first step, the playoffs is the last chance to determine who's better. The Clips showed that they were up on the Lakers in both. Again, it's not debateable, since FACTS don't lie. You're shitting on nobody.