It's June 03, 2024, 02:26:14 PM
but is hanging him really enough? i think it would be a harder punishment for this guy to stay in jail till he fucking dies...
the court decided he is gulty about one claime to hang him. Then they said it's not necessary to invastigate other claimes. It seems true and sensible by the time. BUT!!!If you think a little bit you can figure out what was the main reason. They didn't search the other claimes and hanged him quickly. Because US and UK was the main guilty behind the other claims. Halep massacre, Iraq-Iran war and others. How can the puppet court say Saddam used the chemical weapons which gaved him by US and UK to use against where they decided. I'm not trying to protect Saddam, he was a hand of emperialism on middle east and maniac killer. But if i have a chance to choose to decide who must be hanged on the world first. I got a strong option(you know who i'm talking about). And i want you to notice that Saddam killed in a eve day of muslims. Because America is happy to kill a muslim(however he never lived as a muslim i hope people dont take him as a muslim) and kill a arabic. This was a test and they are trying to provoke the arabic and islam world. The scene we wathced today was disrespectful, like all they did when he was laughing behind a "so called" white wall.
Quote from: Cey_Cey on December 30, 2006, 06:38:28 AMthe court decided he is gulty about one claime to hang him. Then they said it's not necessary to invastigate other claimes. It seems true and sensible by the time. BUT!!!If you think a little bit you can figure out what was the main reason. They didn't search the other claimes and hanged him quickly. Because US and UK was the main guilty behind the other claims. Halep massacre, Iraq-Iran war and others. How can the puppet court say Saddam used the chemical weapons which gaved him by US and UK to use against where they decided. I'm not trying to protect Saddam, he was a hand of emperialism on middle east and maniac killer. But if i have a chance to choose to decide who must be hanged on the world first. I got a strong option(you know who i'm talking about). And i want you to notice that Saddam killed in a eve day of muslims. Because America is happy to kill a muslim(however he never lived as a muslim i hope people dont take him as a muslim) and kill a arabic. This was a test and they are trying to provoke the arabic and islam world. The scene we wathced today was disrespectful, like all they did when he was laughing behind a "so called" white wall.LOL. You're the only one smart enough to figure it out!
Quote from: Cey_Cey on December 30, 2006, 06:38:28 AMthe court decided he is gulty about one claime to hang him. Then they said it's not necessary to invastigate other claimes. It seems true and sensible by the time. BUT!!!If you think a little bit you can figure out what was the main reason. They didn't search the other claimes and hanged him quickly. Because US and UK was the main guilty behind the other claims. Halep massacre, Iraq-Iran war and others. How can the puppet court say Saddam used the chemical weapons which gaved him by US and UK to use against where they decided. I'm not trying to protect Saddam, he was a hand of emperialism on middle east and maniac killer. But if i have a chance to choose to decide who must be hanged on the world first. I got a strong option(you know who i'm talking about). And i want you to notice that Saddam killed in a eve day of muslims. Because America is happy to kill a muslim(however he never lived as a muslim i hope people dont take him as a muslim) and kill a arabic. This was a test and they are trying to provoke the arabic and islam world. The scene we wathced today was disrespectful, like all they did when he was laughing behind a "so called" white wall.True, and here's an article on the subject:http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/46093Saddam is just one dead out of many, but let's be realistic. This whole process is nonsensical.1) We attack Saddam because he has WMD. No one talked about going to Iraq to bring Saddam to justice.2) No WMD found. So we put Saddam on trail by his own government. What were the laws used to evaluate his guilt? The trial was surely a sham. He certainly deserved death, but this trial was a joke, and I hope it it not a joke we will soon regret making. A real trial would have embarrassed the US government, so we did this fake bullshit. 3) The US government killed 100,000+ Iraqi civilians in this fake war. We tortured and stole the rights of many. 4) The Iraqi's will likely replace Saddam with someone far worse than him. And then what we will have accomplished? Does anyone really think it was worth a $300+ billion to hang this guy? Because that's what it cost. And the net benefit to the US people by hanging Saddam? It's negative. We destabilized a region, and killed a leader that rejected Al-Queda. What happens when Iraq becomes sympathetic to Islamic extremism? 5) If you think this was a reasonable venture, then you must also think it reasonable to parade around the world deposing many other "evil" dictators that do bad things. There are at least a dozen more governments we should invade and topple for crimes against humanity, but we won't. And most of us don't want to. But if you think this is okay, but leaving other tyrants in power is acceptable you're a hypocrite.
of course without France...
my throat hurts, its hard to swallow, and my body feels like i got a serious ass beating.
Quote from: Cey_Cey on December 31, 2006, 04:49:21 PMof course without France...You mad about the fact that they accepted the Armenian Genocide and even had a memorial built?
Shame we had to lose so many Americans to kill this one man. Also a shame that it's not going to change anything or make the situation in Iraq better. Perhaps hanging two more people will improve the situation. I'm talking of course about george bush and dick cheney.