It's May 25, 2024, 06:31:13 AM
lmao that was a dumb post smoke break, follow your screen name's advice and take one
Ah. Posing threats with weapons of mass destruction (not to mention using them) is alright now all of a sudden?
Patents are only valid for 20 years. Does that mean you're now saying it's been okay since around 1965 for the entire world to arm themselves with totally destructive weaponry?
It is splitting hairs i'll give you that, but, Atom bomb- An explosive weapon of great destructive power derived from the rapid release of energy in the fission of heavy atomic nuclei. while a thermo-nuclear bomb works on fusion. the latter is bigger(1000x more powerful) while the first was a smaller one. Theres a difference.
Quote from: 11z Is Fuckin' Serious About This! on March 29, 2007, 11:25:48 AMAh. Posing threats with weapons of mass destruction (not to mention using them) is alright now all of a sudden?I don't know what fucking post you were reading, but i sure never said that.
nagasaki and hiroshima were hit by atom bombs not only for the japanese to fall further into submission but also to scare the russians.
Quote from: 11z Is Fuckin' Serious About This! on March 29, 2007, 11:25:48 AMPatents are only valid for 20 years. Does that mean you're now saying it's been okay since around 1965 for the entire world to arm themselves with totally destructive weaponry?well the cat's outta the bag at this point, but I really doubt patent rules apply to classified military documents.
We developed all that shit first(with the help of foreign scientists who also thought we should have it) so yeah we should get the benefits of it.
Explain to me the difference between a nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb?
Of course I realise there is no such thing as patent for military documents. Thing is, you're saying the USA has the sole right to have nuclear weapons, and I wonder why you think that's justified.
You developed it? It's a chemical process. That's physics: a science. It's part of the world we live in. How are you going to claim the sole right to enjoy the benefits of it? What, America owns the universe now?
Quote from: 11z Is Fuckin' Serious About This! on March 29, 2007, 02:35:04 PMExplain to me the difference between a nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb? Atom bomb- An explosive weapon of great destructive power derived from the rapid release of energy in the fission of heavy atomic nuclei.while a thermo-nuclear bomb works on fusion which creates an explosion nearly 1000x larger.I get what you're saying which is why "It is splitting hairs i'll give you that" but, when talking in context of that war there is a major difference as the thermonuclear "super" bomb wasn't developed until almost 10 years later.It's kind of like comparing a pistol and rifle, one allows for a much larger bullet, destruction, but both work on the same properties.
Quote from: 11z Is Fuckin' Serious About This! on March 29, 2007, 11:25:48 AMOf course I realise there is no such thing as patent for military documents. Thing is, you're saying the USA has the sole right to have nuclear weapons, and I wonder why you think that's justified. I don't think we have the sole right to it, it's not justified, but it is rational. There were very valid reasons once it was created to stop it from spreading which obviously didn't work out too well. I would have liked to have seen what oppenheimer suggested enacted, which was to end the war by showing what we had in a civilized demonstration to the japanese and russians and share what we discovered with them in the hopes we could have it used for power purposes as well as a deterrent for conflict. Instead what we got was paranoia and the "scorpions in a bottle" stalemate with the soviets and what we have now is the worry that with countrys like iran getting peaceful power facilities may(scratch that, do) find it necessary and easy to turn around and make a bomb for the reason of self-defense in a hostile environment because everyone else does.
Quote from: Smoke Break on March 29, 2007, 10:52:04 AMWe developed all that shit first(with the help of foreign scientists who also thought we should have it) so yeah we should get the benefits of it.Quote from: 11z Is Fuckin' Serious About This! on March 29, 2007, 02:35:04 PMYou developed it? It's a chemical process. That's physics: a science. It's part of the world we live in. How are you going to claim the sole right to enjoy the benefits of it? What, America owns the universe now? The best minds of the world worked on learning and fleshing out that science, but they developed the transportation device and methods to actually detonate it with maximum effect.
. The US never did anything like that with Guatanamo Bay prisoners.
Quote from: IRAN iz Gangsta! on March 28, 2007, 09:25:13 PMIts official ya'll are bunch of punk pussy ass mothafuckaz with double standards. They are treated nicely, given food, they confess without force and they are not even complaining. So WHAT THE FUCK are you liittle bitches moaning about they were abducted from Iraqi waters, it shouldnt of happened, just makes themselves look bad.I don't mind Iran, obviously they want respect and they got the balls to demand it. But they gotta understand they can not hold out against the West forever...they should use their current position to cut a deal, instead of isolating themselves.
Its official ya'll are bunch of punk pussy ass mothafuckaz with double standards. They are treated nicely, given food, they confess without force and they are not even complaining. So WHAT THE FUCK are you liittle bitches moaning about
These termo-nuclear bombs are just one type of nuclear bombs, as are the atomic bombs.
I see what's wrong with Iran arming themselves like that, but isn't the problem that the environment is hostile with nuclear weaponry? Of course, you can put them under control all you like, but there would be no need for that hadn't they been challenged, right?
Haha, so do you still stand by your claim that these scientists really wanted you to enjoy the benefits of having these weapons?
Forget that last reply I have deleted it in order to post a more constructive one, so for the record where do you stand on Iran? especially when considering the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty isn't worth the toilet paper it was written on.