It's April 29, 2024, 12:58:54 AM
its just a name dawg, why can't a muslim or a non muslim cat call his son muhammad? i mean i really do not know the reason for this thread, don rizzle is a intelligent cat and he knows i got luv for cat(nuttin "homo", y'all know what i mean) but is this a thread just made to diss someones religion or ability in naming there son? i know you better than this rizzle my nizzle, loli know nuff cats whoz name is jesus....great namepz
Quote from: Don Rizzle on May 10, 2006, 03:16:12 AMiraq would just get annexed by iranThat would be a great solution. If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
iraq would just get annexed by iran
Quote from: Loco is tha motion... on April 13, 2007, 05:36:05 PMMy take on all those protests is that before the cartoon being published, Muslims fellt like they were/are purposely being targeted around the world by the media and the military, like 'bombing our bretheren overseas and arranging them in naked shit stained human pyramids, now they got the nerve to kick us while we are down and claim artistic liberty?' The cartoon understandably just pushed some people to the edge. Muhammad was a man, so you can give a man that name.So that we remember he was just a man, we should not characterise him. I'm not saying that Islam teaches that Muhammad is scared or should be treated as such, but anyone that denies the absolute fact that backwoods muslims believe him to be sacred (just like backwoods American nuts believe the flag and to an extent the president is sacred) is simply not being honest with themselves or not thinking it through, like the arab muslim world is immune to the mass stupidity that plagues the rest of the world.
My take on all those protests is that before the cartoon being published, Muslims fellt like they were/are purposely being targeted around the world by the media and the military, like 'bombing our bretheren overseas and arranging them in naked shit stained human pyramids, now they got the nerve to kick us while we are down and claim artistic liberty?' The cartoon understandably just pushed some people to the edge. Muhammad was a man, so you can give a man that name.So that we remember he was just a man, we should not characterise him.
Quote from: Shallow on April 13, 2007, 06:11:29 PMQuote from: Loco is tha motion... on April 13, 2007, 05:36:05 PMMy take on all those protests is that before the cartoon being published, Muslims fellt like they were/are purposely being targeted around the world by the media and the military, like 'bombing our bretheren overseas and arranging them in naked shit stained human pyramids, now they got the nerve to kick us while we are down and claim artistic liberty?' The cartoon understandably just pushed some people to the edge. Muhammad was a man, so you can give a man that name.So that we remember he was just a man, we should not characterise him. I'm not saying that Islam teaches that Muhammad is scared or should be treated as such, but anyone that denies the absolute fact that backwoods muslims believe him to be sacred (just like backwoods American nuts believe the flag and to an extent the president is sacred) is simply not being honest with themselves or not thinking it through, like the arab muslim world is immune to the mass stupidity that plagues the rest of the world. Sure, some Muslims do treat the Prophet as sacred and inadvertably worship him and such ignorance can be seen across the social spectrum. I think we can all agree that everybody is stupid in various ways. In Australia inciting a group to violence is a crime of sedition. I still think the cartoon boardered on inciting violence considering the timing of its publishing and its context within current world events, for instance somebody burning the US flag at the site of ground zero would be stomped to death and a judge would probably consider that the burner was purposely inciting hatred.
The muslim leaders that insinuated the reaction are agents of Satan. The knew the exact reaction they'd get and they chose to follow through with it anyway. Many of them were educated men, imams, community leaders.
Good point. You'd expect to expect more, from the supposed good, but those expectations of goodness can be dangerous and decieving to yourself anyway, I place no expectations on anybody, everybody is a potential scumbag or angel ninja in my eyes. Jesus thought everybody capable of salvation, regardless of profession, from the High Priests collecting money at the temple door right to the dirty dirty dirty dirty whores working the streets.