Author Topic: Bynum>JO.  (Read 796 times)

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2008, 11:22:03 PM »
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2008, 11:24:32 PM »
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe

JO is scoring like 3 more poinst a game

but anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrect

and call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long.  shaq dominated against no threats too.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 10, 2001, 04:19:36 PM
This guy aint no crip, and I'm 100% sure on that because he doesn't type like a crip, I know crips, and that fool is not a crip.


"I went from being homeless strung out on Dust to an 8 bedroom estate signed 2 1 of my fav rappers... Pump it up jokes can't hurt me."-- Mr. Joey Buddens
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2008, 11:48:20 PM »
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe

JO is scoring like 3 more poinst a game

but anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrect

and call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long.  shaq dominated against no threats too.


he averages 3 more points attempting almost double the shots Bynum takes! ahahahaha.

P.S. It's called the Showtime Lakers.
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2008, 12:23:43 AM »
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO.   Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.


And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe

JO is scoring like 3 more poinst a game

but anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrect

and call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long.  shaq dominated against no threats too.

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2008, 01:26:51 AM »


And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em.

80s = Lakers
90s = Bulls
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2008, 07:16:26 AM »
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2008, 11:21:48 AM »


And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em.

80s = Lakers
90s = Bulls



The greatest team ever assembled...and if you haven't heard of the Lakers in the 90's, you've been living under a rock.
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #22 on: January 08, 2008, 11:23:19 AM »


And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em  ;D

And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em.

80s = Lakers
90s = Bulls

Well if you were raised in the 90s then you know about those 3 straight championships we won to start off the millennium. I know you heard of that ;D
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2008, 11:33:49 AM »
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe


That'll never be true as long as LeBron keeps doing this...

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/i--mrQzEl14" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/i--mrQzEl14</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/qE2gOnVOSpQ" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/qE2gOnVOSpQ</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/xZILJf7LhCo" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/xZILJf7LhCo</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/t8z3bymtYyc" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/t8z3bymtYyc</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/IUjwP1onBok" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/IUjwP1onBok</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/rVb1WgdO4Jc&amp;NR=1" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/rVb1WgdO4Jc&amp;NR=1</a>



and after he stops doing that, he needs to learn how to make these...

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/Pc-cxl1UGTQ" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/Pc-cxl1UGTQ</a>
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2008, 11:37:30 AM »
Outside of the 1991, the Lakers never got into the Finals in the 90s and only made it past the 2nd round one other time. They were the Dallas Mavericks of 90s. Its not like the Lakers did anything worthwhile in the 90s for people to even know them. The 90s belonged to the Bulls. The Rockets. The Spurs. Not the Lakers.
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #25 on: January 08, 2008, 11:38:02 AM »
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #26 on: January 08, 2008, 11:40:17 AM »
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #27 on: January 08, 2008, 11:41:18 AM »
Outside of the 1991, the Lakers never got into the Finals in the 90s and only made it past the 2nd round one other time. They were the Dallas Mavericks of 90s. Its not like the Lakers did anything worthwhile in the 90s for people to even know them. The 90s belonged to the Bulls. The Rockets. The Spurs. Not the Lakers.


You're right...acquiring Shaq and Kobe in 1996 wasn't big at all. ::)



LMAO@the Spurs.
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #28 on: January 08, 2008, 11:44:42 AM »
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D

Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #29 on: January 08, 2008, 11:51:51 AM »
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D

Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.


His supporting cast didn't suck as much as the current Cavs, they just threw in the towel once Rudy-T quit midway through the season...BTW, LeBron was a -7 in the Lakers-Cavs match-up, while Kobe was a +8.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2007122005